📖 ZKIZ Archives

中華藥業(8120):延遲公佈業績，違反上市規則

1 : GS(14)@2011-04-09 12:57:50

http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... LN20110331196_C.pdf

---

北海集團(0701，前稱中華製漆)專區(關係:0128、0155、0225、0271、0346、2882、徐展堂、龔氏)

1 : GS(14)@2011-04-09 14:38:31

(blank)

---

2 : GS(14)@2011-04-09 14:38:38

http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... N201103301306_C.pdf
經營一般

---

3 : GS(14)@2011-09-03 16:42:27

http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... TN20110830828_C.pdf
大致持平，負債好輕

展 望
展 望 二 零 一 一 年 下 半 年 ， 未 來 經 濟 環 境 仍 充 滿 挑 戰 。 中 國 內 地 通 貨 膨 脹 與 歐 美 債
務 危 機 令 全 球 經 濟 表 現 及 前 景 陷 入 不 明 朗 及 不 穩 定 ， 而 中 國 政 府 實 行 財 政 緊 縮 措
施 或 會 影 響 中 國 內 地 的 增 長 勢 頭 。
面 對 挑 戰 ， 本 集 團 將 加 強 基 礎 管 理 、 不 斷 提 高 生 產 效 率 、 降 低 生 產 成 本 、 嚴 格 控
制 日 常 行 政 開 支 並 且 採 取 積 極 措 施 節 省 所 有 可 控 費 用 ， 以 提 高 盈 利 能 力 。
本 集 團 將 繼 續 專 注 於 製 漆 業 務 ， 致 力 成 為 首 屈 一 指 的 優 質 環 保 及 安 全 油 漆 產 品 製
造 商 。

---

4 : gundamlotte(13580)@2012-03-29 22:36:35

末期業績

http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... N201203293337_C.pdf

---

5 : GS(14)@2012-03-30 22:52:51

盈利跌70%，至700萬，少量負債，爛爛地的殼

集團︰
　即期－香港
　　本年度支出42 －
　即期－其他地區
　　本年度支出18,324 12,074
　　過往年度撥備不足／（超額撥備） 263 (1,635)
　遞延1,568 194
本年度稅項支出總額　20,197 10,633
應佔聯營公司之稅項1,513,000港元（二零一零年：188,000港元）已在綜合收益表之賬面列入「應
佔聯營公司溢利及虧損」。
8. 股息
二零一一年二零一零年
千港元千港元
擬派末期股息－每股普通股0.5港仙
　（二零一零年：1港仙） 9,442 18,884
於二零一一年六月二十八日舉行的股東週年大會，本公司股東批准分派截至二零一零年十二
月三十一日止年度的末期股息每股1港仙，總額約18,884,000港元。
擬派年度末期股息須待本公司股東於應屆股東週年大會上批准方可作實。實際金額列賬為截
至二零一二年十二月三十一日止年度的可供分派儲備。

展望
展望未來，本集團相信二零一二年的營商環境仍充滿挑戰，但亦充滿機遇。根據
中國政府的十二五規劃，預期未來數年中國內地的城市化水平將會提升，因此亦
將刺激製漆產品的需求。本集團將積極把握城市化加速及生活水平提升帶來的良
機。
此外，本集團將繼續提高生產效率，改善生產流程和加強信息及物流系統，以提
高運營效率。本集團亦將繼續專注於提升產品及服務質量，加強營銷策略，以迎
合大小城市客戶的不同需求。

---

6 : GS(14)@2012-08-23 22:19:28

http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... TN20120823698_C.pdf
盈利增250%，至700萬，負8,000萬現金，空空地的雜野

展望
展望未來，本集團的營商環境挑戰與機遇並存。中國政府近來已放寬貨幣政策。央
行減息及下調銀行存款準備金率給市場帶來中國政府將提振經濟的積極信號。
此外，城市化的持續深化預計將給製漆產品帶來旺盛需求。本集團將積極把握城市
化加速及人民生活水平改善所帶來的機遇，致力提升市場佔有率。
本集團將繼續專注於製漆業務，致力成為首屈一指的優質環保及安全油漆產品製造
商。

---

7 : greatsoup38(830)@2013-01-10 00:35:28

接班
http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... TN20130109192_C.pdf
北海集團有限公司（「本公司」，連同其附屬公司統稱「本集團」）董事會（「董事會」）
宣佈，以下各項由二零一三年一月九日起生效：
(1) 徐蔭堂先生退任本公司董事總經理兼執行董事職務。徐先生接受委任為本公司高
級顧問；
(2) 徐浩銓先生，執行副主席，接任本公司董事總經理職務；及
(3) 在香港代表接受送達法律程序文件的授權代表由徐蔭堂先生變更為徐浩銓先生。
董事總經理退任
徐蔭堂先生退任本公司董事總經理兼執行董事職務。徐先生，66 歲，服務本集團逾
25 年。為持續受益於徐先生之豐富經驗及業務關係，徐先生獲委任為本公司高級顧
問。作為本公司高級顧問，徐先生將繼續就本集團業務及發展等事宜向本公司提供意
見。
徐先生確認與董事會並無意見不合，亦無任何有關其退任的事項需要通知本公司股
東。
董事會謹此向徐先生於在任期間對本公司作出之寶貴貢獻及接受委任為本公司高級
顧問職務致以衷心謝意。
新董事總經理委任
徐浩銓先生，現為本公司執行副主席，接任本公司董事總經理職務。徐先生，49 歲，
於一九八五年九月加入本集團。彼為香港合資格律師。徐先生為Prime Surplus Limited
之唯一董事兼股東，該公司為本公司主要股東。於本公佈刊發日期，徐先生持有
447,053,620 股本公司股份的權益，以及98,000,000 股本公司股份的衍生權益，合共佔
本公司現有已發行股本約28.86%（按證券及期貨條例第十五部所界定）。徐先生與本
公司訂立服務協議，亦無指定任期，據此徐先生之月薪為365,000 港元，另外每月房
屋津貼不多於70,000 港元以及其他附加福利。徐先生的酬金由薪酬委員會釐定，就徐
先生的職務及責任、表現、經驗、付出的時間及市況作出考慮。
由於徐先生作為全權受益人之一項全權信託之受託人於禁止交易期間買賣本公司股
份，香港聯合交易所有限公司（「聯交所」）曾於一九九九年十二月公開譴責徐先生違
反聯交所證券上市規則（「上市規則」）。聯交所認為在有需要時彼有責任通知有關受
託人停止買賣。以下於香港註冊成立之公司（徐先生任／曾任其董事）曾被列入接管
程序或債權人或強制清盤程序中：冠傑投資有限公司（物業持有及投資，已於一九九
九年五月二十五日委任指定接管人接管以64,803,777.28港元另加利息成本作
抵押之物業，並於一九九九年十二月二十九日和解及財產接管程序終止）、菊花閣有
限公司（酒樓業務，已於一九九九年二月五日開始債權人自動清盤並於二零零一年五
月十五日解散）及喜港有限公司（投資控股，已於一九九九年九月十日及一九九九年
十一月十七日分別委任指定接管人接管已抵押物業及開始強制清盤，並於二零零三年
六月七日解散）。
除上文所披露者外，概無任何其他事項需要通知本公司股東，亦無任何其他資料須根
據上市規則第13.51(2)條的任何規定須予披露。

---

8 : greatsoup38(830)@2013-04-06 01:40:27

701
盈利增170%，至3,700萬，3,500萬現金

---

9 : GS(14)@2013-09-11 15:50:49

701
盈利增1.3倍，至2,500萬，輕債

---

10 : 94873293(10306)@2013-12-03 17:13:19

升到停咗牌

---

11 : greatsoup38(830)@2013-12-04 00:25:09

94873293在10樓提及

---

升到停咗牌

分拆油漆上市?

---

12 : 94873293(10306)@2013-12-04 12:32:11

可能吹分拆墓園上市, 吹..........

---

13 : greatsoup38(830)@2013-12-06 00:45:18

94873293在12樓提及

---

可能吹分拆墓園上市, 吹..........

都賺唔到錢

---

14 : A39393212002(33729)@2013-12-15 00:02:38

ok

---

15 : qt(2571)@2014-02-25 21:49:34

701 盈喜

---

16 : GS(14)@2014-02-26 01:45:01

701

---

17 : greatsoup38(830)@2014-03-20 02:01:33

701
盈利增2倍，至1.12億，6,000萬現金

---

18 : 自動波人(1313)@2014-03-20 02:24:10

我今日亂棍買入咗

---

19 : VC(35825)@2014-03-20 13:59:54

0.395入左

---

20 : 自動波人(1313)@2014-03-20 14:16:09

VC在19樓提及

---

0.395入左

我0.405斬左

---

21 : VC(35825)@2014-03-20 14:17:16

自動波人在20樓提及

---

VC在19樓提及

---

0.395入左

我0.405斬左

做乜咁快斬

---

22 : 自動波人(1313)@2014-03-20 14:19:08

VC在21樓提及

---

自動波人在20樓提及

---

VC在19樓提及

---

0.395入左

我0.405斬左

做乜咁快斬

走勢問題,業績咁靚,但計埋尋日兩支陰,可能已經預先炒左

---

23 : VC(35825)@2014-03-20 14:30:43

自動波人在22樓提及

---

VC在21樓提及

---

自動波人在20樓提及

---

VC在19樓提及

---

0.395入左

我0.405斬左

做乜咁快斬

走勢問題,業績咁靚,但計埋尋日兩支陰,可能已經預先炒左

我就係見業績靚先入，唔理短期走勢啦。

---

24 : 自動波人(1313)@2014-03-20 14:32:08

VC在23樓提及

---

自動波人在22樓提及

---

VC在21樓提及

---

自動波人在20樓提及

---

VC在19樓提及

---

0.395入左

我0.405斬左

做乜咁快斬

走勢問題,業績咁靚,但計埋尋日兩支陰,可能已經預先炒左

我就係見業績靚先入，唔理短期走勢啦。

我膽小

---

25 : lemonwongwong(33038)@2014-03-25 12:00:10

i buy some today

---

26 : GS(14)@2014-07-21 23:37:02

http://sdinotice.hkex.com.hk/di/ ... =MAIN&lang=ZH&&pg=1

莊中買到17%

---

27 : GS(14)@2014-08-29 01:53:07

---

28 : 李澤楷(15220)@2014-08-29 02:28:23

greatsoup在27樓提及

---

比上年同期升6成，乘2的話，pe10倍。不過我估莊中會增持

---

29 : greatsoup38(830)@2014-08-29 23:04:10

greatsoup在27樓提及

---

盈利增3成，至3,000萬，輕債

---

30 : GS(14)@2014-11-19 22:58:27

又分拆

---

31 : qt(2571)@2014-11-19 23:00:25

298就係摶呢樣?!

---

32 : greatsoup38(830)@2014-11-20 00:07:16

估計都是博呢個

---

33 : GS(14)@2015-03-27 02:28:08

盈利降1成，至1億，8,000萬現金

---

34 : GS(14)@2015-04-16 17:49:37

盈利降1成，至1.06億，7,000萬現金

---

35 : GS(14)@2015-06-16 00:50:49

分拆失敗

---

36 : greatsoup38(830)@2015-07-14 01:30:22

分拆失敗

---

37 : greatsoup38(830)@2015-08-04 22:56:09

盈警

---

38 : greatsoup38(830)@2016-02-01 02:20:15

盈警

---

39 : waisinglau(3738)@2016-02-01 12:35:23

是股價極殘，但成交稀疏全無炒味，熊市大把可揀，留待牛一初現時，再看看？

---

40 : greatsoup38(830)@2016-02-01 15:09:38

股民兄，呢隻勉強可人選，但平貨真是一堆，慢慢買

---

41 : GS(14)@2016-03-29 03:25:01

盈利降7成，至3,600萬，1.8億現金

---

42 : greatsoup38(830)@2016-04-19 00:46:26

又來過

---

43 : Number0(57364)@2016-07-10 13:49:39

greatsoup38在42樓提及

---

又來過

呢次得喇掛

---

44 : greatsoup38(830)@2016-07-10 14:19:17

我希望他得

---

45 : Number0(57364)@2016-07-10 14:22:17

greatsoup38在44樓提及

---

我希望他得

我入咗好少博吓大霧

---

46 : greatsoup38(830)@2016-07-10 14:23:37

我都唔知行不行

---

47 : Number0(57364)@2016-07-10 14:24:38

咁當然~~

---

48 : Number0(57364)@2016-07-13 23:16:35

好似想收檔咁....

---

49 : GS(14)@2016-07-14 07:15:48

呢隻怪怪地d氣

---

50 : greatsoup38(830)@2016-09-10 17:11:17

賺1,900萬，1.8億現金

---

51 : GS(14)@2016-11-24 15:40:31

分拆

---

52 : GS(14)@2017-02-21 15:29:20

http://ps.hket.com/content/16656 ... 4%E6%B4%BD%E8%B3%BC
2017年2月21日 9:50
西貢工廈具住宅重建價值，消息指，四洲集團大廈全幢，獲財團出價3.5億元洽購。

業主曾申請改裝住宅

市場消息指，西貢康定路1號四洲集團大廈，正獲財團洽購。物業現為樓高4層的工廈及附屬寫字樓，佔地約3.07萬平方呎。較早前，業主計劃申請改裝為一幢樓高8層（連1層平台）分層住宅大樓，以地積比兩倍發展，提供6.14萬平方呎樓面，提供79個中大型單位，單位面積平均約777平方呎。當中地下平台設有室外泳池會所，並有29個地庫停車位。消息稱，項目正獲財團出價3.5億元洽購。

西貢康定路屬於非傳統工業區，早年獲改劃為住宅發展地帶，近年有財團紛紛將持有的工廈重建，共涉及351伙，有助推動轉型成低密度住宅區。當中，康定路7號及9號的中華製漆廠房，北海集團曾有意申作酒店發展，最近則計劃作重建住宅，地盤面積40.2萬平方呎，以2.36倍發展，興建兩幢住宅樓宇，提供178伙住宅。

---

53 : GS(14)@2017-04-07 23:45:32

298買701

---

54 : GS(14)@2017-05-14 22:35:37

盈利增5成，至7,700萬，7,600萬現金

---

55 : GS(14)@2017-06-02 12:26:22

待董事會最終決定，中漆於分拆及上市後將成為本公司的非全資附屬公司。將
不會訂立以中漆集團為受益人的不競爭契據。因此，分拆及上市將毋須經股東
於股東特別大會上批准。分拆及上市將構成視為本公司出售於中漆的若干股權。
根據現時對中漆股份發售（作為上市的一部分）規模的估計，其將構成本公司的
一項須予披露交易（有關詞彙的定義見上市規則）。本公司將於適當時候進一步
發表公告以全面遵守上市規則的適用規定。

---

56 : GS(14)@2017-06-17 14:28:44

分拆

---

57 : enigma0323(3470)@2017-06-20 11:10:28

拆到咁呢隻咪變成一隻殼?

---

58 : greatsoup38(830)@2017-06-20 22:19:07

算是殼，但班人太妖

---

59 : greatsoup38(830)@2017-06-23 04:27:05

oh

---

60 : GS(14)@2017-06-25 19:59:37

繼續

---

61 : greatsoup38(830)@2017-06-29 09:06:31

delay listing

---

62 : greatsoup38(830)@2017-06-29 09:07:21

delay listing

---

63 : GS(14)@2017-07-02 09:51:46

補充招股章程

---

64 : GS(14)@2017-07-02 11:42:59

delay listing

---

65 : GS(14)@2017-08-04 11:30:27

董事會謹此通知股東及本公司之有意投資者，根據董事會可得之初步資料及本
集團之未經審核綜合管理帳目，預期截至二零一七年六月三十日止六個月之股
東應佔溢利將較二零一六年同期減少約 90%至 98%。

...
董事會認為本集團之溢利顯著減少主要由於製漆業務之溢利貢獻減少所致。自二
零一七年七月十日開始，製漆業務經已分拆為一間於聯交所主板獨立上市之公
司。截至二零一七年六月三十日止六個月，製漆業務溢利貢獻之顯著減少乃由不
同因素所導致，包括下調製漆及塗料產品平均售價之策略，以促進製漆及塗料產
品之銷售以及增加市場佔有率、原材料成本之上升及製漆業務於聯交所主板上市
而產生約 5,000,000 港元之開支。此等因素均導致製漆業務於截至二零一七年六
月三十日營運虧損之估計。

---

66 : GS(14)@2017-11-17 07:38:56

清盤

---

67 : GS(14)@2018-02-11 16:17:53

盈警

---

68 : GS(14)@2018-08-12 14:32:11

董事會謹此通知本公司之股東（「股東」）及本公司之有意投資者，根據董事會可得
之初步資料及本集團之未經審核綜合管理賬目，預期截至二零一八年六月三十日
止六個月（「六個月期間」）之股東應佔溢利將介乎11,000,000港元至15,000,000港元，
而截至二零一七年六月三十日止六個月則為800,000港元。然而，本集團於六個月
期間可能錄得介乎4,000,000港元至10,000,000港元之虧損淨額，相比截至二零一七
年六月三十日止六個月則錄得純利900,000港元。
股東應佔溢利增加乃由於本集團（不包括中漆集團有限公司（「中漆集團」，為本公
司之非全資附屬公司及於聯交所上市之公司）及其附屬公司）之投資物業於六個月
期間之公平值收益增加。另一方面，六個月期間之預期虧損淨額乃主要由於中漆
集團之表現未如理想。
...
就董事所知，中漆集團於六個月期間之表現未如理想乃由於下列之多項非預期因素：
首先，自二零一七年下半年開始之原油價格升浪於六個月期間內持續。原油價格
持續上升令中漆集團主要原材料（如溶劑及樹脂）之價格於六個月期間內顯著增加。
由於價格競爭激烈，中漆集團未能將原材料成本之增幅全部轉嫁予客戶。
其次，中國內地繼續推行更為嚴格之環境保護及危險化學品安全措施，變相不鼓
勵使用溶劑型油漆及塗料產品。因此，中漆集團之溶劑型產品於六個月期間之需
求及銷售受到不利影響。
第三，中漆集團未能按產量及銷量下降之比例削減生產間接成本及其他直接成本，
原因為六個月期間內之產量較低而未能達至規模經濟效益。
最後，人民幣較去年同期升值。由於中漆集團於六個月期間錄得虧損，人民幣升
值對換算為港元後之財務業績造成負面影響。
因此，中漆集團於六個月期間之收入及毛利率均見下跌而中漆集團之股東應佔虧
損則增加。

---

69 : GS(14)@2018-09-11 00:51:51

公司出售西貢油漆廠房，鄧耀昇購入，作價9億，以灣仔物業權益支付，鄧氏租回物業經營

加上食物網匯及實惠大廈，買晒成條街
http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... N201803191110_C.pdf
http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... TN20180424546_C.pdf

http://std.stheadline.com/daily/ ... id=1568826&target=2

---

70 : GS(14)@2019-02-04 18:17:41

董事會謹此通知本公司之股東（「股東」）及本公司之有意投資者，根據董事會可得
之初步資料及本集團之未經審核綜合管理賬目，預期本公司於截至二零一八年
十二月三十一日止年度將錄得介乎18,000,000港元至26,000,000港元之股東應佔虧
損，相比截至二零一七年十二月三十一日止年度則錄得股東應佔溢利為
37,500,000港元。
於截至二零一八年十二月三十一日止年度，本集團於香港及中國內地之投資物業
組合錄得公平值收益約91,000,000港元。然而，本公司之非全資附屬公司中漆集團
有限公司（連同其附屬公司為「中漆集團」）之表現未如理想，導致本集團錄得股東
應佔虧損。就董事所知，中漆集團之表現未如理想主要由於下列之多項非預期因
素所導致：
首先，由於二零一八年中國內地房地產行業及家具製造業對溶劑型及水性油漆及
塗料產品之需求疲弱，中漆集團於截至二零一八年十二月三十一日止年度之收益
因此減少。該需求之下降令價格競爭進一步加劇，繼而對中漆集團之主要油漆及塗料產品之銷量造成負面影響。中漆集團於中國內地之目標市場對使用及儲存溶
劑型油漆及塗料產品推行日益嚴格之規定，亦令到溶劑型油漆及塗料產品之需求
受到不利影響。
其次，原油價格繼續飆升，並在二零一八年十月升至年內最高水平。原油價格之
上漲導致中漆集團之主要原材料－溶劑和樹脂之價格上漲。由於市場現有參與者
之間的價格競爭激烈，中漆集團未能將生產成本之升幅全部轉嫁予其客戶。
第三，由於中漆集團溶劑型及水性油漆及塗料產品之銷售及產量減少，本集團之
毛利率因中漆集團錄得之固定製造費用及直接成本而下降。
此外，為應對不利市況，中漆集團已精簡其銷售及生產團隊。因此，中漆集團就
中國內地若干僱員錄得一次性的裁員補償開支。
中漆集團截至二零一八年十二月三十一日止年度之經營業績亦受到其他因素影響，
有關詳情將載於本公司之業績公告。

---

71 : GS(14)@2019-02-13 05:51:04

298 告 701

---

恆基地產發展故事-恆基地產(0012)、恆基發展(0097，前稱永泰發展)、香港小輪(0050)、中華煤氣(0003)、美麗華酒店(0071)、港華燃氣(1083‎，前稱百江煤氣)

