📖 ZKIZ Archives

鱷兄恆泰的交易- 訊通控股(8082)、南嶺化工(0663)


原本想寫這個交易，和另外兩單交易比較比較現時的價值是多少(收購代價是麵價，以其代價股份及現時股價計算價格)。但是鱷兄今日傳來一信，說南嶺化工的交易原來和徐秉辰的訊通控股(8082)放棄的收購煤礦是一樣，且作價更高，條件更好，相信因此這位趙先生不賣煤礦予訊通控股，改賣給南嶺化工。


這項交易的由來如下:


「於二零零九年九月十五日，買方（本公司之直接全資附屬公司）與賣方訂立買賣協議，據此，賣方有條件同意出售及買方有條件同意購買銷售股份，代價為1,855,000,000 港元（可予調整）。」
http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/listconews/sehk/20090923/LTN20090923564_C.pdf

「於本公佈日期，按本公司委聘之專業獨立估值師所估計，煤礦初步顯示之總值約為人民幣3,100,000,000 元，而恆泰於二零零九年六月三十日之未經審核負債總額約為人民幣1,150,000,000 元（以賣方所提供之管理賬目為基準）。」負債總額驚人。

「代價乃按正常商業條款並經買方與賣方按公平原則磋商後釐定，所按計算基準為本公司委聘之專業獨立估值師保柏國際評估有限公司對煤礦所評估之估值之90%，減去恆泰之負債總額（按二零零九年六月三十日之管理賬目所記錄）。煤礦價值之10%折讓乃買方與賣方共同協定之商業條款。」(31億-11.5億)*90%=人民幣17.55億，再兌換成港元大概就是收購價。

賣方是趙明，現為山西省政協委員，也是在紐約泛歐交易所掛牌的山西普大煤業集團有限公司創辦人兼主席。
http://www.shanxizx.gov.cn/wy/myweb.asp?id=10229

普大集團網頁:


http://www.pudagroup.com/

目標集團是Triumph Fund A Limited，一間於開曼群島註冊成立之有限公司，唯一資產為其於山西恆創之投資。山西恆創將擁有山西普華之99%股本權益。山西普華擁有恆泰註冊及繳足股本之95%，而餘下5%則由鄂爾多斯市東勝區普華德勤商貿有限公司擁有。

「恆泰現時之業務範圍包括銷售有關煤炭之機械設備及配件。於本公佈日期，恆泰為煤礦之採礦許可證之註冊及實益擁有人。恆泰現正對1 號煤礦進行測試，同時申請煤炭生產許可證與安全生產許可證及就政府之聯合檢測及接受程序作準備。預期整個申請過程將於不久將來完成，而有關許可證將於二零零九年十月獲批。」


翻查記錄，原來訊通控股（8082）曾經訂立協議，打算收購目標公司，銷售代價人民幣415,000,000元，另有一個認購代價人民幣500,000,000元。有點不同的是當時普華之註冊及繳足股本由Xue Zhendong擁有90%，其餘10%由Zhangwei擁有；恆泰之註冊及繳足資本之30%由Baotou Hengtong Group Co., Ltd.擁有，其餘70%由

Zhang Hongliang擁有。項目名稱叫做Nianpanliang。協議的其中一個先決條件是「向買方委任之估值師取得估值報告（形式及內容均為買方所滿意），而顯示外商獨資企業、普華及恆泰之價值不少於1,109,987,913港元。」


http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/listconews/gem/20080528/GLN20080528012_C.pdf

後來經過多次延誤，到今年3月31日終於取消協議，理由是賣方未能完全遵守一些協定。
http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/listconews/gem/20090401/GLN20090401050_C.pdf

於二零零九年六月二十六日，訊通重新與趙明就建議收購事項訂立諒解備忘錄，須經買方、賣方及目標進一步磋商，指示總代價不超過人民幣588,000,000元。
http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/listconews/gem/20090626/GLN20090626096_C.pdf

於二零零九年七月二十七日，擔保人（即是趙明）已向買方發出通知，確認其擬不再與買方就諒解備忘錄項下擬進行之建議收購事項進行磋商。有關建議收購事項之磋商因而終止。趙明與訊通訂立諒解備忘錄時，設定總代價不超過人民幣588,000,000元，但與南嶺化工訂立買賣協議，代價倍增為1,855,000,000 港元，趙明的選擇顯然易見。
http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/listconews/gem/20090728/GLN20090728043_C.pdf

現時沒有南嶺化工委聘之估值師的估值報告可研究，不能評論「煤礦初步顯示之總值約為人民幣3,100,000,000 元」的合理性。儘管南嶺化工聲言代價乃根據煤礦估值之90%達致，但它以發行可換股票據之方式支付，而換股價作價0.0625 港元，較股份於最後交易日在聯交所所報之收市價每股0.2030 港元折讓約69.2%，假設趙明會換股並以現價計算，很明顯見到賣方不是以估值的「折讓價」出售，而實際上是以估值的溢價出售。

「董事注意到代價較山西恆創就中國收購事項應付之原初成本有較大溢價。然而，董事認為，由於代價乃根據煤礦估值之90%達致，故代價為公平合理。」這個應該與訊通控股（8082）曾經提及的重組有關，至於是否公平合理就見仁見智。

網上有一則新聞。「已經出售的煤礦名為碾盤梁(Nianpanliang?)煤礦，原來由華泰汽車旗下的恆泰煤炭有限公司經營。新華信企業檔案在線數據顯示：碾盤梁煤礦總投資2.6億元，產能為300萬噸/年。這座煤礦實際年產120萬噸，2008年賣了7億多元，現在是一個山西煤老闆在經營。」
http://stock.sohu.com/20090904/n266458331.shtml


greatsoup:


7億多的東西，給它賣到可換296.8億股的可換股債券，昨日值60.25億，今日值44.82億，果真是天價。


延伸閱讀:


明日系收復河山:


http://realblog.zkiz.com/searchresults.php?searchtext=663&Submit=%E6%90%9C%E5%B0%8B&ownerid=9


明日系:

http://realblog.zkiz.com/searchresults.php?searchtext=8041&Submit=%E6%90%9C%E5%B0%8B&ownerid=9





PermaLink: https://articles.zkiz.com/?id=11284

金山能源(0663，前恆光行、南嶺化工)專區(關係:明日系、0639、8082、王力平、神華)

1 : GS(14)@2010-12-28 21:49:03

http://realforum.zkiz.com/thread.php?tid=9613
新聞專區

鱷兄恆泰的交易- 訊通控股(8082)、南嶺化工（ 663）
http://realblog.zkiz.com/greatsoup/11284
明日系收復河山-南嶺化工(663)
http://realblog.zkiz.com/greatsoup/3965
2 : GS(14)@2010-12-28 21:49:26

http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... TN20101228349_C.pdf
批10億股@20.5仙
3 : GS(14)@2010-12-31 16:20:47

http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... TN20101230497_C.pdf

(ii) 認購方甲— Chinarise Financial Limited
認購方甲乃於英屬處女群島註冊成立之有限公司，主要從事香港上市紅籌公司之私人股本投資業務。董事經作出一切合理查詢後，就彼等所知、所悉及所信，認購方甲及其最終實益擁有人均為與本公司或其任何關連人士概無關連之獨立第三方。

(iv) 認購方乙— Success Business Holdings Limited
認購方乙乃於英屬處女群島註冊成立之有限公司，主要從事香港上市紅籌公司之私人股本投資業務。董事經作出一切合理查詢後，就彼等所知、所悉及所信，認購方乙及其最終實益擁有人均為與本公司或其任何關連人士概無關連之獨立第三方。
4 : 大粒米(1247)@2010-12-31 16:27:08

3樓提及
http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/listconews/sehk/20101230/LTN20101230497_C.pdf

(ii) 認購方甲— Chinarise Financial Limited
認購方甲乃於英屬處女群島註冊成立之有限公司，主要從事香港上市紅籌公司之私人股本投資業務。董事經作出一切合理查詢後，就彼等所知、所悉及所信，認購方甲及其最終實益擁有人均為與本公司或其任何關連人士概無關連之獨立第三方。

(iv) 認購方乙— Success Business Holdings Limited
認購方乙乃於英屬處女群島註冊成立之有限公司，主要從事香港上市紅籌公司之私人股本投資業務。董事經作出一切合理查詢後，就彼等所知、所悉及所信，認購方乙及其最終實益擁有人均為與本公司或其任何關連人士概無關連之獨立第三方。


唔係0.205蚊咩?
0.21?加價?
5 : 大粒米(1247)@2010-12-31 16:27:13

..........
6 : GS(14)@2010-12-31 16:57:50

5樓提及
..........


兩個是唔同的配股
7 : david395(4434)@2011-02-09 12:41:34

金山能源表現看融資成敗

港股呈拉鋸似有所待，或是等待假日情懷消減，或是內地投資氣氛重現，配合稍後炒業績期，亦要留意未來一段資金流向帶來的啟示，對個別早前完成配股集資者，不妨逢低吸納，特別是現價低於配股價的「潛水」一族。

金山能源（663）近年積極收購內地多個煤礦轉型，除了早前完成收購內蒙古兩個煤礦，去年年底落實以59億元收購山西的芍藥花煤礦及酉宜煤礦，已透過三次配股集資約6億元支付部分代價，尚有約14億元要以不同渠道融資，估計定價應在每股0.2元附近水平，在這水平下吸納有一定值博率，嚴定0.178元為止蝕位即可。

由於目前煤價持續高企，而集團內蒙與山西的煤礦逐步投產，去年內蒙礦場產能達380萬至400萬噸，隨着今次收購，令旗下煤礦產能增至1300萬噸，並訂下二至三年內打造成為年產能超過2000萬噸規模的礦企，目前首要解決財政問題，把高達70％的負債比率，下調至50％，集團利用山西與河北的煤企進行整合帶來收購商機，「蛇吞象」能否消化收購的礦產將是其成敗關鍵。

金山能源早前股價反覆回試0.18元支持區，投資者可利用這水平附近作收集，上望0.2至0.23元為炒上落的目標，留意目前大部分股份均呈現在上落通道中炒波幅，宜吸勿搶入市策略可在不同的中資股作買賣。
8 : GS(14)@2011-02-09 21:16:26

除非三十至四十合一，否則真是好難成氣候
9 : GS(14)@2011-02-10 08:08:55

http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... TN20110209115_C.pdf
之前買礦的資料
10 : GS(14)@2011-02-24 21:20:56

http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... TN20110224496_C.pdf
又有中鐵，悶唔悶D?
11 : kamfaiAthrun(1488)@2011-03-24 23:05:08

截至二零一零年十二月三十一日止年度業績
http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... TN20110324833_C.pdf
12 : GS(14)@2011-03-24 23:23:24

— 收益為1,007,700,000港元（ 二零 零九年︰88,700,000港元 ）—顯著增長919,000,000港元或10.4倍。
— 毛利為524,700,000港元（ 二零 零九年︰6,300,000港元）— 顯著增長518,400,000港元。
— 毛利率由二零 零九年7.1 %升至52.1 %。
— 本公司擁有人應佔虧損為905,200,000港元（ 二零 零九年︰1,078,500,000港元 ）。不計及1,133,100,000港元（ 二零 零九年︰1,053,800,000港元 ）之可換股票據公平值虧損，本集團錄得本公司擁有人應佔溢利227,900,000港元（ 二零 零九年：虧損24,700,000港元 ）。由 於 可 換 股 票 據 若 干 條 款 於 二 零 一 零 年 十 二 月 三 十 一 日 起 已 經 修 改 ， 公 平 值 轉 變 將不會於其後財政年 度影響財務業績。
— 未 計 利 息 、 稅 項 、 折 舊 及 攤 銷 之 盈 利 *
為 6 6 1 , 8 0 0 , 0 0 0 港 元（ 二 零 零 九 年 ︰ 虧 損
1 3 , 4 0 0 , 0 0 0 港 元 ）及 未 計 利 息 、 稅 項 、 折 舊 及 攤 銷 之 盈 利 率 為 6 5 . 7 %（ 二 零 零 九 年 ︰
– 15.1 %）。
— 本公司擁有人應佔淨資產1,924,900,000港元（ 二零 零九年：淨負債577,600,000港元 ）—顯著好轉2,502,500,000港元。

有心做，但是超貴
13 : 鉛筆小生(8153)@2011-03-24 23:50:45

我相信呢隻會做得起, 出動到華先生, 一定有料到之人
14 : GS(14)@2011-03-24 23:53:57

13樓提及
我相信呢隻會做得起, 出動到華先生, 一定有料到之人


印下去過千億股，我唔係好信炒得起，做得起機會大D
15 : 鉛筆小生(8153)@2011-03-25 00:05:38

14樓提及
13樓提及
我相信呢隻會做得起, 出動到華先生, 一定有料到之人
印下去過千億股，我唔係好信炒得起，做得起機會大D


股份多寡唔係大問題, 市值也不算細, 炒起話難不難

不過放眼幾年, 應該大有作為....
16 : GS(14)@2011-03-25 00:07:56

15樓提及
14樓提及
13樓提及
我相信呢隻會做得起, 出動到華先生, 一定有料到之人
印下去過千億股，我唔係好信炒得起，做得起機會大D


股份多寡唔係大問題, 市值也不算細, 炒起話難不難

不過放眼幾年, 應該大有作為....



大有作為我是相信的，但現在都已經60億市值，接下來又有幾百億收購，就算買就是印晒等幾年平晒先買得
17 : 鉛筆小生(8153)@2011-03-25 00:17:10

16樓提及
15樓提及
14樓提及
13樓提及
我相信呢隻會做得起, 出動到華先生, 一定有料到之人
印下去過千億股，我唔係好信炒得起，做得起機會大D
股份多寡唔係大問題, 市值也不算細, 炒起話難不難 不過放眼幾年, 應該大有作為....
大有作為我是相信的，但現在都已經60億市值，接下來又有幾百億收購，就算買就是印晒等幾年平晒先買得


我想起福山
18 : GS(14)@2011-03-25 00:23:47

17樓提及
16樓提及
15樓提及
14樓提及
13樓提及
我相信呢隻會做得起, 出動到華先生, 一定有料到之人
印下去過千億股，我唔係好信炒得起，做得起機會大D
股份多寡唔係大問題, 市值也不算細, 炒起話難不難 不過放眼幾年, 應該大有作為....
大有作為我是相信的，但現在都已經60億市值，接下來又有幾百億收購，就算買就是印晒等幾年平晒先買得


我想起福山


福山當時個盤只有20億股，市值10億
http://webb-site.com/dbpub/outstanding.asp?issue=455
http://webb-site.com/dbpub/hpu.asp?issue=455
19 : 鉛筆小生(8153)@2011-03-25 00:25:44

18樓提及
17樓提及
16樓提及
15樓提及
14樓提及
13樓提及
我相信呢隻會做得起, 出動到華先生, 一定有料到之人
印下去過千億股，我唔係好信炒得起，做得起機會大D
股份多寡唔係大問題, 市值也不算細, 炒起話難不難 不過放眼幾年, 應該大有作為....
大有作為我是相信的，但現在都已經60億市值，接下來又有幾百億收購，就算買就是印晒等幾年平晒先買得
我想起福山
福山當時個盤只有20億股，市值10億 http://webb-site.com/dbpub/outstanding.asp?issue=455 http://webb-site.com/dbpub/hpu.asp?issue=455


那要看胃口有多大, 人馬有多強盛
20 : GS(14)@2011-03-25 00:28:22

我覺得如果跌到十仙以下，應該有D用
21 : 鉛筆小生(8153)@2011-03-25 00:31:11

20樓提及
我覺得如果跌到十仙以下，應該有D用


WAIT TO SEE, 如果十仙下, 我也會撈D做WALLPAPER
22 : GS(14)@2011-03-25 00:32:17

21樓提及
20樓提及
我覺得如果跌到十仙以下，應該有D用


WAIT TO SEE, 如果十仙下, 我也會撈D做WALLPAPER


20-30億博200億，我有興趣
23 : 鉛筆小生(8153)@2011-03-25 00:36:03

22樓提及
21樓提及
20樓提及
我覺得如果跌到十仙以下，應該有D用
WAIT TO SEE, 如果十仙下, 我也會撈D做WALLPAPER
20-30億博200億，我有興趣


但係200億中間, 起碼有4,50 億係收購返來, 而變左100億,

實質可能係20-30億博80-90億
24 : GS(14)@2011-03-25 00:36:31

23樓提及
22樓提及
21樓提及
20樓提及
我覺得如果跌到十仙以下，應該有D用
WAIT TO SEE, 如果十仙下, 我也會撈D做WALLPAPER
20-30億博200億，我有興趣


但係200億中間, 起碼有4,50 億係收購返來, 而變左100億,

實質可能係20-30億博80-90億


咁又要拉低D個底線
25 : 鉛筆小生(8153)@2011-03-25 00:38:26

24樓提及
23樓提及
22樓提及
21樓提及
20樓提及
我覺得如果跌到十仙以下，應該有D用
WAIT TO SEE, 如果十仙下, 我也會撈D做WALLPAPER
20-30億博200億，我有興趣
但係200億中間, 起碼有4,50 億係收購返來, 而變左100億, 實質可能係20-30億博80-90億
咁又要拉低D個底線


那你要拉早返你條時間線 smiley
26 : GS(14)@2011-03-25 00:39:11

我不喜歡太短
27 : 鉛筆小生(8153)@2011-03-25 00:42:43

26樓提及
我不喜歡太短


因為你唔夠"長"

如果談整個組合, 長中短亦要同時有

只有長, 就欠缺靈活度
28 : GS(14)@2011-03-25 00:45:14

27樓提及
26樓提及
我不喜歡太短


因為你唔夠"長"

如果談整個組合, 長中短亦要同時有

只有長, 就欠缺靈活度


唔想煩咁多
29 : GS(14)@2011-05-12 22:15:51

http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... TN20110512500_C.pdf
20合1
30 : 鉛筆小生(8153)@2011-05-13 15:48:17

29樓提及
http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/listconews/sehk/20110512/LTN20110512500_C.pdf
20合1

期待已久, 係時候先入一注

合符預期, 0.15 * 20 = $3 度

同中信既關係, 加埋元老後代支持

呢隻後台看來勁過福山

上次高位炒到0.28-0.3 度, 合左股5-6 應該差唔多
31 : 鉛筆小生(8153)@2011-05-13 16:34:45

http://www.663hk.com/attachment/2011051311125217_tc.pdf

對於增持公司股份，金山能源集團主席王大勇先生表示：「總體來說，中國煤炭行業前景樂觀，煤炭需求強勁再加上行業受惠於國家最近頒布的政策法規，這些均為公司發展之有利因素；是次10.6%的股份增持正充分體現了本人對行業以及公司未來發展的信心。就股本架構重組之建議，我們董事會一致認為，這些新建議符合公司及股東的整體利益。我們正逐步完善股本架構重組以吸引更多高質機構性投資者。綜合目前的有利因素及我們為公司長遠發展前景及增長的部署，我們有信心有能力，為公司股東帶來最大的長期利益。」


金山能源：留意山西及內蒙古收購項目
http://news.on.cc/fin/index.html?file=ncbrkd00_20110513161434
...........
而公司會留意山西及內蒙古地區適合的收購項目，屆時會有集資需求。

----------------
第一個係早前0.2 -0.21 入既大行, PE FUND

第二個係中信

合完股後, 會引入D 咩, 無限想像空間

但不說福山能源翻板, 應該是比福山更堅的煤股

--------
http://www.aastocks.com/tc/News/HK6/NOW.435042.html
他預期，未來兩個月將公布有關與投資者中信及中鐵的合作計劃。與中信組戰略聯盟，主要是財務資金方面合作，而與中鐵主要是上下游業務合作。

另外，王氏表示，公司短期不考慮股本融資，若收購需要資金，將透過負債方式融資。由於公司去年負債比率約48%，仍屬低水平，故借貸方式融資對其利息支出的成本壓力不大。
32 : 估民(6429)@2011-05-13 21:43:56

http://iis.aastocks.com/20110513/001206392-0.PDF
由2009-12-21開始換到現在，仲有成102億幾股未換
33 : GS(14)@2011-05-14 11:12:25

換晒就好一點，隻股合埋有點看頭的，但是要等
34 : 估民(6429)@2011-05-14 11:17:55

佢換左個d係市場度派晒的話，咁咪一地都係？
35 : GS(14)@2011-05-14 11:18:32

34樓提及
佢換左個d係市場度派晒的話，咁咪一地都係？


派晒咪無沽壓，但派來D股權又散
36 : 估民(6429)@2011-05-14 11:23:17

35樓提及
34樓提及
佢換左個d係市場度派晒的話，咁咪一地都係？


派晒咪無沽壓，但派來D股權又散

102億幾仲有d可換股票據，幾時派得完？smiley合完會唔會供？
37 : 鉛筆小生(8153)@2011-05-14 11:23:44

33樓提及
換晒就好一點，隻股合埋有點看頭的，但是要等


呢隻一定要合股, 才是王道,

我差不多等了半年才見

還以為會50合一, 不過20合一也已經很好
38 : GS(14)@2011-05-14 11:24:42

36樓提及
35樓提及
34樓提及
佢換左個d係市場度派晒的話，咁咪一地都係？


派晒咪無沽壓，但派來D股權又散

102億幾仲有d可換股票據，幾時派得完？smiley合完會唔會供？


供股就不一定，但大手的空氣應不能免
39 : 鉛筆小生(8153)@2011-05-14 11:29:58

38樓提及
36樓提及
35樓提及
34樓提及
佢換左個d係市場度派晒的話，咁咪一地都係？
派晒咪無沽壓，但派來D股權又散
102億幾仲有d可換股票據，幾時派得完？smiley合完會唔會供？
供股就不一定，但大手的空氣應不能免


我看未必, 多左貨出來, 還要看貨在誰人手

來緊兩個月, 會公佈中信中鐵既合作我看有機去返0.2 - 0.25 呢D位, 好彩會突破上次高位

重點在於其煤礦既質素

管理層人馬已經好掂+紅色力量高

絕對要留意
40 : GS(14)@2011-05-14 11:31:21

我始終覺得不停的亂印不是正路，問題應在於股權稀釋的比例，如果一個礦計潛力能增加利潤20%，我想發行新股的比例一定不能多過16.6%...
41 : 估民(6429)@2011-05-14 11:34:47

兩位睇法似乎有異！
42 : 鉛筆小生(8153)@2011-05-14 11:40:57

41樓提及
兩位睇法似乎有異！

我是愛買紅色資本, 他們手法不西,
一切都STEP BY STEP, 更唔會亂向下炒

從開始佈局個一轉
到等待財技出後再進場食大餐

跟紅色資本食大茶飯, 能食到係好和味
43 : GS(14)@2011-05-14 11:42:55

42樓提及
41樓提及
兩位睇法似乎有異！

我是愛買紅色資本, 他們手法不西,
一切都STEP BY STEP, 更唔會亂向下炒

從開始佈局個一轉
到等待財技出後再進場食大餐

跟紅色資本食大茶飯, 能食到係好和味


如果識買真是幾和味，因為升起來真是無基本因素
44 : 鉛筆小生(8153)@2011-05-14 11:48:27

43樓提及
42樓提及
41樓提及
兩位睇法似乎有異！
我是愛買紅色資本, 他們手法不西, 一切都STEP BY STEP, 更唔會亂向下炒 從開始佈局個一轉到等待財技出後再進場食大餐 跟紅色資本食大茶飯, 能食到係好和味
如果識買真是幾和味，因為升起來真是無基本因素


跟紅色買, 呢個係超難道的動作

比炒老千股更難

我估計合股後既663, 應該都走勢都幾合預期

UNTIL 去到股市大調整, 到時就會插得好急, 不過呢個係一兩年後既事

而家只要唔出D咩意外, 紅色勢力冇大執位既話

663都應該值得留意, 更極適合炒下上落
------
基本因素係幾年後會逐步浮現
45 : GS(14)@2011-05-14 11:50:07

其實這件野就明擺著股權分散，把私有的東西，利用股票市場的資金公有化的方法
46 : 估民(6429)@2011-05-14 11:51:38

請問係9-2009同係9-2010的cb同可換股票據都係發比趙先生？
47 : 鉛筆小生(8153)@2011-05-14 11:53:54

45樓提及
其實這件野就明擺著股權分散，把私有的東西，利用股票市場的資金公有化的方法


可以講得好聽D

先把阿公既野, 放出來

然後, "公"有化市場換來既資金,

最大得益者是阿公

然而, 個班搞手就分一杯玉泉甘露
48 : GS(14)@2011-05-14 11:55:01

是，一次是收購，一次是認購

http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... TN20090923564_C.pdf
http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... TN20100920137_C.pdf
49 : GS(14)@2011-05-14 11:55:55

47樓提及
45樓提及
其實這件野就明擺著股權分散，把私有的東西，利用股票市場的資金公有化的方法


可以講得好聽D

先把阿公既野, 放出來

然後, "公"有化市場換來既資金,

最大得益者是阿公

然而, 個班搞手就分一杯玉泉甘露


這個真是幾好的譬喻
50 : 鉛筆小生(8153)@2011-05-14 11:59:24

49樓提及
47樓提及
45樓提及
其實這件野就明擺著股權分散，把私有的東西，利用股票市場的資金公有化的方法
可以講得好聽D 先把阿公既野, 放出來 然後, "公"有化市場換來既資金, 最大得益者是阿公 然而, 個班搞手就分一杯玉泉甘露
這個真是幾好的譬喻


紅色資本家很多都是這樣發了財

阿公地大脈博, 不知幾多資源,

而在663重點是人脈身上

合完股後, 過多排再引入強者

好快升呢去2-3線煤炭股
51 : GS(14)@2011-05-14 12:04:18

基本上同578走的路差不多
52 : 鉛筆小生(8153)@2011-05-14 12:04:30

突然想起這篇吹水舊聞
http://www.hkdailynews.com.hk/finance.php?id=92786
53 : 鉛筆小生(8153)@2011-05-14 12:07:55

51樓提及
基本上同578走的路差不多

市值差不多, 但人脈實則差很遠....而得到中央既支持亦很大分別

若細看一點, 663 有好大力量去扶持佢地成國家級既煤企

而578 我估最盡都係百餘億就要止步

BTW, 從663 可以看到另一隻未來紅色新星既影子
54 : 估民(6429)@2011-05-14 12:24:34

http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... TN20101230207_C.pdf湯兄請這個呢？
55 : GS(14)@2011-05-14 22:55:25

52樓提及
突然想起這篇吹水舊聞
http://www.hkdailynews.com.hk/finance.php?id=92786



這次不算是甚麼特別的新聞，我真是一大堆，連專訪我都睇了一堆，那些股評都是照抄吧，如果你想睇，我寄一些給你都可以
56 : GS(14)@2011-05-14 22:57:21

54樓提及
http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/listconews/sehk/20101230/LTN20101230207_C.pdf湯兄請這個呢？


你找番這個月的公告就睇到的，這個是Everest Project I Limited認購的股份，12月28日認的。
http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... TN20101228349_C.pdf
57 : 估民(6429)@2011-05-14 23:03:31

56樓提及
54樓提及
http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/listconews/sehk/20101230/LTN20101230207_C.pdf湯兄請這個呢？


你找番這個月的公告就睇到的，這個是Everest Project I Limited認購的股份，12月28日認的。
http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... TN20101228349_C.pdf

我睇左喇！趙生如果換晒d cb同票據應該有成30幾億股？今生報紙話王生同佢買左25億股變大股東？
58 : GS(14)@2011-05-14 23:09:58

57樓提及
56樓提及
54樓提及
http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/listconews/sehk/20101230/LTN20101230207_C.pdf湯兄請這個呢？


你找番這個月的公告就睇到的，這個是Everest Project I Limited認購的股份，12月28日認的。
http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... TN20101228349_C.pdf

我睇左喇！趙生如果換晒d cb同票據應該有成30幾億股？今生報紙話王生同佢買左25億股變大股東？


應該是大約96億股，但是只是CB，並沒有換股，所以實際上持股很少。

如果全部換股，持股大約是30%左右，我想這班人只是計普通股數目，不知道CB的數目同樣非常驚人
http://sdinotice.hkex.com.hk/di/ ... 3&src=MAIN&lang=ZH&
59 : GS(14)@2011-05-14 23:14:11

53樓提及
51樓提及
基本上同578走的路差不多

市值差不多, 但人脈實則差很遠....而得到中央既支持亦很大分別

若細看一點, 663 有好大力量去扶持佢地成國家級既煤企

而578 我估最盡都係百餘億就要止步

BTW, 從663 可以看到另一隻未來紅色新星既影子


總之就唔可以話國家支持就話得，因為始終投資是要睇價值的
60 : 鉛筆小生(8153)@2011-05-15 15:09:20

59樓提及
53樓提及
51樓提及
基本上同578走的路差不多

市值差不多, 但人脈實則差很遠....而得到中央既支持亦很大分別

若細看一點, 663 有好大力量去扶持佢地成國家級既煤企

而578 我估最盡都係百餘億就要止步

BTW, 從663 可以看到另一隻未來紅色新星既影子


總之就唔可以話國家支持就話得，因為始終投資是要睇價值的


應該咁講, 除了向下炒既股之外

所有股都有其投資價值

在乎買入既時候, 價格及公司既狀況

這些CB, 看是郵票, 但經過一連串財技後

轉幾ROUND 之後, 也能成為一, 二線收藏家愛收的貨

只要你選擇對進場的時機....根本不是問題
61 : greatsoup38(830)@2011-05-15 15:14:31

合股跌到三蚊的話，計埋CB換股後大約50億，上年扣除特殊收益賺2.5億，P/E 20倍
http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... TN20110324833_C.pdf

如果跌到兩個半，市值40億，P/E 16倍，加上未來空間、叫做有得博
62 : 大粒米(1247)@2011-05-21 11:33:52

請問:
20合1,再將一手股數由20,000改為1000,即係之前持有1手,合股後都係持有1手??
63 : GS(14)@2011-05-21 11:36:11

62樓提及
請問:
20合1,再將一手股數由20,000改為1000,即係之前持有1手,合股後都係持有1手??

yes
64 : 大粒米(1247)@2011-05-21 11:58:48

63樓提及
62樓提及
請問:
20合1,再將一手股數由20,000改為1000,即係之前持有1手,合股後都係持有1手??

yes


唔該晒!smiley
65 : 大粒米(1247)@2011-05-22 17:42:20

請問湯兄663合股後又拆細一手股數,原有股東手數沒有變,咁做有乜玄機??屎忽痕???
66 : GS(14)@2011-05-22 17:44:34

65樓提及
請問湯兄663合股後又拆細一手股數,原有股東手數沒有變,咁做有乜玄機??屎忽痕???


引下大粒D的基金
67 : 估民(6429)@2011-05-22 17:47:35

股數細左，買賣數量大左有助推高股價？
68 : GS(14)@2011-05-22 17:48:24

67樓提及
股數細左，買賣數量大左有助推高股價？


價高D會形象好D
69 : 大粒米(1247)@2011-05-22 17:49:34

66樓提及
65樓提及
請問湯兄663合股後又拆細一手股數,原有股東手數沒有變,咁做有乜玄機??屎忽痕???


引下大粒D的基金


係喎!!