1 : GS(14)@2011-04-16 13:42:25

三、恆基兆業

恆基兆業有限公司創辦於1973年11月，創辦人李兆基，祖籍廣東順德，1929年出生，早
年曾在其父開設於家鄉的永生銀號當學徒。1948年，年僅19歲的李兆基隨身攜帶1000
元，從家鄉順德南來香港，初期在金舖做外匯黃金買賣，1958年起與郭得勝、馮景禧等
合夥從事地產發展，並創辦新鴻基地產。1972年新地上市後不久，「三劍俠」各奔前
程，李兆基辭去總經理一職，自立門戶創辦恆基兆業。當時，恆基兆業約有資產5,000
萬元，發展地盤約20多個。職員四、五十人，已有一定規模。

恆基兆業與新鴻基地產原來同出一系，淵源深厚，其投資策略亦相當接近，如看好香港
地產業發展前景、緊扣地產市道循環的盛衰、重視維持龐大的土地儲備、重視住宅樓宇
的發展等等。不過，與新地相比，恆基兆業特別重視小型住宅樓宇的發展，故有「小型
住宅之王」的雅稱。

恆基主席李兆基認為，由於香港人口增長迅速，而且隨著經濟的蓬勃發展，市民收入增
加，置業觀念日濃，但土地供應有限，小型住宅樓宇的發展前景大有可為。早期，恆基
兆業的地盤多集中在市區，主要發展300至500方呎單位面積的小型住宅，銷售對象是廣
大受薪階層，由於住宅和工作地點距離不遠，加上交通方便，因而深受置業者的歡迎。

恆基兆業經營地產的方式亦與新地相似，強調貫徹「貨如輪轉」的宗旨，「只做樓宇供
應商不做收租業主」。因此，恆基十分重視增加土地儲備。1976年，恆基旗下發展地盤
已增加至140多個，成為土地儲備最多的地產公司之一。不過，恆基兆業增加土地儲備
的方式相當特別，它極少參與競投港府公開拍賣的官地，而主要是長期派人游說舊樓的
業主售樓，以各個擊破的方式，說服業主出售他們所擁有的單位，然後將整幢樓宇拆卸
重建。恆基又長期在英國和加拿大的中文報紙刊發廣告，收購香港的舊樓，這既方便老
華僑將香港的物業脫手，更令恆基在無競爭對手的條件下以低價購入地皮。這是李氏經
營地產的「絕招」。

早期，恆基的物業發展主要是收購舊樓重建，故主要集中在港九市區。不過，隨著時間
的推移，市區內可供發展或重建的地盤已買少見少，恆基看準新界必定成為地產發展商
日後爭奪的對象，於是自70年代末期開始大量吸納乙種公函換地證書，以保證日後在新
界有足夠的土地可供發展。1981年，李兆基就明確表示：「我們既然以地產發展為主的
公司，但是眼看到的是港九市區可供發展或重建的地盤所餘無幾，相信五年之後便無法
可以再在市區內找到『併樓』式的地皮，而政府官地則價格奇昂，數量也有限，屆時新
界的土地必定成為大家爭奪的對象。我們認為與其在未來幾年後跟其他公司兢出高價爭
投新界土地，倒不如先行未雨綢繆吸納大量換地公函，確保日後在新界有足夠的土地可
供發展。」李兆基這種高瞻遠囑的戰略眼光，可說是恆基兆業成功的重要因素。

正是基於這種戰略眼光，1975年港府開標競投沙田新填海區時，李兆基即作為發起人，
由恆基兆業聯同長實、新地、新世界發展合組百得置業有限公司，投得沙田新市鎮第一
號地段，並在該地段發展規模龐大的沙田第一城。沙田第一城不僅是恆基的精心傑作，
更成為該集團進軍新界地產業的先聲。

恆基兆業創辦初期，李兆基就有意將其在香港上市，當時有關上市條件及招股書已全部
準備好，可惜遇上股市暴跌，被迫取消有關計劃。後來李兆基選擇永泰建業實行「反收
購上市」。永泰建業原是一家規模較小的地產公司，1972年在香港上市，其時實收股本
僅2,532萬元。1975年，李兆基以恆基兆業名下物業換取永泰建業1,900萬股新股，控制
了永泰建業42．9％股權，成為最大股東。1977年，李氏再以名下6個地盤換取永泰建業
4,200多萬股，將控制權增至70.8％。到1979年，永泰建業妁市值已由初上市時的約
4,000萬增至9億元，短短4年間擴大20多倍，成為一間擁有26個發展地盤的中型地產公
司。

然而，永泰建業始終無法替代恆基兆業，前者只及後者的20％左右規模。1981年8月，
正值香港股市午氣沖天之際，李兆基將恆基兆業大部分資產注入旗下一家成立於1976年
1月26日的附屬公司──恆基兆業地產有限公司，並將其在香港掛牌上市。恆基地產上
市時，法定股本30億元，實收股本21.38億元，分10.69億股，每股面值2元，恆地以每
股4元價格公開發售5,000萬單位新股，每單位包括繳足股本1股及未繳足股本4股，未繳
足股本新股東申請時每股先付1元，其餘款項分兩期繳付，每股1.5元，分別於1981年12
月31日及1981年6月30日繳付。全部繳付後恆地集資10億元。恆地上市後即躋身香港十
大地產上市公司之列，該年底恆地市值達35.2億元，在地產上市公司中排名第七位。

80年代期間，恆基集團展開連串資產重組，以使集團結構和業務合理化。重組後，恆基
地產成為集團控股公司和上市旗艦，專責集團的地產發展業務，而旗下永泰建業則改名
為恆基發展，以地產投資和投資控股為主，持有中華煤氣和香港小輪兩家公用事業上市
公司的股權，在香港股市中自成一系。

恆基與新鴻基地產淵源深厚，投資策略亦相當接近，如看好香港地產業發展前景，緊扣
地產市道循環盛衰，以「人棄我取」的策略趁低吸納土地，維持龐大土地儲備等等。
1982至1984年期間，在中英談判僵持不下、香港前途尚末明朗的時候，地產市道低迷，
恆基即「反潮流」地乘機大舉購入土地，為日後公司的發展奠定基礎。

1987年10月股災後，新界的換地證價格下跌了三成，恆地便在1988年5月動用超過5,000
萬元，以平均每方呎1,000元價格，大手購入新界換地證書，加強了日後在屯門和葵涌
商住地皮的投資實力。1989年「六四事件」後，地產市道再次下跌，恆地於1990年度再
斥資3.2億元購入一批換地證書，使公司的換地證賬面值超過7.6億元。1991年3月，當
政府拍賣換地權益證書而乏人問津之時，恆地以8,300萬元悉數購入。因此，恆地成為
香港擁有最多換地權益證書的地產公司之一。

由於採取「反潮流」，「人棄我取」的投資策略，恆地得以低成本維持龐大的土地儲
備。從1990到1996年，恆基的土地儲備從1,650萬方呎增加到2,420萬方呎，其中尚未包
括1340萬方呎農地，成為香港僅次於新地的第二大土地儲備銀行。由於土地成本低，恆
地的邊際利潤相當高，以1993年度為例，該年度恆地其完成及售出160萬方呎樓宇，獲
得利潤約30億元，即平均每方呎純利1,800元，比新地的平均每方呎1,400元還高出接近
三成。

恆地與新地一樣，亦極重視「貨如輪轉」，強調資產負債的平衡。尤其是在市道不景時
期，恆地就會不斷地將樓盤的售價調低，以測試樓價底線，保持貨如輪轉。如1989年
「六四事件」後，恆地即將樓價下調20％。1994年中市道不景，恆地即在一個月內三度
減價推出單位，從初期的每方呎5,576元減至5,090元。恆地還將百貨商場零售促銷的手
法運用到地產市場，諸如以車位配售半山慧豪閣並以先到先得方式認購，向買家提供九
成按揭並對加按的兩成提供首三年免息供款優惠等等，甚至用抽獎送黃金（頭獎黃金
100兩）展開促銷，結果引起買家輪候或市場超額認購，取得滿意的效果。

恆基的算盤可說打得相當精細，即使到了八、九十年代，它仍堅持早年在市區收購舊樓
的策略，以最大的耐心，經長年累月，將逐層樓、逐吋土地收購回來。恆地還發明「袖
珍樓」、「袖珍鋪」，將市區內狹小的地盤建成袖珍式的住宅和店鋪，表面上總體樓價
不高，但平均每方呎的價格及利潤都相當驚人。

恆基在理財方面更是業內有名的高手。1992/93年度，香港地產市道暢旺，恆地盈利急
升64％，李兆基眼見集團股份長期偏低，不利於在股市集資加速集團發展，遂一反傳統
「密底算盤」的作風，採取了連串矚目行動。1993年9月，恆地在公佈年度業價時，大
派現金紅利，每股恆地獲派1元紅利，涉及金額高達16億元，給股東帶來意外驚喜，恆
地股價當日即急升18％。不久，恆地又宣佈集團資產重估，每股資產淨位達42.69元，
比市場預期的25至30元高出三成以上。翌日恆地股價從每股24.2元急升到28.7元。至該
年底，恆地股價升至每股59元，短短3個月內市值急增逾600億元，恆地成為這一時期香
港股市的藍籌明星股。

1993年第四季，恆地趁公司業績理想，連環出擊，先是發行4.6億美元（約35.7億元）
的可換股價券，安排將投資中國內地的恆基中國分拆上市；繼而發行3億美元（約23.38
億元）歐洲美元價券，並取得13.8億元銀團貸款；而旗下恆基發展亦以先舊後新方式配
股集資20億元，短短3個月間恆基其籌得資金超過90億元。

這一時期，恆基股價節節飆升，到1996年11月20日已升至每股74.72元水平。恆地不失
時機地配股籌資，先後於1995年12月和1996年9月兩次以先舊後新方式配股集資22億元
和35.2億元，集資總額達57.2億元。就在第二次配股當日，恆地又宣佈發行武士債券，
集資300多億日圖（約23.4億元）。從1993到1996年，恆基集團集資頻率之高，數額之
大，業內公司無出其右。難怪有評論認為，派高息、借貸、集資已成為恆地的「財政商
標」了。

1995年，港府批地給地鐵公司興建中環總站至大嶼山赤立角新機場之間的機場鐵路，地
鐵招標發展沿線各站上蓋物業，結果，擁有龐大資金的恆地及旗下的中華煤氣聯同新
地、中銀集團所組成財團擊敗了置地，奪得中環機鐵總站上蓋物業發展權。中環機鐵總
站上蓋發展項目佔地約4公頃，發展工程包括3幢高級商廈、零售商場，以及兩間酒店或
服務式住宅大廈，總樓面面積預計達447.7萬方呎，總投資400億元，預料分六期進行，
1997年動工，至2004年全部完成。該發展計劃不僅是機鐵沿線各站中最負盛名及最昂貴
的發展項目，而且也是香港有史以來最大的單一地產項目，屆時完成後，置地的中區王
國將黯然失色，中區地產霸主地位無疑將屬新地、恆地兩大集團。

---

2 : freecow(1747)@2011-04-17 02:56:54

(難怪有評論認為，派高息、借貸、集資已成為恆地的「財政商標」了。)

What is he doing now?? Does he apply the same technic to the situation now??

---

3 : GS(14)@2011-04-17 15:31:43

2樓提及

---

(難怪有評論認為，派高息、借貸、集資已成為恆地的「財政商標」了。)

What is he doing now?? Does he apply the same technic to the situation now??

咪要錢搞地產囉，現在當然不脫情況啦

---

4 : freecow(1747)@2011-04-17 23:21:13

3樓提及

---

2樓提及

---

(難怪有評論認為，派高息、借貸、集資已成為恆地的「財政商標」了。) What is he doing now?? Does he apply the same technic to the situation now??

咪要錢搞地產囉，現在當然不脫情況啦

He already want the stock right to be exercise in order to 集資. Stock price may still go up??

---

5 : onesee(1238)@2011-04-19 15:13:28

四叔增持以來 恒地股輪錄最大跌幅
2011年4月19日

http://www.mpfinance.com/htm/Finance/20110419/News/ea_eac1.htm

---

6 : GS(14)@2011-04-19 21:02:01

4樓提及

---

3樓提及

---

2樓提及

---

(難怪有評論認為，派高息、借貸、集資已成為恆地的「財政商標」了。) What is he doing now?? Does he apply the same technic to the situation now??

咪要錢搞地產囉，現在當然不脫情況啦

He already want the stock right to be exercise in order to 集資. Stock price may still go up??

最少到58吧

---

7 : New comer(7338)@2011-05-05 09:27:20

淡友沽港股 10個月最狠
恒地沽空達 55%　紅輪變仙輪
2011年05月05日

http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/te ... 320&art_id=15226402

---

8 : 鉛筆小生(8153)@2011-05-05 10:18:06

7樓提及

---

淡友沽港股 10個月最狠
恒地沽空達 55%　紅輪變仙輪
2011年05月05日

http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/te ... 320&art_id=15226402

看看四叔最近既回購係少量, 個價可以維持到咁, 算唔錯了

不知道何人為四叔添神奇色彩, 沽空強勁, 總需要補倉

四叔隨時發力一挾既話, 來過順水推舟, $58有何難, 街貨根本不多

我估月中爆上機會大, 值搏率又重現

http://www.etnet.com.hk/www/tc/s ... ortsell.php?code=12

不過短期之來, 我估佢真係要北上借下東風先得


也許, 一切都有時間表, 買花生睇戲吧

---

9 : onesee(1238)@2011-05-05 10:31:57

四叔：豪宅仍有價 有意投地
2011年5月5日

http://www.mpfinance.com/htm/Finance/20110505/News/ea_eab1.htm

---

10 : leoyk1014(859)@2011-05-06 23:08:27

greatsoup sir: 其實(他們)是否想小股東行使紅利認股權政(879) 比錢供股？

---

11 : leoyk1014(859)@2011-05-06 23:08:27

greatsoup sir: 其實(他們)是否想小股東行使紅利認股權政(879) 比錢供股？

---

12 : 鉛筆小生(8153)@2011-05-06 23:16:58

可以肯定的,恒基/四叔唔需大家俾錢供..........
就算係供, 都係大家自願入去

---

13 : 鉛筆小生(8153)@2011-05-06 23:16:58

可以肯定的,恒基/四叔唔需大家俾錢供..........
就算係供, 都係大家自願入去

---

14 : superkkw(6672)@2011-05-06 23:21:50

但係$58行使價喎
除左四叔邊有人會貴供?

---

15 : 鉛筆小生(8153)@2011-05-07 00:02:15

14樓提及

---

但係$58行使價喎除左四叔邊有人會貴供?

其實除左四叔之外, 真係有人行使左

再看環球, 底部有可能今天已經到左,

四叔早排唔硬撐#12, 也許係唔想樹敵

當市況U TURN 後, 你覺得別人會俾返面子四叔嗎? (這我暫信會的)


第二, 再看沽空與街貨問題, 假若大市真的要反彈
四叔一定會順水推舟...到時大手增持恒地, 一日三,五百萬股都可以
到時再挾淡倉有何難?

假若外資大行要聯合行動沽空既話, 本地富豪亦可聯合行動
俗語說, 猛虎不及地頭蟲.......何況四叔係人中之龍

最近還覓得軍師, 更與內地修睦.....多做善舉
這舉更可以為內地近年暴發個批作榜樣

結果中央會否支持四叔, 拭目以待吧

---

16 : 鉛筆小生(8153)@2011-05-07 00:02:15

14樓提及

---

但係$58行使價喎除左四叔邊有人會貴供?

其實除左四叔之外, 真係有人行使左

再看環球, 底部有可能今天已經到左,

四叔早排唔硬撐#12, 也許係唔想樹敵

當市況U TURN 後, 你覺得別人會俾返面子四叔嗎? (這我暫信會的)


第二, 再看沽空與街貨問題, 假若大市真的要反彈
四叔一定會順水推舟...到時大手增持恒地, 一日三,五百萬股都可以
到時再挾淡倉有何難?

假若外資大行要聯合行動沽空既話, 本地富豪亦可聯合行動
俗語說, 猛虎不及地頭蟲.......何況四叔係人中之龍

最近還覓得軍師, 更與內地修睦.....多做善舉
這舉更可以為內地近年暴發個批作榜樣

結果中央會否支持四叔, 拭目以待吧

---

17 : superkkw(6672)@2011-05-07 02:04:24

我心思思想入879,爆上60蚊就發

---

18 : 鉛筆小生(8153)@2011-05-07 02:51:36

17樓提及

---

我心思思想入879,爆上60蚊就發

得個睇字會好D, 如果呢D 錢咁易賺既話, 個個都發左

---

19 : 鉛筆小生(8153)@2011-05-07 02:51:36

17樓提及

---

我心思思想入879,爆上60蚊就發

得個睇字會好D, 如果呢D 錢咁易賺既話, 個個都發左

---

20 : leoyk1014(859)@2011-05-11 22:39:45

渴sir, 如他(恆基地產 12 )真的想人行使 879 供股，但 879 的價直又底，而且 ( 恆基地產 12 )又不在 $58元之上，你估他們會否抬價??

---

21 : GS(14)@2011-05-11 22:41:40

我唔識估，估到就發

但近排加快賣物業，應該告訴你了

---

22 : leoyk1014(859)@2011-05-11 22:45:12

但近排加快賣物業，應該告訴你了 ? what does it means???

---

23 : GS(14)@2011-05-11 22:49:40

22樓提及

---

但近排加快賣物業，應該告訴你了 ? what does it means???

看來他對行使權信心不大

---

24 : 鱷不群(1248)@2011-05-12 01:35:53

點解訪客連個簽名都跟足我

---

25 : GS(14)@2011-05-12 21:28:59

25樓提及

---

點解訪客連個簽名都跟足我

....唔知道

---

26 : superkkw(6672)@2011-05-13 00:03:41

guest default 就係上校

---

27 : leoyk1014(859)@2011-05-13 00:07:55

greatsoup sir :我想問，如果 12 它市價在$58或之上，那879會否被回收。及怎樣? thk!

---

28 : GS(14)@2011-05-14 11:17:32

28樓提及

---

greatsoup sir :我想問，如果 12 它市價在$58或之上，那879會否被回收。及怎樣? thk!

除了行使外，這就變成無價值，不會回收

---

29 : 鉛筆小生(8153)@2011-05-14 11:37:21

29樓提及

---

28樓提及

---

greatsoup sir :我想問，如果 12 它市價在$58或之上，那879會否被回收。及怎樣? thk!

除了行使外，這就變成無價值，不會回收

其實如果要玩衍生, 係LC 6月52-54 既12

都唔玩879

---

30 : onesee(1238)@2011-05-19 14:34:48

大律師5.11億購赫蘭道大屋
2011年5月19日

http://www.mpfinance.com/htm/Finance/20110519/News/ea_eab1.htm

---

31 : 鉛筆小生(8153)@2011-05-19 15:22:41

最近我係到諗, 紅股未必係為集資而行

---

32 : leoyk1014(859)@2011-05-19 18:45:02

why?????????//

---

33 : GS(14)@2011-05-19 21:05:43

32樓提及

---

最近我係到諗, 紅股未必係為集資而行

咁是為方便四叔擺錢增持?

---

34 : leoyk1014(859)@2011-05-19 21:25:23

但我見879是有人抄上抄下，目的為何？

---

35 : GS(14)@2011-05-19 21:26:17

35樓提及

---

但我見879是有人抄上抄下，目的為何？

平嘛

---

36 : leoyk1014(859)@2011-05-19 21:28:54

但抄返上0.1都好難

---

37 : GS(14)@2011-05-19 21:29:36

37樓提及

---

但抄返上0.1都好難

一日賺兩格都和味啦

---

38 : leoyk1014(859)@2011-05-19 21:32:46

但可借有diedline,好在咋天入了些少(0.011),博一博

---

39 : GS(14)@2011-05-19 21:34:10

39樓提及

---

但可借有diedline,好在咋天入了些少(0.011),博一博

唔好問我，總之有得升就走

---

40 : onesee(1238)@2011-05-23 12:37:58

紅輪難行使 恒地集資覓新途
2011年5月23日

http://www.mpfinance.com/htm/Finance/20110523/News/ea_eac1.htm

---

41 : 鱷不群(1248)@2011-05-23 13:52:14

879不用問啦，有得走就要走

---

42 : superkkw(6672)@2011-05-23 21:27:09

大量0.01賣盤

---

43 : GS(14)@2011-05-23 21:28:50

如果可以拆開D輪變牆紙一股一股咁都抵的

---

44 : onesee(1238)@2011-05-24 10:53:35

李兆基4298萬增持恒地
2011年5月24日

http://www.mpfinance.com/htm/Finance/20110524/News/ec_ecj1.htm

---

45 : onesee(1238)@2011-05-27 15:28:55

恒地港鐵發水則 尾班車大贏家
4月1日新制生效 入則申請銳跌九成 2011年5月27日

http://www.mpfinance.com/htm/Finance/20110527/News/ea_eaa1.htm

---

46 : onesee(1238)@2011-06-01 23:44:00

丁書苗天匯3伙終撻訂
2011年6月1日

http://www.mpfinance.com/htm/Finance/20110601/News/ea_eab1.htm

---

47 : superkkw(6672)@2011-06-02 02:26:39

真係人怕出名豬怕肥,特別係大陸富豪

---

48 : GS(14)@2011-06-02 07:54:38

財話短說
小輪 2.8億售銀礦灣酒店
2011年05月13日

http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/te ... 320&art_id=15249944
發表於:2011-05-13 23:42:30

---

49 : GS(14)@2011-06-02 07:54:44

港燃年內拆佛燃滬上市
2011年05月31日

http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/te ... 320&art_id=15299022
發表於:2011-05-31 18:18:35

---

50 : onesee(1238)@2011-06-02 13:45:21

四叔﹕天匯3戶撻訂 難追差價
2011年6月2日

http://www.mpfinance.com/htm/Finance/20110602/News/ea_eab1.htm

---

51 : onesee(1238)@2011-06-02 13:47:23

李家誠研分拆飲食業務上市
2011年6月2日

http://www.mpfinance.com/htm/Finance/20110602/News/ea_eab2.htm

---

52 : 鱷不群(1248)@2011-06-02 14:21:05

52樓提及

---

李家誠研分拆飲食業務上市
2011年6月2日

http://www.mpfinance.com/htm/Finance/20110602/News/ea_eab2.htm

這個主意也不錯，不過我希望他用多一兩年時間養肥隻雞仔才進行，以現時規模未必可以上到主板

---

53 : GS(14)@2011-06-02 21:23:07

53樓提及

---

52樓提及

---

李家誠研分拆飲食業務上市
2011年6月2日

http://www.mpfinance.com/htm/Finance/20110602/News/ea_eab2.htm

這個主意也不錯，不過我希望他用多一兩年時間養肥隻雞仔才進行，以現時規模未必可以上到主板

如果上創業板，兩年就得，但是上來幹甚麼呢?