有d基金係規定唔可以買毫子股既喎!
多謝湯兄!!
70 : GS(14)@2011-05-22 17:55:47

股票咪睇下你點分錢囉
71 : 大粒米(1247)@2011-06-10 21:34:33

69樓提及
66樓提及
65樓提及
請問湯兄663合股後又拆細一手股數,原有股東手數沒有變,咁做有乜玄機??屎忽痕???


引下大粒D的基金


係喎!!

有d基金係規定唔可以買毫子股既喎!
多謝湯兄!!


之前基金用0.2XX入股,到今日咪輸大錢?近日插到0.14是否有基金沽貨??
72 : GS(14)@2011-06-11 09:22:34

71樓提及
69樓提及
66樓提及
65樓提及
請問湯兄663合股後又拆細一手股數,原有股東手數沒有變,咁做有乜玄機??屎忽痕???


引下大粒D的基金


係喎!!

有d基金係規定唔可以買毫子股既喎!
多謝湯兄!!


之前基金用0.2XX入股,到今日咪輸大錢?近日插到0.14是否有基金沽貨??


是輸了大錢，基金沽貨是無明確資料，所以唔知
http://sdinotice.hkex.com.hk/di/ ... 3&src=MAIN&lang=ZH&

CCASS變化
http://webb-site.com/ccass/chldc ... t=chngdn&issue=1259
73 : kaipplppl(7299)@2011-06-20 11:01:30

講到天花龍鳳都無用,個股價唔掂就死得
74 : 鉛筆小生(8153)@2011-06-20 13:15:23

應該係要等有盈利貢獻才決定投資
75 : kaipplppl(7299)@2011-06-20 14:33:38

74樓提及
應該係要等有盈利貢獻才決定投資

今天的我打倒昨天的
76 : 鉛筆小生(8153)@2011-06-20 15:15:20

75樓提及
74樓提及
應該係要等有盈利貢獻才決定投資

今天的我打倒昨天的


我買663, 是作投機用途smiley
77 : GS(14)@2011-06-20 22:16:39

76樓提及
75樓提及
74樓提及
應該係要等有盈利貢獻才決定投資

今天的我打倒昨天的


我買663, 是作投機用途smiley


明賭就無所謂啦
78 : 鉛筆小生(8153)@2011-06-20 23:20:18

77樓提及
76樓提及
75樓提及
74樓提及
應該係要等有盈利貢獻才決定投資

今天的我打倒昨天的


我買663, 是作投機用途smiley


明賭就無所謂啦


等機會大手D 賭
79 : 大粒米(1247)@2011-06-26 13:43:15

湯兄:

岩岩轉左no2930,是否要等實物股票印好先派埋出街先會用返舊no663??乜唔係唔係無紙化左咩??
80 : greatsoup38(830)@2011-06-26 13:59:37

79樓提及
湯兄:

岩岩轉左no2930,是否要等實物股票印好先派埋出街先會用返舊no663??乜唔係唔係無紙化左咩??


都未搞無紙化過，當然是等印好就變番663，大約1星期
81 : 大粒米(1247)@2011-06-26 14:03:39

80樓提及
79樓提及
湯兄:

岩岩轉左no2930,是否要等實物股票印好先派埋出街先會用返舊no663??乜唔係唔係無紙化左咩??


都未搞無紙化過，當然是等印好就變番663，大約1星期


先行謝過!thk!!!

搞左咁耐都係祇聞樓梯響?9成又係法律問題搞唔掂啦.

http://iis.aastocks.com/20110525/001211143-0.PDF
82 : 大粒米(1247)@2011-06-26 14:19:52

80樓提及
79樓提及
湯兄:

岩岩轉左no2930,是否要等實物股票印好先派埋出街先會用返舊no663??乜唔係唔係無紙化左咩??


都未搞無紙化過，當然是等印好就變番663，大約1星期


請問一下,點解2930既股價是0.3?而一手數量是100000?

可能是一通個系統有問題,2930的交易單位是1000/手的!
83 : GS(14)@2011-06-26 18:17:40


先行謝過!thk!!!

搞左咁耐都係祇聞樓梯響?9成又係法律問題搞唔掂啦.

http://iis.aastocks.com/20110525/001211143-0.PDF

呢個是例行程序的，不通過不能合股
84 : GS(14)@2011-06-26 18:19:02


請問一下,點解2930既股價是0.3?而一手數量是100000?

可能是一通個系統有問題,2930的交易單位是1000/手的!


http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... TN20110624573_C.pdf
要聽日先會調番，個號碼可能之前有人用過
85 : 大粒米(1247)@2011-06-26 18:27:38

84樓提及

請問一下,點解2930既股價是0.3?而一手數量是100000?

可能是一通個系統有問題,2930的交易單位是1000/手的!


http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... TN20110624573_C.pdf
要聽日先會調番，個號碼可能之前有人用過


唔該晒湯兄~呢份最清楚.

http://www.hkex.com.hk/chi/marke ... nts/cc_150_2011.pdf


一通平台唔正確的舊料


另外一通遲d有暗盤交易,平台已經搞掂但仲未用到!
86 : choimingming(12170)@2011-06-28 11:43:10

if now buy 2930..finally will change to 663..right? now the price of 2930 =2.06 ..663=0.111...2930 has discount of 7%???????
87 : GS(14)@2011-06-28 21:05:09

86樓提及
if now buy 2930..finally will change to 663..right? now the price of 2930 =2.06 ..663=0.111...2930 has discount of 7%???????


是，無錯，大約7%的差價
88 : choimingming(12170)@2011-06-28 22:17:54

sorry..我SHORT 左...下午用一通看...重有663...但原來今日663己經系無得買....重以為咁筍TIM...
89 : GS(14)@2011-06-28 22:21:50

過幾日並行買賣
90 : GS(14)@2011-07-01 22:03:14

http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... TN20110630885_C.pdf
放棄認購新股
91 : sunshine(3090)@2011-07-02 16:58:52

根本創52周新低，等於未合時的0.1左右
92 : choimingming(12170)@2011-07-02 17:21:29

我2.06買左一小注先...再DROP 再溝...我估唔會drop 到1.25 掛
93 : GS(14)@2011-07-02 17:56:10

第一注未賺錢唔好想著溝貨，除非你那三注的資金真是不多
94 : 鉛筆小生(8153)@2011-07-02 19:04:19

90樓提及
http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/listconews/sehk/20110630/LTN20110630885_C.pdf
放棄認購新股


若要貨, 同一筆錢係市場撈仲好
95 : GS(14)@2011-07-06 08:15:14

http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... N201107051197_C.pdf
董事會欣然公佈，於二零一 一年七月五日（ 於交易 時段後），買方（ 本公司之間接非全資附
屬公司）與賣方訂立諒解備忘錄，內容關於建議收購目標公司全部已發行股本。根據諒解
備忘錄，賣方擬向買方出售目標公司9 0 %股本權益，並促 使裕興礦業向買方無償轉讓目
標公司10 %股本權益。

...
根據賣方提供之資料，目標公司目前擁有及經營 煤礦，煤礦主要生 產動 力煤，按中國標準
之 總 資 源 量 約 1 9 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 噸 。 煤 礦 之 採 礦 面 積 為 8 . 3 9 6 平 方 公 里 。 其 目 前 之 核 准 年 產 量 為600,000噸。近期已完成煤礦之技術改造，而將煤礦之核准年產量提升至900,000噸仍有待中
國有關當局及監管機構批准。煤礦距離本集團目前所擁有及經營之鄂爾多斯市恒泰煤礦約45公里。
96 : CHAUCHAU(1254)@2011-07-09 12:21:53

金山能源 新舊股(00663及02930)並行買賣 7月12日
97 : J J(1180)@2011-07-13 16:24:19

今日1.64搏大霚落注  希望佢由今日開始止跌回升smiley
98 : 仙(13368)@2011-07-19 09:39:56

77樓提及
76樓提及
75樓提及
74樓提及
應該係要等有盈利貢獻才決定投資
今天的我打倒昨天的
我買663, 是作投機用途smiley
明賭就無所謂啦
賭都無謂,现等於未合時的8仙5
99 : 鉛筆小生(8153)@2011-07-19 11:12:57

98樓提及
77樓提及
76樓提及
75樓提及
74樓提及
應該係要等有盈利貢獻才決定投資
今天的我打倒昨天的
我買663, 是作投機用途smiley
明賭就無所謂啦
賭都無謂,现等於未合時的8仙5


慢慢收集中, 呢D 股唔會一下子入爆倉
100 : 仙(13368)@2011-07-19 11:43:48

21樓提及
20樓提及
我覺得如果跌到十仙以下，應該有D用
WAIT TO SEE, 如果十仙下, 我也會撈D做WALLPAPER
自圆其说
101 : 鉛筆小生(8153)@2011-07-19 14:39:40

100樓提及
21樓提及
20樓提及
我覺得如果跌到十仙以下，應該有D用
WAIT TO SEE, 如果十仙下, 我也會撈D做WALLPAPER
自圆其说



我有貨, 已做緊WALLPAPER

但係個大市唔掂, 唔會加太多注

錢現在撈1378, 呢D 繼續坐

多條戰線開動, 預計要捱Q3
102 : 鉛筆小生(8153)@2011-07-19 14:50:55

101樓提及
100樓提及
21樓提及
20樓提及
我覺得如果跌到十仙以下，應該有D用
WAIT TO SEE, 如果十仙下, 我也會撈D做WALLPAPER
自圆其说



我有貨, 已做緊WALLPAPER

但係個大市唔掂, 唔會加太多注

錢現在撈1378, 呢D 繼續坐

多條戰線開動, 預計要捱Q3


出面有好多1-2線股仲平, 短期663我係幾千至一萬股吸
我有D 2.6(未合之前0.13), 2, 1.8

PERCENTAGE 蝕幾多, 不過量唔係好多
----
今天在買998, 估值去到超抵既時間,
搏供股完成炒上4.6 走人
103 : 仙(13368)@2011-07-19 16:28:35

102樓提及
101樓提及
100樓提及
21樓提及
20樓提及
我覺得如果跌到十仙以下，應該有D用
WAIT TO SEE, 如果十仙下, 我也會撈D做WALLPAPER
自圆其说
我有貨, 已做緊WALLPAPER 但係個大市唔掂, 唔會加太多注 錢現在撈1378, 呢D 繼續坐 多條戰線開動, 預計要捱Q3
出面有好多1-2線股仲平, 短期663我係幾千至一萬股吸我有D 2.6(未合之前0.13), 2, 1.8 PERCENTAGE 蝕幾多, 不過量唔係好多 ---- 今天在買998, 估值去到超抵既時間, 搏供股完成炒上4.6 走人
買998窝轮？
104 : 鉛筆小生(8153)@2011-07-19 16:33:44

103樓提及
102樓提及
101樓提及
100樓提及
21樓提及
20樓提及
我覺得如果跌到十仙以下，應該有D用
WAIT TO SEE, 如果十仙下, 我也會撈D做WALLPAPER
自圆其说
我有貨, 已做緊WALLPAPER 但係個大市唔掂, 唔會加太多注 錢現在撈1378, 呢D 繼續坐 多條戰線開動, 預計要捱Q3
出面有好多1-2線股仲平, 短期663我係幾千至一萬股吸我有D 2.6(未合之前0.13), 2, 1.8 PERCENTAGE 蝕幾多, 不過量唔係好多 ---- 今天在買998, 估值去到超抵既時間, 搏供股完成炒上4.6 走人
買998窝轮？


掃了正股+權
XXX K [email protected]

YYYK 2940 @0.395, 0.4 ,0.405,0.42

但收市前出晒2940
105 : 仙(13368)@2011-07-19 16:57:15

104樓提及
103樓提及
102樓提及
101樓提及
100樓提及
21樓提及
20樓提及
我覺得如果跌到十仙以下，應該有D用
WAIT TO SEE, 如果十仙下, 我也會撈D做WALLPAPER
自圆其说
我有貨, 已做緊WALLPAPER 但係個大市唔掂, 唔會加太多注 錢現在撈1378, 呢D 繼續坐 多條戰線開動, 預計要捱Q3
出面有好多1-2線股仲平, 短期663我係幾千至一萬股吸我有D 2.6(未合之前0.13), 2, 1.8 PERCENTAGE 蝕幾多, 不過量唔係好多 ---- 今天在買998, 估值去到超抵既時間, 搏供股完成炒上4.6 走人
買998窝轮？
掃了正股+權 XXX K [email protected] YYYK 2940 @0.395, 0.4 ,0.405,0.42 但收市前出晒2940
買正股不如買1308
106 : 鉛筆小生(8153)@2011-07-19 17:05:26

105樓提及
104樓提及
103樓提及
102樓提及
101樓提及
100樓提及
21樓提及
20樓提及
我覺得如果跌到十仙以下，應該有D用
WAIT TO SEE, 如果十仙下, 我也會撈D做WALLPAPER
自圆其说
我有貨, 已做緊WALLPAPER 但係個大市唔掂, 唔會加太多注 錢現在撈1378, 呢D 繼續坐 多條戰線開動, 預計要捱Q3
出面有好多1-2線股仲平, 短期663我係幾千至一萬股吸我有D 2.6(未合之前0.13), 2, 1.8 PERCENTAGE 蝕幾多, 不過量唔係好多 ---- 今天在買998, 估值去到超抵既時間, 搏供股完成炒上4.6 走人
買998窝轮？
掃了正股+權 XXX K [email protected] YYYK 2940 @0.395, 0.4 ,0.405,0.42 但收市前出晒2940
買正股不如買1308


1308 我倒不如買2866?
但TREND ANALYSIS 叫我唔好買

而FUNDAMENTAL 我都冇研究...哈哈

我主力放在煤股, 建材股, 十二五股, 這是我研究及主力持貨範圍
E.G.
鋁材 98, 1378
水泥 691 914 1136 1893 2009 3323
玻璃 868,3300
107 : 鉛筆小生(8153)@2011-07-19 17:07:43

106樓提及
105樓提及
104樓提及
103樓提及
102樓提及
101樓提及
100樓提及
21樓提及
20樓提及
我覺得如果跌到十仙以下，應該有D用
WAIT TO SEE, 如果十仙下, 我也會撈D做WALLPAPER
自圆其说
我有貨, 已做緊WALLPAPER 但係個大市唔掂, 唔會加太多注 錢現在撈1378, 呢D 繼續坐 多條戰線開動, 預計要捱Q3
出面有好多1-2線股仲平, 短期663我係幾千至一萬股吸我有D 2.6(未合之前0.13), 2, 1.8 PERCENTAGE 蝕幾多, 不過量唔係好多 ---- 今天在買998, 估值去到超抵既時間, 搏供股完成炒上4.6 走人
買998窝轮？
掃了正股+權 XXX K [email protected] YYYK 2940 @0.395, 0.4 ,0.405,0.42 但收市前出晒2940
買正股不如買1308


1308 我倒不如買2866?
但TREND ANALYSIS 叫我唔好買

而FUNDAMENTAL 我都冇研究...哈哈

我主力放在煤股, 建材股, 十二五股, 這是我研究及主力持貨範圍
E.G.
鋁材 98, 1378
水泥 691 914 1136 1893 2009 3323
玻璃 868,3300


如果今年中國冇保障房, 我就會輸大錢
108 : 仙(13368)@2011-07-19 17:35:37

107樓提及
106樓提及
105樓提及
104樓提及
103樓提及
102樓提及
101樓提及
100樓提及
21樓提及
20樓提及
我覺得如果跌到十仙以下，應該有D用
WAIT TO SEE, 如果十仙下, 我也會撈D做WALLPAPER
自圆其说
我有貨, 已做緊WALLPAPER 但係個大市唔掂, 唔會加太多注 錢現在撈1378, 呢D 繼續坐 多條戰線開動, 預計要捱Q3
出面有好多1-2線股仲平, 短期663我係幾千至一萬股吸我有D 2.6(未合之前0.13), 2, 1.8 PERCENTAGE 蝕幾多, 不過量唔係好多 ---- 今天在買998, 估值去到超抵既時間, 搏供股完成炒上4.6 走人
買998窝轮？
掃了正股+權 XXX K [email protected] YYYK 2940 @0.395, 0.4 ,0.405,0.42 但收市前出晒2940
買正股不如買1308
1308 我倒不如買2866? 但TREND ANALYSIS 叫我唔好買 而FUNDAMENTAL 我都冇研究...哈哈 我主力放在煤股, 建材股, 十二五股, 這是我研究及主力持貨範圍 E.G. 鋁材 98, 1378 水泥 691 914 1136 1893 2009 3323 玻璃 868,3300
如果今年中國冇保障房, 我就會輸大錢
买这类型的股， 输大钱机会也不会小， 这类型的股也很贵，斗傻游戏
109 : 鉛筆小生(8153)@2011-07-19 17:42:24

108樓提及
107樓提及
106樓提及
105樓提及
104樓提及
103樓提及
102樓提及
101樓提及
100樓提及
21樓提及
20樓提及
我覺得如果跌到十仙以下，應該有D用
WAIT TO SEE, 如果十仙下, 我也會撈D做WALLPAPER
自圆其说
我有貨, 已做緊WALLPAPER 但係個大市唔掂, 唔會加太多注 錢現在撈1378, 呢D 繼續坐 多條戰線開動, 預計要捱Q3
出面有好多1-2線股仲平, 短期663我係幾千至一萬股吸我有D 2.6(未合之前0.13), 2, 1.8 PERCENTAGE 蝕幾多, 不過量唔係好多 ---- 今天在買998, 估值去到超抵既時間, 搏供股完成炒上4.6 走人
買998窝轮？
掃了正股+權 XXX K [email protected] YYYK 2940 @0.395, 0.4 ,0.405,0.42 但收市前出晒2940
買正股不如買1308
1308 我倒不如買2866? 但TREND ANALYSIS 叫我唔好買 而FUNDAMENTAL 我都冇研究...哈哈 我主力放在煤股, 建材股, 十二五股, 這是我研究及主力持貨範圍 E.G. 鋁材 98, 1378 水泥 691 914 1136 1893 2009 3323 玻璃 868,3300
如果今年中國冇保障房, 我就會輸大錢
买这类型的股， 输大钱机会也不会小， 这类型的股也很贵，斗傻游戏


我平均成本比現價低50%或以上
那何有輸之理, 只要買對, 放長線便能食盡升浪

建材價格今年淡季卻不淡, 那年黎緊旺季會如何?

牛股是會變得更牛, 跟紅頂白最重要
110 : 仙(13368)@2011-07-19 17:56:24

109樓提及
108樓提及
107樓提及
106樓提及
105樓提及
104樓提及
103樓提及
102樓提及
101樓提及
100樓提及
21樓提及
20樓提及
我覺得如果跌到十仙以下，應該有D用
WAIT TO SEE, 如果十仙下, 我也會撈D做WALLPAPER
自圆其说
我有貨, 已做緊WALLPAPER 但係個大市唔掂, 唔會加太多注 錢現在撈1378, 呢D 繼續坐 多條戰線開動, 預計要捱Q3
出面有好多1-2線股仲平, 短期663我係幾千至一萬股吸我有D 2.6(未合之前0.13), 2, 1.8 PERCENTAGE 蝕幾多, 不過量唔係好多 ---- 今天在買998, 估值去到超抵既時間, 搏供股完成炒上4.6 走人
買998窝轮？
掃了正股+權 XXX K [email protected] YYYK 2940 @0.395, 0.4 ,0.405,0.42 但收市前出晒2940
買正股不如買1308
1308 我倒不如買2866? 但TREND ANALYSIS 叫我唔好買 而FUNDAMENTAL 我都冇研究...哈哈 我主力放在煤股, 建材股, 十二五股, 這是我研究及主力持貨範圍 E.G. 鋁材 98, 1378 水泥 691 914 1136 1893 2009 3323 玻璃 868,3300
如果今年中國冇保障房, 我就會輸大錢
买这类型的股， 输大钱机会也不会小， 这类型的股也很贵，斗傻游戏
我平均成本比現價低50%或以上那何有輸之理, 只要買對, 放長線便能食盡升浪 建材價格今年淡季卻不淡, 那年黎緊旺季會如何? 牛股是會變得更牛, 跟紅頂白最重要
其实以你买股的时间你当然会成为赢家， 2940、998差不多在全日低位入。中国建材我3元入，十倍股，吹牛皮！
111 : 鉛筆小生(8153)@2011-07-19 18:02:19

110樓提及
109樓提及
108樓提及
107樓提及
106樓提及
105樓提及
104樓提及
103樓提及
102樓提及
101樓提及
100樓提及
21樓提及
20樓提及
我覺得如果跌到十仙以下，應該有D用
WAIT TO SEE, 如果十仙下, 我也會撈D做WALLPAPER
自圆其说
我有貨, 已做緊WALLPAPER 但係個大市唔掂, 唔會加太多注 錢現在撈1378, 呢D 繼續坐 多條戰線開動, 預計要捱Q3
出面有好多1-2線股仲平, 短期663我係幾千至一萬股吸我有D 2.6(未合之前0.13), 2, 1.8 PERCENTAGE 蝕幾多, 不過量唔係好多 ---- 今天在買998, 估值去到超抵既時間, 搏供股完成炒上4.6 走人
買998窝轮？
掃了正股+權 XXX K [email protected] YYYK 2940 @0.395, 0.4 ,0.405,0.42 但收市前出晒2940
買正股不如買1308
1308 我倒不如買2866? 但TREND ANALYSIS 叫我唔好買 而FUNDAMENTAL 我都冇研究...哈哈 我主力放在煤股, 建材股, 十二五股, 這是我研究及主力持貨範圍 E.G. 鋁材 98, 1378 水泥 691 914 1136 1893 2009 3323 玻璃 868,3300
如果今年中國冇保障房, 我就會輸大錢
买这类型的股， 输大钱机会也不会小， 这类型的股也很贵，斗傻游戏
我平均成本比現價低50%或以上那何有輸之理, 只要買對, 放長線便能食盡升浪 建材價格今年淡季卻不淡, 那年黎緊旺季會如何? 牛股是會變得更牛, 跟紅頂白最重要
其实以你买股的时间你当然会成为赢家， 2940、998差不多在全日低位入。中国建材我3元入，十倍股，吹牛皮！


那請你看TIMESTAMP
發表於:2011-07-19 14:50:55

及出面CHAT ROOM
鉛筆小生說：「有個好朋友叫我撈貨」2011-07-19 15:06:48

這段時間, 你難道買不到嗎?

別扮內地人吧, 牛B
112 : 仙(13368)@2011-07-19 18:07:07

111樓提及
110樓提及
109樓提及
108樓提及
107樓提及
106樓提及
105樓提及
104樓提及
103樓提及
102樓提及
101樓提及
100樓提及
21樓提及
20樓提及
我覺得如果跌到十仙以下，應該有D用
WAIT TO SEE, 如果十仙下, 我也會撈D做WALLPAPER
自圆其说
我有貨, 已做緊WALLPAPER 但係個大市唔掂, 唔會加太多注 錢現在撈1378, 呢D 繼續坐 多條戰線開動, 預計要捱Q3
出面有好多1-2線股仲平, 短期663我係幾千至一萬股吸我有D 2.6(未合之前0.13), 2, 1.8 PERCENTAGE 蝕幾多, 不過量唔係好多 ---- 今天在買998, 估值去到超抵既時間, 搏供股完成炒上4.6 走人
買998窝轮？
掃了正股+權 XXX K [email protected] YYYK 2940 @0.395, 0.4 ,0.405,0.42 但收市前出晒2940
買正股不如買1308
1308 我倒不如買2866? 但TREND ANALYSIS 叫我唔好買 而FUNDAMENTAL 我都冇研究...哈哈 我主力放在煤股, 建材股, 十二五股, 這是我研究及主力持貨範圍 E.G. 鋁材 98, 1378 水泥 691 914 1136 1893 2009 3323 玻璃 868,3300
如果今年中國冇保障房, 我就會輸大錢
买这类型的股， 输大钱机会也不会小， 这类型的股也很贵，斗傻游戏
我平均成本比現價低50%或以上那何有輸之理, 只要買對, 放長線便能食盡升浪 建材價格今年淡季卻不淡, 那年黎緊旺季會如何? 牛股是會變得更牛, 跟紅頂白最重要
其实以你买股的时间你当然会成为赢家， 2940、998差不多在全日低位入。中国建材我3元入，十倍股，不是说你， 是说我自己！
那請你看TIMESTAMP 發表於:2011-07-19 14:50:55 及出面CHAT ROOM 鉛筆小生說：「有個好朋友叫我撈貨」2011-07-19 15:06:48 這段時間, 你難道買不到嗎? 別扮內地人吧, 牛B
吹牛皮不是说你， 是说我自己！是否内地人有何关系？傻B！牛C屎!
113 : 鉛筆小生(8153)@2011-07-19 18:07:48

我從沒看不起內地人, 因為香港好多股都係佢地炒到飛天

不過我有時候會好HARSH 對內地剛認識港股既朋友

佢地會覺得仙毫股抵買, 因為冇得再跌而唔識合一等財技
114 : 鉛筆小生(8153)@2011-07-19 18:12:16

112樓提及
111樓提及
110樓提及
109樓提及
108樓提及
107樓提及
106樓提及
105樓提及
104樓提及
103樓提及
102樓提及
101樓提及
100樓提及
21樓提及
20樓提及
我覺得如果跌到十仙以下，應該有D用
WAIT TO SEE, 如果十仙下, 我也會撈D做WALLPAPER
自圆其说
我有貨, 已做緊WALLPAPER 但係個大市唔掂, 唔會加太多注 錢現在撈1378, 呢D 繼續坐 多條戰線開動, 預計要捱Q3
出面有好多1-2線股仲平, 短期663我係幾千至一萬股吸我有D 2.6(未合之前0.13), 2, 1.8 PERCENTAGE 蝕幾多, 不過量唔係好多 ---- 今天在買998, 估值去到超抵既時間, 搏供股完成炒上4.6 走人
買998窝轮？
掃了正股+權 XXX K [email protected] YYYK 2940 @0.395, 0.4 ,0.405,0.42 但收市前出晒2940
買正股不如買1308
1308 我倒不如買2866? 但TREND ANALYSIS 叫我唔好買 而FUNDAMENTAL 我都冇研究...哈哈 我主力放在煤股, 建材股, 十二五股, 這是我研究及主力持貨範圍 E.G. 鋁材 98, 1378 水泥 691 914 1136 1893 2009 3323 玻璃 868,3300
如果今年中國冇保障房, 我就會輸大錢
买这类型的股， 输大钱机会也不会小， 这类型的股也很贵，斗傻游戏
我平均成本比現價低50%或以上那何有輸之理, 只要買對, 放長線便能食盡升浪 建材價格今年淡季卻不淡, 那年黎緊旺季會如何? 牛股是會變得更牛, 跟紅頂白最重要
其实以你买股的时间你当然会成为赢家， 2940、998差不多在全日低位入。中国建材我3元入，十倍股，不是说你， 是说我自己！
那請你看TIMESTAMP 發表於:2011-07-19 14:50:55 及出面CHAT ROOM 鉛筆小生說：「有個好朋友叫我撈貨」2011-07-19 15:06:48 這段時間, 你難道買不到嗎? 別扮內地人吧, 牛B
吹牛皮不是说你， 是说我自己！是否内地人有何关系？傻B！牛C屎!


我對某些內地人會好嚴格, 也許遇過不少扮大款的人
誤信過內地人而損失過大錢, 所以有時候, 極討厭吹牛皮的人

不過你可以留意下, 我既鋁業股投資
現仍輸錢, 但我相信1378 放數年可像今天的3323 那麼強
115 : 鉛筆小生(8153)@2011-07-19 18:15:08

突然說起自己, 唔知有沒有人像我失意於當年宏觀調控
116 : GS(14)@2011-07-19 21:07:04

我就無啦
117 : wanker44(12796)@2011-07-19 21:55:47

呢隻股千祈唔好買, 平平都唔好買
118 : GS(14)@2011-07-19 21:56:21

你有甚麼理據?
119 : wanker44(12796)@2011-07-19 22:07:57

都係d礦既問題同入面d人...
120 : GS(14)@2011-07-19 22:09:16

個礦就一早講過是原本賣畀其他公司，多謝鱷兄
[realblog]http://realblog.zkiz.com/greatsoup/11284[/realblog]
121 : wanker44(12796)@2011-07-19 22:15:06

入面d人都唔係好嘢黎既, 所以唔敢掂..
122 : GS(14)@2011-07-19 22:15:31

唔好野點籌錢ar
123 : 仙(13368)@2011-07-19 22:17:12

鉛筆小生曾說過
【期待已久, 係時候先入一注

合符預期, 0.15 * 20 = $3 度

同中信既關係, 加埋元老後代支持

呢隻後台看來勁過福山

上次高位炒到0.28-0.3 度, 合左股5-6 應該差唔多】；【管理層人馬已經好掂+紅色力量高

絕對要留意】；【
我是愛買紅色資本, 他們手法不西,
一切都STEP BY STEP, 更唔會亂向下炒

從開始佈局個一轉
到等待財技出後再進場食大餐

跟紅色資本食大茶飯, 能食到係好和味】；【跟紅色買, 呢個係超難道的動作

比炒老千股更難

我估計合股後既663, 應該都走勢都幾合預期

UNTIL 去到股市大調整, 到時就會插得好急, 不過呢個係一兩年後既事

而家只要唔出D咩意外, 紅色勢力冇大執位既話

663都應該值得留意, 更極適合炒下上落
------
基本因素係幾年後會逐步浮現】；【
紅色資本家很多都是這樣發了財

阿公地大脈博, 不知幾多資源,

而在663重點是人脈身上

合完股後, 過多排再引入強者

好快升呢去2-3線煤炭股】等等，就算其不是庄托也是看多吧，但后来又说是投机，自相矛盾，看错不重要，还要强辩。这只股票我买过，势头完全不对的，老早已忘记了， 也拜托失忆症人士也不要昨天的我打倒今天的我。
124 : wanker44(12796)@2011-07-19 22:18:05

不過佢地係益自己人only, 聽到都恐怖...
125 : 鉛筆小生(8153)@2011-07-19 22:18:58

我看法從來沒變, 所以從沒打倒昨天的我smiley
126 : GS(14)@2011-07-19 22:19:08

睇埋今年上半年盤數先
127 : 仙(13368)@2011-07-19 22:28:50

合股时2.4，现在1.76还继续加仓？说实话我不太认识港股，不然也不会向各位求教，看到的却是有人欺世盗名，总言之也到此为止了88
128 : GS(14)@2011-07-19 22:29:56

127樓提及
合股时2.4，现在1.76还继续加仓？说实话我不太认识港股，不然也不会向各位求教，看到的却是有人欺世盗名，总言之也到此为止了88


由他去吧，不信就是不信，信，他也下了注，輸了錢吧

若果你懂的，就多講
129 : 鉛筆小生(8153)@2011-07-19 22:33:58

128樓提及
127樓提及
合股时2.4，现在1.76还继续加仓？说实话我不太认识港股，不然也不会向各位求教，看到的却是有人欺世盗名，总言之也到此为止了88


由他去吧，不信就是不信，信，他也下了注，輸了錢吧

若果你懂的，就多講


我信才會加倉, 不信就不應加倉,

更沒欺世盜名, 請別誤解我吧

所有故事我都相信, 你不妨問問湯SIR, 我的確在投資不少"故事"概念
130 : GS(14)@2011-07-19 22:34:50

宏橋的大趨勢...興發的科技發展突破和老闆的理念、以及國企入股，還有一隻我還少說了，這隻我認為不好
131 : GS(14)@2011-07-19 22:35:37

我都向緊你學習ga
132 : wanker44(12796)@2011-07-19 22:36:41

雖然概念十足, 不過話事人的確會有所影響
133 : 仙(13368)@2011-07-19 22:38:33

128樓提及
127樓提及
合股时2.4，现在1.76还继续加仓？说实话我不太认识港股，不然也不会向各位求教，看到的却是有人欺世盗名，总言之也到此为止了88
由他去吧，不信就是不信，信，他也下了注，輸了錢吧 若果你懂的，就多講
我就是不懂，所以栽在此股身上。但我懂的是趋势投资，也知道H股的银行股可估值较高，所以便来探问究竟。一只趋势向下的股还买，算了吧。
134 : GS(14)@2011-07-19 22:38:43

132樓提及
雖然概念十足, 不過話事人的確會有所影響


我都覺得印得太多股票...話事人又玩咁多財技，但我都覺得是真心做的，不過我自己都是睇戲
135 : 鉛筆小生(8153)@2011-07-19 22:38:58

130樓提及
宏橋的大趨勢...興發的科技發展突破和老闆的理念、以及國企入股，還有一隻我還少說了，這隻我認為不好


那隻真係只有概念, 所以我不想公開

一向都是信則有, 不信則無

投資談的是基本因素, 沒有基本就全是投機

投機蝕本通常面對兩個情況
1. 止蝕離場
2. 繼續蝕
136 : GS(14)@2011-07-19 22:39:18

133樓提及
128樓提及
127樓提及
合股时2.4，现在1.76还继续加仓？说实话我不太认识港股，不然也不会向各位求教，看到的却是有人欺世盗名，总言之也到此为止了88
由他去吧，不信就是不信，信，他也下了注，輸了錢吧 若果你懂的，就多講
我就是不懂，所以栽在此股身上。但我懂的是趋势投资，也知道H股的银行股可估值较高，所以便来探问究竟。一只趋势向下的股还买，算了吧。


但是A股更平，為何不買平的東西，過來買貴的?
137 : 鉛筆小生(8153)@2011-07-19 22:41:24

136樓提及
133樓提及
128樓提及
127樓提及
合股时2.4，现在1.76还继续加仓？说实话我不太认识港股，不然也不会向各位求教，看到的却是有人欺世盗名，总言之也到此为止了88
由他去吧，不信就是不信，信，他也下了注，輸了錢吧 若果你懂的，就多講
我就是不懂，所以栽在此股身上。但我懂的是趋势投资，也知道H股的银行股可估值较高，所以便来探问究竟。一只趋势向下的股还买，算了吧。


但是A股更平，為何不買平的東西，過來買貴的?