---

54 : GS(14)@2011-06-04 12:56:03

http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/te ... 307&art_id=15312153
李兆基︰恒地估值偏低
指市值何止 1200億　揚言續增持
2011年06月04日

---

55 : GS(14)@2011-06-04 13:00:09

http://www.mpfinance.com/htm/Finance/20110604/News/ea_eab1.htm
恒地價值 李兆基指被低估逾半
2011年6月4日

---

56 : GS(14)@2011-06-04 13:00:49

煤氣未來3年 百億投資內地
2011年6月4日
http://www.mpfinance.com/htm/Finance/20110604/News/ea_eab2.htm

---

57 : 鉛筆小生(8153)@2011-06-04 16:08:19

55樓提及

---

http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/template/apple/art_main.php?iss_id=20110604&sec_id=15307&art_id=15312153
李兆基︰恒地估值偏低
指市值何止 1200億　揚言續增持
2011年06月04日

我相信若牛市未完, 恒基下一輪攻勢必會派高息開始

---

58 : GS(14)@2011-06-04 16:16:13

恆地真是幾超值

---

59 : carl_li(1524)@2011-06-07 14:51:34

四叔好過X哥ge..........

---

60 : GS(14)@2011-06-07 21:58:07

60樓提及

---

四叔好過X哥ge..........

至少有誠信

---

61 : onesee(1238)@2011-06-08 14:29:25

四叔棄行使紅輪 續斥近1.3億增持
2011年6月8日

http://www.mpfinance.com/htm/Finance/20110608/News/eb_ebe1.htm

---

62 : GS(14)@2011-06-08 21:19:55

李兆基︰恒地估值偏低
指市值何止 1200億　揚言續增持
2011年06月04日

http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/te ... 320&art_id=15312153

---

63 : GS(14)@2011-06-11 11:52:23

http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/te ... 307&art_id=15329581

四叔：恒地收舊樓唔霸道
2011年06月10日

---

64 : 鱷不群(1248)@2011-06-11 12:12:45

64樓提及

---

http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/template/apple/art_main.php?iss_id=20110610&sec_id=15307&art_id=15329581

四叔：恒地收舊樓唔霸道
2011年06月10日

這個要問問甜心集團

---

65 : GS(14)@2011-06-11 12:14:33

65樓提及

---

64樓提及

---

http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/template/apple/art_main.php?iss_id=20110610&sec_id=15307&art_id=15329581

四叔：恒地收舊樓唔霸道
2011年06月10日

這個要問問甜心集團

請埋社工洗底wor

---

66 : onesee(1238)@2011-06-22 14:01:43

威華達﹕適時再減持港華
2011年6月22日

http://www.mpfinance.com/htm/Finance/20110622/News/ww_ww3.htm

---

67 : GS(14)@2011-07-16 15:23:35

http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/te ... 335&art_id=15436564

香港恒基兆業參與經營
杭州斷橋　貨車飛墮司機傷
2011年07月16日

---

68 : GS(14)@2011-07-21 23:08:45

http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/te ... 104&art_id=15450722
九成員工不滿加薪幅度
中華煤氣醞釀工潮
2011年07月21日

---

69 : superkkw(6672)@2011-07-21 23:55:26

畜牲就有份

---

70 : david395(4434)@2011-08-22 22:45:38

http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... TN20110822562_C.pdf

---

71 : 香男(5828)@2011-10-06 00:18:34

97 到左現金價

---

72 : GS(14)@2011-10-06 19:08:22

73樓提及

---

97 到左現金價

未到好平的水平，只是合理...最低是28.5仙...何況主要資產三橋有事

前貼已講

---

73 : 香男(5828)@2011-10-07 00:36:22

無論現金值 , 圖表 , 大市氣氛 , 老散心態 , 0.466 左右的支持值得試下

---

74 : GS(14)@2011-10-07 20:34:52

75樓提及

---

無論現金值 , 圖表 , 大市氣氛 , 老散心態 , 0.466 左右的支持值得試下

圖表我唔記得，但是想買來短炒同長線唔同的，如要買我寧買1123

---

75 : DragonGirl(40332)@2013-10-11 15:20:09

1083 甚麼都好，timing 問題

---

首都創投(2324，前德泰中華投資)專區(關係:華匯、0870、8037、8082)

1 : GS(14)@2011-05-18 21:59:23

(blank)

---

2 : GS(14)@2011-05-18 22:00:09

http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... TN20100928138_C.pdf

人力資源
於二零一零年六月三十日，本集團有2名僱員（不包括董事）。總員工成本（不包括董事酬金）約705,388港元（二零零九年：1,057,714港元）。彼等在本集團擔任文職、研究、業務發展及行政等職務。本集團薪酬政策符合現行市場慣例，並按個別僱員之表現及經驗而釐定其薪酬。

2 man band,開枱麻雀都唔夠,公司點聯誼?

greatsoup:
可以猜下枚

得兩丁友....咁份annual report 邊個去做....做會計入數都要有人做ga...outsource?..呢d公司上市黎做咩,

greatsoup
這間是21章，1個做基金經理，1個做會計，夠啦..

---

3 : GS(14)@2011-05-18 22:02:14

http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... N201012011258_C.pdf

2324批股

http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... TN20110112573_C.pdf

2供1,每股0.3

見到金江大家識啦

自動波人:
金剛同忠楠,都係避一避好d

---

4 : GS(14)@2011-05-18 22:02:17

http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... TN20110222404_C.pdf
業績

---

5 : GS(14)@2011-05-18 22:02:32

http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... TN20110516472_C.pdf
看來投入最多是2324

---

6 : 拔刺者(4132)@2011-06-09 23:22:57

正興二世

---

7 : GS(14)@2011-06-11 09:39:43

http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... TN20110609698_C.pdf
華匯ed... 買一間就有又多四間入袋，徐先生今次死啦...

8037、8082他們都持有超過10%股權

870重組緊

---

8 : greatsoup38(830)@2011-07-10 17:59:17

http://www.mmt.gov.hk/eng/rulings/SKIC.Ruling.12042011.pdf
德泰中華投資有限公司
二零一一年四月十二日財政司司長根據《證券及期貨條例》(第571章)第252(2)條及附表9向市場失當行為審裁處發出的通知

---

9 : GS(14)@2011-08-14 20:06:36

http://webb-site.com/articles/cvclonglife.asp
Webb哥話丘忠航的持股在意義上已超過30%，觸發要約全面收購，但他無提出

---

10 : GS(14)@2011-08-14 20:06:48

---

11 : 200(9285)@2011-08-17 20:36:50

丘忠航涉持股超法規
股壇長毛踢爆　朗力福昨停牌
2011年08月17日

  (未有評分)
  瀏覽人次：1,600

  Facebook
  Twitter
  轉寄朋友

股壇長毛 David Webb近日又玩踢爆，今次對象是朗力福（ 8037）、首都創投（ 2324），關鍵人物則是首創大股東兼執董丘忠航。他質疑丘忠航透過私人投資，又藉朗力福及首都創投互相持股，共持朗力福和首都創投逾 30%權益，觸發全面收購而未提出，違反法規。　記者：周燕芬

受消息影響，朗力福昨停牌，稱待發佈股價敏感消息。首創收 0.31元，跌 1.6%。
David Webb列出 5大張紙，詳細道出丘忠航與朗力福和首都創投之間的關係。文章指出，首都創投早於 09年已入股朗力福，去年底朗力福亦開始於市場購入首都創投權益，有趣的事情於是開始出現。

建議證監會研全面收購
放大圖片

12345678910

按聯交所權益披露資料， Webb指， 7月底丘忠航透過首創已持朗力福 22.8%權益，加上丘忠航直接持有朗力福 7.99%權益，兩者直接共持有朗力福 30.79%權益，而早於 7月 25日更曾達 31.13%權益，他要求證監會決定丘忠航和首都創投對朗力福是否已觸及全面收購線，朗力福宜暫停買賣直至事件清晰。
而由於丘忠航直接持有首都創投 22.18%權益，朗力福則直接持有首都創投 8.92%，兩者合共持有首都創投達 31.1%，他質疑丘忠航和朗力福亦是一致行動人士。他建議證監會研究丘忠航和朗力福於首都創投是否一致行動人士，是否需要提出全面收購。由於事情或涉及兩間公司互相提全面收購，變成無意義之舉，他認為最後應由其中一家作出全面收購行動。
管理層獨立性受質疑

除股權上有密切關係外， Webb亦指出，朗力福主席張鴻，原來於 03年曾協助首都創投上市，張鴻當時為國泰君安銷售部副總裁。此外，朗力福獨立非執董陳慧殷來自首都創投持 30%權益的 CNI Bullion，任職銷售部董事，其獨立性亦受到質疑。
還有，去年 4月 9日，朗力福給予首都創投認購權，於未來 10年以每股 0.355元認購朗力福 50萬股，但卻沒有任何解釋。而兩間公司更可共用辦公室，去年 7月始一齊租用環球貿易中心（ ICC） 76樓；並同時僱用鄭鄭會計師事務所，在在顯示兩間公司關係密切。

http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/te ... 320&art_id=15531264

中南金融傑作也‧

---

12 : GS(14)@2011-08-17 21:02:27

CNI Bullion = 北方證券呀

---

13 : 200(9285)@2011-08-17 21:12:36

12樓提及

---

CNI Bullion = 北方證券呀=中國 北方金銀業

仲有一間金道貴金屬有限公司係fm104賣廣告‧

---

14 : GS(14)@2011-08-17 22:05:55

13樓提及

---

12樓提及

---

CNI Bullion = 北方證券呀=中國 北方金銀業

仲有一間金道貴金屬有限公司係fm104賣廣告‧

http://www.sfc.hk/sfcprd/eng/pr/ ... =AUE994&applNo=0001
呢間?

---

15 : 200(9285)@2011-08-17 22:09:07

http://24k.hk/

---

16 : GS(14)@2011-08-18 22:25:27

http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... TN20110817616_C.pdf
呢班人...


(6) 由於丘先生與本公司各自於二零一一年七月二十六日至二零一一年七月二十九日 期 間 進 行 之 一 連 串 交 易（而 丘 先 生 亦 未 就 此 遞 交 披 露 權 益 通 知），截 至 二 零
一 一 年 七 月 二 十 九 日，本 公 司 持 有 朗 力 福 已 發 行 股 本 之22.75%，而 丘 先 生 持
有 朗 力 福 已 發 行 股 本 之7.06%。
(7) 基 於 前 述 因 由，直 至 本 公 司 收 到 上 述 詢 問 後，本 公 司 方 才 察 覺 到 本 公 司 與 丘先 生 於 二 零 一 一 年 六 月 十 日 至 二 零 一 一 年 七 月 二 十 八 日 期 間 於 朗 力 福 已 發 行股 本 之 總 持 股 量 超 過30%。
(8) 雖 然 根 據《收 購 守 則》，本 公 司 被 假 定 為 與 丘 先 生 一 致 行 動，惟 因 本 公 司 相 信本 公 司 可 證 實，在 所 有 關 鍵 時 刻，本 公 司 與 丘 先 生 或 其 他 人 士 並 無 任 何 協 議
或 默 契（不 論 正 式 或 非 正 式）以 通 過 購 入 朗 力 福 之 表 決 權 而 合 作 取 得 或 鞏 固 對朗 力 福 之 控 制。
(9) 因 此，本 公 司 並 不 認 為 已 出 現 對 朗 力 福 股 份 提 出 全 面 要 約 的 任 何 責 任，而 本公 司 或 丘 先 生 均 無 意 對 朗 力 福 股 份 提 出 任 何 全 面 要 約。

---

17 : 200(9285)@2011-08-18 22:28:23

直 至 本 公 司 收 到 上 述 詢 問 後，本 公 司 方 才 察 覺 到

( 9 U P )

---

18 : GS(14)@2011-08-18 22:50:21

17樓提及

---

直 至 本 公 司 收 到 上 述 詢 問 後，本 公 司 方 才 察 覺 到

( 9 U P )

好似當人白痴，呢班高手玩野

8037
http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... LN20110818008_C.pdf

丘 先 生 及 首 都 創 投 其 後 已 經 向 董 事 會 確 認：
1. 於 二 零 一 一 年 六 月 十 日 至 二 零 一 一 年 七 月 二 十 八 日 期 間 內，首 都 創 投 及 丘 先生於本公司之已發行股份的累積股權達30%以上，然而，首都創投及丘先生於二 零 一 一 年 八 月 十 二 日 後 方 察 覺 該 情 況；
2. 在所有關鍵時刻，根據《收購守則》的定義，丘先生與首都創投並非一致行動；及
3. 因 此，首 都 創 投 及 丘 先 生 均 認 為 上 述 股 權 並 無 產 生 就 本 公 司 普 通 股 提 出 強 制全 面 要 約 的 任 何 責 任，而 彼 等 均 無 意 就 此 提 出 任 何 全 面 要 約。
另 外 亦 謹 此 提 述 首 都 創 投 日 期 為 二 零 一 一 年 八 月 十 七 日 的 公 告。

---

19 : 200(9285)@2011-08-20 01:05:13

丘忠航辭任皇朝董事被研訊
2011年08月19日

  (未有評分)
  瀏覽人次：1,333

  Facebook
  Twitter
  轉寄朋友

【本報訊】首都創投（ 2324）執行董事丘忠航被指涉及要對朗力福（ 8037）提出全面收購後，又涉及市場失當行為而被研訊。皇朝傢俬（ 1198）公佈，丘氏辭任獨立非執行董事，公告透露，市場失當行為審裁處已開始對丘氏研訊，以確定他有否從事首都創投前身，即德泰大中華的股份虛假交易和操縱證券市場等不當行為，但強調這純屬丘氏私事，與公司無關。丘氏事前也沒有向公司知會研訊一事。

朗力福復牌升近 9%

市場失當審裁處資料顯示，丘忠航於 2009年 1月 7日後，就討論德泰股份配售期間，曾於當年 1月 9日出售德泰股份，而當時出任主席的徐德強購入股份的交易，則被指涉嫌推高股價。
另外，首都創投公佈，公司與丘忠航方於今年 7月 25日分別持有 23.14%及 7.99%朗力福，合計逾 30%，兩者可能因被視為《收購守則》的「一致行動」人士，要提出全面收購一事，已獲證監會查詢跟進。不過首都創投及朗力福均強調，首都創投與丘氏並非一致行動，因此不會向朗力福提出全購。
首都創投及朗力福均指出，本月 12日證監致函詢問，才發覺首都創投及丘忠航按「一致行動」人士定義，在朗力福持股逾 30%，達全購觸發點。
但朗力福指出，首都創投及丘忠航在所有關鍵時刻並非一致行動，亦無提出全購責任，甚至毋須停牌。朗力福昨日復牌，股價扯高 8.7%，收報 0.25元。

出事了

http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/te ... 320&art_id=15538145

---

20 : 拔刺者(4132)@2011-08-20 04:15:32

正式表示關注的那份
http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... TN20110819655_C.pdf

(何時能夠將通告的webb-site.com變為zkiz.com?湯兄)

---

21 : GS(14)@2011-08-20 07:55:27

唔知啊，但呢單野前一排都出了，舊聞當新聞真是有點...

---

22 : 200(9285)@2011-08-20 21:10:24

丘忠航 及 歐陽啟初 大家也是中南系內人，佢地同主持人莊先生也有共同興趣
就係養馬了，兩位係澳門有隻配售馬叫北方勇士成績唔錯有5冠2亞算有馬運了‧

---

23 : GS(14)@2011-08-20 21:25:54

是咩，有無馬睇?

---

24 : 200(9285)@2011-08-20 21:29:59

23樓提及

---

是咩，有無馬睇?

http://www.mjc.mo/NEWMJCPAGE/blo ... 0&blog_type=2&lang=

ready for you .

---

25 : GS(14)@2011-08-20 21:34:05

唔識睇馬，但是好似唔太聽話...

---

26 : 200(9285)@2011-08-20 21:38:22

25樓提及

---

唔識睇馬，但是好似唔太聽話...

好馬來的，配售馬唔係隻隻好野特別是澳門‧

---

27 : 拔刺者(4132)@2011-08-20 21:40:14

26樓提及

---

25樓提及

---

唔識睇馬，但是好似唔太聽話...

好馬來的，配售馬唔係隻隻好野特別是澳門‧

昨晚贏了派3.3倍

---

28 : 200(9285)@2011-08-20 21:46:25

27樓提及

---

26樓提及

---

25樓提及

---

唔識睇馬，但是好似唔太聽話...

好馬來的，配售馬唔係隻隻好野特別是澳門‧

昨晚贏了派3.3倍

丘忠航無拉頭馬

---

29 : 拔刺者(4132)@2011-08-20 21:47:11

c+拉一樣啫

---

30 : 200(9285)@2011-09-15 20:59:04

推介垃圾
http://www.hkdailynews.com.hk/finance.php?id=181240

---

31 : GS(14)@2011-09-15 21:00:37

沉瀣一氣

---

32 : 200(9285)@2011-09-15 21:00:44

司徒明慧股票牌轉左公司

但佢仲有幫中國北方做野

http://www.sfc.hk/sfcprd/eng/pr/ ... =AXI117&applNo=0002

http://www.cni-gold.com/inner_blog_detail.php?id=121


咁奇怪既

---

33 : GS(14)@2011-09-15 21:02:15

查下間怡安又點，好平二十幾就得

---

34 : 200(9285)@2011-09-15 21:05:26

沉瀣一氣???

---

35 : GS(14)@2011-09-15 21:13:13

你見周老師同班人的guanxi好緊密就知啦

---

36 : GS(14)@2011-10-01 14:07:22

叫做賺錢的
http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... N201109301071_C.pdf
展望未來，本集團預期美國及歐洲之經濟增長將放緩。市場避險情緒升溫可能引發更大的市場不確定性，發達國家發展中國家均難倖免。即便如此，美聯儲承諾再維持兩年之低利率，此對股本投資而言實屬有利。另一利好的一面是，中國政府於近期進一步收緊當前之宏觀政策的機會似乎減低。董事將採取審慎措施以管理本集團之投資組合。

---

37 : greatsoup38(830)@2011-10-22 10:43:42

http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... TN20111021126_C.pdf
邊個出假支票?