趋势買股, 一定是1171, 而不是663

為何不跟趋势, 捨其易而其難?
138 : 仙(13368)@2011-07-19 22:42:22

136樓提及
133樓提及
128樓提及
127樓提及
合股时2.4，现在1.76还继续加仓？说实话我不太认识港股，不然也不会向各位求教，看到的却是有人欺世盗名，总言之也到此为止了88
由他去吧，不信就是不信，信，他也下了注，輸了錢吧 若果你懂的，就多講
我就是不懂，所以栽在此股身上。但我懂的是趋势投资，也知道H股的银行股可估值较高，所以便来探问究竟。一只趋势向下的股还买，算了吧。
但是A股更平，為何不買平的東西，過來買貴的?
不炒就是不炒。
139 : GS(14)@2011-07-19 22:42:50

138樓提及
136樓提及
133樓提及
128樓提及
127樓提及
合股时2.4，现在1.76还继续加仓？说实话我不太认识港股，不然也不会向各位求教，看到的却是有人欺世盗名，总言之也到此为止了88
由他去吧，不信就是不信，信，他也下了注，輸了錢吧 若果你懂的，就多講
我就是不懂，所以栽在此股身上。但我懂的是趋势投资，也知道H股的银行股可估值较高，所以便来探问究竟。一只趋势向下的股还买，算了吧。
但是A股更平，為何不買平的東西，過來買貴的?
不炒就是不炒。


要炒嘛，應該買些貨源歸邊的新股呢
140 : 仙(13368)@2011-07-19 22:44:30

138樓提及
136樓提及
133樓提及
128樓提及
127樓提及
合股时2.4，现在1.76还继续加仓？说实话我不太认识港股，不然也不会向各位求教，看到的却是有人欺世盗名，总言之也到此为止了88
由他去吧，不信就是不信，信，他也下了注，輸了錢吧 若果你懂的，就多講
我就是不懂，所以栽在此股身上。但我懂的是趋势投资，也知道H股的银行股可估值较高，所以便来探问究竟。一只趋势向下的股还买，算了吧。
但是A股更平，為何不買平的東西，過來買貴的?
不炒就是不炒。
还有你这边的网页很难进入的。
141 : 鉛筆小生(8153)@2011-07-19 22:45:43

139樓提及
138樓提及
136樓提及
133樓提及
128樓提及
127樓提及
合股时2.4，现在1.76还继续加仓？说实话我不太认识港股，不然也不会向各位求教，看到的却是有人欺世盗名，总言之也到此为止了88
由他去吧，不信就是不信，信，他也下了注，輸了錢吧 若果你懂的，就多講
我就是不懂，所以栽在此股身上。但我懂的是趋势投资，也知道H股的银行股可估值较高，所以便来探问究竟。一只趋势向下的股还买，算了吧。
但是A股更平，為何不買平的東西，過來買貴的?
不炒就是不炒。


要炒嘛，應該買些貨源歸邊的新股呢


1181,1241,1150是個好例子
142 : GS(14)@2011-07-19 22:46:48

還有一些嚴重破底的新股，515、3823是例子
143 : 仙(13368)@2011-07-19 22:47:15

139樓提及
138樓提及
136樓提及
133樓提及
128樓提及
127樓提及
合股时2.4，现在1.76还继续加仓？说实话我不太认识港股，不然也不会向各位求教，看到的却是有人欺世盗名，总言之也到此为止了88
由他去吧，不信就是不信，信，他也下了注，輸了錢吧 若果你懂的，就多講
我就是不懂，所以栽在此股身上。但我懂的是趋势投资，也知道H股的银行股可估值较高，所以便来探问究竟。一只趋势向下的股还买，算了吧。
但是A股更平，為何不買平的東西，過來買貴的?
不炒就是不炒。
要炒嘛，應該買些貨源歸邊的新股呢
不敢買，那些股票很容易输钱的。
144 : GS(14)@2011-07-19 22:47:44

又不是的，抽新股可以做融資嘛
145 : 鉛筆小生(8153)@2011-07-19 22:47:46

142樓提及
還有一些嚴重破底的新股，515、3823是例子


對, 515 真的幾甜
146 : GS(14)@2011-07-19 22:48:08

用融資來抽股，不是叫你在二手市場買呢
147 : GS(14)@2011-07-19 22:48:46

145樓提及
142樓提及
還有一些嚴重破底的新股，515、3823是例子


對, 515 真的幾甜


呢隻當年30幾仙我都猶疑過一陣，不過呢D算數啦
148 : wanker44(12796)@2011-07-19 22:50:12

133樓提及
128樓提及
127樓提及
合股时2.4，现在1.76还继续加仓？说实话我不太认识港股，不然也不会向各位求教，看到的却是有人欺世盗名，总言之也到此为止了88
由他去吧，不信就是不信，信，他也下了注，輸了錢吧 若果你懂的，就多講
我就是不懂，所以栽在此股身上。但我懂的是趋势投资，也知道H股的银行股可估值较高，所以便来探问究竟。一只趋势向下的股还买，算了吧。


唔好信什麼趨勢炒股, 股仔既嘢, 只要仲有故仔同概念, 隨時再開車爆。呢隻概念都好, 不過佢印股票比d人就...太狠
149 : GS(14)@2011-07-19 22:51:24

最緊要市值細，股權集中，邪人一個最多就夠
150 : 鉛筆小生(8153)@2011-07-19 22:52:23

148樓提及
133樓提及
128樓提及
127樓提及
合股时2.4，现在1.76还继续加仓？说实话我不太认识港股，不然也不会向各位求教，看到的却是有人欺世盗名，总言之也到此为止了88
由他去吧，不信就是不信，信，他也下了注，輸了錢吧 若果你懂的，就多講
我就是不懂，所以栽在此股身上。但我懂的是趋势投资，也知道H股的银行股可估值较高，所以便来探问究竟。一只趋势向下的股还买，算了吧。


唔好信什麼趨勢炒股, 股仔既嘢, 只要仲有故仔同概念, 隨時再開車爆。呢隻概念都好, 不過佢印股票比d人就...太狠


趨勢炒股其實值得學, 不過最好放在成交量大既1-2線股

494, 1211, 1171, 3323 呢D 應該用趨勢炒股

幾時成勢, 幾時轉勢等
151 : wanker44(12796)@2011-07-19 22:52:33

141樓提及
139樓提及
138樓提及
136樓提及
133樓提及
128樓提及
127樓提及
合股时2.4，现在1.76还继续加仓？说实话我不太认识港股，不然也不会向各位求教，看到的却是有人欺世盗名，总言之也到此为止了88
由他去吧，不信就是不信，信，他也下了注，輸了錢吧 若果你懂的，就多講
我就是不懂，所以栽在此股身上。但我懂的是趋势投资，也知道H股的银行股可估值较高，所以便来探问究竟。一只趋势向下的股还买，算了吧。
但是A股更平，為何不買平的東西，過來買貴的?
不炒就是不炒。
要炒嘛，應該買些貨源歸邊的新股呢
1181,1241,1150是個好例子


3777都可以考慮
152 : GS(14)@2011-07-19 22:53:22

174呢?
153 : 鉛筆小生(8153)@2011-07-19 22:54:23

151樓提及
141樓提及
139樓提及
138樓提及
136樓提及
133樓提及
128樓提及
127樓提及
合股时2.4，现在1.76还继续加仓？说实话我不太认识港股，不然也不会向各位求教，看到的却是有人欺世盗名，总言之也到此为止了88
由他去吧，不信就是不信，信，他也下了注，輸了錢吧 若果你懂的，就多講
我就是不懂，所以栽在此股身上。但我懂的是趋势投资，也知道H股的银行股可估值较高，所以便来探问究竟。一只趋势向下的股还买，算了吧。
但是A股更平，為何不買平的東西，過來買貴的?
不炒就是不炒。
要炒嘛，應該買些貨源歸邊的新股呢
1181,1241,1150是個好例子


3777都可以考慮


未研究, 但聽朋友講預期PE 低,
呢行業前景好

我倒想等877來研究光通信是什麼一回事
154 : 仙(13368)@2011-07-19 22:54:38

148樓提及
133樓提及
128樓提及
127樓提及
合股时2.4，现在1.76还继续加仓？说实话我不太认识港股，不然也不会向各位求教，看到的却是有人欺世盗名，总言之也到此为止了88
由他去吧，不信就是不信，信，他也下了注，輸了錢吧 若果你懂的，就多講
我就是不懂，所以栽在此股身上。但我懂的是趋势投资，也知道H股的银行股可估值较高，所以便来探问究竟。一只趋势向下的股还买，算了吧。
唔好信什麼趨勢炒股, 股仔既嘢, 只要仲有故仔同概念, 隨時再開車爆。呢隻概念都好, 不過佢印股票比d人就...太狠
买股仔一定要有勢头，那有越卖越便宜。
155 : GS(14)@2011-07-19 22:54:46

3777是好爛的假數股
156 : 仙(13368)@2011-07-19 22:56:13

149樓提及
最緊要市值細，股權集中，邪人一個最多就夠
不尽认同。
157 : wanker44(12796)@2011-07-19 22:56:17

153樓提及
151樓提及
141樓提及
139樓提及
138樓提及
136樓提及
133樓提及
128樓提及
127樓提及
合股时2.4，现在1.76还继续加仓？说实话我不太认识港股，不然也不会向各位求教，看到的却是有人欺世盗名，总言之也到此为止了88
由他去吧，不信就是不信，信，他也下了注，輸了錢吧 若果你懂的，就多講
我就是不懂，所以栽在此股身上。但我懂的是趋势投资，也知道H股的银行股可估值较高，所以便来探问究竟。一只趋势向下的股还买，算了吧。
但是A股更平，為何不買平的東西，過來買貴的?
不炒就是不炒。
要炒嘛，應該買些貨源歸邊的新股呢
1181,1241,1150是個好例子
3777都可以考慮
未研究, 但聽朋友講預期PE 低, 呢行業前景好 我倒想等877來研究光通信是什麼一回事


我only知 3777 冇乜街貨...
158 : GS(14)@2011-07-19 22:56:46

156樓提及
149樓提及
最緊要市值細，股權集中，邪人一個最多就夠
不尽认同。


為何呢?
159 : sunshine(3090)@2011-07-19 22:57:00

6828 should also be considered. the current drop is because of the sale of the 2nd major shareholder, who is just the business partner of the printing company. By the time he sell all its share, the company should be able to rebound as the net asset per share of the company is about HK$1.3. The 2nd major shareholder now only owns about 2-3 % since last week's record. smiley
160 : GS(14)@2011-07-19 22:57:56

159樓提及
6828 should also be considered. the current drop is because of the sale of the 2nd major shareholder, who is just the business partner of the printing company. By the time he sell all its share, the company should be able to rebound as the net asset per share of the company is about HK$1.3. The 2nd major shareholder now only owns about 2-3 % since last week's record. smiley


http://realforum.zkiz.com/thread.php?tid=21875
161 : GS(14)@2011-07-19 22:58:30

http://realforum.zkiz.com/thread.php?tid=20985
3777 資料
162 : 仙(13368)@2011-07-19 22:58:41

158樓提及
156樓提及
149樓提及
最緊要市值細，股權集中，邪人一個最多就夠
不尽认同。
為何呢?
盘子太虚，太易操控。
163 : GS(14)@2011-07-19 22:59:22

就是易操控，又沒人買，這樣就要拉升了，量太多反而沒戲
164 : 鉛筆小生(8153)@2011-07-19 23:01:31

162樓提及
158樓提及
156樓提及
149樓提及
最緊要市值細，股權集中，邪人一個最多就夠
不尽认同。
為何呢?
盘子太虚，太易操控。


量大更是易被操控

330, 1211 當年不是被"操控"嗎
165 : 仙(13368)@2011-07-19 23:01:51

163樓提及
就是易操控，又沒人買，這樣就要拉升了，量太多反而沒戲
还有难以抛售。你还有在新浪那边更新吗？这边不是常能进入的。
166 : 鉛筆小生(8153)@2011-07-19 23:03:37

165樓提及
163樓提及
就是易操控，又沒人買，這樣就要拉升了，量太多反而沒戲
还有难以抛售。你还有在新浪那边更新吗？这边不是常能进入的。


他在談 進入及退出機制
167 : 仙(13368)@2011-07-19 23:06:23

这边常显示：
无法显示网页
您正在查找的页当前不可用。 网站可能遇到支持问题，或者您需要 调整您的浏览器设置。
要试图修复网络连接问题，请单击 工具，然后单击“诊断连接问题...”


其他选项:

单击 刷新按钮，或稍后重试。
>
如果您已经在地址栏中输入该网页的地址， 请确认其拼写正确。

要检查您的网络连接，请单击工具菜单，然后单击 Internet 选项。在连接选项卡上，单击设置。 设置必须与您的局域网(LAN)管理员或 Internet 服务供应商(ISP)提供的一致。
查看您的 Internet 连接设置是否正确被检测。您可能设置让 Microsoft Windows 检查您的网站并自动发现网络连接设置(如果您的网络管理员已经启用此设置)。
单击工具菜单，然后单击 Internet 选项。
在连接选项卡上，单击 LAN 设置。
选择自动检测设置，然后单击确定。
某些站点要求 128 位连接安全。单击帮助菜单，然后单击关于 Internet Explorer 可以查看您所安装的安全强度。
如果您要访问某安全站点，请确保您的安全设置能够支持。请单击工具菜单，然后单击 Internet 选项。在“高级”选项卡上，滚动到“安全”部分，复选 SSL 2.0、SSL 3.0、TLS 1.0、PCT 1.0 设置。
单击上一步按钮，尝试其他链接。



找不到服务器或 DNS 错误
Internet Explorer
168 : 鉛筆小生(8153)@2011-07-19 23:08:06

首先要想想, 自己的量有多大
一萬起五萬止, 低流通股都通常走得到

談到幾十萬, 幾百萬, 什至幾千萬

我倒不認為拿去炒呢D 股票

風險還要比牛熊更為高
169 : 鉛筆小生(8153)@2011-07-19 23:16:20

從仙這位內地人既話語中, 我想SOUP 兄可以看看一個好重要既課題該是

"潛伏" 與 "炒賣"


何時做股票的潛伏, 何時跟風炒賣 何時做退出機制

就如凱雷等, 退出就是IPO

然而我們卻在他們退出後進場或潛伏, 什至跟風炒賣


如果將某些股份既故分析出來, 我覺得會更受內地客歡迎
170 : GS(14)@2011-07-19 23:18:11

166樓提及
165樓提及
163樓提及
就是易操控，又沒人買，這樣就要拉升了，量太多反而沒戲
还有难以抛售。你还有在新浪那边更新吗？这边不是常能进入的。


他在談 進入及退出機制


這個不難，小肥羊是好例子
171 : 鉛筆小生(8153)@2011-07-19 23:19:47

170樓提及
166樓提及
165樓提及
163樓提及
就是易操控，又沒人買，這樣就要拉升了，量太多反而沒戲
还有难以抛售。你还有在新浪那边更新吗？这边不是常能进入的。


他在談 進入及退出機制


這個不難，小肥羊是好例子


我倒聽到D 場的某位朋友說,
小肥羊是美資買的, 所以不被紅旗
172 : 仙(13368)@2011-07-19 23:20:13

除了在这里， 汤先生还有在别的地方更新文章吗？小妹的邮箱地址是[email protected]
173 : 鉛筆小生(8153)@2011-07-19 23:27:26

剛找的:

968 IPO 2008年, 剛三年
http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... TN20080602007_C.HTM

大股東持股>3成
http://sdinotice.hkex.com.hk/di/ ... 8&src=MAIN&lang=ZH&

股權集中

首席財務官, 執行董事及授權代表變更
http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... TN20100920293_C.pdf


執行董事及首席運營官辭任
http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... TN20091201954_C.pdf

售股股東完成出售事項及委任非執行董事
http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... TN20091119276_C.PDF

還有不少, 為何不被紅旗?
174 : GS(14)@2011-07-19 23:31:10

172樓提及
除了在这里， 汤先生还有在别的地方更新文章吗？小妹的邮箱地址是[email protected]


這兒有不定期更新
http://space.wolun.com.cn/18640/
175 : GS(14)@2011-07-19 23:32:03

財政不錯，沒債券，Moody那些全部有的
176 : GS(14)@2011-07-25 23:07:49

http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... TN20110725270_C.pdf
根據買 賣協議，買方已同意購入而賣方已同意出售銷售股份，即目標公司之9 0 %股本權
益，代價為人民幣500,000,000元（ 相當於約602,410,000港元（）可予調整），而賣方已保證裕
興礦業將無償向買方轉讓轉讓股份，即目標公司之10 %股本權益。

..

(a) 倘 實 際 溢 利 相 等 於 或 超 過 人 民 幣 5 4 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 元（ 相 當 於 約 6 5 , 0 6 0 , 0 0 0 港 元 （）「 保 證 溢
利」），餘款將為人民幣100,000,000元（ 相當於約120,480,000港元）；或
(b) 倘實際溢利少於人民幣54,000,000元，餘款將按以 下算式計算：
人民幣100,000,000元 x（ 實際溢利╱人民幣54,000,000元）
於此情況下，餘款將 少於人民幣100,000,000元。

...

有關目標公司之背景資料
目標公司為一家於二零 零六年十二月十五日在中國成立之有限公司，主要從事生 產及銷售
煤炭。目標公司目前 分 別由賣方及裕興礦業擁有90 %及10 %股本權益。
地點及運輸
目 標 公 司 目 前 擁 有 及 經 營 位 於 中 國 內 蒙 古 鄂 爾 多 斯 市 之 煤 礦 ， 其 許 可 範 圍 為 8 . 3 9 6 平 公 方
里。煤礦距離東勝區約46公里，而東勝區正是本集團目前擁有及經營之鄂爾多斯市恒泰煤
礦之所在 地。煤礦鄰近已建設之道路及鐵路基建，方便於區內及 區外運 送煤炭。煤礦連接
國道109及210，並鄰近包神鐵路。
採礦權
煤礦之採礦許可證編號為1500000830688，將於二零一 一年十二月三十一日到期，採礦面積
為8.396平方公里，而核准產能為0.6百萬噸╱年。煤礦之技術升級已於近日完成，目前正等
待中國相關政府機關批准將煤礦之核准產能提升至0.9百萬噸╱年。預期上述批准將於二零
一 一年第四季授出。
產品及資源量
煤礦生 產熱值達5,000千 卡╱千克以 上 之動 力煤，主要用於發電。根據依照中國規則編製之
《內蒙古燎原煤業有限責任公司煤礦生 產地質報告》，於二零一零年十月，煤礦蘊藏約3.14
百萬噸1 2 1 b 及1 2 2 b 類別之資源量╱ 儲量以及約1 2 . 6 5百萬 噸3 3 3 類別之資源量 ╱儲量。董事
相信，將於煤礦進行之額外勘探工程會進一步令333類別（ 相等於JORC規則項下 之推斷資源
量）之資源量╱儲量提升至121b及122b類別（ 相等於JORC規則項下 之探明及控制資源量）。


「目標公司」 指 內蒙古燎原煤業有限責任公司，一家於中國成立之公司，分 別
由賣方及裕興礦業擁有90 %及10 %股本權

「賣方」或「上海昆塔納」指 上海昆塔納投資管理中心，一家於中國註冊成立之有限合夥公司
177 : 鉛筆小生(8153)@2011-07-25 23:19:18

慢慢地併購smiley
178 : GS(14)@2011-07-26 21:54:40

有時間幫你找找這家 上海昆塔納投資管理中心，不過我認為只是過過手吧
179 : fineram(806)@2011-08-04 19:34:55

盈喜

http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... TN20110804832_C.pdf

根據對本集團之未經審核綜合管理賬目作出之初步審閱，預計與截至二零一零年六月三十日止六個月之淨虧損比較，本集團於截至二零一 一年六月三十日止六個月錄得之業績顯著好轉
180 : greatsoup38(830)@2011-08-04 20:57:46

預計於截至二零一 一年六月三十日止六個月轉虧為盈主要由於(i)本集團之採煤業務所帶來之收益大幅增加及(ii)本公司在二零 零九年十二月所發行之可換股票據（「二零 零九年可換股票據」）於截至二零一零年六月三十日止六個月錄得公平值虧損，惟自二零一零年十二月對二零 零九年可換股票據之條款作出修訂後並無二零 零九年可換股票據之公平值變動所致。

建議睇埋業績，如果呢個業績賺到3億的話，間公司PE低過10倍，如果盤數唔假的話，值得留意下
181 : goodyear(10616)@2011-08-08 12:18:30

市差, 有盈喜都冇用
182 : GS(14)@2011-08-08 22:26:35

隻股都是有點問題
183 : GS(14)@2011-08-24 22:51:11

http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... TN20110823572_C.pdf
因利息支出提升，業績倒退，扣採礦權，實際負資產

業績概要
— 收 益 為 5 3 2 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 港 元（ 二 零 一 零 年 ︰ 3 7 4 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 港 元 ）— 大 幅 增 長 1 5 8 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 港
元( + 42 % )。
— 毛 利 為 2 4 4 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 港 元（ 二 零 一 零 年 ︰ 1 8 9 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 港 元 ）— 增 加 5 5 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 港 元
（ + 29 %）。
— 本公司擁有人應佔溢利為94,000,000港元（ 二零一零年︰虧損522,000,000港元 ），大幅
轉虧為盈616,000,000港元。
— 未計利息、稅項、折舊及攤銷之盈利1
為363,000,000港元（ 二零一零年︰237,000,000港
元）— 增加126,000,000港元（ + 53 % ）。
— 二零一 一年上半年之產量︰2 , 2 0 0 , 0 0 0 噸（ 二零一零年：1 , 5 0 0 , 0 0 0 噸 ）—增加7 0 0 , 0 0 0噸
（ + 47 %）。

...
未來展望
今 年 上 半 年 ， 火 電 、 鋼 鐵 、 建 材 等 主 要 下 游 行 業 保 持 高 增 長 ， 再 加 上 隨 保 障 房 的 提 速 開
工，以及高耗 能行業的持續反彈，將拉動煤炭需求繼 續旺盛。下半年內地電煤需求開始進
入高峰期，華中及華東地區對電力的需求增長會隨居民大量使用空調而明顯增加，尤其是
今年在水電供應不足下，火電使用率因而上升亦增加電煤的需求。在內地經濟穩定發展趨
勢下，未來數年內地對煤炭需求將持續增加，煤炭價格亦將繼 續上升，相信能幫助公司在
未來的定價上取得優勢。在煤炭供應方面，下半年內蒙等省份新一輪資源整合進入實質性
實施階段，供應或會較為緊張。市場對高品質、貨源穩定之煤炭需求增加，亦有利於集團
未來在煤炭行業之發展。
隨著集團及各 員工的共同努 力，金山能源在內蒙古的業務已上正軌，今年上半年的產能亦
比去年同期大幅增加。集團亦成功收購位於集團原有之恒泰煤礦毗鄰之燎原煤礦，收購完
成後，集團的產能進一步提升。此項收購為金山能源在內蒙古擴張業務的第一步，集團將
通 過持續收購及業務發展，銳意壯大其在內蒙古的市場份額，並力爭於資源整合中擔當舉
足輕重的角色，以擴充及整合其他內蒙古的小煤礦。
除了現有煤炭開採業務，金山能源亦會增強其縱向產業鏈，開發上游及下游的業務。與中
鐵能源組成聯盟可節省運輸物流成本，繼而提高利潤，最終將為本集團帶來碑益。另外，
中信 信託將為本集團併購煤礦資源及開發其他清潔能源時提供全方位的財務支持。金山能
源成功取得與兩間國內知名企業合作機會，全乃管理層的強大業務網 絡及策略性之部署，
這些將有利集團未來在上游及下游業務的 發展。
而在橫向產業鏈的業務發展方面，金山能源亦會不斷加強自身發展能力，加大原有煤礦的
產能並找尋適合集團發展及擴張的併購機會，加強管理、營運及建設之成本效益。同時，
金山能源亦會放眼中國其他地區，包括山西、貴州及內蒙古等省份，積極尋找更多併購發
展機會，將產品多元化發展，包括焦 煤及無 煙 煤等。
金山能源的煤炭業務發展良好，而策略性之部署亦漸見成效。本公司將把握行業機遇，積
極尋求戰略合作夥伴，增加公司的競爭力及收入來源，打造公司成為中國煤礦開採業中領
先的多元化煤炭企業。富經驗的管理團隊、人脈網 絡及已建立銷售管道，並配合與各策略
性夥伴產 生之協同效應，相信將帶領金山能源在煤炭業脫穎而出。我們會繼 續公司的 發展
方針，以穩定務實的步伐，成為多元化煤礦企業，以為各股東爭取最大的回報。
184 : J J(1180)@2011-08-25 00:00:00

今日已經一股不留  斬哂
185 : GS(14)@2011-08-25 07:35:10

好失望
186 : 鉛筆小生(8153)@2011-08-25 11:32:36

盤數比想像中失望
187 : J J(1180)@2011-08-25 19:57:58

最差係個山東煤礦好似無哂聲氣 提得嗰幾句 似傾唔掂 而家咁多平煤股.................
188 : 鉛筆小生(8153)@2011-08-25 21:18:40

639,1088,1171 好平
189 : GS(14)@2011-08-25 21:24:44

我看好1171
190 : CHAUCHAU(1254)@2011-09-26 19:46:36

http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... TN20110926462_C.pdf
可換股債券於二零一一年九月二十四日到期，而尚未行使之可換股債券已於二零一一年
九月二十六日按照可換股債券之條款獲全數贖回。
191 : GS(14)@2011-12-12 23:00:30

http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... TN20111212550_C.pdf
993原價買晒663的全部未兌換CB，並全部換股，成為公司主要股東，就是當年恆泰那礦發的CB，趙明可能真是人頭，看他賣給那些人的CB全部都是同一類的...

http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... TN20090923564_C.pdf

http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... TN20111201649_C.pdf
192 : J J(1180)@2011-12-26 17:58:15

想請教湯兄點解天行要咁做呢 1.25喎
193 : greatsoup38(830)@2011-12-26 18:06:37

可能有人需要錢吧，他近排有間匯力資源要上市
194 : J J(1180)@2011-12-26 18:27:30

王大x 等錢使 993應該可以折讓價入㗎 點解要溢價入咁蝕底嘅 睇得663咁好 唔明
195 : greatsoup38(830)@2011-12-26 18:29:44

194樓提及
王大 等錢使 993應該可以折讓價入㗎 點解要溢價入咁蝕底嘅 睇得663咁好 唔明


可能那些錢有部分要交番畀人呢?
196 : J J(1180)@2011-12-26 18:37:45

哦 唔怪得上到0.8x 上唔倒啦 唔該湯兄
197 : GS(14)@2012-01-11 22:15:50

http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... TN20120109347_C.pdf
so poison...
金山能源集團有限公司（「本公司」）之董事（「董事」）會（「董事會」）謹此宣佈，自二零一二年
一月九日起，李智華先生（「李先生」）已獲委任為獨立非執行董事。

李先生，39歲，為英國特許公認會計師公會資深會員及香港會計師公會會員。李先生於核
數、會計及財務方面積逾豐富經驗。李先生現為中國公共醫療（控股）有限公司（股份代
號：8116）及科地農業控股有限公司（股份代號：8153）（兩者均於香港聯合交易所有限公司
創業板上市）的獨立非執行董事。
198 : GS(14)@2012-03-07 23:58:13

http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... TN20120307768_C.pdf
金山能源集團有限公司（「本公司」，連同其附屬公司統稱「本集團」）董事（「董事」）會（「董事
會」）近期注意到，趙明先生（「趙先生」）及朱利平先生（「朱先生」）均牽涉一宗由美國證券交
易委員會（「SEC」）就涉嫌挪用Puda Coal, Inc（.「Puda」）的資產（即其於山西普大煤業集團有限
公司（「山西普大」）間接90%權益）而向彼等提出的訴訟（「訴訟」）。
董事會謹此強調，趙先生或朱先生均非本集團任何成員公司的董事或員工，且本集團及本
集團員工（包括董事）與該訴訟概無牽涉。趙先生為本公司於二零零九年發行於二零一四年
到期本金額為50,000,000港元可換股票據（「可換股票據」）之持有人，惟已簽訂協議將其全部
可換股票據向天行國際（控股）有限公司（於香港上市之公司，股份代號：993）出售。據董
事經作出一切合理查詢後所深知、全悉及確信，於本公告日期，趙先生及朱先生並無於本
公司之股份、相關股份及債券中擁有根據香港法例第571章證券及期貨條例第XV部定義而
須予披露之權益。
董事會確認，本集團與趙先生、朱先生、Puda或山西普大概無業務關係。然而，趙先生及
山西普大已就於本公司截至二零一一年六月三十日止六個月中期報告所披露之若干銀行貸
款向本集團作出擔保。截至本公告日期，董事會並無知悉由各銀行提供的貸款因該訴訟而
受到不利影響，亦不預期該訴訟將對本集團業務及營運構成任何重大不利影響。
199 : P4EVER(23901)@2012-03-13 00:52:19

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RIbOp0w6
Is Shanxi Puda Coal issuing misleading PRs in the PRC to restore its reputation?