茲提述一宗最近由一名Chan Ping Yee先生 (「原告」) 在高等法院對本公司 (作為被
告) 提出的訴訟，訴訟編號為 HCA 1700/2011。訴訟理由涉及一張日期為二零一一
年五月一日，金額為39,000,000港元的未能承兌支票，原告聲稱該筆款項須向其支付
但在欲兌現該支票時遭拒兌。
本公司在徹底調查此事及就此充分諮詢過法律意見後，確信原告的索償毫無理據，
因為 (1) 所述的支票在該情況下，並不構成可執行之票據；及（2）根據匯票條例，
所述的支票在發出上述訴訟的傳訊令狀前已經註銷。

http://sdinotice.hkex.com.hk/di/ ... ee&src=MAIN&lang=ZH
同名同姓的人叫陳秉義，當年他就認購了這批8%債...

http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... LN20060216035_C.pdf

這間Concept Capital 是否和德泰有關? 這筆錢剛好和他欠的錢差不多
http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... LN20110621038_C.pdf

---

38 : greatsoup38(830)@2011-10-22 10:44:46

http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... LN20101019002_C.pdf
原來佢都有同人一齊買了8351

---

39 : greatsoup38(830)@2011-10-22 10:45:01

http://sdinotice.hkex.com.hk/di/ ... ee&src=MAIN&lang=ZH

---

40 : GS(14)@2012-01-19 00:03:46

http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... TN20120118664_C.pdf
茲提述首都創投有限公司 (「本公司」) 分別於二零一一年八月十九日、十二月
十二日及十二月二十九日就市場失當行為審裁處對本公司兩名執行董事的查詢
所刊發的公告 (「該等公告」)。除另有界定或文意另有所指外，本公告所用詞
彙與該等公告所界定者具有相同涵義。
本公司董事會現就該查詢的進展提供進一步資料，實質聽證會將增加兩天，即二
零一二年一月十八日及一月二十日。
本公司在需要及適當時會作進一步公告。

---

41 : 摘星(6904)@2012-02-26 11:57:40

http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... TN20120224457_C.pdf

公告及通告 - [中期業績]

截至二零一一年十二月三十一日止六個月中期業績公布

截至二零一一年十二月三十一日止六個月（「本期間」），本集團錄得負數營業額
107,000,000港元（二零一零年：正數20,700,000港元）及本公司股權持有人應佔虧損
86,500,000港元（二零一零年：溢利40,500,000港元）。



本公司股權持有人應佔業績由
盈轉虧，主要由於全球投資環境不穩定。本期間之財務資產虧損淨額為111,100,000
港元，而去年同期則錄得溢利20,000,000港元。於本期間，本集團聯營公司中國北
方金銀業有限公司之表現保持理想，為本集團帶來應佔溢利30,900,000港元。

---

42 : traveller(1405)@2012-03-05 23:36:52

邱生又上場，佢都幾好搵

---

43 : 200(9285)@2012-03-15 21:13:02

中環在線：首都創投　大股東唔撈

中期業績見紅嘅首都創投（ 2324），再有董事唔撈，繼舊年 11月非執行董事蕭少滔辭職之後，家就連大股東兼執行董事丘忠航都唔做董事。

人事變動頻頻

其實丘忠航同另一位董事徐德強，舊年 8月曾經因為涉嫌虛假交易、操控股價及操控證券市場三項控罪，被市場失當行為審裁處進行調查，自此之後，公司亦陸續開始出現人事變動，上星期一就重新委任咗劉大貝做董事會主席，邱恩明及張國裕就分別做執董同非執董。今次丘忠航退任，唔知係咪公司想洗底嘅先兆呢？

http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/te ... 320&art_id=16154170

---

44 : GS(14)@2012-03-16 22:31:34

唉，華匯玩

---

45 : 200(9285)@2012-03-16 22:34:02

44樓提及

---

唉，華匯玩

丘忠航唔係華匯人嗎?

---

46 : GS(14)@2012-03-16 22:34:48

是啊，但有事

---

47 : 200(9285)@2012-03-16 22:39:44

46樓提及

---

是啊，但有事

莊先生炒q埋佢‧

---

48 : GS(14)@2012-03-16 22:40:15

遲D另有用途

---

49 : 200(9285)@2012-03-31 17:10:49

27樓提及

---

26樓提及

---

25樓提及

---

唔識睇馬，但是好似唔太聽話...

好馬來的，配售馬唔係隻隻好野特別是澳門‧

昨晚贏了派3.3倍

隻新馬琴晚贏了兩位也無出現‧

---

50 : 200(9285)@2012-04-14 13:57:33

入左的新馬也不要了‧
http://www.mjc.mo/race/info/hrs_info.php?brand_no=C204

---

51 : GS(14)@2012-04-14 19:34:11

Like Mr. Hui

---

52 : GS(14)@2012-05-03 00:35:26

http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... N201205021788_C.pdf
買垃圾

收購事項
董事欣然宣佈，於二零一二年五月二日（交易時段後），本公司與賣方訂立買賣協
議，以收購Long Surplus之權益。本公司根據買賣協議應付之代價將以向賣方配發
及發行代價股份 (入賬列作繳足) 清償。發行代價股份須待聯交所上市委員會批准
代價股份上市及買賣後，方可作實。
根據買賣協議，本公司同意購買，而賣方亦同意出售Long Surplus之全部已發行股
本，代價為19,008,480港元，將以發行84,116,984股代價股份清償，代價股份相當
於本公司現有已發行股本約10.00%，另相當於經發行代價股份擴大之本公司已發
行股本約9.09%。
每股代價股份之發行價為0.226 港元，較股份於最後交易日期之收市價每股0.228
港元折讓約0.88%，另較股份於買賣協議日期前過去五個完整交易日之平均收市價
每股0.233港元折讓約3.00%。
..
(G) 本公司接獲且全權酌情信納由本公司所委聘之獨立專業估值師行對Go
Markets Pty Limited全部股本權益作出之估值報告指其於二零一二年四月三
十日之公平市值為不少於501,480,000港元；
...
有關LONG SURPLUS之資料
Long Surplus為一間投資控股公司，其持有247 Capital Limited之241,642股每股面值
1.00美元B類股份，相當於其全部已發行股本之3.98%。247 Capital Limited擁有Go
Markets Pty Limited之100%股本權益，該公司由二零零六年起於澳洲從事網上貿易
業務。Go Markets Pty Limited為「直通式處理」(Straight Through Processing)供應商，
專門為零售投資者提供網上外匯交易。董事已獲告知，Go Markets Pty Limited之客
戶基礎遍及全球超過120個國家，擁有逾16,000個各戶賬戶。Go Markets Pty Limited
於荷蘭亦設有歐洲支部。
據董事於作出一切合理查詢後所深知、盡悉及確信，且經Long Surplus確認，Long
Surplus及其最終實益擁有人均為獨立第三方，與本公司及本公司之關連人士概無關
連。

---

53 : GS(14)@2012-05-03 00:36:02

http://www.gomarketsaus.com/

---

54 : donaldleung0804(5940)@2012-05-09 10:43:15

小魚又推8082了！

---

55 : GS(14)@2012-05-09 21:26:36

正一垃圾粉皮

---

56 : 200(9285)@2012-05-23 23:20:19

證監會昨對首都創投（2324）及公司前董事丘忠航（圖）採取紀律行動，指兩者於去年6月增持朗力福（8037）至30.19%股權，觸發全面收購責任，但並無提出全面收購，違反《收購合併守則》。
證監向丘忠航施加冷淡對待令，禁止他直接或間接使用香港證券市場設施，為期18個月，由今日起至明年11月22日止，並公開譴責丘氏及首都創投在此事上的行為。
首都創投是一間根據聯交所《上市規則》第21章上市的投資公司，主要投資於中港上市及非上市公司，丘忠航在事發時是公司執行董事、大股東兼投資委員會成員。
證監指，在事發期間，丘氏管理兩個投資賬戶，一個屬於首都創投，另一個屬於他的個人投資，在買入朗力福股份時，他是唯一決策者。他聲稱，因計算錯誤才買入過多朗力福股份，雖然他知道需要把公司及個人於朗力福的合併持股量保持於30%以下，但無證據顯示他認真地實施有效的合規程序。丘忠航及首都創投均承認違反《收購守則》，並同意今次紀律處分行動。

http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/financeestate/art/20120523/16360445

---

57 : GS(14)@2012-06-19 00:14:48

http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... TN20120618005_C.pdf
本公告乃由本公司根據香港聯合交易所有限公司證券上市規則（「上市規則」）第13.09
條而作出。
首都創投有限公司（「本公司」）董事會（「董事會」）各董事（「董事」）謹此公佈，於
二零一二年六月十五日（交易時段後），本公司與一名獨立第三方（與本公司董事、最
高行政人員、主要股東及管理層股東或彼等各自之任何聯繫人士（定義見上市規則）
概無關連，且非與上述人士一致行動）（「獨立第三方」）訂立意向書（「意向書」）。意
向書乃有關獨立第三方認購佔本公司經擴大已發行股本不低於10%及不超過30%之新
股份，認購價有待商定（「認購事項」）
根據意向書條款，於認講事項完成時，獨立第三方及其一致行動人士將會持有本公司
經擴大發行股本不超過30%。除訂約方之保密條文外，意向書之所有其他條款均無法
律約束力。

---

58 : i3640(1387)@2012-07-08 16:38:50

1/復牌呢味野都可以夾份搞齊齊上?!
2/佢地系親戚檔?!

“根據託管協議，本公司之附屬公司Winning Point已於簽訂託管協議時支付不可退還誠意金2,500,000港元。”
06/07/2012   00901  萊福資本  有關金至尊珠寶控股有限公司復牌建議之託管協議之最新資料
http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... TN20120706622_C.pdf
“根據託管協議，本公司的附屬公司Huge Energy於簽訂託管協議時已支付不可退還的誠意金2,500,000港元”
06/07/2012   02324  首都創投  有關金至尊珠寶控股有限公司復牌建議的託管協議的最新情況
http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... TN20120706592_C.pdf

---

59 : greatsoup38(830)@2012-07-08 16:46:28

1. 可以，好多都是例如286

2. 都算是親戚，同一堆人

---

60 : kwuntl(19490)@2012-07-26 23:12:58

首都創投(HKSE:2324.HK - 新聞 - 公司資料)(前名德泰中華)大股東兼前執行董事丘忠航，以及集團執行董事徐德強，被市場失當行為審裁處裁定，違反《證券及期貨條例》有關虛假交易、操控價格及操控證券市場的罪名成立。

事發在2009年1月，首都創投於同月13日配售1.5015億股新股，配售價為0.045元，較當天停牌前收市價折讓18.2%。而於1月8日的收市價只有0.042元，股價大升原因是兩人的內幕交易所致。丘忠航於1月9日收市前20分鐘，把超過180萬股股份售予徐德強，每股介乎0.49至0.55元。(ir/a)


其實點解會係丘忠航同徐德強親自出手...? 唔搵人頭去做...?

---

61 : GS(14)@2012-07-27 09:56:43

60樓提及

---

首都創投(HKSE:2324.HK - 新聞 - 公司資料)(前名德泰中華)大股東兼前執行董事丘忠航，以及集團執行董事徐德強，被市場失當行為審裁處裁定，違反《證券及期貨條例》有關虛假交易、操控價格及操控證券市場的罪名成立。
事發在2009年1月，首都創投於同月13日配售1.5015億股新股，配售價為0.045元，較當天停牌前收市價折讓18.2%。而於1月8日的收市價只有0.042元，股價大升原因是兩人的內幕交易所致。丘忠航於1月9日收市前20分鐘，把超過180萬股股份售予徐德強，每股介乎0.49至0.55元。(ir/a)
其實點解會係丘忠航同徐德強親自出手...? 唔搵人頭去做...?

有人建議的，自己睇下份野啦
http://www.mmt.gov.hk/eng/reports/SKIC_Report_Part_I.pdf

---

62 : Alfred Ho(32091)@2012-08-22 14:27:09

求救入左 2324

小弟上2个星期和朋友食飯,我朋友帶左个肥仔一起到場,並說肥仔為新進財金精英.局上肥仔財金精英不斷推介隻2324.話短期内会有surprise。叫我唔好miss 左个幾会. $0.156左右買左成2球……吊，今日得反0.115….点好？

---

63 : GS(14)@2012-08-22 14:44:38

62樓提及

---

求救入左 2324
小弟上2个星期和朋友食飯,我朋友帶左个肥仔一起到場,並說肥仔為新進財金精英.局上肥仔財金精英不斷推介隻2324.話短期内会有surprise。叫我唔好miss 左个幾会. $0.156左右買左成2球……吊，今日得反0.115….点好？

斬，講完

呢個風報紙講幾百次，無句真

---

64 : Alfred Ho(32091)@2012-08-22 14:50:14

63樓提及

---

62樓提及

---

求救入左 2324
小弟上2个星期和朋友食飯,我朋友帶左个肥仔一起到場,並說肥仔為新進財金精英.局上肥仔財金精英不斷推介隻2324.話短期内会有surprise。叫我唔好miss 左个幾会. $0.156左右買左成2球……吊，今日得反0.115….点好？

斬，講完
呢個風報紙講幾百次，無句真

大股东要玩完？冇得等？

---

65 : GS(14)@2012-08-22 14:53:16

64樓提及

---

63樓提及

---

62樓提及

---

求救入左 2324
小弟上2个星期和朋友食飯,我朋友帶左个肥仔一起到場,並說肥仔為新進財金精英.局上肥仔財金精英不斷推介隻2324.話短期内会有surprise。叫我唔好miss 左个幾会. $0.156左右買左成2球……吊，今日得反0.115….点好？

斬，講完
呢個風報紙講幾百次，無句真

大股东要玩完？冇得等？

隻野向下炒的

---

66 : kwuntl(19490)@2012-08-22 15:12:22

我都有個朋友介紹我買呢隻...累我埋單輸左一千蚊...
金融界老X何其多...

---

67 : GS(14)@2012-08-22 16:08:57

66樓提及

---

我都有個朋友介紹我買呢隻...累我埋單輸左一千蚊...
金融界老X何其多...

我唔明點解仲有人輸在這隻股

---

68 : Alfred Ho(32091)@2012-08-23 10:19:54

67樓提及

---

66樓提及

---

我都有個朋友介紹我買呢隻...累我埋單輸左一千蚊...
金融界老X何其多...

我唔明點解仲有人輸在這隻股

曰日波幅成6-8%,成个赌场咁.....

---

69 : GS(14)@2012-08-23 10:20:36

68樓提及

---

67樓提及

---

66樓提及

---

我都有個朋友介紹我買呢隻...累我埋單輸左一千蚊...
金融界老X何其多...

我唔明點解仲有人輸在這隻股

曰日波幅成6-8%,成个赌场咁.....

直情是九死一生

---

70 : Alfred Ho(32091)@2012-08-23 10:25:28

69樓提及

---

68樓提及

---

67樓提及

---

66樓提及

---

我都有個朋友介紹我買呢隻...累我埋單輸左一千蚊...
金融界老X何其多...

我唔明點解仲有人輸在這隻股

曰日波幅成6-8%,成个赌场咁.....

直情是九死一生

今日斬左，輸左8个。

---

71 : GS(14)@2012-08-23 10:27:17

70樓提及

---

69樓提及

---

68樓提及

---

67樓提及

---

66樓提及

---

我都有個朋友介紹我買呢隻...累我埋單輸左一千蚊...
金融界老X何其多...

我唔明點解仲有人輸在這隻股

曰日波幅成6-8%,成个赌场咁.....

直情是九死一生

今日斬左，輸左8个。

希望唔好我烏雅口累你可版輸少D... 因為呢D 股實在太cheap

---

72 : Alfred Ho(32091)@2012-08-23 10:45:25

71樓提及

---

70樓提及

---

69樓提及

---

68樓提及

---

67樓提及

---

66樓提及

---

我都有個朋友介紹我買呢隻...累我埋單輸左一千蚊...
金融界老X何其多...

我唔明點解仲有人輸在這隻股

曰日波幅成6-8%,成个赌场咁.....

直情是九死一生

今日斬左，輸左8个。

希望唔好我烏雅口累你可版輸少D... 因為呢D 股實在太cheap

多谢你先啱，其实隻野有D咩事？点解突然插得咁利害？有故仔？

---

73 : GS(14)@2012-08-23 10:47:24

72樓提及

---

71樓提及

---

70樓提及

---

69樓提及

---

68樓提及

---

67樓提及

---

66樓提及

---

我都有個朋友介紹我買呢隻...累我埋單輸左一千蚊...
金融界老X何其多...

我唔明點解仲有人輸在這隻股

曰日波幅成6-8%,成个赌场咁.....

直情是九死一生

今日斬左，輸左8个。

希望唔好我烏雅口累你可版輸少D... 因為呢D 股實在太cheap

多谢你先啱，其实隻野有D咩事？点解突然插得咁利害？有故仔？

隻野個老細被人捉左內幕交易走左你咪唔是唔知吧，可能他要散貨找你做替死鬼

---

74 : Alfred Ho(32091)@2012-08-23 11:04:40

73樓提及

---

72樓提及

---

71樓提及

---

70樓提及

---

69樓提及

---

68樓提及

---

67樓提及

---

66樓提及

---

我都有個朋友介紹我買呢隻...累我埋單輸左一千蚊...
金融界老X何其多...

我唔明點解仲有人輸在這隻股

曰日波幅成6-8%,成个赌场咁.....

直情是九死一生

今日斬左，輸左8个。

希望唔好我烏雅口累你可版輸少D... 因為呢D 股實在太cheap

多谢你先啱，其实隻野有D咩事？点解突然插得咁利害？有故仔？

隻野個老細被人捉左內幕交易走左你咪唔是唔知吧，可能他要散貨找你做替死鬼

唔知......個朋友話会升爆.....吊.....

---

75 : GS(14)@2012-08-23 11:05:52

升爆都唔會話你聽啦

---

76 : Alfred Ho(32091)@2012-08-23 11:08:33

75樓提及

---

升爆都唔會話你聽啦

吊，班仆街老千幾時死呀...

---

77 : GS(14)@2012-08-23 11:09:23

76樓提及

---

75樓提及

---

升爆都唔會話你聽啦

吊，班仆街老千幾時死呀...

唔知呀，唔聽扮傻就得

---

78 : Alfred Ho(32091)@2012-08-23 11:11:25

77樓提及

---

76樓提及

---

75樓提及

---

升爆都唔會話你聽啦

吊，班仆街老千幾時死呀...

唔知呀，唔聽扮傻就得

Thank you~~~

---

79 : hopingu(1296)@2012-08-23 13:34:16

留意湯財的文, 未必可以發達(甚至阻大家發達), 但肯定可以輸少好多冤枉錢係ot 股身上~~

http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/financeestate/art/20120823/16627593
投資一周：發達要賺窮人錢

首都創投（2324）的故事：上星期，一位線人打電話過來，說首都創投（2324）會炒起，那時的股價是0.16元。誰知過了兩天，不但不升，反而跌至0.14元。
我沒有買，但作為專業蠱惑仔，馬上致電線人，爆着粗說﹕「我買了50萬錢，家陣點算先（下略100字粗口）……」
他說﹕「好大沽壓，現在先放下去，會跌至0.12元以下，收齊貨先再踢返上來。」
我說﹕「你哋不是好乾嘅咩？邊個有貨掟你？」
他說﹕「有條友叫『 T君』，在高位買了幾百萬錢，猛咁沽貨。我梗係把股價質低，接齊貨，先至炒啦！」
「咁而家即係點？」
「 T君分開五日沽貨，沽清了，所以股價也已穩定下來。」他說﹕「家陣二三線咁旺，隻嘢又得一億市值咁多，我都要炒返轉，賺返點錢啦，如果唔係要隻殼來做乜？」

---

80 : Alfred Ho(32091)@2012-08-23 13:41:41

79樓提及

---

留意湯財的文, 未必可以發達(甚至阻大家發達), 但肯定可以輸少好多冤枉錢係ot 股身上~~
http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/financeestate/art/20120823/16627593
投資一周：發達要賺窮人錢
首都創投（2324）的故事：上星期，一位線人打電話過來，說首都創投（2324）會炒起，那時的股價是0.16元。誰知過了兩天，不但不升，反而跌至0.14元。
我沒有買，但作為專業蠱惑仔，馬上致電線人，爆着粗說﹕「我買了50萬錢，家陣點算先（下略100字粗口）……」
他說﹕「好大沽壓，現在先放下去，會跌至0.12元以下，收齊貨先再踢返上來。」
我說﹕「你哋不是好乾嘅咩？邊個有貨掟你？」
他說﹕「有條友叫『 T君』，在高位買了幾百萬錢，猛咁沽貨。我梗係把股價質低，接齊貨，先至炒啦！」
「咁而家即係點？」
「 T君分開五日沽貨，沽清了，所以股價也已穩定下來。」他說﹕「家陣二三線咁旺，隻嘢又得一億市值咁多，我都要炒返轉，賺返點錢啦，如果唔係要隻殼來做乜？」

......................................!!!

---

81 : GS(14)@2012-08-24 09:28:01

http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... TN20120823716_C.pdf
配售8,400萬股@11.3仙

配售之所得款項淨額約9,000,000港元。董事會擬視乎市況及投資機會而將所得款
項淨額用作投資及營運資金。

---

82 : Alfred Ho(32091)@2012-08-24 12:49:34

81樓提及

---

http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/listconews/SEHK/2012/0823/LTN20120823716_C.pdf
配售8,400萬股@11.3仙
配售之所得款項淨額約9,000,000港元。董事會擬視乎市況及投資機會而將所得款
項淨額用作投資及營運資金。

大股东係威利，邱中行比人踢走左.

---

83 : greatsoup38(830)@2012-08-24 12:53:12

是呀，無錯

---

84 : Alfred Ho(32091)@2012-08-24 12:56:01

83樓提及

---

是呀，無錯

邱中行仲有D咩？D fds 話佢好劲.

---

85 : greatsoup38(830)@2012-08-24 13:09:09

84樓提及

---

83樓提及

---

是呀，無錯

邱中行仲有D咩？D fds 話佢好劲.

他勁個鬼... 幾萬銀街數都畀唔起，個個都勁做唔到生意都是廢

---

86 : Alfred Ho(32091)@2012-08-24 13:16:08

85樓提及

---

84樓提及

---

83樓提及

---

是呀，無錯

邱中行仲有D咩？D fds 話佢好劲.

他勁個鬼... 幾萬銀街數都畀唔起，個個都勁做唔到生意都是廢

哈…幾萬銀街數都畀唔起,未同我差唔多。佢又做淫爱堂經理，吊完來係空心牛老官。

---

87 : greatsoup38(830)@2012-08-24 13:18:25

86樓提及

---

85樓提及

---

84樓提及

---

83樓提及

---

是呀，無錯

邱中行仲有D咩？D fds 話佢好劲.

他勁個鬼... 幾萬銀街數都畀唔起，個個都勁做唔到生意都是廢

哈…幾萬銀街數都畀唔起,未同我差唔多。佢又做淫爱堂經理，吊完來係空心牛老官。

唔作大個屎眼邊個信佢呀

---

88 : Alfred Ho(32091)@2012-08-24 13:24:09

87樓提及

---

86樓提及

---

85樓提及

---

84樓提及

---

83樓提及

---

是呀，無錯

邱中行仲有D咩？D fds 話佢好劲.

他勁個鬼... 幾萬銀街數都畀唔起，個個都勁做唔到生意都是廢

哈…幾萬銀街數都畀唔起,未同我差唔多。佢又做淫爱堂經理，吊完來係空心牛老官。

唔作大個屎眼邊個信佢呀

今次玩完鸟。

---

89 : oman(1154)@2012-08-24 13:33:01

STARMAN'S COLUMN - 江小魚
首創主席暗助「保釣」  
(2012年08月24日)

所謂港澳「保釣勇士」到釣魚台「宣示主權」，原來整隊人能夠成行，都要拜民間累捐超過七位數字之助，收了錢，怎可以不出海？這些錢，等同「戲金」？
日本右翼分子也到尖閣諸島插上太陽旗。其實，若不帶著所謂有點盲目的民族主義角度，客觀而言，這群島嶼，西方人稱之為Pinnacle Islands，日文譯之為尖閣諸島(Senkaku)。
中華人民共和國叫作釣魚島，在台灣的中華民國，則稱之為釣魚台。不少香港人叫「釣魚台」，可能政治不正確，因北京方面是叫「釣魚島」。
很多中國人都以為，中日關係「卡」在歷史問題，至今仍爭拗不斷。不過，這款想法似乎頗有問題，也反映持此論點的有關蛋頭專家不學無術。
早在1972年日中兩國建交，在「歷史問題」上──即二戰當中的中日戰爭問題的處理上，中日兩國已達成共識；日本侵略了中國，給中國政府和中國人民帶來巨大傷害和災難，日本對此進行由衷反省。
這一共識實現了中日兩國的邦交正常化，它意味著兩國從政治和外交意義上已就歷史問題達成了共識。否則，中日根本無法建立邦交，時任中共總理周恩來亦不可能同意並簽字，因這無法給國民合理交代。
周恩來總理在40年前實現中日邦交正常化的邏輯很清楚。歷史是客觀存在的，誰也改變不了，今天中日兩國人民其實面對的關鍵不在歷史本身，而是在於對歷史的認識。「歷史認識問題」即我們如何認識當年發生的歷史事件，這才是主要關鍵點。日本人，和中國人差異有多大？大家可能敢認而不敢講，正因有差異，看同一件事，自然有不同觀點。
中共「十八大」快將召開，所謂保釣不過是政治姿態的目光轉移；其實日本都幾無癮，你中國內部要「講數」，就搵著日本來搞，日本國內輿論對此清楚不過。
個人最討厭香港某些媒體，狗吠甚麼「中日必將一戰」！香港人好想打仗咩？到時股、樓「冧」到七彩呀！到時戰情稍見嚴峻，全國糧食供作軍需，無多餘可輸港，餓死你班友呀！中日必將一戰，知唔知自己講乜呀！
某周刊報道今次所謂「保釣」，提及一位暗地補給糧水的台灣猛人、中國國民黨中常委劉大貝，其現任職首都創投(2324)主席；我曾和他在「福臨門」吃過一次晚飯，當然只講股票不談政治。
我當時在想，他在中台兩邊均「吃得開」，現又坐正首都創投主席，難免幻想，該股未來究竟有何大龍鳳搞作？

---

90 : Alfred Ho(32091)@2012-08-24 13:36:02

89樓提及

---

STARMAN'S COLUMN - 江小魚
首創主席暗助「保釣」
(2012年08月24日)
所謂港澳「保釣勇士」到釣魚台「宣示主權」，原來整隊人能夠成行，都要拜民間累捐超過七位數字之助，收了錢，怎可以不出海？這些錢，等同「戲金」？
日本右翼分子也到尖閣諸島插上太陽旗。其實，若不帶著所謂有點盲目的民族主義角度，客觀而言，這群島嶼，西方人稱之為Pinnacle Islands，日文譯之為尖閣諸島(Senkaku)。
中華人民共和國叫作釣魚島，在台灣的中華民國，則稱之為釣魚台。不少香港人叫「釣魚台」，可能政治不正確，因北京方面是叫「釣魚島」。
很多中國人都以為，中日關係「卡」在歷史問題，至今仍爭拗不斷。不過，這款想法似乎頗有問題，也反映持此論點的有關蛋頭專家不學無術。
早在1972年日中兩國建交，在「歷史問題」上──即二戰當中的中日戰爭問題的處理上，中日兩國已達成共識；日本侵略了中國，給中國政府和中國人民帶來巨大傷害和災難，日本對此進行由衷反省。
這一共識實現了中日兩國的邦交正常化，它意味著兩國從政治和外交意義上已就歷史問題達成了共識。否則，中日根本無法建立邦交，時任中共總理周恩來亦不可能同意並簽字，因這無法給國民合理交代。
周恩來總理在40年前實現中日邦交正常化的邏輯很清楚。歷史是客觀存在的，誰也改變不了，今天中日兩國人民其實面對的關鍵不在歷史本身，而是在於對歷史的認識。「歷史認識問題」即我們如何認識當年發生的歷史事件，這才是主要關鍵點。日本人，和中國人差異有多大？大家可能敢認而不敢講，正因有差異，看同一件事，自然有不同觀點。
中共「十八大」快將召開，所謂保釣不過是政治姿態的目光轉移；其實日本都幾無癮，你中國內部要「講數」，就搵著日本來搞，日本國內輿論對此清楚不過。
個人最討厭香港某些媒體，狗吠甚麼「中日必將一戰」！香港人好想打仗咩？到時股、樓「冧」到七彩呀！到時戰情稍見嚴峻，全國糧食供作軍需，無多餘可輸港，餓死你班友呀！中日必將一戰，知唔知自己講乜呀！
某周刊報道今次所謂「保釣」，提及一位暗地補給糧水的台灣猛人、中國國民黨中常委劉大貝，其現任職首都創投(2324)主席；我曾和他在「福臨門」吃過一次晚飯，當然只講股票不談政治。
我當時在想，他在中台兩邊均「吃得開」，現又坐正首都創投主席，難免幻想，該股未來究竟有何大龍鳳搞作？

劉大貝係中南人？？？？

---

91 : GS(14)@2012-08-24 23:08:12

他話是就是啦，打手

---

92 : kwuntl(19490)@2012-09-12 17:53:21

呢隻係咪想向下炒...?

---

93 : GS(14)@2012-09-12 22:29:54

92樓提及

---

呢隻係咪想向下炒...?

是

---

94 : GS(14)@2012-09-28 00:32:30

http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... TN20120927639_C.pdf
炒股蝕死左，無錢

業務回顧及前景
於回顧年度內，經濟問題不僅局限於歐洲及北美地區，中國及其他發展中國家亦
出現增長倒退，情況令人憂慮。現時令人擔心的是新興國家的強大經濟體系亦將
陷入西方經濟發展放緩的困局。全球投資氣氛因此變得更加脆弱。由於投資環
境正在不斷惡化，本集團按公平值計入損益之財務資產錄得虧損約153,100,000港
元。除上文所述之上市投資外，可供出售投資– Quidam Assets Limited之估值亦受
到市場不確定因素之不利影響。Quidam Assets Limited投資之公允值變動虧損約
15,000,000港元已經於本年度確認。
在低息環境下，貴金屬已經成為對抗通脹之熱門投資產品，導致年內金銀交易活
動頻仍，本集團聯營公司中國北方金銀業有限公司因而表現出色，本集團分佔其
溢利高達49,100,000港元，部分彌補本集團股本投資平平之表現。
除現有業務外，於二零一二年五月，本集團收購Go Markets Pty Limited投資，其
作為「直通式處理」(Straight Through Processing)供應商，專門為零售投資者提供網
上外匯交易。收購代價為數約19,000,000港元，以本公司配發及發行約84,100,000
股股份予賣方的方式支付。
儘管投資環境自去年底起重大改變，本集團為加強資本及股東基礎、提升本集團
競爭力及參與具有較高發展潛力之項目，本公司於年內進行配售。本公司於二零
一一年八月成功按每股0.3港元配售約250,000,000股股份，配售所得款項總額約
75,000,000港元。
展望將來，本集團預期全球經濟增長將持續放緩。市場避險情緒升溫可能引發更
大的市場不確定性和波動，發達國家和發展中國家均難倖免。然而，二零一二年
九月已經宣佈第三期量化寬鬆。聯邦儲備局推出每月四百億美元、不設屆滿日期
的新債券購買計劃，以購買機構的按揭擔保證券，並繼續維持超低利率政策最少
至二零一五年中，其對股本投資而言實屬有利。另一利好的一面是，中國政府於
短期內進一步收緊當前之宏觀政策的機會似乎減低。董事將採取審慎措施以管理
本集團之投資組合。

---

95 : wilyty(1376)@2012-09-28 08:36:49

BIG C is really amazing

---

96 : david395(4434)@2012-09-29 10:21:40

瞬間賺幾球

首都創投極具爆升潛力

黃嘉俊

中國北方證券集團有限公司副總裁

[email protected]



‧劉本身曾任國民黨中常委，在台灣的人脈網絡強大，絕對勝任兆豐票券董事長的身份。

‧首都創投現時的估值極度低廉，每股資產淨值為0.7元，折讓高達八成半。



現時在市場上，大折讓的股分有很多，但要捉摸到一隻會大幅抽升的，是有一定的困難。如筆者早前提及的首都創投（02324），雖然股價未有大炒作，但以現市值計，其實是偏低。加上近日台灣有報章報道，首都創投現主席劉大貝已被內定委任為台灣「兆豐票券」的董事長，劉本身曾任國民黨中常委，在台灣的人脈網絡強大，絕對勝任兆豐票券董事長的身分。



奕黧}始注意，若劉大貝在兆豐上任董事長後，其香港旗艦首都創投的前景應有一定憧憬，而筆者最近留意到多左「唉-bank」牌掛入，不知道是不是「唉-bank」或「專業投資者」消息突別靈通入十球博中獎，還是對公司前中短線都有信心。



首都創投現時的估值極度低廉，現價不夠0.1元，每股資產淨值為0.7元，折讓高達八成半。現時市值僅1億，連主板淨殼價都未達到，因此股價要翻兩番也不是難事。加上，技術指標(14)RSI約為12.2，已呈非常超賣，近日該股成交開始活躍，建議收集後，耐心等侯爆發，以其超落後走勢，以及近期市場瘋炒落後股分而言，大幅向下風險不高。加上首都創投日日波幅都有7至8%，升一格就有錢落袋。

---

97 : greatsoup38(830)@2012-09-29 10:36:11

我想笑，最新報告話得番4毛都唔夠

---

98 : GS(14)@2012-10-10 00:57:42

http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... TN20121009377_C.pdf
執行董事及董事會主席之辭任
首都創投有限公司 (「本公司」) 董事會 (「董事會」) 宣布，劉大貝博士 (「劉博
士」) 已辭任本公司執行董事、董事會主席及投資委員會主席，由二零一二年十月九
日起生效。
劉博士辭任之原因是最近獲台灣官方財政部委任為兆豐票券金融股份有限公司董事
長，根據台灣當局的規定，未經特別許可，不得兼任其他公司的董事職務。劉博士
確認彼與董事會並無爭議，且概無有關其辭任的其他事宜須促請股東注意。
首席顧問之委任
董事會欣然宣布，由二零一二年十月九日起，劉博士已獲委任為本公司首席顧問 「( 首
席顧問」) ，就本公司的策略規劃及整體發展出謀獻策。首席顧問並不是董事會成員。
授權代表之變更
董事會亦宣布，由二零一二年十月九日起，劉博士不再擔任本公司按聯交所證券上
市規則第3.05條的要求而設的授權代表 (「授權代表」)，執行董事及投資委員會成員
孔凡鵬先生已獲委接任授權代表之職務。
董事會謹藉此機會向劉博士於任內對本公司所作出之寶貴貢獻由衷致謝，又歡迎劉
博士及孔先生出任本公司的新職務。

---

99 : Vincemgm12(32446)@2012-10-10 08:59:48

2324会唔会是885的走勢翻板呢？尋底中！

---

100 : GS(14)@2012-10-10 21:54:14

99樓提及

---

2324会唔会是885的走勢翻板呢？尋底中！

885? 淨是得一隻?

---

101 : greatsoup38(830)@2012-10-19 00:54:25

http://orientaldaily.on.cc/cnt/finance/20121018/00202_038.html
首都創投（02324）執行董事孔凡鵬，遭富強證券入稟追討227萬元孖展證券戶口欠款。富強證券在入稟狀指出，孔氏於二○一○三月開設案中戶口，截至去年二月底戶口虧絀超過500萬元，同年九月，富強證券變賣戶口所有股票、證券抵債，現追討227萬元尾數。

---

102 : GS(14)@2013-01-05 12:17:04

http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... TN20130104006_C.pdf
10合1，2供1，65仙，金江包銷，都幾例牌

---

103 : amazingrick(36737)@2013-02-22 22:55:11

一股賺3毫，點睇？雖然都幾假

---

104 : greatsoup38(830)@2013-02-23 10:36:08

103樓提及

---

一股賺3毫，點睇？雖然都幾假

唔使睇，是0.3仙，不是0.3元，你睇錯左

---

105 : amazingrick(36737)@2013-02-23 11:47:58

104樓提及

---

103樓提及

---

一股賺3毫，點睇？雖然都幾假

唔使睇，是0.3仙，不是0.3元，你睇錯左

唔怪之得！

---

106 : alb(35614)@2013-03-12 11:09:14

又炒起，印象中4月供股

(greatsoup: 已修改，有pdf 字尾至好貼)

---

107 : greatsoup38(830)@2013-03-12 21:56:11

106樓提及

---

又炒起，印象中4月供股

他們成日都是咁玩好悶

---

108 : alb(35614)@2013-03-14 08:14:24

睇下大C點講



實戰理論 - 沈振盈 2013年3月13日

實戰理論：大市22800有支持 - 沈振盈

港股上個禮拜挾完後，昨日已走了樣，恒指下破23000關口，一些炒兩會概念的板塊，跌幅更加驚人。筆者一早已提醒大家，市場可能是炒錯市，擔心會議完結前，已有資金提早散貨套現。一眾太陽能、基建、鐵路等股份，跌幅動輒5%至6%。內地股市亦疲弱，滬綜指已連跌四日，走勢也頗駭人。相信大市短期內仍會反覆，但估計22600至22800應有支持。

首都創投(2324)昨日宣佈，向六名承配人配售金額總值2,000萬元的可換股債券，年利息10厘，換股價0.1元，較上日收市價0.075元溢價約33.33%。昨日消息公佈後，股價進一步上升，收報0.087元，仍低於此可換股債券的行使價約13%。

指數股揀港交所平保
股價走勢方面，自12月於0.055元水平出現小型雙底後，開始建立起大型橫行區，於0.067元水平見支持，並間中出現急升回吐，但仍然守穩橫行區上。今次以0.1元行使價發CB，起碼可作參考，就是承配人的買貨成本在0.1元之上。

技術上，昨日上破2月中高位0.077元，出現了技術突破，若能企穩0.1元之上，此乃1月初之高位，先上望0.15元，止蝕位0.078元。

若以資產淨值計，根據早前公佈的業績報告，截至2012年12月底計，為0.3783元，現價的折讓頗大。截至2012年12月底止6個月未經審核的盈利為296萬元，開始轉虧為盈，每股盈利0.3仙。以前景及NAV的折讓計，首都創投皆具吸納價值。

回說大市，由於技術上出現短暫的調整訊號，指數股可等多一、兩天才趁低吸納。若指數能回落至100日線，便可落注買貨，首選為港交所(388)及平保(2318)。

---

109 : GS(14)@2013-03-14 10:04:14

大輸一年到晚推2324啦

---

110 : GS(14)@2013-05-25 13:01:03

273賣晒2324

---

111 : alb(35614)@2013-05-25 15:55:31

110樓提及

---

273賣晒2324

脫離關係?

---

112 : greatsoup38(830)@2013-05-25 15:56:20

111樓提及

---

110樓提及

---

273賣晒2324

脫離關係?

遲早咪一齊番，都是班老千搞來搞去

---

113 : lemonwongwong(33038)@2013-06-11 00:30:29

2324有咩背景?

---

114 : greatsoup38(830)@2013-06-11 00:31:25

113樓提及

---

2324有咩背景?

華匯康健澳門

---

115 : lemonwongwong(33038)@2013-06-11 00:32:03

哦。。。。有澳門份。。。

---

116 : greatsoup38(830)@2013-07-30 00:12:47

無人供股

---

117 : GS(14)@2013-10-01 12:24:38

2324
虧損降95%，至600萬，1億可變現資產

---

118 : supermandavid(42431)@2013-10-13 18:28:05

117樓提及

---

2324
虧損降95%，至600萬，1億可變現資產

大C，我發現E隻股票的在9月尾時中國金融公司有4.92％的股份，然後10月頭又去左另一個證券商度（完整7百萬股），你說係埋有野搞緊啊？

---

119 : greatsoup38(830)@2013-10-13 18:33:06

118樓提及

---

117樓提及

---

2324
虧損降95%，至600萬，1億可變現資產

大C，我發現E隻股票的在9月尾時中國金融公司有4.92％的股份，然後10月頭又去左另一個證券商度（完整7百萬股），你說係埋有野搞緊啊？

唔好搞呢d股啦，呢d股好難玩的....是從福財轉左去中金，中金轉去銀河的，即是又是班同夥，唔好中計啦

咁樣轉來轉去都是要你以為有背景，無視就得啦，又唔是好多錢

點解你地咁執迷不悟仲要去搞垃圾股，明知呃人呃錢還要花心機，無你咁好氣

---

120 : VA(33206)@2013-11-04 21:59:25

殼股潮越炒越勁，近排連啲「創仔」都炒到癲晒，勝曉嵐上個禮拜聽到，創仔殼最低入場費已要兩個億先有得傾，點解咁好價？皆因大sell side、buy side都想趕喺10月1日新例前搞掂。除咗創仔，而家殼潮仲蔓延到較冷門嘅「21仔」（即係21章公司，如周顯早前報稱自己買咗嘅首都創投（2324）就係21仔）。點解會蔓延到呢啲公司？因為而家多咗資產管理公司搵融資渠道，好似東方、長城呢啲大型資產管理公司，都話搵殼。事實上，21仔吃香唔係未試過，好似國開國際（1062），早兩年被國家開發銀行旗下專責資產管理嘅國開金融用每股0.4元收購咗，1062上周五收市報0.68元，較佢NAV 0.353元有近倍溢價，反映中資金融機構係有一定優勢。再睇番資料，目前市面上得25間21仔，因上市格要求甚高，所以近年再冇新嘅21仔登場，咁仲有咁多中資金融機構要嚟香港上市嘅話，就一定要借殼上，睇怕呢25間21仔短期都會癲埋一份。

http://www.sharpdaily.hk/supplem ... aRice-21%E4%BB%94/2

---

121 : GS(14)@2013-12-06 16:51:25

每手1萬股變5,000股

---

122 : greatsoup38(830)@2013-12-29 22:57:13

8100 出售2324 cb

---

123 : GS(14)@2014-01-16 00:54:35

盈喜

---

124 : GS(14)@2014-01-28 00:14:35

1供4，4送1紅股，認購價均是25仙

---

125 : 投機仁(34693)@2014-01-29 00:32:03

又係年年向南的垃圾

---

126 : greatsoup38(830)@2014-01-29 00:41:10

不知所謂

---

127 : greatsoup38(830)@2014-01-31 19:44:05

2324

---

128 : greatsoup38(830)@2014-01-31 19:45:10

又轉番人wor?

---

129 : 200(9285)@2014-02-04 21:14:57

丘忠航活躍返d了
http://www.cni-gold.com/inner_trend_detail.php?id=10789

2014-01-20

作者 : Marketing

點擊 : 266人次
活動：友聯勵進社30周年聯歡晚宴暨名譽社長就職典禮

時間：2014年1月17日（星期五）

地點：香港會議展覽中心四樓君爵廳

主禮嘉賓：香港特區立法局議員張華峰太平紳士及香港金銀業貿易場理事長張德熙先生

嘉賓：香港金銀業貿易場董事會成員、友聯勵進社成員、中國北方金融集團主席丘忠航先生及中國北方金融集團有限公司代表


中國北方金銀業有限公司於業內名聲超卓，備受業內人士推崇，中國北方金融集團主席丘忠航先生更獲委任為香港金銀業貿易場友聯勵進社第十五屆(2013-2015年度)名譽社長。


為隆重其事，金銀業貿易場設宴於香港會議展覽中心，舉行友聯勵進社30周年聯歡晚宴暨名譽社長就職典禮。

勵進社於1947年組織成立，友聯社翌年成立，1984年兩社合併，正式名為「友聯勵進社」。簡稱「友勵社」，以聯絡同業感情、團結互助、增進同人福利及發展體育為宗旨。多年來舉辦不少節目，包括旅行、就職聯歡會、體育活動等，在公益事務方面亦不遺餘力，現有社員數百人。

---

130 : GS(14)@2014-02-04 23:29:26

呢排可能個冷淡對待令就取消?