山西普大煤业煤炭在中国，以恢复其声誉发出误导性陈述？
200 : GS(14)@2012-04-07 12:53:03

This video shows you the relation about PUDA and 663
201 : GS(14)@2012-07-28 13:34:50

http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... TN20120727667_C.pdf
本公司董事會（「董事會」）謹此知會本公司股東及有意投資人士，根據本集團未經審核管理
賬目之初步審閱，預期與二零一一年同期比較，本集團將於截至二零一二年六月三十日止
六個月期間（「期間」）錄得溢利減少或錄得虧損，此乃由於期間內煤炭產量及煤炭平均售價
同時下跌，以及若干資產可能產生減值損失，導致收益下降所致。
202 : 鉛筆小生(8153)@2012-07-31 14:00:02

煤一退色, 呢D變身股變返爛殼
203 : GS(14)@2012-07-31 17:38:51

隻野連D礦都是怪怪地，好似405 那種模式
204 : 鉛筆小生(8153)@2012-07-31 17:56:03

203樓提及
隻野連D礦都是怪怪地，好似405 那種模式

405 那種模式?? IFC??
205 : GS(14)@2012-07-31 17:57:01

204樓提及
203樓提及
隻野連D礦都是怪怪地，好似405 那種模式

405 那種模式?? IFC??


其實他注D礦同中信D信託有關...都是信託套現手段
206 : GS(14)@2012-08-31 12:02:45

http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... TN20120830952_C.PDF
盈利增20%，至6,000萬，超重債

收益
本集團錄得總收益約396,000,000港元（截至二零一一年六月三十日止期間：532,000,000港
元），較上一比較期間減少26%。期內，恒泰及燎原（該公司乃於二零一一年八月被本集團
收購）之收益貢獻分別約為2 8 3 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 港元（ 截至二零一一年六月三十日止期間：
532,000,000港元）及113,000,000港元。
期內，產自恒泰及燎原的原煤平均售價（「平均售價」）分別約為每噸人民幣140元（截至二零
一一年六月三十日止期間：人民幣206元）及人民幣243元。期內，恒泰及燎原錄得銷售量
分別約1,640,000噸（截至二零一一年六月三十日止期間：2,200,000噸）及380,000噸。平均售
價及銷售量均有所減少，乃由於期內中國經濟放慢，大大打擊煤炭市場以致需求疲弱所
致。
銷售成本
銷售成本主要包括折舊與攤銷、生產薪金及相關勞工成本、稅項、供應、公用事業及其他
與生產相關之連帶開支。期內，銷售成本約為356,800,000港元（截至二零一一年六月三十日
止期間：288,700,000港元），較上一比較期間增加24%。該增加主要由於燎原期內產生銷售
成本約109,000,000港元所致。
毛利及毛利率
整體毛利自去年約244,000,000港元減至約39,000,000港元。恒泰之毛利率為12%，而截至二
零一一年六月三十日止六個月則為46%。期內，燎原錄得毛利率3.5%。有關顯著減少乃由
於上述之期內平均售價下降所致。
...
所得稅
期內， 所得稅抵免約為180,500,000 港元（ 截至二零一一年六月三十日止期間： 開支
43,900,000港元），為恒泰及燎原產生之經營溢利之稅項撥備約19,900,000港元（截至二零一
一年六月三十日止期間：73,300,000港元），已被遞延稅項撥回約200,400,000港元（截至二零
一一年六月三十日止期間：29,400,000港元）所抵銷。期內並無作出香港利得稅撥備。
...
未來展望
展望二零一二年下半年，全球經濟環境預期仍然不穩。在保持經濟穩步發展的同時，中國
政府將繼續採納緊縮政策，藉著遏制石油及煤炭價格升勢壓抑國內通脹情況。然而，由於
中國的耗能架構仍以煤炭為主要原材料，故本集團對煤炭行業的長遠前景感到樂觀。
動力煤市場
自二零一二年八月起，國內動力煤儲量徐徐回落，呈現市場好轉的先兆。由於發電廠將不
斷消耗煤儲量，故預期本年度旺季所顯現的影響將較淺薄。第三季的預計煤產量維持穩
定，並可預見供求情況將於第四季重回正軌。
產品組合
藉著去年收購燎原，本集團的煤炭資源得以增加，並能豐富產品組合以銷售高熱值原煤。
恒泰選煤廠計劃於二零一三年投產；屆時，本集團的產品種類將更趨多元化，由原煤以至
潔淨煤，預期可提升利潤率。
深化擴展
本集團明白到，充實的煤炭資源對長期可持續發展的重要性，故將採取措施趕快就毗鄰燎
原的潛在新礦場提出申請。與此同時，本集團將積極探索優質的併購項目，務求擴充本集
團的煤炭資源及生產規模。
財務流動性
考慮到日後的流動性，本集團將與中港兩地多家大型銀行聯手集資以應付未來發展所需。
本集團亦將致力維持貿易應收及應付賬款穩健周轉。同時，本集團將於適當時候進行股本
集資活動及引進優秀的長期投資者，以進一步鞏固其資金基礎。
207 : 自動波人(1313)@2012-10-17 22:25:13

真係估唔到,

北大青鳥買野,0.45認購1,555,555,000股,佔擴大股本後52.12%,取得控股權

http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... TN20121017547_C.pdf
208 : GS(14)@2012-10-17 22:26:43

認購事項原因及所得款項用途
本集團目前從事開採及銷售煤之業務。
如本公司於截至二零一一年十二月三十一日止年度之年報內披露，本集團之流動負債淨額
約為1,259,000,000港元。如本公司截至二零一二年六月三十日止六個月之中期報告內披露，
本集團於二零一二年六月三十日之未經審核流動負債淨額約為1,363,000,000港元。本集團繼
續經營之能力因重大不明朗因素而顯著存疑。儘管預期本集團自採煤業務所產生之淨經營
現金流入仍然足以支付其到期負債及資本承諾，惟於並無取得外部融資之情況下，本集團
之財務狀況難以大幅改善。
董事已考慮其他如供股等集資方法。然而，鑒於本集團近日之股份買賣價格及融資需要，
根據上市規則之規定聘請任何包銷商以全面包銷供股存在困難。董事亦曾考慮債務融資，
惟以本集團目前之財務狀況，難以覓得任何財務機構以本公司可負擔之條款借出該筆融資
金額。
基於上述原因，本公司認為找到新股本融資乃本公司當務之急，根據特別授權進行配售乃
本公司最切實可行之選擇。認購方進行之認購事項為本公司提供一個良好機遇，以籌集長
期股權基金，償還其未償負債、為其經營提供資金、改善本公司之財務狀況及尋找適當之
投資機會（倘適用）。此外，董事有信心認購方將為本公司帶來額外資源及投資機會，對本
公司及股東整體而言均有利。經考慮上述所有因素後方行訂立認購協議，董事（不包括將
於聽取獨立財務顧問有關認購事項之條款及清洗豁免公平合理性之意見後方表達意見之獨
立董事委員會成員）認為，進行認購事項符合本公司及股東之整體利益。
由於認購事項須獲獨立股東批准，獨立股東可於考慮獨立董事委員會（經獨立財務顧問建
議）之意見後，就認購事項之相關決議案自行決定如何投票。
認購事項之所得款項淨額（經扣除所有相關開支之後）約為663,000,000港元，擬用於(i)償還
本集團負債；(ii)日後倘有合適機遇時就新收購事項或業務機會作出投資及(iii)本集團之一
般營運資金。
認購方之背景及資料
認購方為於開曼群島註冊成立之獲豁免有限公司，其擬成為基金之一般合夥人。認購方之
控股股東為: (i)北京北大青鳥環宇科技股份有限公司（其已發行H股於聯交所創業板上市（股
票編號：8095），而其主要業務為研究、開發、製造、市場推廣及銷售無線消防報警系統及
相關產品、發展旅遊及休閒業務及投資控股）之全資附屬公司北大青鳥環宇科技（開曼）發
展有限公司；及(ii) Benjamin Clark Danielson先生，於煤炭及其他採礦範疇之天然資源分部擁
有豐富的投資及基金管理經驗。

...
申請清洗豁免
緊隨完成後，認購方及其一致行動人士將合共於1,555,555,000股股份中擁有權益，佔本公司
現有已發行股本約108.88%及本公司經擴大已發行股本約52.12%（假設本公司之已發行股本
自認購協議日期至完成之日並無變動，惟不包括發行認購股份）。根據收購守則第26.1條，
除非自執行人員取得清洗豁免，否則認購方有責任就其及其一致行動人士尚未擁有或同意
收購之本公司所有已發行股份及其他證券向股東作出強制性全面收購建議。就此，認購方
將就發行認購股份向執行人員申請清洗豁免。倘執行人員授出清洗豁免，須待（其中包括）
獨立股東於股東特別大會上以點票方式批准後方可作實。
倘清洗豁免獲獨立股東批准，認購方及其一致行動人士於本公司之總股權將超過50%。認
購方及其一致行動人士可能進一步增加彼等於本公司之股權而不會產生任何收購守則第26
條項下作出全面收購建議之進一步責任。
209 : 自動波人(1313)@2012-10-17 22:28:50

仲要等股東舉手,
申請豁免清洗,避免全購

認購事項
根據認購協議，本公司有條件同意配發及發行且認購方有條件同意以現金認購1,555,555,000
股新股份，認購價為每股認購股份0.45港元。
於認購協議日期，已發行股份為1,428,729,168股。認購股份佔本公司現有已發行股本約
108.88%及本公司經配發及發行認購股份擴大後之已發行股本約52.12%（假設本公司之已發
行股本自認購協議日期至完成之日並無變動，惟不包括發行認購股份）。
認購價
每股認購股份之認購價為0.45港元，而每股認購股份之淨認購價約為0.426港元。認購方須
以現金及按下列方式支付認購事項之總代價：
(a) 認購方須於認購協議日期後五(5)個營業日內支付10,000,000港元，作為可退還按金，倘
完成根據認購協議之條款發生，則為認購價之部分付款；及
(b) 認購方須於完成後向本公司支付餘額689,999,750港元。
倘認購協議於完成前終止或完成由於任何原因並無發生，本公司將於終止或確認完成將不
會發生後五(5)個營業日內向認購方悉數退回按金（不計息）。
認購方擬以有意成為基金有限責任夥伴之各方將提供之資金撥付本公司將支付之認購價。
認購價乃本公司與認購方參考最近股份交易價經公平磋商而釐訂。認購價較：
(a) 最後交易日聯交所所報收市價每股股份0.48港元折讓6.25%；
(b) 截至及包括最後交易日止最後5個交易日聯交所所報每股股份之平均收市價0.491港元折
讓約8.35%；

(c) 截至及包括最後交易日止最後10個交易日聯交所所報每股股份之平均收市價約0.507港
元折讓約11.24%；及
(d) 截至及包括最後交易日止最後30個交易日聯交所所報每股股份之平均收市價0.432港元
溢價約4.17%。
董事認為，認購價反映股份之最近交易價，因此屬公平合理。董事（不包括將於聽取獨立
財務顧問有關認購事項之條款及清洗豁免公平合理性之意見後方表達意見之獨立董事委員
會成員）認為，認購協議之條款屬公平合理及屬一般商業條款，且訂立認購協議符合股東
之整體利益。

認購事項原因及所得款項用途
本集團目前從事開採及銷售煤之業務。
如本公司於截至二零一一年十二月三十一日止年度之年報內披露，本集團之流動負債淨額
約為1,259,000,000港元。如本公司截至二零一二年六月三十日止六個月之中期報告內披露，
本集團於二零一二年六月三十日之未經審核流動負債淨額約為1,363,000,000港元。本集團繼
續經營之能力因重大不明朗因素而顯著存疑。儘管預期本集團自採煤業務所產生之淨經營
現金流入仍然足以支付其到期負債及資本承諾，惟於並無取得外部融資之情況下，本集團
之財務狀況難以大幅改善。
董事已考慮其他如供股等集資方法。然而，鑒於本集團近日之股份買賣價格及融資需要，
根據上市規則之規定聘請任何包銷商以全面包銷供股存在困難。董事亦曾考慮債務融資，
惟以本集團目前之財務狀況，難以覓得任何財務機構以本公司可負擔之條款借出該筆融資
金額。
基於上述原因，本公司認為找到新股本融資乃本公司當務之急，根據特別授權進行配售乃
本公司最切實可行之選擇。認購方進行之認購事項為本公司提供一個良好機遇，以籌集長
期股權基金，償還其未償負債、為其經營提供資金、改善本公司之財務狀況及尋找適當之
投資機會（倘適用）。此外，董事有信心認購方將為本公司帶來額外資源及投資機會，對本
公司及股東整體而言均有利。經考慮上述所有因素後方行訂立認購協議，董事（不包括將
於聽取獨立財務顧問有關認購事項之條款及清洗豁免公平合理性之意見後方表達意見之獨
立董事委員會成員）認為，進行認購事項符合本公司及股東之整體利益。
由於認購事項須獲獨立股東批准，獨立股東可於考慮獨立董事委員會（經獨立財務顧問建
議）之意見後，就認購事項之相關決議案自行決定如何投票。
認購事項之所得款項淨額（經扣除所有相關開支之後）約為663,000,000港元，擬用於(i)償還
本集團負債；(ii)日後倘有合適機遇時就新收購事項或業務機會作出投資及(iii)本集團之一
般營運資金。

認購方之背景及資料
認購方為於開曼群島註冊成立之獲豁免有限公司，其擬成為基金之一般合夥人。認購方之
控股股東為: (i)北京北大青鳥環宇科技股份有限公司（其已發行H股於聯交所創業板上市（股
票編號：8095），而其主要業務為研究、開發、製造、市場推廣及銷售無線消防報警系統及
相關產品、發展旅遊及休閒業務及投資控股）之全資附屬公司北大青鳥環宇科技（開曼）發
展有限公司；及(ii) Benjamin Clark Danielson先生，於煤炭及其他採礦範疇之天然資源分部擁
有豐富的投資及基金管理經驗。
210 : GS(14)@2012-10-17 22:29:00

都是d好朋友
211 : 自動波人(1313)@2012-10-17 22:38:36

隻野咁重債,重唔撲水我驚佢會爆
212 : GS(14)@2012-10-17 22:39:41

211樓提及
隻野咁重債,重唔撲水我驚佢會爆


仲有好虛空
213 : 鉛筆小生(8153)@2012-10-17 23:35:05

唉~煤價咁跌下來, 無了無了
214 : 自動波人(1313)@2012-10-17 23:41:41

213樓提及
唉~煤價咁跌下來, 無了無了


有排跌

連老美都變左煤出口國
215 : GS(14)@2012-10-17 23:43:43

213樓提及
唉~煤價咁跌下來, 無了無了


隻野本身就有d假的成份
216 : GS(14)@2012-10-17 23:44:14

214樓提及
213樓提及
唉~煤價咁跌下來, 無了無了

有排跌
連老美都變左煤出口國


咁無野講
217 : GS(14)@2012-12-04 00:03:42

http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... N201212031515_C.pdf
茲提述金山能源集團有限公司日期為二零一二年十一月十五日之通函（「該通函」），內容有
關（其中包括）建議按每股認購股份0.45港元之認購價向Jade Bird Strategic Investment（「認購
方」）發行1,555,555,000股新股份。除另有界定者外，本公告所用詞彙與該通函所界定者具相
同涵義。
認購方擬作出補充，其正考慮並就訂立一項融資安排以提供資金於完成時向本公司支付部
份認購價而展開磋商。認購方仍擬以有意成為基金之有限責任夥伴人之各方提供資金以撥
付大部分認購價。倘該融資安排落實，可能導致認購方將予收購的認購股份被抵押或質押
予相關融資人。
獨立財務顧問已確認，認購方的融資安排（包括可能將認購股份抵押或質押）概不會影響其
載列於該通函的函件內有關認購事項及清洗豁免的意見及其向獨立董事委員會及獨立股東
作出的推薦建議。
218 : GS(14)@2013-01-31 00:22:39

http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... TN20130130457_C.pdf
本公司董事（「董事」）會（「董事會」）謹此知會本公司股東及有意投資人士，根據本集團未經審核管理賬目之初步審閱，預期與二零一一年年度錄得盈利相比，本集團截至二零一二年十二月三十一日止年度將錄得虧損，此乃由於截至二零一二年十二月三十一日止年度內煤炭產量及煤炭平均售價同時下跌導致收益下降，以及若干資產（包括但不限於物業、廠房及設備、採礦權及其他應收款項）產生減值損失所致。
219 : greatsoup38(830)@2013-03-13 00:51:25

http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... TN20130311728_C.pdf
663贖回993 CB
220 : greatsoup38(830)@2013-04-03 00:50:44

663

轉盈為虧，稅前虧3.2億，負資產爛殼
221 : greatsoup38(830)@2013-04-17 00:00:46

663贖回993票據
222 : greatsoup38(830)@2013-04-17 00:02:51

663版本
223 : greatsoup38(830)@2013-05-03 00:53:54

買福頭銀礦哈哈哈
224 : GS(14)@2013-07-22 22:47:04

盈警
225 : GS(14)@2013-08-12 19:28:35

oh
226 : 自動波人(1313)@2013-08-23 18:13:45

噢,港交所唔批
227 : greatsoup38(830)@2013-08-23 23:58:48

咁賤賣仲得了
228 : greatsoup38(830)@2013-09-01 16:41:44

663
稅前虧損增1倍，至1.4億，負資產重債
229 : greatsoup38(830)@2013-09-26 23:25:13

http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... TN20130924597_C.pdf
663
buy things
230 : GS(14)@2013-10-28 23:56:15

5,000 幾萬買垃圾技術
231 : unmindful(16834)@2013-11-13 14:51:41

異動?
232 : greatsoup38(830)@2013-11-13 22:34:10

unmindful在231樓提及
異動?


呢d咁的垃圾算啦
233 : greatsoup38(830)@2013-11-19 00:39:59

買垃圾成功
234 : greatsoup38(830)@2014-01-12 20:29:52

http://seekingalpha.com/instablo ... re-a-chinese-bernie

正相
235 : GS(14)@2014-01-28 00:48:13

663贖回993 票據
236 : GS(14)@2014-01-28 00:48:21

993版
237 : greatsoup38(830)@2014-04-03 18:21:55

663

轉虧4億，負資產重債
238 : GS(14)@2014-09-29 01:47:05

虧損增20%，至1.7億，負資產重債
239 : GS(14)@2014-10-25 12:01:49

發行3.3億股及3.3億option予母公司，認購價25仙
240 : greatsoup38(830)@2015-02-04 00:01:05

CB
241 : greatsoup38(830)@2015-02-18 02:14:20

663認購8117新股
242 : GS(14)@2015-04-04 02:53:32

賣掉煤業公司
243 : GS(14)@2015-05-06 02:18:50

主席判罰，成身屎
244 : jj1984(29252)@2015-06-30 00:21:05

配股@0.375,
再2供[email protected]
金仔.
245 : GS(14)@2015-07-03 02:42:42

1. 33仙配售6.68億股
2. 2供1，每股12仙
246 : greatsoup38(830)@2015-07-05 01:15:33

賣晒，盈喜
247 : GS(14)@2015-07-09 01:41:23

不配售不供股
248 : greatsoup38(830)@2015-08-05 00:19:55

配售6.68億股@27.5仙
249 : greatsoup38(830)@2015-09-03 02:27:34

虧損降33%，至1.2億，負資產空殼重債
250 : GS(14)@2015-11-08 20:05:47

placing 2.5b [email protected] cents
251 : sunshine(3090)@2015-11-08 22:43:24

big boss increasing its share
252 : GS(14)@2015-11-08 23:11:30

Yeah but no use
253 : GS(14)@2016-01-20 22:58:07

改配售規模
254 : GS(14)@2016-03-11 17:27:01

盈喜
255 : GS(14)@2016-07-05 01:18:20

盈喜
256 : GS(14)@2016-09-02 04:20:25

虧損降55%，至4,600萬，1.8億現金
257 : greatsoup38(830)@2016-09-13 01:18:29

虧損增320%，至3,000萬，輕債，持有垃圾股，有663、2322、2326、3823、2223和6828
258 : GS(14)@2017-04-02 17:41:50

虧損增2倍，至9,800萬，1.3億現金
259 : GS(14)@2017-09-12 14:09:51

虧損降15%，至4,600萬，7,000萬現金
260 : GS(14)@2017-12-05 01:44:52

買野
261 : GS(14)@2017-12-30 14:23:44

太陽能
262 : GS(14)@2018-05-14 02:24:44

虧，1.2億可變現資產
263 : GS(14)@2018-08-01 07:47:52

好好
PermaLink: https://articles.zkiz.com/?id=272318

環球資源(NASDAQ:GSOL) 予仁智國際(8082)股東的信

1 : GS(14)@2011-02-26 18:27:30

http://webb-site.com/codocs/GlobalSources110222.pdf
PermaLink: https://articles.zkiz.com/?id=273151

仁智國際(8082): 我們沒有東西補充

1 : GS(14)@2011-02-26 18:45:42

http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... LN20110224078_C.pdf
2 : skfv(15984)@2012-05-17 19:44:52

http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/financeestate/art/20110516/15256717

香港骨灰龕場唔夠，唔少孝子賢孫為咗令先人「住」得安樂，惟有將佢哋嘅遺體移去第二度安葬。隔山買牛已經有難度，何況買棺材山地。不過，互聯網世界，無遠弗屆，早前玄學家楊天命就夥拍仁智國際（8082）度咗條好橋，以網購方式，幫孝子賢孫為先人喺內地搵吉穴。事隔幾個月，呢個網購服務終於面世。前幾日楊天命同華華講，呢個禮拜五（20日）舉行嘅「香港長者博覽」就會正式公佈詳情。

網頁附程式　揀穴夾八字
不過，華華當然要先行收風，楊天命話，自從做咗仁智國際嘅顧問之後，親自去咗蘇州好多次，睇吓仁智早前買落嘅蘇州市「名流陵園」，做實地考察。佢話睇完之後，將陵園分成咗幾個區，好似 C1同 C2區係「甲山庚向」，利後人財富興旺， C2區仲加埋大利升官， M2區就旺人丁。佢仲諗到，首創預先「點穴」服務，喺網上公開上述嘅墓穴風水資料，畀啲客人因應自己要求揀吉穴，省得百年歸老嗰陣倒瀉籮蟹。
乜揀吉穴唔係要夾先人同後人時辰八字 o架咩？原來楊天命搵人編寫咗個電腦程式，只要客人將個人時辰八字輸入，電腦就可以幫先人揀最適合嘅區。華華百無禁忌，即刻上仁智嘅網睇，可惜「墓地選購」嗰欄仍然建設中，仲未可以見識吓呢啲咁「體貼」嘅服務。
PermaLink: https://articles.zkiz.com/?id=273157

首都創投(2324，前德泰中華投資)專區(關係:華匯、0870、8037、8082)

1 : GS(14)@2011-05-18 21:59:23

(blank)
2 : GS(14)@2011-05-18 22:00:09

http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... TN20100928138_C.pdf

人力資源
於二零一零年六月三十日，本集團有2名僱員（不包括董事）。總員工成本（不包括董事酬金）約705,388港元（二零零九年：1,057,714港元）。彼等在本集團擔任文職、研究、業務發展及行政等職務。本集團薪酬政策符合現行市場慣例，並按個別僱員之表現及經驗而釐定其薪酬。

2 man band,開枱麻雀都唔夠,公司點聯誼?

greatsoup:
可以猜下枚

得兩丁友....咁份annual report 邊個去做....做會計入數都要有人做ga...outsource?..呢d公司上市黎做咩,

greatsoup
這間是21章，1個做基金經理，1個做會計，夠啦..
3 : GS(14)@2011-05-18 22:02:14

http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... N201012011258_C.pdf

2324批股

http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... TN20110112573_C.pdf

2供1,每股0.3

見到金江大家識啦

自動波人:
金剛同忠楠,都係避一避好d
4 : GS(14)@2011-05-18 22:02:17

http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... TN20110222404_C.pdf
業績
5 : GS(14)@2011-05-18 22:02:32

http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... TN20110516472_C.pdf
看來投入最多是2324
6 : 拔刺者(4132)@2011-06-09 23:22:57

正興二世
7 : GS(14)@2011-06-11 09:39:43

http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... TN20110609698_C.pdf
華匯ed... 買一間就有又多四間入袋，徐先生今次死啦...

8037、8082他們都持有超過10%股權

870重組緊
8 : greatsoup38(830)@2011-07-10 17:59:17

http://www.mmt.gov.hk/eng/rulings/SKIC.Ruling.12042011.pdf
德泰中華投資有限公司
二零一一年四月十二日財政司司長根據《證券及期貨條例》(第571章)第252(2)條及附表9向市場失當行為審裁處發出的通知
9 : GS(14)@2011-08-14 20:06:36

http://webb-site.com/articles/cvclonglife.asp
Webb哥話丘忠航的持股在意義上已超過30%，觸發要約全面收購，但他無提出
10 : GS(14)@2011-08-14 20:06:48

11 : 200(9285)@2011-08-17 20:36:50

丘忠航涉持股超法規
股壇長毛踢爆　朗力福昨停牌
2011年08月17日

  (未有評分)
  瀏覽人次：1,600

  Facebook
  Twitter
  轉寄朋友

股壇長毛 David Webb近日又玩踢爆，今次對象是朗力福（ 8037）、首都創投（ 2324），關鍵人物則是首創大股東兼執董丘忠航。他質疑丘忠航透過私人投資，又藉朗力福及首都創投互相持股，共持朗力福和首都創投逾 30%權益，觸發全面收購而未提出，違反法規。　記者：周燕芬

受消息影響，朗力福昨停牌，稱待發佈股價敏感消息。首創收 0.31元，跌 1.6%。
David Webb列出 5大張紙，詳細道出丘忠航與朗力福和首都創投之間的關係。文章指出，首都創投早於 09年已入股朗力福，去年底朗力福亦開始於市場購入首都創投權益，有趣的事情於是開始出現。

建議證監會研全面收購
放大圖片

12345678910

按聯交所權益披露資料， Webb指， 7月底丘忠航透過首創已持朗力福 22.8%權益，加上丘忠航直接持有朗力福 7.99%權益，兩者直接共持有朗力福 30.79%權益，而早於 7月 25日更曾達 31.13%權益，他要求證監會決定丘忠航和首都創投對朗力福是否已觸及全面收購線，朗力福宜暫停買賣直至事件清晰。
而由於丘忠航直接持有首都創投 22.18%權益，朗力福則直接持有首都創投 8.92%，兩者合共持有首都創投達 31.1%，他質疑丘忠航和朗力福亦是一致行動人士。他建議證監會研究丘忠航和朗力福於首都創投是否一致行動人士，是否需要提出全面收購。由於事情或涉及兩間公司互相提全面收購，變成無意義之舉，他認為最後應由其中一家作出全面收購行動。
管理層獨立性受質疑

除股權上有密切關係外， Webb亦指出，朗力福主席張鴻，原來於 03年曾協助首都創投上市，張鴻當時為國泰君安銷售部副總裁。此外，朗力福獨立非執董陳慧殷來自首都創投持 30%權益的 CNI Bullion，任職銷售部董事，其獨立性亦受到質疑。
還有，去年 4月 9日，朗力福給予首都創投認購權，於未來 10年以每股 0.355元認購朗力福 50萬股，但卻沒有任何解釋。而兩間公司更可共用辦公室，去年 7月始一齊租用環球貿易中心（ ICC） 76樓；並同時僱用鄭鄭會計師事務所，在在顯示兩間公司關係密切。

http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/te ... 320&art_id=15531264

中南金融傑作也‧
12 : GS(14)@2011-08-17 21:02:27

CNI Bullion = 北方證券呀
13 : 200(9285)@2011-08-17 21:12:36

12樓提及
CNI Bullion = 北方證券呀=中國 北方金銀業


仲有一間金道貴金屬有限公司係fm104賣廣告‧
14 : GS(14)@2011-08-17 22:05:55

13樓提及
12樓提及
CNI Bullion = 北方證券呀=中國 北方金銀業


仲有一間金道貴金屬有限公司係fm104賣廣告‧


http://www.sfc.hk/sfcprd/eng/pr/ ... =AUE994&applNo=0001
呢間?
15 : 200(9285)@2011-08-17 22:09:07

http://24k.hk/
16 : GS(14)@2011-08-18 22:25:27

http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... TN20110817616_C.pdf
呢班人...