---

131 : 200(9285)@2014-02-17 21:04:29

greatsoup在130樓提及

---

呢排可能個冷淡對待令就取消?

可能係，條撚人遲d唔知會不會出返山，佢檔野好似無租icc 搬左去中環‧

---

132 : GS(14)@2014-02-17 23:29:50

200在131樓提及

---

greatsoup在130樓提及

---

呢排可能個冷淡對待令就取消?

可能係，條撚人遲d唔知會不會出返山，佢檔野好似無租icc 搬左去中環‧

現在邊度開左?

---

133 : 200(9285)@2014-02-18 18:50:30

greatsoup在132樓提及

---

200在131樓提及

---

greatsoup在130樓提及

---

呢排可能個冷淡對待令就取消?

可能係，條撚人遲d唔知會不會出返山，佢檔野好似無租icc 搬左去中環‧

現在邊度開左?

香港皇后大道中16號新世界大廈2304室.

---

134 : greatsoup38(830)@2014-02-18 22:34:49

200在133樓提及

---

greatsoup在132樓提及

---

200在131樓提及

---

greatsoup在130樓提及

---

呢排可能個冷淡對待令就取消?

可能係，條撚人遲d唔知會不會出返山，佢檔野好似無租icc 搬左去中環‧

現在邊度開左?

香港皇后大道中16號新世界大廈2304室.

同叔老巢啊

---

135 : 200(9285)@2014-02-27 19:42:25

8037 有無專區呀?

---

136 : greatsoup38(830)@2014-03-01 12:26:05

2324

盈利急增27.6倍，至8,600萬，輕債

---

137 : Louis(1212)@2014-05-27 22:51:41

首都創投(02324.HK)供股僅獲54.07%認購
2014年4月17日  05:48:02 a.m. HKT, AAFN

首都創投(02324.HK)公布供股結果，接獲涉及合共3.7億股有效接納及申請，佔供股總數54.07%，包銷商已促使獨立第三方認購餘下3.14億股供股股份。建議已成為無條件，供股股份預期本月22日(星期二)開始買賣。(de/d)


阿思達克財經新聞

份額持有人的大傾銷:
http://sdinotice.hkex.com.hk/di/ ... 4&src=MAIN&lang=ZH&

有何意見？

---

138 : greatsoup38(830)@2014-05-28 01:10:27

佢地好有默契

---

139 : newtonau(41980)@2014-06-13 10:39:52

什麼意思?現價$0.19，資產值$0.7115。為何要出呢份野?

[url][/url]

---

140 : chungonluk(36574)@2014-06-14 15:42:24

2324 之前在0.6停過一段時間, 以前每前跌左都會升番去0.6, 依家出緊黃金交叉唔知有冇機會??

---

141 : greatsoup38(830)@2014-06-14 20:12:02

chungonluk在140樓提及

---

2324 之前在0.6停過一段時間, 以前每前跌左都會升番去0.6, 依家出緊黃金交叉唔知有冇機會??

講d野都無邏輯

---

142 : GS(14)@2014-09-28 08:53:54

虧損增10倍，至7,260萬，8,200萬現金

---

143 : greatsoup38(830)@2015-01-16 01:10:26

盈喜

---

144 : greatsoup38(830)@2015-02-27 01:33:46

盈利急增60%，至1.3億，5.5億可變現資產

---

145 : greatsoup38(830)@2015-03-16 01:25:57

5合1，1供7，每股25仙

---

146 : greatsoup38(830)@2015-03-16 01:26:53

5合1，1供7，每股25仙

---

147 : greatsoup38(830)@2015-03-16 01:26:55

5合1，1供7，每股25仙

---

148 : greatsoup38(830)@2015-03-16 01:29:04

5合1後，1供7，每股25仙

---

149 : greatsoup38(830)@2015-03-16 14:05:59

test

---

150 : greatsoup38(830)@2015-03-17 10:28:43

adf

---

151 : abbychau(1)@2015-03-17 20:46:22

asdfasdf

---

152 : abbychau(1)@2015-03-17 20:46:37

asdfasdf

---

153 : Banana Republic(1499)@2015-03-21 09:52:24

供极都有，正！

---

154 : GS(14)@2015-03-25 01:12:23

恐怖啦

---

155 : jj1984(29252)@2015-05-12 13:01:19

真經典,1拆5,再5合1.....呢間21章公司永無翻身之日

---

156 : greatsoup38(830)@2015-05-13 01:33:41

唔好玩

---

157 : GS(14)@2015-06-25 00:33:43

改做9月年結

---

158 : greatsoup38(830)@2015-07-16 01:07:30

盈喜

---

159 : GS(14)@2015-07-21 01:27:32

供股不足額

---

160 : greatsoup38(830)@2015-09-02 01:13:08

盈利增14倍，至10.8億，輕債

---

161 : greatsoup38(830)@2015-09-28 23:08:53

http://webb-site.com/articles/sinceresmart.asp
Hao Wen, Capital VC and Unity
24th September 2015

Browsing through documents for a much longer forthcoming story, we came across two highly questionable acquisitions that link together 3 listed companies: Hao Wen Holdings Ltd (Hao Wen, 8019) and two Chapter 21 investment companies, Capital VC Ltd (Capital VC, 2324) and Unity Investments Holdings Ltd (Unity, 0913) that we have warned investors about in the past.

On 1-Sep-2014, Hao Wen Holdings Ltd (Hao Wen, 8019) announced the acquisition of 22.5% of Sincere Smart International Ltd (Sincere Smart, BVI), which owns 100% of Ideal Surplus Inc Ltd, a HK company which, according to Hao Wen, is "principally engaged in the provision of cloud platforms application and solutions". The "About us" page of its web site seems to confirm this, but if you click on the English "Home" button then you get a whole different experience - some sort of online Chinese betting platform. The vendor was a Mr Wang Zewei (Wang Zewei) and the deal completed on 8-Oct-2014.

The cash purchase price of HK$69m for 22.5% implies a valuation for 100% of HK$306.7m, compared with net profit from 7-Jan-2013 to 31-Mar-2014 of $3.4m and net assets of $2.9m, so this was a rich valuation indeed. Hao Wen was "principally engaged in the sale of biodegradable products and raw materials and the manufacture and sale of biomass fuel". You can see the synergy, can't you? No?

There was no mention of who owned the other 77.5% of Sincere Smart, so we dug, and found that in the 6 months to 31-Dec-2014, Capital VC bought an unspecified stake in Sincere Smart for HK$42.7m, see note 13 of the interim results. The open offer circular of Capital VC dated 24-Jun-2015, p53, discloses that the stake is 14.00%. So like Hao Wen, Capital VC had paid a price which implies a $305m valuation on Sincere Smart. The next page shows that in the 9 months to 31-Dec-2014, Sincere Smart lost HK$0.2m and ended with net assets of HK$2.7m. This is not what you would call a growth company.

But there was a third player. Note 12 of the 2014 annual report of Unity shows that it spent HK$90m on 29.5% of Sincere Smart, again a valuation of HK$305.1m. So the 3 companies, Hao Wen, Capital VC and Unity had altogether spent HK$201.7m on a 66% stake. However, on 5-Feb-2015, Unity agreed to sell its stake to "a third party" for HK$92m, of which $2m had been paid (see note 33) and $90m was due by 2-Oct-2015. That's rather convenient, because it avoids having to do an impairment test on the investment for the 2014 audit.

Capital VC has deferred its year end from 30-Jun-2015 to 30-Sep-2015, so it won't have to deal with that problem just yet.

The connection between Hao Wen and Unity goes further though.

Another investment made by Unity in 2014 was a 29.9% stake in Peak Zone Group Ltd (Peak Zone, BVI) for HK$90m, valuing the whole at $301m. Peak Zone is "engaged in the provision of integrated application." Note 17(iii) of the Unity 2014 annual report says Peak Zone made a profit of HK$0.392m and had net assets of HK3.092m, so this appears to be another vastly overpriced investment. Again, it was convenient that on 27-Feb-2015, after the year end and before the accounts were audited, Unity agreed to sell its stake to "a third party" for HK$108m, of which just $2m had been received and the rest was due by 31-Dec-2015. That raises the valuation of Peak Zone even further, to HK$361.2m. As Peak Zone was under contract for sale, no impairment test was applied.

By amazing coincidence, the 2014 annual results of Hao Wen include a footnote that on 6-Feb-2015, after the year end, it agreed to buy 5.4% of Peak Zone from an "independent third party" for HK$19.2m (implying a valuation of $355.6m), and the transaction was completed on 16-Feb-2015.

Webb-site Reports urges the SFC's corporate misconduct team to investigate these transactions.

---

162 : greatsoup38(830)@2015-09-28 23:19:42

Bubbles and troubles in Hong Kong
24th September 2015

As readers may recall, last year, Lerado Group (Holding) Co Ltd (Lerado, 1225) announced the proposed sale of its core business of baby strollers and infant car seats to Canadian listed firm Dorel Industries Inc (Dorel) for HK$930m. Lerado was planning to squat on most of the cash proceeds and only pay out $0.30 per share, or $228m. For this reason, we opposed the sale, because of concern that Lerado would become a cash shell trading at a discount to its net asset value. Your editor, David Webb, is a disclosed substantial shareholder currently holding over 8%. However, the sale was approved by shareholders on 16-Sep-2014 and completed on 31-Oct-2014.

Our concerns have now proven justified, culminating in current egregious proposals not just by Lerado but by other listed companies. We hope to stop them, if the regulators will require certain parties to play fairer. This article is long and complicated, and we thought about breaking it into pieces, but the picture becomes clearer if you assemble the whole jigsaw, so here it is. Apart from Lerado, this article covers transactions by numerous other listed companies in which you may have an interest, and several billion US dollars of bubbles.

So pour yourself a large coffee and let's get started.
Lerado share movements

The first sign of movement in Lerado came on 25-Nov-2014. Intelligence Hong Kong Group Ltd (IHK) is a company owned 68.27% by Lerado Chairman Henry Huang Ying Yuan (Mr Huang) and 31.73% by his wife, Jamy Huang Chen Li Chu. IHK owns 148,353,540 shares which was 19.50% of Lerado at 31-Dec-2014, before the recent dilutions. On 25-Nov-2014, our system shows those shares moving from CTBC Asia Ltd (the local subsidiary of a Taiwan bank) where they had rested since 30-Dec-2009, to Convoy Investment Services Ltd (Convoy IS), the brokerage sister of Convoy Financial Holdings Ltd (Convoy FH, 1019). Convoy IS is in the process of trying to list on the GEM in the form of CIS Holdings Ltd, which filed an application proof on 23-Mar-2015, sponsored by Quam Capital Ltd.

There can be any number of reasons for such transfers, but one possibility is that the shares are security for a loan. Banks and brokers are exempt from disclosing security interests in shares pledged to them. It wouldn't be so worrying were it not for the fact that Mark Mak Kwong Yiu (Mr Mak), CEO of Convoy FH and a director of Convoy IS, is also claimed to be an INED of Lerado since 25-Apr-2014. Mr Mak joined Convoy as CFO in 2002.

You may recall that in Some bubbles for New Year (31-Dec-2014) we warned about a bubble then called Finsoft Corporation (Finsoft, 8018), which was then trading at $1.235 (adjusted for the subsequent 2:1 split), with a market value of HK$4.94bn, or 110 times its net asset value. Convoy FH owned over 5% of Finsoft. The stock didn't stop there though. It reached a high of $2.92 on 20-May-2015, when Finsoft was valued at HK$11.68bn. Since then, it has crashed 94.8% to its close on Wednesday (23-Sep-2015) at $0.139, down a net 88.7% since our article. Finsoften aren't what they seem.

The Finsoft bubble allowed Convoy FH to book unrealised gains of HK$238.4m for 2014. It sold 40m shares (2%) of Finsoft on 20-Jan-2015 for about $73.5m (split-adjusted: $0.919 per share) and went below the 5% disclosure threshold. The sale was purportedly on-market but it was far larger than market volume that day of 1.925m shares so the disclosure must be wrong.

Returning to Lerado, another large chunk of 96,805,800 shares (12.71% at 31-Dec-2014) was held by Hwa Foo Investment Ltd (Hwa Foo), 30% controlled by Patrick Chen Chun Chieh (Mr Chen), an Executive Director and the son of the late co-founder of Lerado, and 70% by his mother. He joined the board on 3-Apr-2008 following his father's death on 14-Feb-2008. On 8-Sep-2014 those shares moved from HSBC (where they had rested since 27-Jun-2007) to UBS Securities HK Ltd , and then, more interestingly, they moved to small broker Win Fung Securities Ltd (Win Fung) on 9-Dec-2014, two weeks after IHK's holding moved to Convoy IS. So the Huangs and the Chens had moved custody of 32.21% of Lerado after leaving it untouched for years. More on Win Fung below.
Dispute with Dorel

First let's mention that on 10-Feb-2015, Lerado announced that it was in dispute with Dorel over the final net asset value of the business, which may lead to a partial repayment of the purchase price, in an unspecified "significant" amount.

On 27-Mar-2015, Lerado announced that it could not reach agreement with Dorel, so under the terms of the sale they had agreed to go to arbitration with an independent accountant, not yet appointed. In the 2014 annual results announcement on 30-Mar-2015, Lerado revealed that the disputed amount was HK$307m, which accordingly had been booked as a liability in the balance sheet. Still, Lerado ended 2014 with cash of $797m or HK$1.048 per share and no bank borrowings. The disputed amount was about $0.404 per share, so even if they have to pay all of that back, there would have been $0.644 per share of cash, and net assets of $633m or $0.832 per share.

On 20-Jul-2015, Lerado announced that it and Dorel had appointed RSM Nelson Wheeler as the independent accountant to determine the disputed items. Two months later, the result has not yet been announced. If Lerado were to win all of it, then the pro forma net asset value at 31-Dec-2014 increases to $1.236 per share.
Lerado swaps shares for property from CIFG

The day after the results, 31-Mar-2015, Lerado announced the acquisition of a property in Guangzhou from China Investment and Finance Group Ltd (CIFG, 1126) for HK$39m, but despite being flush with cash, only HK$1m was payable in cash and the rest in 76m new Lerado shares (9.49% of then existing shares) issued under the general mandate at $0.50 each, again a discount to cash and NAV per share.

The intended use of the property is as premises for the residual business of Lerado, which is mainly mobility scooters for the elderly and disabled, or what it calls "medical products". However, even if intended use of the property sounds plausible, the issue of shares at a discount to net cash and NAV was entirely inappropriate. The deal completed on 17-Apr-2015, giving CIFG a 8.59% stake in Lerado. Our system shows that CIFG deposited the shares into CCASS with Astrum Capital Management Ltd (Astrum) on 5-May-2015.

CIFG is not a regular listed company, but is a closed-end investment company listed under Chapter 21. This prohibits taking controlling positions (over 30%) in companies, and requires it to adhere to its stated investment restrictions. We asked the Stock Exchange why CIFG was allowed to invest in property in the first place. The result was this "clarification announcement" on 7-Aug-2015, admitting that investment properties were outside the scope of CIFG's Investment Policy and blaming it on the former Chairman and Vice Chairman. They had been removed by the Board on 14-Sep-2012, 6 months after becoming uncontactable.
Lerado begins money-lending and stockbroking

The "Prospects" section of Lerado's 2014 results indicated a new direction. The board had "concrete financial knowledge and background" and had decided to diversify into "securities trading, money lending business and other financial and property investment." It revealed that on 23-Feb-2015, Lerado had agreed to buy an unnamed target company, for HK$1.6m plus its net asset value. The target was a securities broker and planned to engage in margin financing business after the acquisition was completed. On 17-Apr-2015, Lerado announced that it would reallocate HK$300m of its cash pile for these activities.

On 2-Jul-2015 Lerado announced the name of the target, Yim Cheong Share Broking and Investment Co Ltd, and that the acquisition was completed that day. This was then renamed Black Marble Securities Ltd (Black Marble Securities), and Lerado intended to pump HK$200m into it. This small, nearly-dormant broker at that point had a minimal two licensed staff and minimal holdings in its CCASS account shown here.

Policy note: This highlights a defect in the Listing Rules: if you make a "Major Acquisition" (over 25% of your total assets), then you need shareholders' approval, but if you buy or establish a small company and then pump your funds into this new line of business, then this is completely exempt, even though shareholders are exposed to very new and different risks.

Lerado had also established BlackMarble Capital Ltd, incorporated 28-Jan-2015, a licensed money-lender. The application was gazetted on 27-Feb-2015 and the license was granted on 22-May-2015.
Lerado option grants

On 12-Feb-2015, Lerado granted options over 75m new shares (equivalent to 9.86% of the existing shares), of which half went to an unspecified number of employees, and half to "5 consultants". The options were exercisable for 2 years at $0.592 per share. It makes no sense whatever to be granting options which exercise at less than net cash per share, and much less than NAV per share, diluting both. Staff could have been incentivised with a restricted share purchase scheme to use the company's cash to buy stock in the market, which closed at $0.58 on the date of the option grants.

Despite being options of 2 years duration, 48m of the 75m were quickly exercised. We arranged an inspection of the share register on 14-Apr-2015 to discover who had been in such a hurry. We combined that with two filings of allotments by Lerado, which did not name the recipients. Here are the results:
Shareholder  Shares  Date entered  Status
Chu Chun Ting  7,500,000  11-Mar-2015  1 employee, 1 consultant
Kung Yiu Fai  7,500,000  11-Mar-2015
Chan Kam Fuk  7,500,000  17-Mar-2015  employee
Law Yee Man, Thomas  3,000,000  17-Mar-2015  employee
Wang Zewei  7,500,000  20-Mar-2015  consultant
Wong Sin Fai, Cynthia  7,500,000  20-Mar-2015  consultant
Kwok Wai Leung  7,500,000  2-Apr-2015  consultant
Total so far  48,000,000  14-Apr-2015  3 employees, 4 consultants

That leaves 1 more consultant who has not exercised the options. We recognise some of these names:

Chan Kam Fuk is Dominic Chan Kam Fuk (Dominic Chan), proprietor of accountancy firm Dominic K.F. Chan & Co. He was appointed as Company Secretary of Lerado on 1-Aug-2014.
Thomas Law Yee Man (Mr Law), an architect, is an INED of two listed companies, AcrossAsia Ltd (AcrossAsia, 8061) and Sage International Group Ltd (Sage, 8082). Here's a connection: Mr Law joined AcrossAsia on 28-May-2010, replacing Mr Mak of Convoy, who resigned as INED four days earlier. Perhaps Mr Mak helped to arrange Mr Law as his replacement at AcrossAsia. And here's another connection: Leung Tin Fu (Mr Leung), founder and Chairman of Sage until 14-Dec-2007, is also a pre-IPO holder of 10% of Convoy IS. Dominic Chan was an INED of Sage, resigning the same day as Mr Leung. We don't know what role Mr Law plays as an "employee" of Lerado.

Cynthia Wong Sin Fai (Cynthia Wong) is a solicitor who consults for Robertsons and has been Company Secretary of Suncorp Technologies Ltd (Suncorp, 1063) since 15-Feb-2011. We'll come back to that. We don't know what role she plays as a "consultant" to Lerado.

Wang Zewei (Mr Wang) is the name of the person who in 2014 sold 22.5% of Sincere Smart International Ltd to Hao Wen Holdings Ltd (Hao Wen, 8019) for HK$69m, valuing the business at $306.7m when it had net assets of $2.9m. Two other companies, Capital VC Ltd (Capital VC, 2324) and Unity Investments Holdings Ltd (Unity, 0913), bought 14% and 29.5% for $42.7m and $90m respectively, without naming the vendor(s). For more, see our article Hao Wen, Capital VC and Unity today. We don't know what role Mr Wang plays as a "consultant" to Lerado. He was the only mainlander on the list, and he gave an office address at 10 Gaoxin South 4th Road, Nanshan District, Shenzhen.

Incidentally, Mr Mak was also an Executive Director of Computech Holdings Ltd, now named China Mobile Games and Cultural Investment Ltd (CMG, 8081), from 30-Jul-2008 to 28-Apr-2014, three days after he joined Lerado. In fact he was the only ED of CMG from 17-Sep-2009 to 8-Nov-2011. The Convoy FH IPO prospectus dated 29-Jun-2010 said that despite this, Mr Mak considered Convoy his main focus and "has devoted more than 80% of his time to his duties" at Convoy during 2007-2009 and he would continue to allocate a similar proportion of his time to Convoy after listing. That basically meant that CMG only had about 0.2 Executive Directors!

Win Fung acted as the placing agent for CMG in a placing on 22-Apr-2015.