(6) 由於丘先生與本公司各自於二零一一年七月二十六日至二零一一年七月二十九日 期 間 進 行 之 一 連 串 交 易（而 丘 先 生 亦 未 就 此 遞 交 披 露 權 益 通 知），截 至 二 零
一 一 年 七 月 二 十 九 日，本 公 司 持 有 朗 力 福 已 發 行 股 本 之22.75%，而 丘 先 生 持
有 朗 力 福 已 發 行 股 本 之7.06%。
(7) 基 於 前 述 因 由，直 至 本 公 司 收 到 上 述 詢 問 後，本 公 司 方 才 察 覺 到 本 公 司 與 丘先 生 於 二 零 一 一 年 六 月 十 日 至 二 零 一 一 年 七 月 二 十 八 日 期 間 於 朗 力 福 已 發 行股 本 之 總 持 股 量 超 過30%。
(8) 雖 然 根 據《收 購 守 則》，本 公 司 被 假 定 為 與 丘 先 生 一 致 行 動，惟 因 本 公 司 相 信本 公 司 可 證 實，在 所 有 關 鍵 時 刻，本 公 司 與 丘 先 生 或 其 他 人 士 並 無 任 何 協 議
或 默 契（不 論 正 式 或 非 正 式）以 通 過 購 入 朗 力 福 之 表 決 權 而 合 作 取 得 或 鞏 固 對朗 力 福 之 控 制。
(9) 因 此，本 公 司 並 不 認 為 已 出 現 對 朗 力 福 股 份 提 出 全 面 要 約 的 任 何 責 任，而 本公 司 或 丘 先 生 均 無 意 對 朗 力 福 股 份 提 出 任 何 全 面 要 約。
17 : 200(9285)@2011-08-18 22:28:23

直 至 本 公 司 收 到 上 述 詢 問 後，本 公 司 方 才 察 覺 到

( 9 U P )
18 : GS(14)@2011-08-18 22:50:21

17樓提及
直 至 本 公 司 收 到 上 述 詢 問 後，本 公 司 方 才 察 覺 到

( 9 U P )


好似當人白痴，呢班高手玩野

8037
http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... LN20110818008_C.pdf

丘 先 生 及 首 都 創 投 其 後 已 經 向 董 事 會 確 認：
1. 於 二 零 一 一 年 六 月 十 日 至 二 零 一 一 年 七 月 二 十 八 日 期 間 內，首 都 創 投 及 丘 先生於本公司之已發行股份的累積股權達30%以上，然而，首都創投及丘先生於二 零 一 一 年 八 月 十 二 日 後 方 察 覺 該 情 況；
2. 在所有關鍵時刻，根據《收購守則》的定義，丘先生與首都創投並非一致行動；及
3. 因 此，首 都 創 投 及 丘 先 生 均 認 為 上 述 股 權 並 無 產 生 就 本 公 司 普 通 股 提 出 強 制全 面 要 約 的 任 何 責 任，而 彼 等 均 無 意 就 此 提 出 任 何 全 面 要 約。
另 外 亦 謹 此 提 述 首 都 創 投 日 期 為 二 零 一 一 年 八 月 十 七 日 的 公 告。
19 : 200(9285)@2011-08-20 01:05:13

丘忠航辭任皇朝董事被研訊
2011年08月19日

  (未有評分)
  瀏覽人次：1,333

  Facebook
  Twitter
  轉寄朋友

【本報訊】首都創投（ 2324）執行董事丘忠航被指涉及要對朗力福（ 8037）提出全面收購後，又涉及市場失當行為而被研訊。皇朝傢俬（ 1198）公佈，丘氏辭任獨立非執行董事，公告透露，市場失當行為審裁處已開始對丘氏研訊，以確定他有否從事首都創投前身，即德泰大中華的股份虛假交易和操縱證券市場等不當行為，但強調這純屬丘氏私事，與公司無關。丘氏事前也沒有向公司知會研訊一事。

朗力福復牌升近 9%

市場失當審裁處資料顯示，丘忠航於 2009年 1月 7日後，就討論德泰股份配售期間，曾於當年 1月 9日出售德泰股份，而當時出任主席的徐德強購入股份的交易，則被指涉嫌推高股價。
另外，首都創投公佈，公司與丘忠航方於今年 7月 25日分別持有 23.14%及 7.99%朗力福，合計逾 30%，兩者可能因被視為《收購守則》的「一致行動」人士，要提出全面收購一事，已獲證監會查詢跟進。不過首都創投及朗力福均強調，首都創投與丘氏並非一致行動，因此不會向朗力福提出全購。
首都創投及朗力福均指出，本月 12日證監致函詢問，才發覺首都創投及丘忠航按「一致行動」人士定義，在朗力福持股逾 30%，達全購觸發點。
但朗力福指出，首都創投及丘忠航在所有關鍵時刻並非一致行動，亦無提出全購責任，甚至毋須停牌。朗力福昨日復牌，股價扯高 8.7%，收報 0.25元。

出事了

http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/te ... 320&art_id=15538145
20 : 拔刺者(4132)@2011-08-20 04:15:32

正式表示關注的那份
http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... TN20110819655_C.pdf

(何時能夠將通告的webb-site.com變為zkiz.com?湯兄smiley)
21 : GS(14)@2011-08-20 07:55:27

唔知啊，但呢單野前一排都出了，舊聞當新聞真是有點...
22 : 200(9285)@2011-08-20 21:10:24

丘忠航 及 歐陽啟初 大家也是中南系內人，佢地同主持人莊先生也有共同興趣
就係養馬了，兩位係澳門有隻配售馬叫北方勇士成績唔錯有5冠2亞算有馬運了‧
23 : GS(14)@2011-08-20 21:25:54

是咩，有無馬睇?
24 : 200(9285)@2011-08-20 21:29:59

23樓提及
是咩，有無馬睇?


http://www.mjc.mo/NEWMJCPAGE/blo ... 0&blog_type=2&lang=

ready for you .
25 : GS(14)@2011-08-20 21:34:05

唔識睇馬，但是好似唔太聽話...
26 : 200(9285)@2011-08-20 21:38:22

25樓提及
唔識睇馬，但是好似唔太聽話...


好馬來的，配售馬唔係隻隻好野特別是澳門‧
27 : 拔刺者(4132)@2011-08-20 21:40:14

26樓提及
25樓提及
唔識睇馬，但是好似唔太聽話...
好馬來的，配售馬唔係隻隻好野特別是澳門‧
昨晚贏了派3.3倍
28 : 200(9285)@2011-08-20 21:46:25

27樓提及
26樓提及
25樓提及
唔識睇馬，但是好似唔太聽話...
好馬來的，配售馬唔係隻隻好野特別是澳門‧
昨晚贏了派3.3倍


丘忠航無拉頭馬
29 : 拔刺者(4132)@2011-08-20 21:47:11

c+拉一樣啫
30 : 200(9285)@2011-09-15 20:59:04

推介垃圾
http://www.hkdailynews.com.hk/finance.php?id=181240
31 : GS(14)@2011-09-15 21:00:37

沉瀣一氣
32 : 200(9285)@2011-09-15 21:00:44

司徒明慧股票牌轉左公司

但佢仲有幫中國北方做野

http://www.sfc.hk/sfcprd/eng/pr/ ... =AXI117&applNo=0002

http://www.cni-gold.com/inner_blog_detail.php?id=121


咁奇怪既
33 : GS(14)@2011-09-15 21:02:15

查下間怡安又點，好平二十幾就得
34 : 200(9285)@2011-09-15 21:05:26

沉瀣一氣???
35 : GS(14)@2011-09-15 21:13:13

你見周老師同班人的guanxi好緊密就知啦
36 : GS(14)@2011-10-01 14:07:22

叫做賺錢的
http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... N201109301071_C.pdf
展望未來，本集團預期美國及歐洲之經濟增長將放緩。市場避險情緒升溫可能引發更大的市場不確定性，發達國家發展中國家均難倖免。即便如此，美聯儲承諾再維持兩年之低利率，此對股本投資而言實屬有利。另一利好的一面是，中國政府於近期進一步收緊當前之宏觀政策的機會似乎減低。董事將採取審慎措施以管理本集團之投資組合。
37 : greatsoup38(830)@2011-10-22 10:43:42

http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... TN20111021126_C.pdf
邊個出假支票?

茲提述一宗最近由一名Chan Ping Yee先生 (「原告」) 在高等法院對本公司 (作為被
告) 提出的訴訟，訴訟編號為 HCA 1700/2011。訴訟理由涉及一張日期為二零一一
年五月一日，金額為39,000,000港元的未能承兌支票，原告聲稱該筆款項須向其支付
但在欲兌現該支票時遭拒兌。
本公司在徹底調查此事及就此充分諮詢過法律意見後，確信原告的索償毫無理據，
因為 (1) 所述的支票在該情況下，並不構成可執行之票據；及（2）根據匯票條例，
所述的支票在發出上述訴訟的傳訊令狀前已經註銷。

http://sdinotice.hkex.com.hk/di/ ... ee&src=MAIN&lang=ZH
同名同姓的人叫陳秉義，當年他就認購了這批8%債...

http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... LN20060216035_C.pdf

這間Concept Capital 是否和德泰有關? 這筆錢剛好和他欠的錢差不多
http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... LN20110621038_C.pdf
38 : greatsoup38(830)@2011-10-22 10:44:46

http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... LN20101019002_C.pdf
原來佢都有同人一齊買了8351
39 : greatsoup38(830)@2011-10-22 10:45:01

http://sdinotice.hkex.com.hk/di/ ... ee&src=MAIN&lang=ZH
40 : GS(14)@2012-01-19 00:03:46

http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... TN20120118664_C.pdf
茲提述首都創投有限公司 (「本公司」) 分別於二零一一年八月十九日、十二月
十二日及十二月二十九日就市場失當行為審裁處對本公司兩名執行董事的查詢
所刊發的公告 (「該等公告」)。除另有界定或文意另有所指外，本公告所用詞
彙與該等公告所界定者具有相同涵義。
本公司董事會現就該查詢的進展提供進一步資料，實質聽證會將增加兩天，即二
零一二年一月十八日及一月二十日。
本公司在需要及適當時會作進一步公告。
41 : 摘星(6904)@2012-02-26 11:57:40

http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... TN20120224457_C.pdf

公告及通告 - [中期業績]

截至二零一一年十二月三十一日止六個月中期業績公布

截至二零一一年十二月三十一日止六個月（「本期間」），本集團錄得負數營業額
107,000,000港元（二零一零年：正數20,700,000港元）及本公司股權持有人應佔虧損
86,500,000港元（二零一零年：溢利40,500,000港元）。



本公司股權持有人應佔業績由
盈轉虧，主要由於全球投資環境不穩定。本期間之財務資產虧損淨額為111,100,000
港元，而去年同期則錄得溢利20,000,000港元。於本期間，本集團聯營公司中國北
方金銀業有限公司之表現保持理想，為本集團帶來應佔溢利30,900,000港元。
42 : traveller(1405)@2012-03-05 23:36:52

邱生又上場，佢都幾好搵
43 : 200(9285)@2012-03-15 21:13:02

中環在線：首都創投　大股東唔撈

中期業績見紅嘅首都創投（ 2324），再有董事唔撈，繼舊年 11月非執行董事蕭少滔辭職之後，家就連大股東兼執行董事丘忠航都唔做董事。

人事變動頻頻

其實丘忠航同另一位董事徐德強，舊年 8月曾經因為涉嫌虛假交易、操控股價及操控證券市場三項控罪，被市場失當行為審裁處進行調查，自此之後，公司亦陸續開始出現人事變動，上星期一就重新委任咗劉大貝做董事會主席，邱恩明及張國裕就分別做執董同非執董。今次丘忠航退任，唔知係咪公司想洗底嘅先兆呢？

http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/te ... 320&art_id=16154170
44 : GS(14)@2012-03-16 22:31:34

唉，華匯玩
45 : 200(9285)@2012-03-16 22:34:02

44樓提及
唉，華匯玩


丘忠航唔係華匯人嗎?
46 : GS(14)@2012-03-16 22:34:48

是啊，但有事
47 : 200(9285)@2012-03-16 22:39:44

46樓提及
是啊，但有事


莊先生炒q埋佢‧
48 : GS(14)@2012-03-16 22:40:15

遲D另有用途
49 : 200(9285)@2012-03-31 17:10:49

27樓提及
26樓提及
25樓提及
唔識睇馬，但是好似唔太聽話...
好馬來的，配售馬唔係隻隻好野特別是澳門‧
昨晚贏了派3.3倍


隻新馬琴晚贏了兩位也無出現‧
50 : 200(9285)@2012-04-14 13:57:33

入左的新馬也不要了‧
http://www.mjc.mo/race/info/hrs_info.php?brand_no=C204
51 : GS(14)@2012-04-14 19:34:11

Like Mr. Hui
52 : GS(14)@2012-05-03 00:35:26

http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... N201205021788_C.pdf
買垃圾

收購事項
董事欣然宣佈，於二零一二年五月二日（交易時段後），本公司與賣方訂立買賣協
議，以收購Long Surplus之權益。本公司根據買賣協議應付之代價將以向賣方配發
及發行代價股份 (入賬列作繳足) 清償。發行代價股份須待聯交所上市委員會批准
代價股份上市及買賣後，方可作實。
根據買賣協議，本公司同意購買，而賣方亦同意出售Long Surplus之全部已發行股
本，代價為19,008,480港元，將以發行84,116,984股代價股份清償，代價股份相當
於本公司現有已發行股本約10.00%，另相當於經發行代價股份擴大之本公司已發
行股本約9.09%。
每股代價股份之發行價為0.226 港元，較股份於最後交易日期之收市價每股0.228
港元折讓約0.88%，另較股份於買賣協議日期前過去五個完整交易日之平均收市價
每股0.233港元折讓約3.00%。
..
(G) 本公司接獲且全權酌情信納由本公司所委聘之獨立專業估值師行對Go
Markets Pty Limited全部股本權益作出之估值報告指其於二零一二年四月三
十日之公平市值為不少於501,480,000港元；
...
有關LONG SURPLUS之資料
Long Surplus為一間投資控股公司，其持有247 Capital Limited之241,642股每股面值
1.00美元B類股份，相當於其全部已發行股本之3.98%。247 Capital Limited擁有Go
Markets Pty Limited之100%股本權益，該公司由二零零六年起於澳洲從事網上貿易
業務。Go Markets Pty Limited為「直通式處理」(Straight Through Processing)供應商，
專門為零售投資者提供網上外匯交易。董事已獲告知，Go Markets Pty Limited之客
戶基礎遍及全球超過120個國家，擁有逾16,000個各戶賬戶。Go Markets Pty Limited
於荷蘭亦設有歐洲支部。
據董事於作出一切合理查詢後所深知、盡悉及確信，且經Long Surplus確認，Long
Surplus及其最終實益擁有人均為獨立第三方，與本公司及本公司之關連人士概無關
連。
53 : GS(14)@2012-05-03 00:36:02

http://www.gomarketsaus.com/
54 : donaldleung0804(5940)@2012-05-09 10:43:15

小魚又推8082了！
55 : GS(14)@2012-05-09 21:26:36

正一垃圾粉皮
56 : 200(9285)@2012-05-23 23:20:19

證監會昨對首都創投（2324）及公司前董事丘忠航（圖）採取紀律行動，指兩者於去年6月增持朗力福（8037）至30.19%股權，觸發全面收購責任，但並無提出全面收購，違反《收購合併守則》。
證監向丘忠航施加冷淡對待令，禁止他直接或間接使用香港證券市場設施，為期18個月，由今日起至明年11月22日止，並公開譴責丘氏及首都創投在此事上的行為。
首都創投是一間根據聯交所《上市規則》第21章上市的投資公司，主要投資於中港上市及非上市公司，丘忠航在事發時是公司執行董事、大股東兼投資委員會成員。
證監指，在事發期間，丘氏管理兩個投資賬戶，一個屬於首都創投，另一個屬於他的個人投資，在買入朗力福股份時，他是唯一決策者。他聲稱，因計算錯誤才買入過多朗力福股份，雖然他知道需要把公司及個人於朗力福的合併持股量保持於30%以下，但無證據顯示他認真地實施有效的合規程序。丘忠航及首都創投均承認違反《收購守則》，並同意今次紀律處分行動。

http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/financeestate/art/20120523/16360445
57 : GS(14)@2012-06-19 00:14:48

http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... TN20120618005_C.pdf
本公告乃由本公司根據香港聯合交易所有限公司證券上市規則（「上市規則」）第13.09
條而作出。
首都創投有限公司（「本公司」）董事會（「董事會」）各董事（「董事」）謹此公佈，於
二零一二年六月十五日（交易時段後），本公司與一名獨立第三方（與本公司董事、最
高行政人員、主要股東及管理層股東或彼等各自之任何聯繫人士（定義見上市規則）
概無關連，且非與上述人士一致行動）（「獨立第三方」）訂立意向書（「意向書」）。意
向書乃有關獨立第三方認購佔本公司經擴大已發行股本不低於10%及不超過30%之新
股份，認購價有待商定（「認購事項」）
根據意向書條款，於認講事項完成時，獨立第三方及其一致行動人士將會持有本公司
經擴大發行股本不超過30%。除訂約方之保密條文外，意向書之所有其他條款均無法
律約束力。
58 : i3640(1387)@2012-07-08 16:38:50

1/復牌呢味野都可以夾份搞齊齊上?!
2/佢地系親戚檔?!

“根據託管協議，本公司之附屬公司Winning Point已於簽訂託管協議時支付不可退還誠意金2,500,000港元。”
06/07/2012   00901  萊福資本  有關金至尊珠寶控股有限公司復牌建議之託管協議之最新資料
http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... TN20120706622_C.pdf
“根據託管協議，本公司的附屬公司Huge Energy於簽訂託管協議時已支付不可退還的誠意金2,500,000港元”
06/07/2012   02324  首都創投  有關金至尊珠寶控股有限公司復牌建議的託管協議的最新情況
http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... TN20120706592_C.pdf
59 : greatsoup38(830)@2012-07-08 16:46:28

1. 可以，好多都是例如286

2. 都算是親戚，同一堆人
60 : kwuntl(19490)@2012-07-26 23:12:58

首都創投(HKSE:2324.HK - 新聞 - 公司資料)(前名德泰中華)大股東兼前執行董事丘忠航，以及集團執行董事徐德強，被市場失當行為審裁處裁定，違反《證券及期貨條例》有關虛假交易、操控價格及操控證券市場的罪名成立。

事發在2009年1月，首都創投於同月13日配售1.5015億股新股，配售價為0.045元，較當天停牌前收市價折讓18.2%。而於1月8日的收市價只有0.042元，股價大升原因是兩人的內幕交易所致。丘忠航於1月9日收市前20分鐘，把超過180萬股股份售予徐德強，每股介乎0.49至0.55元。(ir/a)


其實點解會係丘忠航同徐德強親自出手...? 唔搵人頭去做...?
61 : GS(14)@2012-07-27 09:56:43

60樓提及
首都創投(HKSE:2324.HK - 新聞 - 公司資料)(前名德泰中華)大股東兼前執行董事丘忠航，以及集團執行董事徐德強，被市場失當行為審裁處裁定，違反《證券及期貨條例》有關虛假交易、操控價格及操控證券市場的罪名成立。
事發在2009年1月，首都創投於同月13日配售1.5015億股新股，配售價為0.045元，較當天停牌前收市價折讓18.2%。而於1月8日的收市價只有0.042元，股價大升原因是兩人的內幕交易所致。丘忠航於1月9日收市前20分鐘，把超過180萬股股份售予徐德強，每股介乎0.49至0.55元。(ir/a)
其實點解會係丘忠航同徐德強親自出手...? 唔搵人頭去做...?


有人建議的，自己睇下份野啦
http://www.mmt.gov.hk/eng/reports/SKIC_Report_Part_I.pdf
62 : Alfred Ho(32091)@2012-08-22 14:27:09

求救入左 2324

小弟上2个星期和朋友食飯,我朋友帶左个肥仔一起到場,並說肥仔為新進財金精英.局上肥仔財金精英不斷推介隻2324.話短期内会有surprise。叫我唔好miss 左个幾会. $0.156左右買左成2球……吊，今日得反0.115….点好？
63 : GS(14)@2012-08-22 14:44:38

62樓提及
求救入左 2324
小弟上2个星期和朋友食飯,我朋友帶左个肥仔一起到場,並說肥仔為新進財金精英.局上肥仔財金精英不斷推介隻2324.話短期内会有surprise。叫我唔好miss 左个幾会. $0.156左右買左成2球……吊，今日得反0.115….点好？

斬，講完

呢個風報紙講幾百次，無句真
64 : Alfred Ho(32091)@2012-08-22 14:50:14

63樓提及
62樓提及
求救入左 2324
小弟上2个星期和朋友食飯,我朋友帶左个肥仔一起到場,並說肥仔為新進財金精英.局上肥仔財金精英不斷推介隻2324.話短期内会有surprise。叫我唔好miss 左个幾会. $0.156左右買左成2球……吊，今日得反0.115….点好？

斬，講完
呢個風報紙講幾百次，無句真



大股东要玩完？冇得等？
65 : GS(14)@2012-08-22 14:53:16

64樓提及
63樓提及
62樓提及
求救入左 2324
小弟上2个星期和朋友食飯,我朋友帶左个肥仔一起到場,並說肥仔為新進財金精英.局上肥仔財金精英不斷推介隻2324.話短期内会有surprise。叫我唔好miss 左个幾会. $0.156左右買左成2球……吊，今日得反0.115….点好？

斬，講完
呢個風報紙講幾百次，無句真

大股东要玩完？冇得等？

隻野向下炒的
66 : kwuntl(19490)@2012-08-22 15:12:22

我都有個朋友介紹我買呢隻...累我埋單輸左一千蚊...
金融界老X何其多...
67 : GS(14)@2012-08-22 16:08:57

66樓提及
我都有個朋友介紹我買呢隻...累我埋單輸左一千蚊...
金融界老X何其多...


我唔明點解仲有人輸在這隻股
68 : Alfred Ho(32091)@2012-08-23 10:19:54

67樓提及
66樓提及
我都有個朋友介紹我買呢隻...累我埋單輸左一千蚊...
金融界老X何其多...

我唔明點解仲有人輸在這隻股



曰日波幅成6-8%,成个赌场咁.....
69 : GS(14)@2012-08-23 10:20:36

68樓提及
67樓提及
66樓提及
我都有個朋友介紹我買呢隻...累我埋單輸左一千蚊...
金融界老X何其多...

我唔明點解仲有人輸在這隻股

曰日波幅成6-8%,成个赌场咁.....


直情是九死一生
70 : Alfred Ho(32091)@2012-08-23 10:25:28

69樓提及
68樓提及
67樓提及
66樓提及
我都有個朋友介紹我買呢隻...累我埋單輸左一千蚊...
金融界老X何其多...

我唔明點解仲有人輸在這隻股

曰日波幅成6-8%,成个赌场咁.....

直情是九死一生



今日斬左，輸左8个。
71 : GS(14)@2012-08-23 10:27:17

70樓提及
69樓提及
68樓提及
67樓提及
66樓提及
我都有個朋友介紹我買呢隻...累我埋單輸左一千蚊...
金融界老X何其多...

我唔明點解仲有人輸在這隻股

曰日波幅成6-8%,成个赌场咁.....

直情是九死一生

今日斬左，輸左8个。


希望唔好我烏雅口累你可版輸少D... 因為呢D 股實在太cheap
72 : Alfred Ho(32091)@2012-08-23 10:45:25

71樓提及
70樓提及
69樓提及
68樓提及
67樓提及
66樓提及
我都有個朋友介紹我買呢隻...累我埋單輸左一千蚊...
金融界老X何其多...

我唔明點解仲有人輸在這隻股

曰日波幅成6-8%,成个赌场咁.....

直情是九死一生

今日斬左，輸左8个。

希望唔好我烏雅口累你可版輸少D... 因為呢D 股實在太cheap


多谢你先啱，其实隻野有D咩事？点解突然插得咁利害？有故仔？
73 : GS(14)@2012-08-23 10:47:24

72樓提及
71樓提及
70樓提及
69樓提及
68樓提及
67樓提及
66樓提及
我都有個朋友介紹我買呢隻...累我埋單輸左一千蚊...
金融界老X何其多...

我唔明點解仲有人輸在這隻股

曰日波幅成6-8%,成个赌场咁.....

直情是九死一生

今日斬左，輸左8个。

希望唔好我烏雅口累你可版輸少D... 因為呢D 股實在太cheap

多谢你先啱，其实隻野有D咩事？点解突然插得咁利害？有故仔？

隻野個老細被人捉左內幕交易走左你咪唔是唔知吧，可能他要散貨找你做替死鬼
74 : Alfred Ho(32091)@2012-08-23 11:04:40

73樓提及
72樓提及
71樓提及
70樓提及
69樓提及
68樓提及
67樓提及
66樓提及
我都有個朋友介紹我買呢隻...累我埋單輸左一千蚊...
金融界老X何其多...

我唔明點解仲有人輸在這隻股

曰日波幅成6-8%,成个赌场咁.....

直情是九死一生

今日斬左，輸左8个。

希望唔好我烏雅口累你可版輸少D... 因為呢D 股實在太cheap

多谢你先啱，其实隻野有D咩事？点解突然插得咁利害？有故仔？

隻野個老細被人捉左內幕交易走左你咪唔是唔知吧，可能他要散貨找你做替死鬼


唔知......個朋友話会升爆.....吊.....
75 : GS(14)@2012-08-23 11:05:52

升爆都唔會話你聽啦
76 : Alfred Ho(32091)@2012-08-23 11:08:33

75樓提及
升爆都唔會話你聽啦


吊，班仆街老千幾時死呀...
77 : GS(14)@2012-08-23 11:09:23

76樓提及
75樓提及
升爆都唔會話你聽啦

吊，班仆街老千幾時死呀...


唔知呀，唔聽扮傻就得
78 : Alfred Ho(32091)@2012-08-23 11:11:25

77樓提及
76樓提及
75樓提及
升爆都唔會話你聽啦

吊，班仆街老千幾時死呀...

唔知呀，唔聽扮傻就得


Thank you~~~
79 : hopingu(1296)@2012-08-23 13:34:16

留意湯財的文, 未必可以發達(甚至阻大家發達), 但肯定可以輸少好多冤枉錢係ot 股身上~~

http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/financeestate/art/20120823/16627593
投資一周：發達要賺窮人錢

首都創投（2324）的故事：上星期，一位線人打電話過來，說首都創投（2324）會炒起，那時的股價是0.16元。誰知過了兩天，不但不升，反而跌至0.14元。
我沒有買，但作為專業蠱惑仔，馬上致電線人，爆着粗說﹕「我買了50萬錢，家陣點算先（下略100字粗口）……」
他說﹕「好大沽壓，現在先放下去，會跌至0.12元以下，收齊貨先再踢返上來。」
我說﹕「你哋不是好乾嘅咩？邊個有貨掟你？」
他說﹕「有條友叫『 T君』，在高位買了幾百萬錢，猛咁沽貨。我梗係把股價質低，接齊貨，先至炒啦！」
「咁而家即係點？」
「 T君分開五日沽貨，沽清了，所以股價也已穩定下來。」他說﹕「家陣二三線咁旺，隻嘢又得一億市值咁多，我都要炒返轉，賺返點錢啦，如果唔係要隻殼來做乜？」
80 : Alfred Ho(32091)@2012-08-23 13:41:41

79樓提及
留意湯財的文, 未必可以發達(甚至阻大家發達), 但肯定可以輸少好多冤枉錢係ot 股身上~~
http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/financeestate/art/20120823/16627593
投資一周：發達要賺窮人錢
首都創投（2324）的故事：上星期，一位線人打電話過來，說首都創投（2324）會炒起，那時的股價是0.16元。誰知過了兩天，不但不升，反而跌至0.14元。
我沒有買，但作為專業蠱惑仔，馬上致電線人，爆着粗說﹕「我買了50萬錢，家陣點算先（下略100字粗口）……」
他說﹕「好大沽壓，現在先放下去，會跌至0.12元以下，收齊貨先再踢返上來。」
我說﹕「你哋不是好乾嘅咩？邊個有貨掟你？」
他說﹕「有條友叫『 T君』，在高位買了幾百萬錢，猛咁沽貨。我梗係把股價質低，接齊貨，先至炒啦！」
「咁而家即係點？」
「 T君分開五日沽貨，沽清了，所以股價也已穩定下來。」他說﹕「家陣二三線咁旺，隻嘢又得一億市值咁多，我都要炒返轉，賺返點錢啦，如果唔係要隻殼來做乜？」



......................................!!!
81 : GS(14)@2012-08-24 09:28:01

http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... TN20120823716_C.pdf
配售8,400萬股@11.3仙

配售之所得款項淨額約9,000,000港元。董事會擬視乎市況及投資機會而將所得款
項淨額用作投資及營運資金。
82 : Alfred Ho(32091)@2012-08-24 12:49:34

81樓提及
http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/listconews/SEHK/2012/0823/LTN20120823716_C.pdf
配售8,400萬股@11.3仙
配售之所得款項淨額約9,000,000港元。董事會擬視乎市況及投資機會而將所得款
項淨額用作投資及營運資金。



大股东係威利，邱中行比人踢走左.
83 : greatsoup38(830)@2012-08-24 12:53:12

是呀，無錯
84 : Alfred Ho(32091)@2012-08-24 12:56:01

83樓提及
是呀，無錯



邱中行仲有D咩？D fds 話佢好劲.
85 : greatsoup38(830)@2012-08-24 13:09:09

84樓提及
83樓提及
是呀，無錯

邱中行仲有D咩？D fds 話佢好劲.


他勁個鬼... 幾萬銀街數都畀唔起，個個都勁做唔到生意都是廢
86 : Alfred Ho(32091)@2012-08-24 13:16:08

85樓提及
84樓提及
83樓提及
是呀，無錯

邱中行仲有D咩？D fds 話佢好劲.

他勁個鬼... 幾萬銀街數都畀唔起，個個都勁做唔到生意都是廢



哈…幾萬銀街數都畀唔起,未同我差唔多。佢又做淫爱堂經理，吊完來係空心牛老官。
87 : greatsoup38(830)@2012-08-24 13:18:25

86樓提及
85樓提及
84樓提及
83樓提及
是呀，無錯

邱中行仲有D咩？D fds 話佢好劲.

他勁個鬼... 幾萬銀街數都畀唔起，個個都勁做唔到生意都是廢

哈…幾萬銀街數都畀唔起,未同我差唔多。佢又做淫爱堂經理，吊完來係空心牛老官。


唔作大個屎眼邊個信佢呀
88 : Alfred Ho(32091)@2012-08-24 13:24:09

87樓提及
86樓提及
85樓提及
84樓提及
83樓提及
是呀，無錯

邱中行仲有D咩？D fds 話佢好劲.

他勁個鬼... 幾萬銀街數都畀唔起，個個都勁做唔到生意都是廢

哈…幾萬銀街數都畀唔起,未同我差唔多。佢又做淫爱堂經理，吊完來係空心牛老官。

唔作大個屎眼邊個信佢呀


今次玩完鸟。
89 : oman(1154)@2012-08-24 13:33:01

STARMAN'S COLUMN - 江小魚
首創主席暗助「保釣」  
(2012年08月24日)

所謂港澳「保釣勇士」到釣魚台「宣示主權」，原來整隊人能夠成行，都要拜民間累捐超過七位數字之助，收了錢，怎可以不出海？這些錢，等同「戲金」？
日本右翼分子也到尖閣諸島插上太陽旗。其實，若不帶著所謂有點盲目的民族主義角度，客觀而言，這群島嶼，西方人稱之為Pinnacle Islands，日文譯之為尖閣諸島(Senkaku)。
中華人民共和國叫作釣魚島，在台灣的中華民國，則稱之為釣魚台。不少香港人叫「釣魚台」，可能政治不正確，因北京方面是叫「釣魚島」。
很多中國人都以為，中日關係「卡」在歷史問題，至今仍爭拗不斷。不過，這款想法似乎頗有問題，也反映持此論點的有關蛋頭專家不學無術。
早在1972年日中兩國建交，在「歷史問題」上──即二戰當中的中日戰爭問題的處理上，中日兩國已達成共識；日本侵略了中國，給中國政府和中國人民帶來巨大傷害和災難，日本對此進行由衷反省。
這一共識實現了中日兩國的邦交正常化，它意味著兩國從政治和外交意義上已就歷史問題達成了共識。否則，中日根本無法建立邦交，時任中共總理周恩來亦不可能同意並簽字，因這無法給國民合理交代。
周恩來總理在40年前實現中日邦交正常化的邏輯很清楚。歷史是客觀存在的，誰也改變不了，今天中日兩國人民其實面對的關鍵不在歷史本身，而是在於對歷史的認識。「歷史認識問題」即我們如何認識當年發生的歷史事件，這才是主要關鍵點。日本人，和中國人差異有多大？大家可能敢認而不敢講，正因有差異，看同一件事，自然有不同觀點。
中共「十八大」快將召開，所謂保釣不過是政治姿態的目光轉移；其實日本都幾無癮，你中國內部要「講數」，就搵著日本來搞，日本國內輿論對此清楚不過。
個人最討厭香港某些媒體，狗吠甚麼「中日必將一戰」！香港人好想打仗咩？到時股、樓「冧」到七彩呀！到時戰情稍見嚴峻，全國糧食供作軍需，無多餘可輸港，餓死你班友呀！中日必將一戰，知唔知自己講乜呀！
某周刊報道今次所謂「保釣」，提及一位暗地補給糧水的台灣猛人、中國國民黨中常委劉大貝，其現任職首都創投(2324)主席；我曾和他在「福臨門」吃過一次晚飯，當然只講股票不談政治。
我當時在想，他在中台兩邊均「吃得開」，現又坐正首都創投主席，難免幻想，該股未來究竟有何大龍鳳搞作？
90 : Alfred Ho(32091)@2012-08-24 13:36:02

89樓提及
STARMAN'S COLUMN - 江小魚
首創主席暗助「保釣」
(2012年08月24日)
所謂港澳「保釣勇士」到釣魚台「宣示主權」，原來整隊人能夠成行，都要拜民間累捐超過七位數字之助，收了錢，怎可以不出海？這些錢，等同「戲金」？
日本右翼分子也到尖閣諸島插上太陽旗。其實，若不帶著所謂有點盲目的民族主義角度，客觀而言，這群島嶼，西方人稱之為Pinnacle Islands，日文譯之為尖閣諸島(Senkaku)。
中華人民共和國叫作釣魚島，在台灣的中華民國，則稱之為釣魚台。不少香港人叫「釣魚台」，可能政治不正確，因北京方面是叫「釣魚島」。
很多中國人都以為，中日關係「卡」在歷史問題，至今仍爭拗不斷。不過，這款想法似乎頗有問題，也反映持此論點的有關蛋頭專家不學無術。
早在1972年日中兩國建交，在「歷史問題」上──即二戰當中的中日戰爭問題的處理上，中日兩國已達成共識；日本侵略了中國，給中國政府和中國人民帶來巨大傷害和災難，日本對此進行由衷反省。
這一共識實現了中日兩國的邦交正常化，它意味著兩國從政治和外交意義上已就歷史問題達成了共識。否則，中日根本無法建立邦交，時任中共總理周恩來亦不可能同意並簽字，因這無法給國民合理交代。
周恩來總理在40年前實現中日邦交正常化的邏輯很清楚。歷史是客觀存在的，誰也改變不了，今天中日兩國人民其實面對的關鍵不在歷史本身，而是在於對歷史的認識。「歷史認識問題」即我們如何認識當年發生的歷史事件，這才是主要關鍵點。日本人，和中國人差異有多大？大家可能敢認而不敢講，正因有差異，看同一件事，自然有不同觀點。
中共「十八大」快將召開，所謂保釣不過是政治姿態的目光轉移；其實日本都幾無癮，你中國內部要「講數」，就搵著日本來搞，日本國內輿論對此清楚不過。
個人最討厭香港某些媒體，狗吠甚麼「中日必將一戰」！香港人好想打仗咩？到時股、樓「冧」到七彩呀！到時戰情稍見嚴峻，全國糧食供作軍需，無多餘可輸港，餓死你班友呀！中日必將一戰，知唔知自己講乜呀！
某周刊報道今次所謂「保釣」，提及一位暗地補給糧水的台灣猛人、中國國民黨中常委劉大貝，其現任職首都創投(2324)主席；我曾和他在「福臨門」吃過一次晚飯，當然只講股票不談政治。
我當時在想，他在中台兩邊均「吃得開」，現又坐正首都創投主席，難免幻想，該股未來究竟有何大龍鳳搞作？






劉大貝係中南人？？？？
91 : GS(14)@2012-08-24 23:08:12

他話是就是啦，打手
92 : kwuntl(19490)@2012-09-12 17:53:21

呢隻係咪想向下炒...?
93 : GS(14)@2012-09-12 22:29:54

92樓提及
呢隻係咪想向下炒...?


是
94 : GS(14)@2012-09-28 00:32:30

http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... TN20120927639_C.pdf
炒股蝕死左，無錢

業務回顧及前景
於回顧年度內，經濟問題不僅局限於歐洲及北美地區，中國及其他發展中國家亦
出現增長倒退，情況令人憂慮。現時令人擔心的是新興國家的強大經濟體系亦將
陷入西方經濟發展放緩的困局。全球投資氣氛因此變得更加脆弱。由於投資環
境正在不斷惡化，本集團按公平值計入損益之財務資產錄得虧損約153,100,000港
元。除上文所述之上市投資外，可供出售投資– Quidam Assets Limited之估值亦受
到市場不確定因素之不利影響。Quidam Assets Limited投資之公允值變動虧損約
15,000,000港元已經於本年度確認。
在低息環境下，貴金屬已經成為對抗通脹之熱門投資產品，導致年內金銀交易活
動頻仍，本集團聯營公司中國北方金銀業有限公司因而表現出色，本集團分佔其
溢利高達49,100,000港元，部分彌補本集團股本投資平平之表現。
除現有業務外，於二零一二年五月，本集團收購Go Markets Pty Limited投資，其
作為「直通式處理」(Straight Through Processing)供應商，專門為零售投資者提供網
上外匯交易。收購代價為數約19,000,000港元，以本公司配發及發行約84,100,000
股股份予賣方的方式支付。
儘管投資環境自去年底起重大改變，本集團為加強資本及股東基礎、提升本集團
競爭力及參與具有較高發展潛力之項目，本公司於年內進行配售。本公司於二零
一一年八月成功按每股0.3港元配售約250,000,000股股份，配售所得款項總額約
75,000,000港元。
展望將來，本集團預期全球經濟增長將持續放緩。市場避險情緒升溫可能引發更
大的市場不確定性和波動，發達國家和發展中國家均難倖免。然而，二零一二年
九月已經宣佈第三期量化寬鬆。聯邦儲備局推出每月四百億美元、不設屆滿日期
的新債券購買計劃，以購買機構的按揭擔保證券，並繼續維持超低利率政策最少
至二零一五年中，其對股本投資而言實屬有利。另一利好的一面是，中國政府於
短期內進一步收緊當前之宏觀政策的機會似乎減低。董事將採取審慎措施以管理
本集團之投資組合。
95 : wilyty(1376)@2012-09-28 08:36:49

BIG C is really amazing
96 : david395(4434)@2012-09-29 10:21:40

瞬間賺幾球

首都創投極具爆升潛力

黃嘉俊

中國北方證券集團有限公司副總裁

[email protected]



‧劉本身曾任國民黨中常委，在台灣的人脈網絡強大，絕對勝任兆豐票券董事長的身份。

‧首都創投現時的估值極度低廉，每股資產淨值為0.7元，折讓高達八成半。



現時在市場上，大折讓的股分有很多，但要捉摸到一隻會大幅抽升的，是有一定的困難。如筆者早前提及的首都創投（02324），雖然股價未有大炒作，但以現市值計，其實是偏低。加上近日台灣有報章報道，首都創投現主席劉大貝已被內定委任為台灣「兆豐票券」的董事長，劉本身曾任國民黨中常委，在台灣的人脈網絡強大，絕對勝任兆豐票券董事長的身分。



奕黧}始注意，若劉大貝在兆豐上任董事長後，其香港旗艦首都創投的前景應有一定憧憬，而筆者最近留意到多左「唉-bank」牌掛入，不知道是不是「唉-bank」或「專業投資者」消息突別靈通入十球博中獎，還是對公司前中短線都有信心。



首都創投現時的估值極度低廉，現價不夠0.1元，每股資產淨值為0.7元，折讓高達八成半。現時市值僅1億，連主板淨殼價都未達到，因此股價要翻兩番也不是難事。加上，技術指標(14)RSI約為12.2，已呈非常超賣，近日該股成交開始活躍，建議收集後，耐心等侯爆發，以其超落後走勢，以及近期市場瘋炒落後股分而言，大幅向下風險不高。加上首都創投日日波幅都有7至8%，升一格就有錢落袋。
97 : greatsoup38(830)@2012-09-29 10:36:11

我想笑，最新報告話得番4毛都唔夠
98 : GS(14)@2012-10-10 00:57:42

http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... TN20121009377_C.pdf
執行董事及董事會主席之辭任
首都創投有限公司 (「本公司」) 董事會 (「董事會」) 宣布，劉大貝博士 (「劉博
士」) 已辭任本公司執行董事、董事會主席及投資委員會主席，由二零一二年十月九
日起生效。
劉博士辭任之原因是最近獲台灣官方財政部委任為兆豐票券金融股份有限公司董事
長，根據台灣當局的規定，未經特別許可，不得兼任其他公司的董事職務。劉博士
確認彼與董事會並無爭議，且概無有關其辭任的其他事宜須促請股東注意。
首席顧問之委任
董事會欣然宣布，由二零一二年十月九日起，劉博士已獲委任為本公司首席顧問 「( 首
席顧問」) ，就本公司的策略規劃及整體發展出謀獻策。首席顧問並不是董事會成員。
授權代表之變更
董事會亦宣布，由二零一二年十月九日起，劉博士不再擔任本公司按聯交所證券上
市規則第3.05條的要求而設的授權代表 (「授權代表」)，執行董事及投資委員會成員
孔凡鵬先生已獲委接任授權代表之職務。
董事會謹藉此機會向劉博士於任內對本公司所作出之寶貴貢獻由衷致謝，又歡迎劉
博士及孔先生出任本公司的新職務。
99 : Vincemgm12(32446)@2012-10-10 08:59:48

2324会唔会是885的走勢翻板呢？尋底中！
100 : GS(14)@2012-10-10 21:54:14

99樓提及
2324会唔会是885的走勢翻板呢？尋底中！


885? 淨是得一隻?
101 : greatsoup38(830)@2012-10-19 00:54:25

http://orientaldaily.on.cc/cnt/finance/20121018/00202_038.html
首都創投（02324）執行董事孔凡鵬，遭富強證券入稟追討227萬元孖展證券戶口欠款。富強證券在入稟狀指出，孔氏於二○一○三月開設案中戶口，截至去年二月底戶口虧絀超過500萬元，同年九月，富強證券變賣戶口所有股票、證券抵債，現追討227萬元尾數。
102 : GS(14)@2013-01-05 12:17:04

http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... TN20130104006_C.pdf
10合1，2供1，65仙，金江包銷，都幾例牌
103 : amazingrick(36737)@2013-02-22 22:55:11

一股賺3毫，點睇？雖然都幾假
104 : greatsoup38(830)@2013-02-23 10:36:08

103樓提及
一股賺3毫，點睇？雖然都幾假


唔使睇，是0.3仙，不是0.3元，你睇錯左
105 : amazingrick(36737)@2013-02-23 11:47:58

104樓提及
103樓提及
一股賺3毫，點睇？雖然都幾假


唔使睇，是0.3仙，不是0.3元，你睇錯左


唔怪之得！
106 : alb(35614)@2013-03-12 11:09:14

又炒起，印象中4月供股

(greatsoup: 已修改，有pdf 字尾至好貼)
107 : greatsoup38(830)@2013-03-12 21:56:11

106樓提及
又炒起，印象中4月供股


他們成日都是咁玩好悶
108 : alb(35614)@2013-03-14 08:14:24

睇下大C點講



實戰理論 - 沈振盈 2013年3月13日

實戰理論：大市22800有支持 - 沈振盈

港股上個禮拜挾完後，昨日已走了樣，恒指下破23000關口，一些炒兩會概念的板塊，跌幅更加驚人。筆者一早已提醒大家，市場可能是炒錯市，擔心會議完結前，已有資金提早散貨套現。一眾太陽能、基建、鐵路等股份，跌幅動輒5%至6%。內地股市亦疲弱，滬綜指已連跌四日，走勢也頗駭人。相信大市短期內仍會反覆，但估計22600至22800應有支持。

首都創投(2324)昨日宣佈，向六名承配人配售金額總值2,000萬元的可換股債券，年利息10厘，換股價0.1元，較上日收市價0.075元溢價約33.33%。昨日消息公佈後，股價進一步上升，收報0.087元，仍低於此可換股債券的行使價約13%。

指數股揀港交所平保
股價走勢方面，自12月於0.055元水平出現小型雙底後，開始建立起大型橫行區，於0.067元水平見支持，並間中出現急升回吐，但仍然守穩橫行區上。今次以0.1元行使價發CB，起碼可作參考，就是承配人的買貨成本在0.1元之上。

技術上，昨日上破2月中高位0.077元，出現了技術突破，若能企穩0.1元之上，此乃1月初之高位，先上望0.15元，止蝕位0.078元。

若以資產淨值計，根據早前公佈的業績報告，截至2012年12月底計，為0.3783元，現價的折讓頗大。截至2012年12月底止6個月未經審核的盈利為296萬元，開始轉虧為盈，每股盈利0.3仙。以前景及NAV的折讓計，首都創投皆具吸納價值。

回說大市，由於技術上出現短暫的調整訊號，指數股可等多一、兩天才趁低吸納。若指數能回落至100日線，便可落注買貨，首選為港交所(388)及平保(2318)。
109 : GS(14)@2013-03-14 10:04:14

大輸一年到晚推2324啦
110 : GS(14)@2013-05-25 13:01:03

273賣晒2324
111 : alb(35614)@2013-05-25 15:55:31

110樓提及
273賣晒2324


脫離關係?
112 : greatsoup38(830)@2013-05-25 15:56:20

111樓提及
110樓提及
273賣晒2324


脫離關係?


遲早咪一齊番，都是班老千搞來搞去
113 : lemonwongwong(33038)@2013-06-11 00:30:29

2324有咩背景?
114 : greatsoup38(830)@2013-06-11 00:31:25

113樓提及
2324有咩背景?


華匯康健澳門
115 : lemonwongwong(33038)@2013-06-11 00:32:03

哦。。。。有澳門份。。。
116 : greatsoup38(830)@2013-07-30 00:12:47

無人供股
117 : GS(14)@2013-10-01 12:24:38

2324
虧損降95%，至600萬，1億可變現資產
118 : supermandavid(42431)@2013-10-13 18:28:05

117樓提及
2324
虧損降95%，至600萬，1億可變現資產


大C，我發現E隻股票的在9月尾時中國金融公司有4.92％的股份，然後10月頭又去左另一個證券商度（完整7百萬股），你說係埋有野搞緊啊？
119 : greatsoup38(830)@2013-10-13 18:33:06

118樓提及
117樓提及
2324
虧損降95%，至600萬，1億可變現資產


大C，我發現E隻股票的在9月尾時中國金融公司有4.92％的股份，然後10月頭又去左另一個證券商度（完整7百萬股），你說係埋有野搞緊啊？


唔好搞呢d股啦，呢d股好難玩的....是從福財轉左去中金，中金轉去銀河的，即是又是班同夥，唔好中計啦

咁樣轉來轉去都是要你以為有背景，無視就得啦，又唔是好多錢

點解你地咁執迷不悟仲要去搞垃圾股，明知呃人呃錢還要花心機，無你咁好氣
120 : VA(33206)@2013-11-04 21:59:25

殼股潮越炒越勁，近排連啲「創仔」都炒到癲晒，勝曉嵐上個禮拜聽到，創仔殼最低入場費已要兩個億先有得傾，點解咁好價？皆因大sell side、buy side都想趕喺10月1日新例前搞掂。除咗創仔，而家殼潮仲蔓延到較冷門嘅「21仔」（即係21章公司，如周顯早前報稱自己買咗嘅首都創投（2324）就係21仔）。點解會蔓延到呢啲公司？因為而家多咗資產管理公司搵融資渠道，好似東方、長城呢啲大型資產管理公司，都話搵殼。事實上，21仔吃香唔係未試過，好似國開國際（1062），早兩年被國家開發銀行旗下專責資產管理嘅國開金融用每股0.4元收購咗，1062上周五收市報0.68元，較佢NAV 0.353元有近倍溢價，反映中資金融機構係有一定優勢。再睇番資料，目前市面上得25間21仔，因上市格要求甚高，所以近年再冇新嘅21仔登場，咁仲有咁多中資金融機構要嚟香港上市嘅話，就一定要借殼上，睇怕呢25間21仔短期都會癲埋一份。

http://www.sharpdaily.hk/supplem ... aRice-21%E4%BB%94/2
121 : GS(14)@2013-12-06 16:51:25

每手1萬股變5,000股
122 : greatsoup38(830)@2013-12-29 22:57:13

8100 出售2324 cb
123 : GS(14)@2014-01-16 00:54:35

盈喜
124 : GS(14)@2014-01-28 00:14:35

1供4，4送1紅股，認購價均是25仙
125 : 投機仁(34693)@2014-01-29 00:32:03

又係年年向南的垃圾
126 : greatsoup38(830)@2014-01-29 00:41:10

不知所謂
127 : greatsoup38(830)@2014-01-31 19:44:05

2324
128 : greatsoup38(830)@2014-01-31 19:45:10

又轉番人wor?
129 : 200(9285)@2014-02-04 21:14:57

丘忠航活躍返d了
http://www.cni-gold.com/inner_trend_detail.php?id=10789

2014-01-20

作者 : Marketing

點擊 : 266人次
活動：友聯勵進社30周年聯歡晚宴暨名譽社長就職典禮

時間：2014年1月17日（星期五）

地點：香港會議展覽中心四樓君爵廳

主禮嘉賓：香港特區立法局議員張華峰太平紳士及香港金銀業貿易場理事長張德熙先生

嘉賓：香港金銀業貿易場董事會成員、友聯勵進社成員、中國北方金融集團主席丘忠航先生及中國北方金融集團有限公司代表


中國北方金銀業有限公司於業內名聲超卓，備受業內人士推崇，中國北方金融集團主席丘忠航先生更獲委任為香港金銀業貿易場友聯勵進社第十五屆(2013-2015年度)名譽社長。


為隆重其事，金銀業貿易場設宴於香港會議展覽中心，舉行友聯勵進社30周年聯歡晚宴暨名譽社長就職典禮。

勵進社於1947年組織成立，友聯社翌年成立，1984年兩社合併，正式名為「友聯勵進社」。簡稱「友勵社」，以聯絡同業感情、團結互助、增進同人福利及發展體育為宗旨。多年來舉辦不少節目，包括旅行、就職聯歡會、體育活動等，在公益事務方面亦不遺餘力，現有社員數百人。
130 : GS(14)@2014-02-04 23:29:26

呢排可能個冷淡對待令就取消?
131 : 200(9285)@2014-02-17 21:04:29

greatsoup在130樓提及
呢排可能個冷淡對待令就取消?


可能係，條撚人遲d唔知會不會出返山，佢檔野好似無租icc 搬左去中環‧
132 : GS(14)@2014-02-17 23:29:50

200在131樓提及
greatsoup在130樓提及
呢排可能個冷淡對待令就取消?


可能係，條撚人遲d唔知會不會出返山，佢檔野好似無租icc 搬左去中環‧


現在邊度開左?
133 : 200(9285)@2014-02-18 18:50:30

greatsoup在132樓提及
200在131樓提及
greatsoup在130樓提及
呢排可能個冷淡對待令就取消?


可能係，條撚人遲d唔知會不會出返山，佢檔野好似無租icc 搬左去中環‧


現在邊度開左?


香港皇后大道中16號新世界大廈2304室.
134 : greatsoup38(830)@2014-02-18 22:34:49

200在133樓提及
greatsoup在132樓提及
200在131樓提及
greatsoup在130樓提及
呢排可能個冷淡對待令就取消?


可能係，條撚人遲d唔知會不會出返山，佢檔野好似無租icc 搬左去中環‧


現在邊度開左?


香港皇后大道中16號新世界大廈2304室.


同叔老巢啊
135 : 200(9285)@2014-02-27 19:42:25

8037 有無專區呀?
136 : greatsoup38(830)@2014-03-01 12:26:05

2324

盈利急增27.6倍，至8,600萬，輕債
137 : Louis(1212)@2014-05-27 22:51:41

首都創投(02324.HK)供股僅獲54.07%認購
2014年4月17日  05:48:02 a.m. HKT, AAFN

首都創投(02324.HK)公布供股結果，接獲涉及合共3.7億股有效接納及申請，佔供股總數54.07%，包銷商已促使獨立第三方認購餘下3.14億股供股股份。建議已成為無條件，供股股份預期本月22日(星期二)開始買賣。(de/d)


阿思達克財經新聞

份額持有人的大傾銷:
http://sdinotice.hkex.com.hk/di/ ... 4&src=MAIN&lang=ZH&

有何意見？smiley
138 : greatsoup38(830)@2014-05-28 01:10:27

佢地好有默契
139 : newtonau(41980)@2014-06-13 10:39:52

什麼意思?現價$0.19，資產值$0.7115。為何要出呢份野?

[url][/url]
140 : chungonluk(36574)@2014-06-14 15:42:24

2324 之前在0.6停過一段時間, 以前每前跌左都會升番去0.6, 依家出緊黃金交叉唔知有冇機會??
141 : greatsoup38(830)@2014-06-14 20:12:02

chungonluk在140樓提及
2324 之前在0.6停過一段時間, 以前每前跌左都會升番去0.6, 依家出緊黃金交叉唔知有冇機會??


講d野都無邏輯
142 : GS(14)@2014-09-28 08:53:54

虧損增10倍，至7,260萬，8,200萬現金
143 : greatsoup38(830)@2015-01-16 01:10:26

盈喜
144 : greatsoup38(830)@2015-02-27 01:33:46

盈利急增60%，至1.3億，5.5億可變現資產
145 : greatsoup38(830)@2015-03-16 01:25:57

5合1，1供7，每股25仙
146 : greatsoup38(830)@2015-03-16 01:26:53

5合1，1供7，每股25仙
147 : greatsoup38(830)@2015-03-16 01:26:55

5合1，1供7，每股25仙
148 : greatsoup38(830)@2015-03-16 01:29:04

5合1後，1供7，每股25仙
149 : greatsoup38(830)@2015-03-16 14:05:59

test
150 : greatsoup38(830)@2015-03-17 10:28:43

adf
151 : abbychau(1)@2015-03-17 20:46:22

asdfasdf
152 : abbychau(1)@2015-03-17 20:46:37

asdfasdf
153 : Banana Republic(1499)@2015-03-21 09:52:24

供极都有，正！
154 : GS(14)@2015-03-25 01:12:23

恐怖啦
155 : jj1984(29252)@2015-05-12 13:01:19

真經典,1拆5,再5合1.....呢間21章公司永無翻身之日
156 : greatsoup38(830)@2015-05-13 01:33:41

唔好玩
157 : GS(14)@2015-06-25 00:33:43

改做9月年結
158 : greatsoup38(830)@2015-07-16 01:07:30

盈喜
159 : GS(14)@2015-07-21 01:27:32

供股不足額
160 : greatsoup38(830)@2015-09-02 01:13:08

盈利增14倍，至10.8億，輕債
161 : greatsoup38(830)@2015-09-28 23:08:53

http://webb-site.com/articles/sinceresmart.asp
Hao Wen, Capital VC and Unity
24th September 2015

Browsing through documents for a much longer forthcoming story, we came across two highly questionable acquisitions that link together 3 listed companies: Hao Wen Holdings Ltd (Hao Wen, 8019) and two Chapter 21 investment companies, Capital VC Ltd (Capital VC, 2324) and Unity Investments Holdings Ltd (Unity, 0913) that we have warned investors about in the past.

On 1-Sep-2014, Hao Wen Holdings Ltd (Hao Wen, 8019) announced the acquisition of 22.5% of Sincere Smart International Ltd (Sincere Smart, BVI), which owns 100% of Ideal Surplus Inc Ltd, a HK company which, according to Hao Wen, is "principally engaged in the provision of cloud platforms application and solutions". The "About us" page of its web site seems to confirm this, but if you click on the English "Home" button then you get a whole different experience - some sort of online Chinese betting platform. The vendor was a Mr Wang Zewei (Wang Zewei) and the deal completed on 8-Oct-2014.

The cash purchase price of HK$69m for 22.5% implies a valuation for 100% of HK$306.7m, compared with net profit from 7-Jan-2013 to 31-Mar-2014 of $3.4m and net assets of $2.9m, so this was a rich valuation indeed. Hao Wen was "principally engaged in the sale of biodegradable products and raw materials and the manufacture and sale of biomass fuel". You can see the synergy, can't you? No?

There was no mention of who owned the other 77.5% of Sincere Smart, so we dug, and found that in the 6 months to 31-Dec-2014, Capital VC bought an unspecified stake in Sincere Smart for HK$42.7m, see note 13 of the interim results. The open offer circular of Capital VC dated 24-Jun-2015, p53, discloses that the stake is 14.00%. So like Hao Wen, Capital VC had paid a price which implies a $305m valuation on Sincere Smart. The next page shows that in the 9 months to 31-Dec-2014, Sincere Smart lost HK$0.2m and ended with net assets of HK$2.7m. This is not what you would call a growth company.

But there was a third player. Note 12 of the 2014 annual report of Unity shows that it spent HK$90m on 29.5% of Sincere Smart, again a valuation of HK$305.1m. So the 3 companies, Hao Wen, Capital VC and Unity had altogether spent HK$201.7m on a 66% stake. However, on 5-Feb-2015, Unity agreed to sell its stake to "a third party" for HK$92m, of which $2m had been paid (see note 33) and $90m was due by 2-Oct-2015. That's rather convenient, because it avoids having to do an impairment test on the investment for the 2014 audit.

Capital VC has deferred its year end from 30-Jun-2015 to 30-Sep-2015, so it won't have to deal with that problem just yet.

The connection between Hao Wen and Unity goes further though.

Another investment made by Unity in 2014 was a 29.9% stake in Peak Zone Group Ltd (Peak Zone, BVI) for HK$90m, valuing the whole at $301m. Peak Zone is "engaged in the provision of integrated application." Note 17(iii) of the Unity 2014 annual report says Peak Zone made a profit of HK$0.392m and had net assets of HK3.092m, so this appears to be another vastly overpriced investment. Again, it was convenient that on 27-Feb-2015, after the year end and before the accounts were audited, Unity agreed to sell its stake to "a third party" for HK$108m, of which just $2m had been received and the rest was due by 31-Dec-2015. That raises the valuation of Peak Zone even further, to HK$361.2m. As Peak Zone was under contract for sale, no impairment test was applied.

By amazing coincidence, the 2014 annual results of Hao Wen include a footnote that on 6-Feb-2015, after the year end, it agreed to buy 5.4% of Peak Zone from an "independent third party" for HK$19.2m (implying a valuation of $355.6m), and the transaction was completed on 16-Feb-2015.

Webb-site Reports urges the SFC's corporate misconduct team to investigate these transactions.
162 : greatsoup38(830)@2015-09-28 23:19:42

Bubbles and troubles in Hong Kong
24th September 2015

As readers may recall, last year, Lerado Group (Holding) Co Ltd (Lerado, 1225) announced the proposed sale of its core business of baby strollers and infant car seats to Canadian listed firm Dorel Industries Inc (Dorel) for HK$930m. Lerado was planning to squat on most of the cash proceeds and only pay out $0.30 per share, or $228m. For this reason, we opposed the sale, because of concern that Lerado would become a cash shell trading at a discount to its net asset value. Your editor, David Webb, is a disclosed substantial shareholder currently holding over 8%. However, the sale was approved by shareholders on 16-Sep-2014 and completed on 31-Oct-2014.

Our concerns have now proven justified, culminating in current egregious proposals not just by Lerado but by other listed companies. We hope to stop them, if the regulators will require certain parties to play fairer. This article is long and complicated, and we thought about breaking it into pieces, but the picture becomes clearer if you assemble the whole jigsaw, so here it is. Apart from Lerado, this article covers transactions by numerous other listed companies in which you may have an interest, and several billion US dollars of bubbles.

So pour yourself a large coffee and let's get started.
Lerado share movements

The first sign of movement in Lerado came on 25-Nov-2014. Intelligence Hong Kong Group Ltd (IHK) is a company owned 68.27% by Lerado Chairman Henry Huang Ying Yuan (Mr Huang) and 31.73% by his wife, Jamy Huang Chen Li Chu. IHK owns 148,353,540 shares which was 19.50% of Lerado at 31-Dec-2014, before the recent dilutions. On 25-Nov-2014, our system shows those shares moving from CTBC Asia Ltd (the local subsidiary of a Taiwan bank) where they had rested since 30-Dec-2009, to Convoy Investment Services Ltd (Convoy IS), the brokerage sister of Convoy Financial Holdings Ltd (Convoy FH, 1019). Convoy IS is in the process of trying to list on the GEM in the form of CIS Holdings Ltd, which filed an application proof on 23-Mar-2015, sponsored by Quam Capital Ltd.

There can be any number of reasons for such transfers, but one possibility is that the shares are security for a loan. Banks and brokers are exempt from disclosing security interests in shares pledged to them. It wouldn't be so worrying were it not for the fact that Mark Mak Kwong Yiu (Mr Mak), CEO of Convoy FH and a director of Convoy IS, is also claimed to be an INED of Lerado since 25-Apr-2014. Mr Mak joined Convoy as CFO in 2002.

You may recall that in Some bubbles for New Year (31-Dec-2014) we warned about a bubble then called Finsoft Corporation (Finsoft, 8018), which was then trading at $1.235 (adjusted for the subsequent 2:1 split), with a market value of HK$4.94bn, or 110 times its net asset value. Convoy FH owned over 5% of Finsoft. The stock didn't stop there though. It reached a high of $2.92 on 20-May-2015, when Finsoft was valued at HK$11.68bn. Since then, it has crashed 94.8% to its close on Wednesday (23-Sep-2015) at $0.139, down a net 88.7% since our article. Finsoften aren't what they seem.

The Finsoft bubble allowed Convoy FH to book unrealised gains of HK$238.4m for 2014. It sold 40m shares (2%) of Finsoft on 20-Jan-2015 for about $73.5m (split-adjusted: $0.919 per share) and went below the 5% disclosure threshold. The sale was purportedly on-market but it was far larger than market volume that day of 1.925m shares so the disclosure must be wrong.

Returning to Lerado, another large chunk of 96,805,800 shares (12.71% at 31-Dec-2014) was held by Hwa Foo Investment Ltd (Hwa Foo), 30% controlled by Patrick Chen Chun Chieh (Mr Chen), an Executive Director and the son of the late co-founder of Lerado, and 70% by his mother. He joined the board on 3-Apr-2008 following his father's death on 14-Feb-2008. On 8-Sep-2014 those shares moved from HSBC (where they had rested since 27-Jun-2007) to UBS Securities HK Ltd , and then, more interestingly, they moved to small broker Win Fung Securities Ltd (Win Fung) on 9-Dec-2014, two weeks after IHK's holding moved to Convoy IS. So the Huangs and the Chens had moved custody of 32.21% of Lerado after leaving it untouched for years. More on Win Fung below.
Dispute with Dorel

First let's mention that on 10-Feb-2015, Lerado announced that it was in dispute with Dorel over the final net asset value of the business, which may lead to a partial repayment of the purchase price, in an unspecified "significant" amount.