The option shares were deposited into CCASS via various brokers as follows. Click on the dates to see the movements in CCASS:
Date  Broker  Number
15-Apr-2015  SBI China Capital Financial Services Ltd (SBI CCFS)  7,500,000
29-Apr-2015  Win Fung  7,500,000
8-May-2015  Gransing Securities Co Ltd (Gransing)  7,500,000
27-May-2015  Gransing  7,500,000
24-Jun-2015  Prudential Brokerage Ltd  7,500,000
4-Aug-2015  Convoy IS  3,000,000
13-Aug-2015  UOB Kay Hian (HK) Ltd  7,500,000
Total   48,000,000

It appears likely that Mr Law deposited his 3m shares with Convoy IS, as all the other deposits matched the 7.5m option grants.

Incidentally, the other pre-IPO investor in 10% of Convoy IS is Howard Jiang Qi Hang, who featured in several previous investigations on Webb-site Reports.

Gransing is a name you will see again - it has acted 4 times as a placing agent for Convoy FH, in a bond placing on 21-Jan-2015 and a bond placing on 16-Sep-2014 as well as two unannounced bond placings on 8-Jul-2014 and 14-Nov-2014 mentioned in Convoy FH's annual report. Gransing's client list in Webb-site Who's Who also shows that it has acted as placing agent for Hao Wen, Suncorp and WLS Holdings Ltd (WLS, 8021), a company which we cover below.
CIFG-Lerado cross-holding

On 22-Apr-2015, probably in response to queries from the regulators, Lerado made a "voluntary announcement" trying, and in our view failing, to justify its decision to use shares rather than cash to buy the property from CIFG.

On 21-May-2015, Lerado announced that it had agreed to subscribe for 130m shares (12.44%) of CIFG at at $0.275, or $35.75m in total, setting up a cross-holding between the two, as CIFG still held 8.59% of Lerado. This was, incidentally, highly dilutive to CIFG, a 66.9% discount to its NAV per share at 30-Apr-2015 of $0.83. This fact was omitted from the CIFG announcement. The issue completed on 2-Jun-2015. Our system indicates that Lerado deposited 70m CIFG shares with Gransing on 23-Jun-2015, and deposited 60m CIFG shares with Kingston Securities Ltd (Kingston) the next day.

On 11-Aug-2015, Lerado cut its holding in CIFG from 128.8m shares (12.32%) to 103.392m shares (9.89%), selling the shares at an average $0.196, a 29% loss. As the stake was cut below 10%, Lerado is no longer a "substantial shareholder" and "connected person" of CIFG under the Listing Rules.

Policy note: the disclosure threshold for substantial shareholdings in HK-listed companies was reduced by law from 10% to 5% on 1-Apr-2003, but the Listing Rules have never been updated to match this.
Lerado issues shares to CAID (0048)

On 26-May-2015, Lerado announced the acquisition of Brilliant Summit Ltd from China Automotive Interior Decoration Holdings Ltd (CAID, 0048), for HK$45m, but again, not using any of the cash pile. Instead, it issued 75m shares at $0.60 each, or 7.82% of the enlarged issued shares of Lerado, further diluting existing shareholders. The target was "engaged in the trading of garment accessories, such as nylon tape, polyester tape and polyester string". It had net assets of just $7.24m and a net profit in the year to 31-Mar-2015 of $0.9m.

In giving reasons, Lerado claimed that "certain fabric products and expertise knowledge of the Target Group can be utilised in the Group's business of manufacturing medial products, including but not limited to powered and non powered mobility aid, wheel chairs and other durable equipment". Stretching the polyester tape further, they claimed that the Target Group's "sizable clientele" would allow Lerado to "penetrate into a new market." This rather ignores the fact that Lerado already had its own expertise in sourcing fabrics for baby strollers, infant car seats and mobility aids over many years.

CAID had purchased Brilliant Summit from its manager, a Mr Cheung Ngai, for HK$42m on 15-May-2013. He apparently goes by the name of "Elman" and apart from Brilliant Summit (products here), he runs another company in the same line of business called San Wah Holdings Ltd. CAID, announcing the sale of Brilliant Summit to Lerado, said that "as a result of the constantly increasing costs of sales and competition, the Company is of the view that its business is not expected to grow at its current rate without further investments and developments." CAID intended to hold the Lerado shares "to achieves earnings in the form of capital appreciation."

The transaction completed on 16-Jun-2015. We can see that CAID deposited the 75m new Lerado shares with Win Fung in two batches, 40m on 23-Jun-2015 and 35m on 14-Jul-2015. Of all the brokers it could use, why this little firm, and why is this the same firm in which Mr Chen and one of the option holders also deposited their Lerado shares? The shares are positioned in the same custodian ahead of an important vote on Lerado's future. To summarise those deposits of shares with Win Fung:
Shareholder  Shares  Deposit date
Mr Chen (Hwa Foo)  96,805,800  9-Dec-2014
An exercised option holder  7,500,000  29-Apr-2015
CAID  40,000,000  23-Jun-2015
CAID  35,000,000  14-Jul-2015
Total  179,305,800  

CAID's new INED or mooncake coordinator

For some light relief, on 4-Sep-2015 CAID appointed a new INED and audit committee member, Ms Adeline Ng Li La, who "has over 10 years of experience in human resources and corporate management". She also has a Certificate of Human Resources Management from HK Baptist University and is "a senior administrative officer of a renowned international technology company in Hong Kong". Wow, she sounds highly qualified, doesn't she?

A quick search discovers her Linked In page (copy here). Since May 2015, she has been personal assistant to the General Manager of Amadeus Hong Kong Ltd - and her duties include "supervise the receptionist and the cleaning lady", "coordinate mooncake distribution", "manage pantry cabinet" and planning the Christmas party. Now this of course is all important work, but probably not that relevant to the duties of a listed company director and audit committee member. We wonder how she was introduced to CAID. This is probably not what HKEx had in mind when it started promoting board diversity, but it's what you get when as a regulator, you let controlling shareholders vote on INED elections.
CAID and Convoy

On 30-Jun-2015, CAID announced a placing via Convoy IS, listing the Financial Adviser as Opus Capital Ltd (Opus Capital) and using the full 20% general mandate of 276.48m shares at $0.485, a 19.2% discount to the closing price of $0.60. However, the price then collapsed, and on 9-Jul-2015, they cut the placing price to $0.345, a 42.5% discount to the original closing price. The placing completed on 21-Jul-2015. Our CCASS analysis shows that 125.48m shares were deposited with Astrum, only 68m with Convoy IS and 25m with Kingston, with the remaining 58m to 4 other brokers.

CAID's interim results for 30-Jun-2015 disclosed a huge unrealised gain of RMB 448.6m (HK$561m) on "held-for-trading investments" which then had a market value of RMB564.0m (HK$705m). In other words, a gain of about 389% in 6 months. No normal stock will give you that, but a bubble stock will. Net tangible assets at 30-Jun-2015 were RMB761.9m (HK$952m) or about $0.689 per share, so the investments accounted for 74% of that.

CAID's interim report contains the following statement, which we regard as false and misleading:

"At 30 June 2015, there was no significant investment held by the Group."

Policy note: Some of the listed companies which have recently reported exceptionally large percentage gains on listed securities must own bubble stocks. If you know what stocks a listed company owns, then you would be able to take the SFC's concentration warnings into account and discount those investments to what you regard as fair value, rather than relying on inflated market valuations. But unfortunately, the Stock Exchange and SFC do not require such disclosure, even when inflated listed investments make up the bulk of a companies net assets. They simply rely on the company having to announce losses as inside information after the bubble has burst, rather than telling you that they hold bubble stocks in the first place.

This is despite the fact that Listing Rules Appendix 16 paragraphs 32(4) and 40(2) (or on GEM, Rules 18.41(4) and 18.59) require that companies disclose "significant investments held, their performance during the financial [year/half-year] and their future prospects". It seems that SEHK just doesn't want to enforce this.

Although the Listing Rules which require such disclosure contain no definition of "significant", it should be seen in the context of the size of the holder's balance sheet and therefore the potential impact on shareholder value if the market value of the investments were to change. Whether the investment is "held-for-trading" or as a long-term "available for sale" asset is irrelevant to the potential impact on shareholder value, except for the fact that profits tax applies to trading.

Separately, many listed companies have avoided the notifiable transaction rules in Chapter 14 by declaring themselves to be "in the business" of trading securities. This then allows them to invest as much of their shareholders' money as they like on purchasing "held-for-trading" securities without announcing the transactions, because they are deemed transactions "of a revenue nature in the ordinary and usual course of business" under Listing Rule 14.04(1)(g). The Stock Exchange should close this loophole. Investments in securities, regardless of how they are booked, should be subject to the notifiable transaction rules.

You might wonder then why CAID did not just cash in some of its $705m of investments rather than raise $94.2m in a placing of 20% new shares, claiming that it needed the money. The results failed to identify these spectacular investments, but noted that by 31-Aug-2015, the value had decreased by 23.5% since the end of June. That's about HK$224m of loss.
CIFG and Lerado: parallel open offers

On 17-Aug-2015, Lerado announced a massive 3:1 open offer of new shares at $0.15 each, a 68% discount to the market price of $0.47, with no excess applications. The primary underwriter is Gransing, the Financial Adviser is Octal Capital Ltd (Octal Capital) and the IFA is Opus Capital, the same as the Financial Adviser to CAID.

As we've said before, deep discount open offers are a form of extortion of existing shareholders, because they are faced with the choice of either being heavily diluted economically, or putting in cash to prevent the dilution. Unlike rights issues, the holder does not have the third option of selling his entitlements to recover the discount and thereby mitigate the economic damage. For this reason, the UK Listing Rules include a limit (set decades ago) of not more than a 10% discount on open offers. Hong Kong, still in many ways a developing market, allows this extortion to continue. See UK Listing Rule 9.5.10.

Adding to this abuse is that an open offer often involves no ability for shareholders to make "excess application" for unsubscribed shares. Nor are the unsubscribed shares sold in the market to capture the premium above the issue price for the benefit of passive shareholders. This leaves the underwriter with the benefit of the discount on shares which shareholders cannot or do not subscribe. In these circumstances, the open offer in practice is a conditional placing of deeply discounted shares with the "underwriter", subject to a right of first refusal by existing shareholders pro rata to their holdings.

Gransing cannot end up as a controlling shareholder of Lerado, so it has to have sub-underwriters. From a disclosure of interest, we can see that Capital VC (mentioned above) is a sub-underwriter for 370m shares, or 9.64% of the enlarged capital. Another disclosure shows that Barry Lau Wang Chi is a sub-underwriter for 370m shares. He is a Responsible Officer of Adamas Asset Management (HK) Ltd (Adamas), which will feature below.

On 9-Sep-2015, CIFG announced a huge 8:1 open offer with no excess applicatoins, "underwritten" by Black Marble Securities, which is owned by Lerado. The Financial Adviser to CIFG is Akron Corporate Finance Ltd (Akron) and the IFA is Opus Capital, the same as Lerado's IFA and CAID's FA.

As Lerado owns less than 10% of CIFG, the underwriting is not a "connected transaction". However, it is blatantly clear that Lerado has a "material interest" in the CIFG transaction and should be prohibited from voting in the EGM of CIFG to approve the open offer. Furthermore, Lerado stands to benefit from any unsubscribed shares at the discounted offer price. As there are no excess applications, this is in effect a discounted placement with Lerado subject to clawback by existing holders.Listing Rule 2.15 states:

"Where a transaction or arrangement of an issuer is subject to shareholders' approval under the provisions of the Exchange Listing Rules, any shareholder that has a material interest in the transaction or arrangement shall abstain from voting on the resolution(s) approving the transaction or arrangement at the general meeting."

Correspondingly, we submit that CIFG should not be permitted to vote in the Lerado EGM, because obviously Lerado is engaged in a commercial transaction with CIFG to provide it with funding under the CIFG open offer.
Mr Chen's "disposal" at a 53% loss

Now, according to a disclosure of interest, on 9-Sep-2015, Mr Chen, ED of Lerado, sold his entire interest of 97,823,800 shares, including a personal holding of 1,018,000 shares and those held by Hwa Foo. Some of it was on-exchange at $0.25, but most of it was off-market at $0.22 because total market volume that day was only 7,625,800 shares. When we look at CCASS movements, on the settlement date of 11-Sep-2015 we see his personal holding of 1,018,000 shares leaving Core Pacific Yamaichi, and only 2,805,800 shares leaving Win Fung, and there have been no reductions in Win Fung's balance since then. So it appears that the other 94,000,000 shares were transferred, off market, to other clients of Win Fung and remain there.

As an ED of Lerado, Mr Chen would have been prohibited from voting in favour of the proposed open offer, so it is a matter of great concern that these shares may have been placed in friendly hands, along with the positions held by CIFG and CAID, to vote in favour (if they are not required to abstain).

This disposal, at a deep discount to cash and to net asset value, of a key block of shares, really makes no economic sense for Mr Chen. If he was unhappy with the effects of the proposed open offer, he could have joined us in voting against the proposal. He was only prohibited from voting in favour. At a purported disposal price (for most of his shares) of $0.22, he appears to have accepted a loss of 53% since the open offer was announced. We find this hard to believe. Accordingly we urge the SFC to investigate the true nature of the transactions and who has bought the shares. We would be surprised if the "buyers" had not been mentioned elsewhere in this article.

China 33 Media (8087)

There's another open offer we need to tell you about, and the background is this.

On 26-Jan-2015, China 33 Media Group Ltd (C33M, 8087) announced that its controlling shareholder, Lizhong Ltd (Lizhong), which had held 243.756m shares (43.13%) had 5 days earlier pledged 192m shares (32.00%) to a lender and on 22-Jan to 26-Jan Lizhong had sold its remaining 66.756m shares (11.13%) in the market. They didn't say who the lender was, but a subsequent disclosure of interest shows that it is funds managed by Adamas, which was mentioned above. Our analysis shows the average price received by Lizhong in the 3 days was $0.4192 per share, a total of $27.98m. Now, why did Lizhong need to sell those shares and borrow that money by pledging the remainder? Read on.

On 10-Apr-2015, CIFG, via its 100% subsidiary New Express Investment Ltd, agreed to subscribe 120m shares (16.67%) of China 33 Media Group Ltd (C33M, 8087) at $0.22, exhausting its general mandate, for a total of HK$26.4m. The deal completed on 22-Apr-2015, diluting Lizhong from 32.00% to 26.67%. Our system shows that on 6-May-2015, CIFG deposited its C33M shares with Gransing.

Three months later, on 24-Jul-2015, C33M announced a massive 7 for 1 open offer at $0.10, a 75.6% discount to the closing price of $0.41, without excess applications. The Financial Adviser was Octal Capital (the same as for Lerado's open offer), and the underwriters were Gransing, Kingston and RHB OSK Securities HK Ltd (RHB OSK). The IFA again was Opus Capital, the same as for Lerado. Lizhong undertook to take up part of its entitlement amounting to 844,799,700 shares, which to the nearest thousand is 4.4 shares for each share it owns, not 7. That would cost it $84.5m, but of course, it had already raised about $27.98m by selling shares in the market in January, so there was a funding gap of $56.5m, or about $0.294 per existing share, which it might have borrowed from Adamas funds.

If CIFG was to maintain its holding, it would have to put in another $0.70 for each share it held. It had sold a few shares but still held 113.622m (15.78%). The share price dived 26.8% on the day after the news, but the prospect strangely seemed to delight CIFG, which undertook not to sell any more and to take up all its entitlements to 795.354m shares at a cost of $79.5m. However, on 4-Aug-2015, C33M announced that it and Gransing had agreed to cut CIFG's commitment to 290m shares. As a result CIFG would be diluted to 7.01% of C33M.

Under GEM Listing Rule 10.39(1) or Main Board Listing Rule 7.24(5)(a), if an open offer is at a ratio higher than 1 for 2 then it must be approved by "independent" shareholders excluding the controlling shareholder or, if none, the executive directors and their associates. So the largest holder of C33M, Lizhong, could not vote in favour at the EGM, as it is an associate of the Chairman.

How convenient, then, that there was another "independent" shareholder who could vote in favour. Look at the EGM results on 31-Aug-2015. CIFG almost certainly voted its 113.622m shares in favour, and only 2,050 other shares voted in favour, while 28,638,000 shares voted against. The open offer was thereby approved, and the prospectus was published on 14-Sep-2015.
Update, 26-Sep-2015

The C33M open offer prospectus discloses that several sub-underwriters have been engaged. Gransing, with a commitment of 1,905,200,300 shares (33.07% of the enlarged shares), engaged SBI CCFS for 800m shares (13.89%) and 3 other unnamed sub-underwriters for a total of 540m shares (9.37%), each with less than 5% of enlarged shares. RHB OSK, with a commitment of 500m shares (8.68%) had engaged 2 unnamed sub-underwriters to take all of them.

Kingston, with an underwriting commitment of 1500m shares (26.04%), had engaged but then terminated 4 sub-underwriters to take all of it. One was Harvest Aspect International Ltd, which a filing shows is owned by William Yu Tsung Chin, for 644.64m shares (11.19%). The remaining 3 each had less than 5% but totaled 14.85%. After these 4 were terminated, Kingston engaged a single sub-underwriter for the whole lot. Guess who? Black Marble Securities (owned by Lerado).

SBI CCFS and Black Marble have each failed to file a disclosure of interest.

The denominator in the calculation of percentage for disclosure of interests under s308 of the Securities and Futures Ordinance is based on the number of "issued shares", not the number which may be in issue in the future. So in a 7:1 open offer, there are new shares equivalent to 700% of existing shares. All the filings by the underwriters and sub-underwriters in the C33M case use the wrong denominator (the number of shares which will be in issue if the open offer completes) and hence show the wrong percentage, which should be multiplied by a factor of 8. Anyone with an underwriting commitment equal to 5% or more of the existing shares (in the case of C33M, 36m shares) should make a filing, and clearly, that has not happened, with several sub-underwriters of Gransing, RHB OSK and Kingston. The SFC should require them to correct their filings and to procure filings by their sub-underwriters, including those which have now been terminated.
GreaterChina Professional Services (8193)

Now let's look at how Lerado (via Black Marble Securities) and Akron (Financial Adviser to CIFG on its open offer) have been working together in another transaction.

GreaterChina Professional Services Ltd (GPS, 8193) is listed on GEM and owns Greater China Appraisal Ltd, which values real estate and other assets. On 13-Nov-2014, GPS began to deviate from its core business, by buying 80% of Golden Vault Ltd, which indirectly owns a mainland advertising business with in-elevator poster frames and LCD displays in Changshu, PRC, for HK$110m in promissory notes.

Golden Vault had turnover of RMB 7.34m in 2013 and net assets of RMB 5.73m (HK$7.16m) at 30-Sep-2014. This business was valued by Roma Appraisals Ltd at $184m, because, hey, elevators are difficult to get into - especially when they are going up. That valuer is owned by Roma Group Ltd (Roma, 8072) and the financial adviser on the profit forecast was Akron.

A disclosure of interest shows that on 11-May-2015, China Environmental Energy Investment Ltd (CEEI, 0986) increased its holding in GPS from 2.63% to 5.13%, buying 21.495m shares at $0.556 per share. From our CCASS system we see the shares deposited with Southwest Securities (HK) Brokerage Ltd (SWSHK, formerly Tanrich Securities Co Ltd).

On 8-Jul-2015, Roma announced that it had agreed to lend up to HK$58m to Brilliant One Holdings Ltd (Brilliant One) for 12 months at 12% p.a., secured by 310.85m shares in an unnamed GEM-listed company and guaranteed by persons named Ip Kwok Kwong and Wong Chi Keung, the ultimate owners of Brilliant One. That non-disclosure of the GEM company's name was silly, because it was easily determined that Brilliant One was the 36.23% controlling shareholder of GPS, which eventually announced the loan facility on 4-Aug-2015. Ip Kwok Kwong is the MD of GPS, while Wong Chi Keung (this one) is an accountant with 13 INED positions. The loan facility includes a maximum loan-to-value ratio of 65%. So if they draw the full loan, then the share price falling below $0.287 would trigger a top-up obligation. The shares were moved from Emperor Securities Ltd to Infast Brokerage Ltd on 9-Jul-2015.

On 9-Jul-2015, the day after the share pledge, GPS announced a huge proposed placing of shares under a specific mandate, 2.6bn shares at $0.10, a 74.4% discount to the market price of $0.39, via Black Marble Securities, which is owned by Lerado. The Financial Adviser is Akron (the same as for Lerado's open offer). That represents 303% of the existing shares, and they are not even bothering to make the shares available to existing shareholders by an open offer or rights issue. Simultaneously, it was proposed that SEEC Media Group Ltd (SEECM, 0205) would subscribe 1.4bn shares at the same price, a total of $140m, for 28.82% of the enlarged shares.

Policy note: As we mentioned above, open offers or rights issues larger than 1 for 2 (a 50% enlargement of issued shares) must be subject to shareholders' approval with controlling shareholders abstaining, or if there are none, then with executive directors and their associates abstaining. That does provide some small measure of protection, (unless the vote is being manipulated with warehoused shares). However, this protection is negated by the fact that a massive placing under a "specific mandate" can be approved without requiring controllers or executive directors to abstain. The Listing Rules should be amended to close the loophole so that controllers/executive directors should be required to abstain from voting in favour of any proposal to approve a "specific mandate" that enlarges the issued shares by more than 50%.