On 27-Mar-2015, Lerado announced that it could not reach agreement with Dorel, so under the terms of the sale they had agreed to go to arbitration with an independent accountant, not yet appointed. In the 2014 annual results announcement on 30-Mar-2015, Lerado revealed that the disputed amount was HK$307m, which accordingly had been booked as a liability in the balance sheet. Still, Lerado ended 2014 with cash of $797m or HK$1.048 per share and no bank borrowings. The disputed amount was about $0.404 per share, so even if they have to pay all of that back, there would have been $0.644 per share of cash, and net assets of $633m or $0.832 per share.

On 20-Jul-2015, Lerado announced that it and Dorel had appointed RSM Nelson Wheeler as the independent accountant to determine the disputed items. Two months later, the result has not yet been announced. If Lerado were to win all of it, then the pro forma net asset value at 31-Dec-2014 increases to $1.236 per share.
Lerado swaps shares for property from CIFG

The day after the results, 31-Mar-2015, Lerado announced the acquisition of a property in Guangzhou from China Investment and Finance Group Ltd (CIFG, 1126) for HK$39m, but despite being flush with cash, only HK$1m was payable in cash and the rest in 76m new Lerado shares (9.49% of then existing shares) issued under the general mandate at $0.50 each, again a discount to cash and NAV per share.

The intended use of the property is as premises for the residual business of Lerado, which is mainly mobility scooters for the elderly and disabled, or what it calls "medical products". However, even if intended use of the property sounds plausible, the issue of shares at a discount to net cash and NAV was entirely inappropriate. The deal completed on 17-Apr-2015, giving CIFG a 8.59% stake in Lerado. Our system shows that CIFG deposited the shares into CCASS with Astrum Capital Management Ltd (Astrum) on 5-May-2015.

CIFG is not a regular listed company, but is a closed-end investment company listed under Chapter 21. This prohibits taking controlling positions (over 30%) in companies, and requires it to adhere to its stated investment restrictions. We asked the Stock Exchange why CIFG was allowed to invest in property in the first place. The result was this "clarification announcement" on 7-Aug-2015, admitting that investment properties were outside the scope of CIFG's Investment Policy and blaming it on the former Chairman and Vice Chairman. They had been removed by the Board on 14-Sep-2012, 6 months after becoming uncontactable.
Lerado begins money-lending and stockbroking

The "Prospects" section of Lerado's 2014 results indicated a new direction. The board had "concrete financial knowledge and background" and had decided to diversify into "securities trading, money lending business and other financial and property investment." It revealed that on 23-Feb-2015, Lerado had agreed to buy an unnamed target company, for HK$1.6m plus its net asset value. The target was a securities broker and planned to engage in margin financing business after the acquisition was completed. On 17-Apr-2015, Lerado announced that it would reallocate HK$300m of its cash pile for these activities.

On 2-Jul-2015 Lerado announced the name of the target, Yim Cheong Share Broking and Investment Co Ltd, and that the acquisition was completed that day. This was then renamed Black Marble Securities Ltd (Black Marble Securities), and Lerado intended to pump HK$200m into it. This small, nearly-dormant broker at that point had a minimal two licensed staff and minimal holdings in its CCASS account shown here.

Policy note: This highlights a defect in the Listing Rules: if you make a "Major Acquisition" (over 25% of your total assets), then you need shareholders' approval, but if you buy or establish a small company and then pump your funds into this new line of business, then this is completely exempt, even though shareholders are exposed to very new and different risks.

Lerado had also established BlackMarble Capital Ltd, incorporated 28-Jan-2015, a licensed money-lender. The application was gazetted on 27-Feb-2015 and the license was granted on 22-May-2015.
Lerado option grants

On 12-Feb-2015, Lerado granted options over 75m new shares (equivalent to 9.86% of the existing shares), of which half went to an unspecified number of employees, and half to "5 consultants". The options were exercisable for 2 years at $0.592 per share. It makes no sense whatever to be granting options which exercise at less than net cash per share, and much less than NAV per share, diluting both. Staff could have been incentivised with a restricted share purchase scheme to use the company's cash to buy stock in the market, which closed at $0.58 on the date of the option grants.

Despite being options of 2 years duration, 48m of the 75m were quickly exercised. We arranged an inspection of the share register on 14-Apr-2015 to discover who had been in such a hurry. We combined that with two filings of allotments by Lerado, which did not name the recipients. Here are the results:
Shareholder  Shares  Date entered  Status
Chu Chun Ting  7,500,000  11-Mar-2015  1 employee, 1 consultant
Kung Yiu Fai  7,500,000  11-Mar-2015
Chan Kam Fuk  7,500,000  17-Mar-2015  employee
Law Yee Man, Thomas  3,000,000  17-Mar-2015  employee
Wang Zewei  7,500,000  20-Mar-2015  consultant
Wong Sin Fai, Cynthia  7,500,000  20-Mar-2015  consultant
Kwok Wai Leung  7,500,000  2-Apr-2015  consultant
Total so far  48,000,000  14-Apr-2015  3 employees, 4 consultants

That leaves 1 more consultant who has not exercised the options. We recognise some of these names:

Chan Kam Fuk is Dominic Chan Kam Fuk (Dominic Chan), proprietor of accountancy firm Dominic K.F. Chan & Co. He was appointed as Company Secretary of Lerado on 1-Aug-2014.
Thomas Law Yee Man (Mr Law), an architect, is an INED of two listed companies, AcrossAsia Ltd (AcrossAsia, 8061) and Sage International Group Ltd (Sage, 8082). Here's a connection: Mr Law joined AcrossAsia on 28-May-2010, replacing Mr Mak of Convoy, who resigned as INED four days earlier. Perhaps Mr Mak helped to arrange Mr Law as his replacement at AcrossAsia. And here's another connection: Leung Tin Fu (Mr Leung), founder and Chairman of Sage until 14-Dec-2007, is also a pre-IPO holder of 10% of Convoy IS. Dominic Chan was an INED of Sage, resigning the same day as Mr Leung. We don't know what role Mr Law plays as an "employee" of Lerado.

Cynthia Wong Sin Fai (Cynthia Wong) is a solicitor who consults for Robertsons and has been Company Secretary of Suncorp Technologies Ltd (Suncorp, 1063) since 15-Feb-2011. We'll come back to that. We don't know what role she plays as a "consultant" to Lerado.

Wang Zewei (Mr Wang) is the name of the person who in 2014 sold 22.5% of Sincere Smart International Ltd to Hao Wen Holdings Ltd (Hao Wen, 8019) for HK$69m, valuing the business at $306.7m when it had net assets of $2.9m. Two other companies, Capital VC Ltd (Capital VC, 2324) and Unity Investments Holdings Ltd (Unity, 0913), bought 14% and 29.5% for $42.7m and $90m respectively, without naming the vendor(s). For more, see our article Hao Wen, Capital VC and Unity today. We don't know what role Mr Wang plays as a "consultant" to Lerado. He was the only mainlander on the list, and he gave an office address at 10 Gaoxin South 4th Road, Nanshan District, Shenzhen.

Incidentally, Mr Mak was also an Executive Director of Computech Holdings Ltd, now named China Mobile Games and Cultural Investment Ltd (CMG, 8081), from 30-Jul-2008 to 28-Apr-2014, three days after he joined Lerado. In fact he was the only ED of CMG from 17-Sep-2009 to 8-Nov-2011. The Convoy FH IPO prospectus dated 29-Jun-2010 said that despite this, Mr Mak considered Convoy his main focus and "has devoted more than 80% of his time to his duties" at Convoy during 2007-2009 and he would continue to allocate a similar proportion of his time to Convoy after listing. That basically meant that CMG only had about 0.2 Executive Directors!

Win Fung acted as the placing agent for CMG in a placing on 22-Apr-2015.

The option shares were deposited into CCASS via various brokers as follows. Click on the dates to see the movements in CCASS:
Date  Broker  Number
15-Apr-2015  SBI China Capital Financial Services Ltd (SBI CCFS)  7,500,000
29-Apr-2015  Win Fung  7,500,000
8-May-2015  Gransing Securities Co Ltd (Gransing)  7,500,000
27-May-2015  Gransing  7,500,000
24-Jun-2015  Prudential Brokerage Ltd  7,500,000
4-Aug-2015  Convoy IS  3,000,000
13-Aug-2015  UOB Kay Hian (HK) Ltd  7,500,000
Total   48,000,000

It appears likely that Mr Law deposited his 3m shares with Convoy IS, as all the other deposits matched the 7.5m option grants.

Incidentally, the other pre-IPO investor in 10% of Convoy IS is Howard Jiang Qi Hang, who featured in several previous investigations on Webb-site Reports.

Gransing is a name you will see again - it has acted 4 times as a placing agent for Convoy FH, in a bond placing on 21-Jan-2015 and a bond placing on 16-Sep-2014 as well as two unannounced bond placings on 8-Jul-2014 and 14-Nov-2014 mentioned in Convoy FH's annual report. Gransing's client list in Webb-site Who's Who also shows that it has acted as placing agent for Hao Wen, Suncorp and WLS Holdings Ltd (WLS, 8021), a company which we cover below.
CIFG-Lerado cross-holding

On 22-Apr-2015, probably in response to queries from the regulators, Lerado made a "voluntary announcement" trying, and in our view failing, to justify its decision to use shares rather than cash to buy the property from CIFG.

On 21-May-2015, Lerado announced that it had agreed to subscribe for 130m shares (12.44%) of CIFG at at $0.275, or $35.75m in total, setting up a cross-holding between the two, as CIFG still held 8.59% of Lerado. This was, incidentally, highly dilutive to CIFG, a 66.9% discount to its NAV per share at 30-Apr-2015 of $0.83. This fact was omitted from the CIFG announcement. The issue completed on 2-Jun-2015. Our system indicates that Lerado deposited 70m CIFG shares with Gransing on 23-Jun-2015, and deposited 60m CIFG shares with Kingston Securities Ltd (Kingston) the next day.

On 11-Aug-2015, Lerado cut its holding in CIFG from 128.8m shares (12.32%) to 103.392m shares (9.89%), selling the shares at an average $0.196, a 29% loss. As the stake was cut below 10%, Lerado is no longer a "substantial shareholder" and "connected person" of CIFG under the Listing Rules.

Policy note: the disclosure threshold for substantial shareholdings in HK-listed companies was reduced by law from 10% to 5% on 1-Apr-2003, but the Listing Rules have never been updated to match this.
Lerado issues shares to CAID (0048)

On 26-May-2015, Lerado announced the acquisition of Brilliant Summit Ltd from China Automotive Interior Decoration Holdings Ltd (CAID, 0048), for HK$45m, but again, not using any of the cash pile. Instead, it issued 75m shares at $0.60 each, or 7.82% of the enlarged issued shares of Lerado, further diluting existing shareholders. The target was "engaged in the trading of garment accessories, such as nylon tape, polyester tape and polyester string". It had net assets of just $7.24m and a net profit in the year to 31-Mar-2015 of $0.9m.

In giving reasons, Lerado claimed that "certain fabric products and expertise knowledge of the Target Group can be utilised in the Group's business of manufacturing medial products, including but not limited to powered and non powered mobility aid, wheel chairs and other durable equipment". Stretching the polyester tape further, they claimed that the Target Group's "sizable clientele" would allow Lerado to "penetrate into a new market." This rather ignores the fact that Lerado already had its own expertise in sourcing fabrics for baby strollers, infant car seats and mobility aids over many years.

CAID had purchased Brilliant Summit from its manager, a Mr Cheung Ngai, for HK$42m on 15-May-2013. He apparently goes by the name of "Elman" and apart from Brilliant Summit (products here), he runs another company in the same line of business called San Wah Holdings Ltd. CAID, announcing the sale of Brilliant Summit to Lerado, said that "as a result of the constantly increasing costs of sales and competition, the Company is of the view that its business is not expected to grow at its current rate without further investments and developments." CAID intended to hold the Lerado shares "to achieves earnings in the form of capital appreciation."

The transaction completed on 16-Jun-2015. We can see that CAID deposited the 75m new Lerado shares with Win Fung in two batches, 40m on 23-Jun-2015 and 35m on 14-Jul-2015. Of all the brokers it could use, why this little firm, and why is this the same firm in which Mr Chen and one of the option holders also deposited their Lerado shares? The shares are positioned in the same custodian ahead of an important vote on Lerado's future. To summarise those deposits of shares with Win Fung:
Shareholder  Shares  Deposit date
Mr Chen (Hwa Foo)  96,805,800  9-Dec-2014
An exercised option holder  7,500,000  29-Apr-2015
CAID  40,000,000  23-Jun-2015
CAID  35,000,000  14-Jul-2015
Total  179,305,800  

CAID's new INED or mooncake coordinator

For some light relief, on 4-Sep-2015 CAID appointed a new INED and audit committee member, Ms Adeline Ng Li La, who "has over 10 years of experience in human resources and corporate management". She also has a Certificate of Human Resources Management from HK Baptist University and is "a senior administrative officer of a renowned international technology company in Hong Kong". Wow, she sounds highly qualified, doesn't she?

A quick search discovers her Linked In page (copy here). Since May 2015, she has been personal assistant to the General Manager of Amadeus Hong Kong Ltd - and her duties include "supervise the receptionist and the cleaning lady", "coordinate mooncake distribution", "manage pantry cabinet" and planning the Christmas party. Now this of course is all important work, but probably not that relevant to the duties of a listed company director and audit committee member. We wonder how she was introduced to CAID. This is probably not what HKEx had in mind when it started promoting board diversity, but it's what you get when as a regulator, you let controlling shareholders vote on INED elections.
CAID and Convoy

On 30-Jun-2015, CAID announced a placing via Convoy IS, listing the Financial Adviser as Opus Capital Ltd (Opus Capital) and using the full 20% general mandate of 276.48m shares at $0.485, a 19.2% discount to the closing price of $0.60. However, the price then collapsed, and on 9-Jul-2015, they cut the placing price to $0.345, a 42.5% discount to the original closing price. The placing completed on 21-Jul-2015. Our CCASS analysis shows that 125.48m shares were deposited with Astrum, only 68m with Convoy IS and 25m with Kingston, with the remaining 58m to 4 other brokers.

CAID's interim results for 30-Jun-2015 disclosed a huge unrealised gain of RMB 448.6m (HK$561m) on "held-for-trading investments" which then had a market value of RMB564.0m (HK$705m). In other words, a gain of about 389% in 6 months. No normal stock will give you that, but a bubble stock will. Net tangible assets at 30-Jun-2015 were RMB761.9m (HK$952m) or about $0.689 per share, so the investments accounted for 74% of that.

CAID's interim report contains the following statement, which we regard as false and misleading:

"At 30 June 2015, there was no significant investment held by the Group."

Policy note: Some of the listed companies which have recently reported exceptionally large percentage gains on listed securities must own bubble stocks. If you know what stocks a listed company owns, then you would be able to take the SFC's concentration warnings into account and discount those investments to what you regard as fair value, rather than relying on inflated market valuations. But unfortunately, the Stock Exchange and SFC do not require such disclosure, even when inflated listed investments make up the bulk of a companies net assets. They simply rely on the company having to announce losses as inside information after the bubble has burst, rather than telling you that they hold bubble stocks in the first place.

This is despite the fact that Listing Rules Appendix 16 paragraphs 32(4) and 40(2) (or on GEM, Rules 18.41(4) and 18.59) require that companies disclose "significant investments held, their performance during the financial [year/half-year] and their future prospects". It seems that SEHK just doesn't want to enforce this.

Although the Listing Rules which require such disclosure contain no definition of "significant", it should be seen in the context of the size of the holder's balance sheet and therefore the potential impact on shareholder value if the market value of the investments were to change. Whether the investment is "held-for-trading" or as a long-term "available for sale" asset is irrelevant to the potential impact on shareholder value, except for the fact that profits tax applies to trading.

Separately, many listed companies have avoided the notifiable transaction rules in Chapter 14 by declaring themselves to be "in the business" of trading securities. This then allows them to invest as much of their shareholders' money as they like on purchasing "held-for-trading" securities without announcing the transactions, because they are deemed transactions "of a revenue nature in the ordinary and usual course of business" under Listing Rule 14.04(1)(g). The Stock Exchange should close this loophole. Investments in securities, regardless of how they are booked, should be subject to the notifiable transaction rules.

You might wonder then why CAID did not just cash in some of its $705m of investments rather than raise $94.2m in a placing of 20% new shares, claiming that it needed the money. The results failed to identify these spectacular investments, but noted that by 31-Aug-2015, the value had decreased by 23.5% since the end of June. That's about HK$224m of loss.
CIFG and Lerado: parallel open offers

On 17-Aug-2015, Lerado announced a massive 3:1 open offer of new shares at $0.15 each, a 68% discount to the market price of $0.47, with no excess applications. The primary underwriter is Gransing, the Financial Adviser is Octal Capital Ltd (Octal Capital) and the IFA is Opus Capital, the same as the Financial Adviser to CAID.

As we've said before, deep discount open offers are a form of extortion of existing shareholders, because they are faced with the choice of either being heavily diluted economically, or putting in cash to prevent the dilution. Unlike rights issues, the holder does not have the third option of selling his entitlements to recover the discount and thereby mitigate the economic damage. For this reason, the UK Listing Rules include a limit (set decades ago) of not more than a 10% discount on open offers. Hong Kong, still in many ways a developing market, allows this extortion to continue. See UK Listing Rule 9.5.10.

Adding to this abuse is that an open offer often involves no ability for shareholders to make "excess application" for unsubscribed shares. Nor are the unsubscribed shares sold in the market to capture the premium above the issue price for the benefit of passive shareholders. This leaves the underwriter with the benefit of the discount on shares which shareholders cannot or do not subscribe. In these circumstances, the open offer in practice is a conditional placing of deeply discounted shares with the "underwriter", subject to a right of first refusal by existing shareholders pro rata to their holdings.

Gransing cannot end up as a controlling shareholder of Lerado, so it has to have sub-underwriters. From a disclosure of interest, we can see that Capital VC (mentioned above) is a sub-underwriter for 370m shares, or 9.64% of the enlarged capital. Another disclosure shows that Barry Lau Wang Chi is a sub-underwriter for 370m shares. He is a Responsible Officer of Adamas Asset Management (HK) Ltd (Adamas), which will feature below.

On 9-Sep-2015, CIFG announced a huge 8:1 open offer with no excess applicatoins, "underwritten" by Black Marble Securities, which is owned by Lerado. The Financial Adviser to CIFG is Akron Corporate Finance Ltd (Akron) and the IFA is Opus Capital, the same as Lerado's IFA and CAID's FA.

As Lerado owns less than 10% of CIFG, the underwriting is not a "connected transaction". However, it is blatantly clear that Lerado has a "material interest" in the CIFG transaction and should be prohibited from voting in the EGM of CIFG to approve the open offer. Furthermore, Lerado stands to benefit from any unsubscribed shares at the discounted offer price. As there are no excess applications, this is in effect a discounted placement with Lerado subject to clawback by existing holders.Listing Rule 2.15 states:

"Where a transaction or arrangement of an issuer is subject to shareholders' approval under the provisions of the Exchange Listing Rules, any shareholder that has a material interest in the transaction or arrangement shall abstain from voting on the resolution(s) approving the transaction or arrangement at the general meeting."

Correspondingly, we submit that CIFG should not be permitted to vote in the Lerado EGM, because obviously Lerado is engaged in a commercial transaction with CIFG to provide it with funding under the CIFG open offer.
Mr Chen's "disposal" at a 53% loss

Now, according to a disclosure of interest, on 9-Sep-2015, Mr Chen, ED of Lerado, sold his entire interest of 97,823,800 shares, including a personal holding of 1,018,000 shares and those held by Hwa Foo. Some of it was on-exchange at $0.25, but most of it was off-market at $0.22 because total market volume that day was only 7,625,800 shares. When we look at CCASS movements, on the settlement date of 11-Sep-2015 we see his personal holding of 1,018,000 shares leaving Core Pacific Yamaichi, and only 2,805,800 shares leaving Win Fung, and there have been no reductions in Win Fung's balance since then. So it appears that the other 94,000,000 shares were transferred, off market, to other clients of Win Fung and remain there.

As an ED of Lerado, Mr Chen would have been prohibited from voting in favour of the proposed open offer, so it is a matter of great concern that these shares may have been placed in friendly hands, along with the positions held by CIFG and CAID, to vote in favour (if they are not required to abstain).

This disposal, at a deep discount to cash and to net asset value, of a key block of shares, really makes no economic sense for Mr Chen. If he was unhappy with the effects of the proposed open offer, he could have joined us in voting against the proposal. He was only prohibited from voting in favour. At a purported disposal price (for most of his shares) of $0.22, he appears to have accepted a loss of 53% since the open offer was announced. We find this hard to believe. Accordingly we urge the SFC to investigate the true nature of the transactions and who has bought the shares. We would be surprised if the "buyers" had not been mentioned elsewhere in this article.

China 33 Media (8087)

There's another open offer we need to tell you about, and the background is this.

On 26-Jan-2015, China 33 Media Group Ltd (C33M, 8087) announced that its controlling shareholder, Lizhong Ltd (Lizhong), which had held 243.756m shares (43.13%) had 5 days earlier pledged 192m shares (32.00%) to a lender and on 22-Jan to 26-Jan Lizhong had sold its remaining 66.756m shares (11.13%) in the market. They didn't say who the lender was, but a subsequent disclosure of interest shows that it is funds managed by Adamas, which was mentioned above. Our analysis shows the average price received by Lizhong in the 3 days was $0.4192 per share, a total of $27.98m. Now, why did Lizhong need to sell those shares and borrow that money by pledging the remainder? Read on.

On 10-Apr-2015, CIFG, via its 100% subsidiary New Express Investment Ltd, agreed to subscribe 120m shares (16.67%) of China 33 Media Group Ltd (C33M, 8087) at $0.22, exhausting its general mandate, for a total of HK$26.4m. The deal completed on 22-Apr-2015, diluting Lizhong from 32.00% to 26.67%. Our system shows that on 6-May-2015, CIFG deposited its C33M shares with Gransing.

Three months later, on 24-Jul-2015, C33M announced a massive 7 for 1 open offer at $0.10, a 75.6% discount to the closing price of $0.41, without excess applications. The Financial Adviser was Octal Capital (the same as for Lerado's open offer), and the underwriters were Gransing, Kingston and RHB OSK Securities HK Ltd (RHB OSK). The IFA again was Opus Capital, the same as for Lerado. Lizhong undertook to take up part of its entitlement amounting to 844,799,700 shares, which to the nearest thousand is 4.4 shares for each share it owns, not 7. That would cost it $84.5m, but of course, it had already raised about $27.98m by selling shares in the market in January, so there was a funding gap of $56.5m, or about $0.294 per existing share, which it might have borrowed from Adamas funds.

If CIFG was to maintain its holding, it would have to put in another $0.70 for each share it held. It had sold a few shares but still held 113.622m (15.78%). The share price dived 26.8% on the day after the news, but the prospect strangely seemed to delight CIFG, which undertook not to sell any more and to take up all its entitlements to 795.354m shares at a cost of $79.5m. However, on 4-Aug-2015, C33M announced that it and Gransing had agreed to cut CIFG's commitment to 290m shares. As a result CIFG would be diluted to 7.01% of C33M.

Under GEM Listing Rule 10.39(1) or Main Board Listing Rule 7.24(5)(a), if an open offer is at a ratio higher than 1 for 2 then it must be approved by "independent" shareholders excluding the controlling shareholder or, if none, the executive directors and their associates. So the largest holder of C33M, Lizhong, could not vote in favour at the EGM, as it is an associate of the Chairman.

How convenient, then, that there was another "independent" shareholder who could vote in favour. Look at the EGM results on 31-Aug-2015. CIFG almost certainly voted its 113.622m shares in favour, and only 2,050 other shares voted in favour, while 28,638,000 shares voted against. The open offer was thereby approved, and the prospectus was published on 14-Sep-2015.
Update, 26-Sep-2015

The C33M open offer prospectus discloses that several sub-underwriters have been engaged. Gransing, with a commitment of 1,905,200,300 shares (33.07% of the enlarged shares), engaged SBI CCFS for 800m shares (13.89%) and 3 other unnamed sub-underwriters for a total of 540m shares (9.37%), each with less than 5% of enlarged shares. RHB OSK, with a commitment of 500m shares (8.68%) had engaged 2 unnamed sub-underwriters to take all of them.

Kingston, with an underwriting commitment of 1500m shares (26.04%), had engaged but then terminated 4 sub-underwriters to take all of it. One was Harvest Aspect International Ltd, which a filing shows is owned by William Yu Tsung Chin, for 644.64m shares (11.19%). The remaining 3 each had less than 5% but totaled 14.85%. After these 4 were terminated, Kingston engaged a single sub-underwriter for the whole lot. Guess who? Black Marble Securities (owned by Lerado).

SBI CCFS and Black Marble have each failed to file a disclosure of interest.

The denominator in the calculation of percentage for disclosure of interests under s308 of the Securities and Futures Ordinance is based on the number of "issued shares", not the number which may be in issue in the future. So in a 7:1 open offer, there are new shares equivalent to 700% of existing shares. All the filings by the underwriters and sub-underwriters in the C33M case use the wrong denominator (the number of shares which will be in issue if the open offer completes) and hence show the wrong percentage, which should be multiplied by a factor of 8. Anyone with an underwriting commitment equal to 5% or more of the existing shares (in the case of C33M, 36m shares) should make a filing, and clearly, that has not happened, with several sub-underwriters of Gransing, RHB OSK and Kingston. The SFC should require them to correct their filings and to procure filings by their sub-underwriters, including those which have now been terminated.
GreaterChina Professional Services (8193)

Now let's look at how Lerado (via Black Marble Securities) and Akron (Financial Adviser to CIFG on its open offer) have been working together in another transaction.

GreaterChina Professional Services Ltd (GPS, 8193) is listed on GEM and owns Greater China Appraisal Ltd, which values real estate and other assets. On 13-Nov-2014, GPS began to deviate from its core business, by buying 80% of Golden Vault Ltd, which indirectly owns a mainland advertising business with in-elevator poster frames and LCD displays in Changshu, PRC, for HK$110m in promissory notes.

Golden Vault had turnover of RMB 7.34m in 2013 and net assets of RMB 5.73m (HK$7.16m) at 30-Sep-2014. This business was valued by Roma Appraisals Ltd at $184m, because, hey, elevators are difficult to get into - especially when they are going up. That valuer is owned by Roma Group Ltd (Roma, 8072) and the financial adviser on the profit forecast was Akron.

A disclosure of interest shows that on 11-May-2015, China Environmental Energy Investment Ltd (CEEI, 0986) increased its holding in GPS from 2.63% to 5.13%, buying 21.495m shares at $0.556 per share. From our CCASS system we see the shares deposited with Southwest Securities (HK) Brokerage Ltd (SWSHK, formerly Tanrich Securities Co Ltd).

On 8-Jul-2015, Roma announced that it had agreed to lend up to HK$58m to Brilliant One Holdings Ltd (Brilliant One) for 12 months at 12% p.a., secured by 310.85m shares in an unnamed GEM-listed company and guaranteed by persons named Ip Kwok Kwong and Wong Chi Keung, the ultimate owners of Brilliant One. That non-disclosure of the GEM company's name was silly, because it was easily determined that Brilliant One was the 36.23% controlling shareholder of GPS, which eventually announced the loan facility on 4-Aug-2015. Ip Kwok Kwong is the MD of GPS, while Wong Chi Keung (this one) is an accountant with 13 INED positions. The loan facility includes a maximum loan-to-value ratio of 65%. So if they draw the full loan, then the share price falling below $0.287 would trigger a top-up obligation. The shares were moved from Emperor Securities Ltd to Infast Brokerage Ltd on 9-Jul-2015.

On 9-Jul-2015, the day after the share pledge, GPS announced a huge proposed placing of shares under a specific mandate, 2.6bn shares at $0.10, a 74.4% discount to the market price of $0.39, via Black Marble Securities, which is owned by Lerado. The Financial Adviser is Akron (the same as for Lerado's open offer). That represents 303% of the existing shares, and they are not even bothering to make the shares available to existing shareholders by an open offer or rights issue. Simultaneously, it was proposed that SEEC Media Group Ltd (SEECM, 0205) would subscribe 1.4bn shares at the same price, a total of $140m, for 28.82% of the enlarged shares.

Policy note: As we mentioned above, open offers or rights issues larger than 1 for 2 (a 50% enlargement of issued shares) must be subject to shareholders' approval with controlling shareholders abstaining, or if there are none, then with executive directors and their associates abstaining. That does provide some small measure of protection, (unless the vote is being manipulated with warehoused shares). However, this protection is negated by the fact that a massive placing under a "specific mandate" can be approved without requiring controllers or executive directors to abstain. The Listing Rules should be amended to close the loophole so that controllers/executive directors should be required to abstain from voting in favour of any proposal to approve a "specific mandate" that enlarges the issued shares by more than 50%.

Brilliant One, which has pledged its controlling shareholding to Roma, was allowed to vote to approve this outrageous proposal.

Of the $395.1m net proceeds, GPS intends to use $100m in its money-lending subsidiary, Colbert Finance Ltd, and $150m to develop its securities brokerage business. It doesn't own a stockbroker yet, but it plans to either buy one or set one up. The EGM approved the placing on 14-Sep-2015 without objection. With an avalanche of shares due to hit the market at $0.10, it is quite impressive that the stock still closed at $0.495 on 23-Sep-2015.
SEECM (0205)

Now let's look at a fourth open offer involving Lerado (via Black Marble Securities) and Opus Capital.

SEECM is, or was, principally engaged in advertising agency, distribution of books and magazines. And securities trading, of course, like all shoddy companies should be. It announced its investment in GPS on 10-Jul-2015.

On 17-Jul-2015, SEECM announced that it had agreed to subscribe 103.02m shares (16.67%) of China New Economy Fund Ltd (CNEF, 0080) at $0.385, for a total of HK$39.66m, exhausting CNEF's general mandate. CNEF is another Chapter 21 investment company, and that was a 61.5% discount to the NAV of CNEF at 30-Jun-2015 of $1.00. As we noted in our article Some Bubbles for New Year on 31-Dec-2014, CNEF had shares in the Finsoft bubble alongside Convoy FH, and Tony Tai Man Hin, the CFO and Company Secretary of CNEF, was an INED of Finsoft. He retired from Finsoft on 5-May-2015. The CNEF announcement of the subscription named Astrum as the placing agent and did not mention the discount to NAV.

Also on 17-Jul-2015, SEECM announced that it is applying to the SFC to set up a stockbroker. Now everyone wants to be a broker. Lerado, GPS and SEECM.

On 19-Aug-2015, SEECM announced a huge open offer, 3 for 1 at $0.10, a 61.5% discount to the market price of $0.26. The Financial Adviser is Opus Capital (the FA of CAID and the IFA of C33M and Lerado), the IFA is Hercules Capital Ltd (Hercules) and the underwriter is Black Marble Securities, owned by Lerado. Again there will be no excess applications, so the "underwriter" gets the benefit of discounted unsubscribed shares. Of net proceeds of $624m, SEECM plans to use HK$365m to set up a stockbroker, $30m to set up a corporate finance advisory and asset management firm and $225m for the acquisition and operation of an unspecified e-commerce platform.

The shares dived on the news, dropping 35.4% to $0.168 the next day. But they weren't done yet. On 9-Sep-2015, they decided to increase the carnage by consolidating the shares 2:1 and then changing the offer terms to 5 new shares for each consolidated share at $0.10, equivalent to $0.05 before the consolidation. So the offer discount becomes an effective 80.8% discount to the original closing price of $0.26. This will raise a bit less though, HK$519m. This news caused another drop in the price, by 16.7% from $0.156 to $0.13 the next day. So the stock price had now halved even before putting the plan to a vote.

A circular for the capital reorganisation went out on 18-Sep-2015 for an EGM on 12-Oct-2015. We urge shareholders to vote against the resolutions. They are special resolutions that require a 75% majority to pass, so blocking it is more feasible than usual. If it passes, then a circular to propose the open offer is due out on 28-Oct-2015.
Chan Cheong Yee and CESHK

There is a common person to a number of these companies. Chan Cheong Yee (C Y Chan) is a Responsible Officer of China Everbright Securities (HK) Ltd (CESHK). CESHK is the investment manager of four Chapter 21 companies: CIFG, CNEF, China Innovation Investment Ltd (CII, 1217) and China Investment Development Ltd (CID, 0204). C Y Chan is an ED of all 4 companies, and he is also an ED of Capital VC.
CID (0204)

CID is in its own little bubble - it closed on 23-Sep-2015 at $0.157, compared with NAV of $0.024 at 31-Aug-2015.
CEEI (0986)

Now remember we mentioned CEEI, the investor in GPS? On 12-Nov-2014, CEEI announced a placing of 48,190,489 shares at $0.97 per share to raise HK$46.28m, exhausting the general mandate, followed by a huge 8:1 rights issue at $0.195 per share, an 82.4% discount to the market price of $1.11, to raise between $376m and $451m. Excess applications were allowed. At the time, CEEI had no substantial shareholders.

Win Fung was both the placing agent and the rights issue underwriter. The placing was on a best efforts basis, and on 27-Nov-2014, the placing price was cut to $0.66. The placing was completed on 3-Dec-2014, and all the shares were deposited into the CCASS account of Win Fung for its clients. Not a single share moved out of that account until after the EGM to approve the rights issue. And guess what, the EGM results on 18-Dec-2014 show that the number of shares voted in favour of the rights issue was 48,437,576, just 247,087 more than the number of placing shares.

On 12-Mar-2015, CEEI announced that it would start investing in "quality stock and other financial products", so don't say you weren't warned! On 17-Apr-2015, CEEI announced that it had bought 51m shares (0.337%) of Suncorp (mentioned above) that day in the market for HK$61.45m at an average of $1.205 after a huge run up in the share price following completion of a placing at $0.245 per share on 13-Apr-2015. The stock closed at $0.204 on 23-Sep-2015, down 83% since the purchase by CEEI. Some of the other investments by CEEI are covered below.
WLS (8021)

Now let's tell who may have benefitted from a huge bubble in the shares of WLS Holdings Ltd (WLS, 8021), a construction company.

As background, on 21-Oct-2014, WLS announced that CIFG would subscribe for 79m shares (16.67% of enlarged) at $0.177, a 0.6% premium to market, exhausting the general mandate. On the face of it, WLS had no other substantial shareholders. The deal completed on 31-Oct-2014. The shares were deposited with Fordjoy Securities and Futures Ltd (Fordjoy) on 5-Nov-2014. CIFG rapidly sold off the shares, from 12-Nov-2014, dropping below 5% on 3-Dec-2014.

WLS owns a licensed money-lender, Gold Medal Hong Kong Ltd, incorporated on 19-Mar-2014 and licensed on 26-Nov-2014.

On 21-Jan-2015, WLS announced a 5:1 share consolidation and a proposed massive placing of 540m consolidated shares (563.16% of the existing shares) at $0.30 via SWSHK (then Tanrich Securities Co Ltd). The Financial Adviser was Akron. This placing price was a 42.3% discount to the adjusted closing price of $0.52. At the 5-Mar-2015 SGM to approve the placing, votes in favour were 89,597,500, or 18.69% of the issued shares. Total turnout was only 19.00%. We suspect most of those votes in favour were shares previously held by CIFG, but we'll never know for sure.

Of the 540m shares, we know that CEEI took 63m shares (9.91% of enlarged), because it announced the subscription on 18-Mar-2015. Disclosures of interests show that Samuel Chiu Se Chung, a licensed Representative of Roofer Securities Ltd, also subscribed 9.9%. Unity, mentioned above, subscribed 31.5m shares (4.95%), as did Capital VC, mentioned above and Avant Capital Management (HK) Ltd (Avant), as asset manager. Mr Ye Ruiqiang subscribed 4.95%. As of 31-Dec-2014, he owned 6.44% of Capital VC.

There are 4 subscribers whom we cannot identify. A person named Zhang Yan subscribed 40.67m shares (6.40%) which were probably deposited with Emperor Securities Ltd, and a person named Zheng Wanying subscribed 31.33m shares (4.93%). A person named Civic Cheung Sun Kei subscribed 54m shares (8.49%) and another named Cheung Kam Hong subscribed the same number.

A person named Wong Chun Wah subscribed 23m shares (3.62%). It's a common name but we see that the same number went to the custody of Henik Securities Ltd, where there is a licensee called Wong Chun Wah. Similarly a person named Ma Kin Lung subscribed 31.0m shares (4.88%), and we see that number deposited with Get Nice Securities Ltd, where Ma Kin Lung is a licensed representative.

A person named Tam Siu Ki subscribed 54m shares (8.49%), increasing his stake to 9.28%. That may or may not be the same as Simon Tam Siu Ki, who was a representative of RHB OSK (then known as Prudence Securities Co Ltd) until his license was revoked on 30-Oct-2003 for rat-trading and other trading malpractices. In summary, then after the placing, the holdings were:
Name  Shares  Stake %
1  CEEI (0986)  63,000,000  9.91
2  Samuel Chiu Se Chung  63,000,000  9.91
3  Tam Siu Ki  59,000,000  9.28
4  Cheung Kam Hong  54,000,000  8.49  
5  Cheung Sun Kei, Civic  54,000,000  8.49
6  Zhang Yan  40,670,000  6.40
7  Avant  31,500,000  4.95
8  Capital VC (2324)  31,500,000  4.95
9  Unity (0913)  31,500,000  4.95
10  Ye Ruiqiang  31,500,000  4.95
11  Zheng Wanying  31,330,000  4.93
12  Ma Kin Lung  31,000,000  4.88
13  Wong Chun Wah  23,000,000  3.62
Total  540,000,000  85.71

The WLS placing completed on 27-Mar-2015 and the CCASS deposits are here. By that time, the stock had more than doubled to $1.25. Unlike the allotments after the IPO, there was no concentration warning. Yet 13 holders held 85.71% of the stock.

The price continued to climb. On 15-May-2015, with the stock at $2.26, 7.53x the placing price, WLS announced a 7:1 bonus issue. The stock spiked again and was suspended at $4.27 on 17-Jun-2015, prompting the company to announce that it was negotiating for a possible share issue. After a brief correction to $2.50, it was suspended again on 19-Jun-2015, pending announcement on 23-Jun-2015 of a "framework agreement" for possible subscriptions by Avant and Shin Kong Capital Management Inc (SKCM) of 1920m and 5760m shares (post-bonus) at $0.06875, a 78% discount to the bonus-adjusted closing price of $0.3125, to raise $528m gross and enlarge the issued shares by 151%.

While the stock was suspended, it went ex-bonus on 23-Jun-2015 and the bonus shares were distributed on 3-Jul-2015, so for 10 days straddling the half-year point, only 1/8 of the company was tradable. When trading in those shares resumed on 24-Jun-2015, the stock shot up again on heavy volume, reaching a daily high of $1.22 on 26-Jun-2015. Remember that most of the existing shares had been issued at a bonus-adjusted $0.0375, so they were now up 32.5x. WLS closed at $1.05 on 30-Jun-2015, allowing those listed companies which held the stock to book enormous "fair value gains" in their interim results. At the end of June, WLS had a market capitalisation of HK$5341m, compared with net tangible assets at 30-Apr-2015 of HK$282m ($0.055 per share), so it was trading at 18.9x NAV.

Disclosures of interest indicate that SKCM was using a vehicle called SKCM TMT I, L.P., which was 50% owned by Chiang Chun Yi and 50% by Yam Tak Cheung, and managed by SKCM TMT GP Co. Ltd, which is 40% owned by SKCM. After all that excitement, SKCM backed out of the deal on 8-Aug-2015 citing disagreement over due diligence on WLS, but Avant signed a new agreement on 12-Aug-2015 to continue to subscribe 1920m shares at $0.06875, conditional on WLS issuing at least 252m shares in a fund-raising exercise so that Avant ends up with 29.48% of less - certainly under the 30% takeover trigger.

Now this long and winding road takes us back to Lerado. On 18-Aug-2015, WLS announced two placings via Black Marble Securities, owned by Lerado. The underwritten tranche is of 360m shares (7.08% of existing shares) at $0.06875, and there is a further "best efforts" placing of 5400m shares (106.15%) at the same price, at 82.1% discount to the closing price of $0.385. Together these could raise $389.22m mostly for, you guessed it, money-lending and securities business. The shares closed on 23-Sep-2015 at $0.27, down 74.3% since the end of June, but still at 4.9x NAV.
Raise the umbrellas: China Jicheng (1027)

Perhaps the most ridiculous bubble in our market at present (although there is a lot of competition for that title) is umbrella maker China Jicheng Holdings Ltd (CJ, 1027) which listed on 13-Feb-2015. It peaked on 18-Sep-2015 at $3.18 with a market value of HK$47.7bn, compared with net tangible assets in the 30-Jun-2015 interim results of $399.6m, or $0.0267 per share. So it was trading at 119x NTA.

Adjusting for a 25:1 stock split in June, CJ's IPO priced the shares at $0.044, so was up 72.3x since the IPO. This gives new meaning to the term "umbrella movement". The initial custody positions of the 150m IPO shares (25%) are in our records here. The top 3 brokers will now be familiar to you: Gransing (8.72% of CJ), Win Fung (8.18%) and SWSHK (3.73%), a total 20.64% or 82.54% of the float.

On 14-May-2015, the SFC warned that 16 shareholders owned 24.02% of CJ, or 96.08% of the float, leaving 0.98% of CJ for everyone else. The stock closed at $13.76 the day before that warning, or $0.5504 after the stock split, so it is up 5.14x since then.

In its annual results for 31-Mar-2015, CEEI (mentioned above) disclosed a holding of 12.67m shares (2.11%) in CJ at a purchase cost of $1.10 per share, which means they were allocated in the IPO, because they have never traded that low. After the stock split that will be 316.75m shares at $0.044. So CEEI doesn't always pay bubble prices for bubble shares - it occasionally gets in at the bottom.

The controlling shareholder of CJ is its Chairman, Huang Wenji, with 11.25bn shares (75%) which, on paper, makes him a US$ umbrella multi-billionaire. We note that on 17-Sep-2015, he deposited 1.5bn shares into CCASS with Black Marble Securities, owned by Lerado. That could be preparation for a placing of existing shares and possibly a subscription of new ones, if anyone is dumb enough to buy them.

Lerado interim results show massive gain

Lerado is one of several companies which have made enormous market gains in the first half of 2015 without disclosing what stocks it bought. In the 30-Jun-2015 interim results, it disclosed "held-for-trading investments" comprising "equity securities listed in Hong Kong" of HK$702.1m. It also said that by 28-Aug-2015, the value had declined by 11%. It booked an unrealised gain of $626.5m, implying a purchase cost of $75.6m and a gain of 829% in 6 months or less. No normal stock does that. Whatever stock(s) they hold, it must be bubble paper, and investors deserve to know what it is so that they can make their own assessment of "fair value" rather than relying on an artificial market price.

After providing for $105m of profits tax on the gains, Lerado had net tangible assets at 30-Jun-2015 of $1220m, or $1.27 per share. But if those gains evaporate, then the NTA drops to $698.5m, or $0.728 per share. Both figures are before dilution from the proposed open offer. If the offer proceeds, then that NAV would be diluted to about $0.430 (with the gains) or $0.295 (without the gains). Both figures assume that Lerado loses the Dorel arbitration, which is worth $307m, which is $0.320 per share before the open offer or $0.080 per share after the open offer.
Capital VC's open offer

On 13-Mar-2015, Capital VC announced a 5:1 share consolidation to be followed by a 7:1 open offer at $0.25 per consolidated share without excess applications. That was a 76.5% discount to the adjusted closing price of $1.065 per share. The Financial Adviser was Akron, and the "underwriter" was SBI CCFS. The last published NAV at 28-Feb-2015 was an adjusted $4.821, so the issue discount to NAV was 94.8%. The stock sold off on the news, down 39.9% the next day to an adjusted $0.64.

Policy note: Chapter 21 investment companies like Capital VC have to publish their NAV monthly. This involves valuing all their listed investments at market prices, so they know what they are. Until 2002, these announcements had to be published in newspapers, so space was at a premium. Now that announcements are online for the last 13 years, this is no longer the case. Yet the Listing Rules still only require Chapter 21 companies to disclose the top 10 investments once per year in the annual report. This is ridiculous. The top 10 investments should be disclosed every month so that shareholders know what risks they are taking.

Again, investors faced the extortion of having to either see the investment heavily diluted, or put in more cash, and no excess applications were allowed, so it is really a placing with the "underwriter" subject to first refusal of existing holders pro rata. The underwriter benefits from any unsubscribed shares at a discount to market. To eliminate the possibility of SBI CCFS holding a controlling stake, it had to arrange sub-underwriters. They included Gransing, for 180m shares, Jun Yang Securities Co Ltd (Jun Yang Securities), for 152m, Avant, for 142.5m, and Fordjoy, for 80m shares.

Incidentally, SBI CCFS is 52% owned by Cao Guo Qi, a director of several listed companies, and 48% by Zhang Xiongfeng, the current Chairman of CMG, mentioned above.

On 11-Jun-2015, Capital VC shareholders approved the consolidation and open offer without objection. Voting turnout was only 14.39% of the issued and eligible shares, probably including the 6.44% owned by Ye Ruiqiang.

Policy note: shareholders are often unaware of opportunities to protect themselves by voting against such egregious proposals, because the SFC does not require banks and brokers who hold their stock to inform them of EGMs and seek voting instructions. As a result, most banks and brokers, in the small print of the client contracts, state that they are not obliged to do so. This is a major barrier to investor participation in governance, and the SFC should act to resolve this, as we said in our submission Principles of Responsible Regulation (26-May-2015).

On 24-Jun-2015, six days before Capital VC's financial year-end, it announced that it was changing its year-end to 30-Sep-2015, so it would produce a second set of condensed "interim" results for the 12 months to 30-Jun-2015. The purported reason for this was:

"to align the Company's financial year end date with that of the Company's principal associate, CNI Bullion Limited, which is the Group's substantial investment."

This holds no water though. Remember, Capital VC is a Chapter 21 investment company, so under Rule 21.04(3)(a), it is not allowed to take "legal, or effective, management control of underlying investments" and under Rule 21.04(3)(b) it is required to maintain a "reasonable spread of investments". So there is no logical reason to align the year ends of Capital VC and any of its investments, including CNI Bullion Ltd, which only accounted for 9% of Capital VC's NAV at 31-Dec-2014.

So what was the real reason for extending the year-end? In our view, to delay the annual disclosure of the portfolio. It's so embarrassing to have to show that your castle is built on sand.

On 15-Jul-2015 Capital VC announced that its NAV at 30-Jun-2015 was $9.0782 per share, and on 27-Aug-2015 it announced the second interim results for the 12 months to June. Capital VC booked a pre-tax profit on financial assets of $1314m for the 12 months, compared with $163m in the first 6 months, so the second-half profit was $1151m. As an investment company, it does not distinguish between realised and unrealised gains, but we can deduce them from the amount of deferred tax, which is tax that is only payable when they cash out. Note 8 shows deferred tax of $132m, so as profits tax is 16.5% they have about $800m of net unrealised gains, probably in bubble stocks.

Anyway, with that NAV in mind, let's return to the open offer. 7:1 at $0.25, versus NAV of $9.0782, so the open offer would dilute NAV to $1.354 before expenses. Shareholders who did nothing would lose 85% of their net asset value. Yet, when the offer closed on 9-Jul-2015, only 23.7% of the shares were subscribed. That left the underwriters and whoever was behind them with 66.75% of the company, acquired at $0.25 per share. The market price closed that day at $0.32. Due to market losses in July, the NAV closed that month at $1.0292, and $0.8824 at the end of August. Amazingly there was nobody with a disclosed 5% shareholding after the offer closed.

Meanwhile, even in market price terms, the shareholders who did not subscribe (and most of them did not vote against the open offer) had seen the price collapse from $1.065 before the open offer to $0.32, even while Capital VC was racking up huge gains as a holder of the unnamed inflated stocks.
Jun Yang (0397)

Jun Yang Securities is owned by Jun Yang Financial Holdings Ltd (Jun Yang, 0397). Until August, this was known as Jun Yang Solar Power Investments Ltd, but that's out of fashion, so now, like everyone else, it wants to be a financial services powerhouse.

Note 24 on page 113 of Jun Yang's 2014 annual report reveals that it owned 2.49% of Tech Pro Technology Development Ltd (Tech Pro Technology, 3823) and 4.49% of Town Health International Medical Group Ltd (Town Health, 3886). Those had a market value of about HK$235m and $280m respectively, out of total listed equities of $854m. Jun Yang booked an unrealised gain on held-for-trading investments of HK$350m for 2014, without which it would have made a loss before tax of $98m.
Tech Pro Technology (3823)

This is another bubble stock, up 93.14% in 2014, and it has kept on going, up a net 22.62% this year so far. It closed on 23-Sep-2015 at $1.87, valuing the firm at HK$12.13bn. When a company includes the syllable "Tech" in its name twice, you know it is desperate for attention. The company makes LED lamps and losses. Oh and football. Yes, it has bought a French soccer club, FC Sochaux-Montbeliard SA. After all, why sponsor the shirts when you can buy the whole thing?

The interim report at 30-Jun-2015, shows net tangible assets of RMB475m (HK$594m) or about HK$0.092 per share. Turnover for the period was RMB111m, so if you annualize that you get RMB222m or HK$278m. So the shares are trading at about 20.4x NTA and about 44x turnover.

L&A (8195)

This is another bubble stock. L & A International Holdings Ltd (L&A, 8195) makes cashmere sweaters. It listed on 10-Oct-2014 after a placing at $0.06 per share (adjusted for the 10:1 split on 21-Apr-2015). In the placing, the top 10 placees received 89.74% of the float. It closed on 23-Sep-2015 at $2.92, up 48.7x since the listing. The market value is HK$11.68bn, compared with net tangible assets of HK$129m at 31-Mar-2015, or about $0.032 per share, so it trades at 90x book value. Revenue for the year was $350m, so it trades at 33x sales.

Despite this ridiculous valuation, or perhaps because of it, CEEI bought 69.384m L&A shares (1.73%) in the market from 17-Apr-2015 to 12-May-2015, spending a total of HK$112.7m or an average of $1.62 per share. This was announced on 12-May-2015. Of course, we don't know who the sellers were. Lucky them.

On 24-Jun-2015, the SFC issued a concentration warning, noting that 19 shareholders held 23.18% out of the 25% float.
Roundup

What you have seen here is a repeated pattern of abuse. The key steps in several transactions are:

Position votes in friendly hands which are not visibly connected to controlling shareholders or executive directors, by issuance of new shares or transfer of existing shares.
Arrange loan financing for any existing controller to take up entitlements, or even sell shares in the market with enough time gap to deter allegations of insider dealing.
Announce either (i) a large, deep-discount open offer without excess applications; or (ii) a "special mandate" placing, which in the first case will need "independent" shareholders' approval and in the latter, just shareholders' approval.
Use friendly votes to approve the proposal which damages the financial interests of anyone who cannot or does not put up cash (in the case of a placing, this isn't even an option).
Complete the fund-raising and receive deeply discounted shares as the underwriter, sub-underwriter or placee of the shares.

Hong Kong deserves better if it wishes to make a claim to be a world-class financial centre.

© Webb-site.com, 2015
163 : GS(14)@2015-10-16 00:59:23

不知所云
164 : greatsoup38(830)@2015-11-10 01:31:20

1 for 1 bonus shares
165 : greatsoup38(830)@2015-12-17 01:48:45

盈利增2.6倍，至2.5億，11.2億可變現資產
166 : GS(14)@2016-04-16 00:20:06

盈警
167 : greatsoup38(830)@2016-05-11 02:45:00

轉虧1.8億，現金1.8億
168 : greatsoup38(830)@2016-07-03 15:08:55

虧損降45%，至3,800萬，986持有745、802、1027、1063、1225、2324、8021、8193、8195
169 : GS(14)@2016-10-15 04:01:23

盈警
170 : GS(14)@2016-10-29 13:50:28

8100 買 8086、8018、1019、6161、6836、8081、2324、
171 : greatsoup38(830)@2016-11-12 14:10:22

5合1，又1供3@20仙
172 : GS(14)@2017-01-01 16:58:14

轉虧2.1億元，輕債
173 : GS(14)@2017-03-20 02:02:03

無人供
174 : greatsoup38(830)@2017-05-25 07:52:58

虧損增75%，至2,100萬，輕債
175 : greatsoup38(830)@2017-05-25 07:53:35

持有8021、1389、8193、802、8226、275
176 : greatsoup38(830)@2017-07-21 04:38:18

8100持2324
177 : GS(14)@2017-10-10 17:40:19

本公司董事會（「董事會」）謹此通知本公司股東（「股東」）及有意投資者，根據本
集團截至二零一七年九月三十日止年度（「本年度」）之未經審核管理賬目及董事
會目前可獲得的資料而作出的初步評估，比對本公司二零一五年╱一六年年報所
載截至二零一六年九月三十日止年度錄得的經審核淨虧損，預期本集團於本年度
將錄得淨虧損的明顯增加。本年度本集團業績之預期變動主要由於本集團上市投
資於本年度的淨虧損較之截至二零一六年九月三十日止年度者增加。
178 : GS(14)@2018-01-01 21:15:41

轉虧4,000萬，8億可變現資產
179 : GS(14)@2018-02-04 14:34:31

根據一般授權配售新股份
於二零一八年二月二日（交易時段後），本公司與配售代理訂立配售協議，據此，
配售代理已同意按盡力基準，向不少於六名獨立承配人配售最多550,000,000股
新股份，每股配售股份價格為0.050港元。
180 : GS(14)@2018-02-05 04:07:19

Webb曰:
The Enigma Network investment company is blowing the general mandate, issuing 19.96% new shares at $0.05, not mentioning the 84.9% discount to Net Asset Value of $0.3308 at 31-Dec-2017. The board claims the issue is in the interests of the Company and the Shareholders as a whole. The placing agent, Infast Brokerage, is 95% owned by GCPS (8193), another Enigma member. 3 minutes eariler, Capital VC announced a grant of 275m options at $0.058 to unnamed persons. Thats another potential 10% enlargement of the share base at an 82.5% discount to NAV. We call on the SFC to direct the Stock Exchange to reject the listing application for all the new shares.

「謎之網絡」投資公司正在衝破一般授權限制，以5仙發行19.96%股權，並無提及發行價較在2017年12月31日淨值33.08仙折讓84.9%。董事局指出發行「對公司及股東有利」。配售代理進匯證券是由另一間「謎之網絡」成員漢華專業服務(8193)持有95%。3分鐘前，首都創投授出2.75億購股權，行使價5.8仙予一些未披露名稱人士。這是另一個折讓82.5%發行10%潛在擴大股本的可能性。我們已經通知證監會和聯交所聯絡，以否決發行新股的申請。
181 : GS(14)@2018-03-21 18:15:57

首都創投有限公司（「本公司」）董事會（「董事會」）察覺本公司股份之價格最近有
所上升。董事會謹此宣佈本公司正協商簽訂有關投資於區塊鏈行業公司（「該投資」）
之意向書（「意向書」）。倘本公司簽訂意向書及╱或具約束力之協議，本公司將於
適當時候根據上市規則之所有適用規定作出進一步公告。
182 : GS(14)@2018-04-13 07:33:29

盈警
183 : greatsoup38(830)@2018-06-01 18:42:31

虧，5.4億可變現資產
184 : GS(14)@2018-10-14 12:43:28

董事會謹此通知股東及潛在投資者，根據本集團截至二零一八年九月三十日止
年度之未經審核管理賬目及董事會目前可獲得的資料而作出的初步評估，比對
截至二零一七年九月三十日止年度所錄得者，預期本集團於截至二零一八年九
月三十日止年度的未經審核綜合淨虧損將大幅減少。
185 : GS(14)@2019-05-24 08:39:05

無野好講
PermaLink: https://articles.zkiz.com/?id=274356

太陽娛樂(8082，前訊通控股、仁智國際)專區(關係:2324、2309)

1 : GS(14)@2014-08-17 00:58:09

http://realforum.zkiz.com/thread.php?tid=5826&page=
前專區
2 : GS(14)@2014-08-17 01:05:31

8082

6個月虧降48%，至1,300萬，3個月虧少20%，至900萬，重債
3 : GS(14)@2014-10-25 11:49:57

1. 配售7,000萬股@0.2
2. 1供2，每股0.2
4 : GS(14)@2015-01-01 14:25:22

通函
5 : GS(14)@2015-05-06 15:29:14

虧損多10%，至2,800萬，空殼重債
6 : greatsoup38(830)@2015-08-14 12:10:42

3個月虧降33%，至240萬，6個月虧降27%，至730萬，3,200萬現金
7 : greatsoup38(830)@2016-04-03 02:50:22

虧損降15%，至2,500萬，2,000萬現金
8 : greatsoup38(830)@2016-05-28 21:04:51

配售1.38億股@14仙
9 : greatsoup38(830)@2016-08-18 06:06:46

虧，2,500萬現金
10 : GS(14)@2016-08-23 12:37:15

buy rubbish commission
11 : GS(14)@2017-01-25 18:42:08

投資協議
於二零一七年一月二十四日（聯交所交易時段後），光尚文化（本公司之直接全資附屬公司）
與太陽娛樂訂立投資協議，據此，投資協議之訂約方已有條件同意共同投資製作目標電影。
根據投資協議，太陽娛樂將負責（其中包括）製作及發行目標電影，而光尚文化將負責出資
26,270,770港元，以為製作目標電影提供資金，相當於製作預算約20%。於投資完成後，光尚
文化將有權享有目標電影之20%收益權。
12 : GS(14)@2017-03-09 09:24:31

於二零一七年三月八日（交易時段後），本公司與配售代理訂立配售協議，據此，配售
代理同意代表本公司，按盡力基準以配售價每股配售股份0.16港元向不少於六(6)名承配
人（彼等及彼等之最終實益擁有人將為獨立第三方）配售配售股份（涉及合共165,000,000
股新股份）。
13 : greatsoup38(830)@2017-05-15 02:51:13

虧，600萬現金，空殼
14 : greatsoup38(830)@2017-06-28 17:48:13

cheap selling
15 : GS(14)@2018-01-24 14:52:15

SOLD TO SUN FOR 0.16
16 : GS(14)@2018-03-06 18:06:06

該等要約結果及該等要約在所有方面成為無條件
於二零一八年三月五日下午四時正，要約人接獲(i)有關股份要約項下合計409,303,666股股份
的有效接納，相當於本公司於本聯合公佈日期全部已發行股本之約35.35%；及(ii)有關購股權
要約項下合計239,276份購股權（相當於未行使購股權之約1.08%）的有效接納。
經計及有關股份要約項下409,303,666股股份的有效接納後，要約人及其一致行動人士（除徐
先生外）將持有合計694,795,978股股份，相當於本公司於本聯合公佈日期全部已發行股本之約
60.01%。由於綜合文件所載股份要約之所有條件已達成，股份要約於二零一八年三月五日在
所有方面已成為無條件。由於股份要約在所有方面已成為無條件，購股權要約亦於二零一八
年三月五日在所有方面已成為無條件。
17 : GS(14)@2018-03-07 21:50:23

1.08%
18 : GS(14)@2018-03-20 11:45:49

62%
19 : GS(14)@2018-04-01 10:41:34

虧，800萬現金
20 : GS(14)@2018-04-11 05:56:48

恢復公眾持股
21 : GS(14)@2018-04-13 07:46:50

控股股東實物分派
22 : bylee(26720)@2018-04-18 18:05:32

what is the purpose of 實物分派?

What is the purpose to buy this shell?
23 : GS(14)@2018-04-19 05:42:53

bylee在22樓提及
what is the purpose of 實物分派?

What is the purpose to buy this shell?


拆番散d股囉
24 : bylee(26720)@2018-04-19 10:33:53

Thx.


Fry?




greatsoup在23樓提及
bylee在22樓提及
what is the purpose of 實物分派?

What is the purpose to buy this shell?


拆番散d股囉
25 : GS(14)@2018-04-19 18:24:00

bylee在24樓提及
Thx.


Fry?




greatsoup在23樓提及
bylee在22樓提及
what is the purpose of 實物分派?

What is the purpose to buy this shell?


拆番散d股囉


唔知啦
26 : GS(14)@2018-07-24 04:33:06

合作不成改借錢
27 : GS(14)@2018-08-19 20:25:31

虧，輕債
28 : GS(14)@2018-11-24 01:27:20

配售協議
於二零一八年十一月二十三日（交易時段後），本公司與配售代理訂立配售協議，據此，配售
代理同意代表本公司，按盡力基準以配售價每股配售股份0.330港元向不少於六(6)名承配人
（彼等及彼等之最終實益擁有人將為獨立第三方）配售配售股份（涉及合共60,000,000股新股
份）。
配售事項須待聯交所上市委員會批准配售股份上市及買賣後，方可作實。本公司將向聯交所
上市委員會申請批准配售股份上市及買賣。
29 : GS(14)@2018-11-27 18:49:31

配售協議
於二零一八年十一月二十三日（交易時段後），本公司與配售代理訂立配售協議，據此，配售
代理同意代表本公司，按盡力基準以配售價每股配售股份0.330港元向不少於六(6)名承配人
（彼等及彼等之最終實益擁有人將為獨立第三方）配售配售股份（涉及合共60,000,000股新股
份）。
30 : GS(14)@2019-04-02 16:33:00

轉賺300萬，1,000萬現金
31 : GS(14)@2019-04-11 02:46:46

洗米華還原8082
32 : GS(14)@2019-04-30 08:33:34

茲提述周焯華先生（「要約人」）與本公司聯合刊發日期為二零一九年四月九日之公佈（「聯合公
佈」），內容有關（其中包括）太陽國際証券有限公司將為及代表要約人作出強制性無條件現金
要約（「該等要約」）以收購全部已發行股份並註銷本公司之所有尚未行使購股權（不包括要約
人及其一致行動人士已擁有及同意將予收購者）。除另有註明者外，本公佈所用詞彙與聯合公
佈所界定者具有相同涵義。
33 : GS(14)@2019-05-26 09:25:45

認購價提高
34 : GS(14)@2019-05-29 00:41:03

易名太陽娛樂
PermaLink: https://articles.zkiz.com/?id=285085
Next Page
ZKIZ Archives @ 2019