Brilliant One, which has pledged its controlling shareholding to Roma, was allowed to vote to approve this outrageous proposal.

Of the $395.1m net proceeds, GPS intends to use $100m in its money-lending subsidiary, Colbert Finance Ltd, and $150m to develop its securities brokerage business. It doesn't own a stockbroker yet, but it plans to either buy one or set one up. The EGM approved the placing on 14-Sep-2015 without objection. With an avalanche of shares due to hit the market at $0.10, it is quite impressive that the stock still closed at $0.495 on 23-Sep-2015.
SEECM (0205)

Now let's look at a fourth open offer involving Lerado (via Black Marble Securities) and Opus Capital.

SEECM is, or was, principally engaged in advertising agency, distribution of books and magazines. And securities trading, of course, like all shoddy companies should be. It announced its investment in GPS on 10-Jul-2015.

On 17-Jul-2015, SEECM announced that it had agreed to subscribe 103.02m shares (16.67%) of China New Economy Fund Ltd (CNEF, 0080) at $0.385, for a total of HK$39.66m, exhausting CNEF's general mandate. CNEF is another Chapter 21 investment company, and that was a 61.5% discount to the NAV of CNEF at 30-Jun-2015 of $1.00. As we noted in our article Some Bubbles for New Year on 31-Dec-2014, CNEF had shares in the Finsoft bubble alongside Convoy FH, and Tony Tai Man Hin, the CFO and Company Secretary of CNEF, was an INED of Finsoft. He retired from Finsoft on 5-May-2015. The CNEF announcement of the subscription named Astrum as the placing agent and did not mention the discount to NAV.

Also on 17-Jul-2015, SEECM announced that it is applying to the SFC to set up a stockbroker. Now everyone wants to be a broker. Lerado, GPS and SEECM.

On 19-Aug-2015, SEECM announced a huge open offer, 3 for 1 at $0.10, a 61.5% discount to the market price of $0.26. The Financial Adviser is Opus Capital (the FA of CAID and the IFA of C33M and Lerado), the IFA is Hercules Capital Ltd (Hercules) and the underwriter is Black Marble Securities, owned by Lerado. Again there will be no excess applications, so the "underwriter" gets the benefit of discounted unsubscribed shares. Of net proceeds of $624m, SEECM plans to use HK$365m to set up a stockbroker, $30m to set up a corporate finance advisory and asset management firm and $225m for the acquisition and operation of an unspecified e-commerce platform.

The shares dived on the news, dropping 35.4% to $0.168 the next day. But they weren't done yet. On 9-Sep-2015, they decided to increase the carnage by consolidating the shares 2:1 and then changing the offer terms to 5 new shares for each consolidated share at $0.10, equivalent to $0.05 before the consolidation. So the offer discount becomes an effective 80.8% discount to the original closing price of $0.26. This will raise a bit less though, HK$519m. This news caused another drop in the price, by 16.7% from $0.156 to $0.13 the next day. So the stock price had now halved even before putting the plan to a vote.

A circular for the capital reorganisation went out on 18-Sep-2015 for an EGM on 12-Oct-2015. We urge shareholders to vote against the resolutions. They are special resolutions that require a 75% majority to pass, so blocking it is more feasible than usual. If it passes, then a circular to propose the open offer is due out on 28-Oct-2015.
Chan Cheong Yee and CESHK

There is a common person to a number of these companies. Chan Cheong Yee (C Y Chan) is a Responsible Officer of China Everbright Securities (HK) Ltd (CESHK). CESHK is the investment manager of four Chapter 21 companies: CIFG, CNEF, China Innovation Investment Ltd (CII, 1217) and China Investment Development Ltd (CID, 0204). C Y Chan is an ED of all 4 companies, and he is also an ED of Capital VC.
CID (0204)

CID is in its own little bubble - it closed on 23-Sep-2015 at $0.157, compared with NAV of $0.024 at 31-Aug-2015.
CEEI (0986)

Now remember we mentioned CEEI, the investor in GPS? On 12-Nov-2014, CEEI announced a placing of 48,190,489 shares at $0.97 per share to raise HK$46.28m, exhausting the general mandate, followed by a huge 8:1 rights issue at $0.195 per share, an 82.4% discount to the market price of $1.11, to raise between $376m and $451m. Excess applications were allowed. At the time, CEEI had no substantial shareholders.

Win Fung was both the placing agent and the rights issue underwriter. The placing was on a best efforts basis, and on 27-Nov-2014, the placing price was cut to $0.66. The placing was completed on 3-Dec-2014, and all the shares were deposited into the CCASS account of Win Fung for its clients. Not a single share moved out of that account until after the EGM to approve the rights issue. And guess what, the EGM results on 18-Dec-2014 show that the number of shares voted in favour of the rights issue was 48,437,576, just 247,087 more than the number of placing shares.

On 12-Mar-2015, CEEI announced that it would start investing in "quality stock and other financial products", so don't say you weren't warned! On 17-Apr-2015, CEEI announced that it had bought 51m shares (0.337%) of Suncorp (mentioned above) that day in the market for HK$61.45m at an average of $1.205 after a huge run up in the share price following completion of a placing at $0.245 per share on 13-Apr-2015. The stock closed at $0.204 on 23-Sep-2015, down 83% since the purchase by CEEI. Some of the other investments by CEEI are covered below.
WLS (8021)

Now let's tell who may have benefitted from a huge bubble in the shares of WLS Holdings Ltd (WLS, 8021), a construction company.

As background, on 21-Oct-2014, WLS announced that CIFG would subscribe for 79m shares (16.67% of enlarged) at $0.177, a 0.6% premium to market, exhausting the general mandate. On the face of it, WLS had no other substantial shareholders. The deal completed on 31-Oct-2014. The shares were deposited with Fordjoy Securities and Futures Ltd (Fordjoy) on 5-Nov-2014. CIFG rapidly sold off the shares, from 12-Nov-2014, dropping below 5% on 3-Dec-2014.

WLS owns a licensed money-lender, Gold Medal Hong Kong Ltd, incorporated on 19-Mar-2014 and licensed on 26-Nov-2014.

On 21-Jan-2015, WLS announced a 5:1 share consolidation and a proposed massive placing of 540m consolidated shares (563.16% of the existing shares) at $0.30 via SWSHK (then Tanrich Securities Co Ltd). The Financial Adviser was Akron. This placing price was a 42.3% discount to the adjusted closing price of $0.52. At the 5-Mar-2015 SGM to approve the placing, votes in favour were 89,597,500, or 18.69% of the issued shares. Total turnout was only 19.00%. We suspect most of those votes in favour were shares previously held by CIFG, but we'll never know for sure.

Of the 540m shares, we know that CEEI took 63m shares (9.91% of enlarged), because it announced the subscription on 18-Mar-2015. Disclosures of interests show that Samuel Chiu Se Chung, a licensed Representative of Roofer Securities Ltd, also subscribed 9.9%. Unity, mentioned above, subscribed 31.5m shares (4.95%), as did Capital VC, mentioned above and Avant Capital Management (HK) Ltd (Avant), as asset manager. Mr Ye Ruiqiang subscribed 4.95%. As of 31-Dec-2014, he owned 6.44% of Capital VC.

There are 4 subscribers whom we cannot identify. A person named Zhang Yan subscribed 40.67m shares (6.40%) which were probably deposited with Emperor Securities Ltd, and a person named Zheng Wanying subscribed 31.33m shares (4.93%). A person named Civic Cheung Sun Kei subscribed 54m shares (8.49%) and another named Cheung Kam Hong subscribed the same number.

A person named Wong Chun Wah subscribed 23m shares (3.62%). It's a common name but we see that the same number went to the custody of Henik Securities Ltd, where there is a licensee called Wong Chun Wah. Similarly a person named Ma Kin Lung subscribed 31.0m shares (4.88%), and we see that number deposited with Get Nice Securities Ltd, where Ma Kin Lung is a licensed representative.

A person named Tam Siu Ki subscribed 54m shares (8.49%), increasing his stake to 9.28%. That may or may not be the same as Simon Tam Siu Ki, who was a representative of RHB OSK (then known as Prudence Securities Co Ltd) until his license was revoked on 30-Oct-2003 for rat-trading and other trading malpractices. In summary, then after the placing, the holdings were:
Name  Shares  Stake %
1  CEEI (0986)  63,000,000  9.91
2  Samuel Chiu Se Chung  63,000,000  9.91
3  Tam Siu Ki  59,000,000  9.28
4  Cheung Kam Hong  54,000,000  8.49  
5  Cheung Sun Kei, Civic  54,000,000  8.49
6  Zhang Yan  40,670,000  6.40
7  Avant  31,500,000  4.95
8  Capital VC (2324)  31,500,000  4.95
9  Unity (0913)  31,500,000  4.95
10  Ye Ruiqiang  31,500,000  4.95
11  Zheng Wanying  31,330,000  4.93
12  Ma Kin Lung  31,000,000  4.88
13  Wong Chun Wah  23,000,000  3.62
Total  540,000,000  85.71

The WLS placing completed on 27-Mar-2015 and the CCASS deposits are here. By that time, the stock had more than doubled to $1.25. Unlike the allotments after the IPO, there was no concentration warning. Yet 13 holders held 85.71% of the stock.

The price continued to climb. On 15-May-2015, with the stock at $2.26, 7.53x the placing price, WLS announced a 7:1 bonus issue. The stock spiked again and was suspended at $4.27 on 17-Jun-2015, prompting the company to announce that it was negotiating for a possible share issue. After a brief correction to $2.50, it was suspended again on 19-Jun-2015, pending announcement on 23-Jun-2015 of a "framework agreement" for possible subscriptions by Avant and Shin Kong Capital Management Inc (SKCM) of 1920m and 5760m shares (post-bonus) at $0.06875, a 78% discount to the bonus-adjusted closing price of $0.3125, to raise $528m gross and enlarge the issued shares by 151%.

While the stock was suspended, it went ex-bonus on 23-Jun-2015 and the bonus shares were distributed on 3-Jul-2015, so for 10 days straddling the half-year point, only 1/8 of the company was tradable. When trading in those shares resumed on 24-Jun-2015, the stock shot up again on heavy volume, reaching a daily high of $1.22 on 26-Jun-2015. Remember that most of the existing shares had been issued at a bonus-adjusted $0.0375, so they were now up 32.5x. WLS closed at $1.05 on 30-Jun-2015, allowing those listed companies which held the stock to book enormous "fair value gains" in their interim results. At the end of June, WLS had a market capitalisation of HK$5341m, compared with net tangible assets at 30-Apr-2015 of HK$282m ($0.055 per share), so it was trading at 18.9x NAV.

Disclosures of interest indicate that SKCM was using a vehicle called SKCM TMT I, L.P., which was 50% owned by Chiang Chun Yi and 50% by Yam Tak Cheung, and managed by SKCM TMT GP Co. Ltd, which is 40% owned by SKCM. After all that excitement, SKCM backed out of the deal on 8-Aug-2015 citing disagreement over due diligence on WLS, but Avant signed a new agreement on 12-Aug-2015 to continue to subscribe 1920m shares at $0.06875, conditional on WLS issuing at least 252m shares in a fund-raising exercise so that Avant ends up with 29.48% of less - certainly under the 30% takeover trigger.

Now this long and winding road takes us back to Lerado. On 18-Aug-2015, WLS announced two placings via Black Marble Securities, owned by Lerado. The underwritten tranche is of 360m shares (7.08% of existing shares) at $0.06875, and there is a further "best efforts" placing of 5400m shares (106.15%) at the same price, at 82.1% discount to the closing price of $0.385. Together these could raise $389.22m mostly for, you guessed it, money-lending and securities business. The shares closed on 23-Sep-2015 at $0.27, down 74.3% since the end of June, but still at 4.9x NAV.
Raise the umbrellas: China Jicheng (1027)

Perhaps the most ridiculous bubble in our market at present (although there is a lot of competition for that title) is umbrella maker China Jicheng Holdings Ltd (CJ, 1027) which listed on 13-Feb-2015. It peaked on 18-Sep-2015 at $3.18 with a market value of HK$47.7bn, compared with net tangible assets in the 30-Jun-2015 interim results of $399.6m, or $0.0267 per share. So it was trading at 119x NTA.

Adjusting for a 25:1 stock split in June, CJ's IPO priced the shares at $0.044, so was up 72.3x since the IPO. This gives new meaning to the term "umbrella movement". The initial custody positions of the 150m IPO shares (25%) are in our records here. The top 3 brokers will now be familiar to you: Gransing (8.72% of CJ), Win Fung (8.18%) and SWSHK (3.73%), a total 20.64% or 82.54% of the float.

On 14-May-2015, the SFC warned that 16 shareholders owned 24.02% of CJ, or 96.08% of the float, leaving 0.98% of CJ for everyone else. The stock closed at $13.76 the day before that warning, or $0.5504 after the stock split, so it is up 5.14x since then.

In its annual results for 31-Mar-2015, CEEI (mentioned above) disclosed a holding of 12.67m shares (2.11%) in CJ at a purchase cost of $1.10 per share, which means they were allocated in the IPO, because they have never traded that low. After the stock split that will be 316.75m shares at $0.044. So CEEI doesn't always pay bubble prices for bubble shares - it occasionally gets in at the bottom.

The controlling shareholder of CJ is its Chairman, Huang Wenji, with 11.25bn shares (75%) which, on paper, makes him a US$ umbrella multi-billionaire. We note that on 17-Sep-2015, he deposited 1.5bn shares into CCASS with Black Marble Securities, owned by Lerado. That could be preparation for a placing of existing shares and possibly a subscription of new ones, if anyone is dumb enough to buy them.

Lerado interim results show massive gain

Lerado is one of several companies which have made enormous market gains in the first half of 2015 without disclosing what stocks it bought. In the 30-Jun-2015 interim results, it disclosed "held-for-trading investments" comprising "equity securities listed in Hong Kong" of HK$702.1m. It also said that by 28-Aug-2015, the value had declined by 11%. It booked an unrealised gain of $626.5m, implying a purchase cost of $75.6m and a gain of 829% in 6 months or less. No normal stock does that. Whatever stock(s) they hold, it must be bubble paper, and investors deserve to know what it is so that they can make their own assessment of "fair value" rather than relying on an artificial market price.

After providing for $105m of profits tax on the gains, Lerado had net tangible assets at 30-Jun-2015 of $1220m, or $1.27 per share. But if those gains evaporate, then the NTA drops to $698.5m, or $0.728 per share. Both figures are before dilution from the proposed open offer. If the offer proceeds, then that NAV would be diluted to about $0.430 (with the gains) or $0.295 (without the gains). Both figures assume that Lerado loses the Dorel arbitration, which is worth $307m, which is $0.320 per share before the open offer or $0.080 per share after the open offer.
Capital VC's open offer

On 13-Mar-2015, Capital VC announced a 5:1 share consolidation to be followed by a 7:1 open offer at $0.25 per consolidated share without excess applications. That was a 76.5% discount to the adjusted closing price of $1.065 per share. The Financial Adviser was Akron, and the "underwriter" was SBI CCFS. The last published NAV at 28-Feb-2015 was an adjusted $4.821, so the issue discount to NAV was 94.8%. The stock sold off on the news, down 39.9% the next day to an adjusted $0.64.

Policy note: Chapter 21 investment companies like Capital VC have to publish their NAV monthly. This involves valuing all their listed investments at market prices, so they know what they are. Until 2002, these announcements had to be published in newspapers, so space was at a premium. Now that announcements are online for the last 13 years, this is no longer the case. Yet the Listing Rules still only require Chapter 21 companies to disclose the top 10 investments once per year in the annual report. This is ridiculous. The top 10 investments should be disclosed every month so that shareholders know what risks they are taking.

Again, investors faced the extortion of having to either see the investment heavily diluted, or put in more cash, and no excess applications were allowed, so it is really a placing with the "underwriter" subject to first refusal of existing holders pro rata. The underwriter benefits from any unsubscribed shares at a discount to market. To eliminate the possibility of SBI CCFS holding a controlling stake, it had to arrange sub-underwriters. They included Gransing, for 180m shares, Jun Yang Securities Co Ltd (Jun Yang Securities), for 152m, Avant, for 142.5m, and Fordjoy, for 80m shares.

Incidentally, SBI CCFS is 52% owned by Cao Guo Qi, a director of several listed companies, and 48% by Zhang Xiongfeng, the current Chairman of CMG, mentioned above.

On 11-Jun-2015, Capital VC shareholders approved the consolidation and open offer without objection. Voting turnout was only 14.39% of the issued and eligible shares, probably including the 6.44% owned by Ye Ruiqiang.

Policy note: shareholders are often unaware of opportunities to protect themselves by voting against such egregious proposals, because the SFC does not require banks and brokers who hold their stock to inform them of EGMs and seek voting instructions. As a result, most banks and brokers, in the small print of the client contracts, state that they are not obliged to do so. This is a major barrier to investor participation in governance, and the SFC should act to resolve this, as we said in our submission Principles of Responsible Regulation (26-May-2015).

On 24-Jun-2015, six days before Capital VC's financial year-end, it announced that it was changing its year-end to 30-Sep-2015, so it would produce a second set of condensed "interim" results for the 12 months to 30-Jun-2015. The purported reason for this was:

"to align the Company's financial year end date with that of the Company's principal associate, CNI Bullion Limited, which is the Group's substantial investment."

This holds no water though. Remember, Capital VC is a Chapter 21 investment company, so under Rule 21.04(3)(a), it is not allowed to take "legal, or effective, management control of underlying investments" and under Rule 21.04(3)(b) it is required to maintain a "reasonable spread of investments". So there is no logical reason to align the year ends of Capital VC and any of its investments, including CNI Bullion Ltd, which only accounted for 9% of Capital VC's NAV at 31-Dec-2014.

So what was the real reason for extending the year-end? In our view, to delay the annual disclosure of the portfolio. It's so embarrassing to have to show that your castle is built on sand.

On 15-Jul-2015 Capital VC announced that its NAV at 30-Jun-2015 was $9.0782 per share, and on 27-Aug-2015 it announced the second interim results for the 12 months to June. Capital VC booked a pre-tax profit on financial assets of $1314m for the 12 months, compared with $163m in the first 6 months, so the second-half profit was $1151m. As an investment company, it does not distinguish between realised and unrealised gains, but we can deduce them from the amount of deferred tax, which is tax that is only payable when they cash out. Note 8 shows deferred tax of $132m, so as profits tax is 16.5% they have about $800m of net unrealised gains, probably in bubble stocks.

Anyway, with that NAV in mind, let's return to the open offer. 7:1 at $0.25, versus NAV of $9.0782, so the open offer would dilute NAV to $1.354 before expenses. Shareholders who did nothing would lose 85% of their net asset value. Yet, when the offer closed on 9-Jul-2015, only 23.7% of the shares were subscribed. That left the underwriters and whoever was behind them with 66.75% of the company, acquired at $0.25 per share. The market price closed that day at $0.32. Due to market losses in July, the NAV closed that month at $1.0292, and $0.8824 at the end of August. Amazingly there was nobody with a disclosed 5% shareholding after the offer closed.

Meanwhile, even in market price terms, the shareholders who did not subscribe (and most of them did not vote against the open offer) had seen the price collapse from $1.065 before the open offer to $0.32, even while Capital VC was racking up huge gains as a holder of the unnamed inflated stocks.
Jun Yang (0397)

Jun Yang Securities is owned by Jun Yang Financial Holdings Ltd (Jun Yang, 0397). Until August, this was known as Jun Yang Solar Power Investments Ltd, but that's out of fashion, so now, like everyone else, it wants to be a financial services powerhouse.

Note 24 on page 113 of Jun Yang's 2014 annual report reveals that it owned 2.49% of Tech Pro Technology Development Ltd (Tech Pro Technology, 3823) and 4.49% of Town Health International Medical Group Ltd (Town Health, 3886). Those had a market value of about HK$235m and $280m respectively, out of total listed equities of $854m. Jun Yang booked an unrealised gain on held-for-trading investments of HK$350m for 2014, without which it would have made a loss before tax of $98m.
Tech Pro Technology (3823)

This is another bubble stock, up 93.14% in 2014, and it has kept on going, up a net 22.62% this year so far. It closed on 23-Sep-2015 at $1.87, valuing the firm at HK$12.13bn. When a company includes the syllable "Tech" in its name twice, you know it is desperate for attention. The company makes LED lamps and losses. Oh and football. Yes, it has bought a French soccer club, FC Sochaux-Montbeliard SA. After all, why sponsor the shirts when you can buy the whole thing?

The interim report at 30-Jun-2015, shows net tangible assets of RMB475m (HK$594m) or about HK$0.092 per share. Turnover for the period was RMB111m, so if you annualize that you get RMB222m or HK$278m. So the shares are trading at about 20.4x NTA and about 44x turnover.

L&A (8195)

This is another bubble stock. L & A International Holdings Ltd (L&A, 8195) makes cashmere sweaters. It listed on 10-Oct-2014 after a placing at $0.06 per share (adjusted for the 10:1 split on 21-Apr-2015). In the placing, the top 10 placees received 89.74% of the float. It closed on 23-Sep-2015 at $2.92, up 48.7x since the listing. The market value is HK$11.68bn, compared with net tangible assets of HK$129m at 31-Mar-2015, or about $0.032 per share, so it trades at 90x book value. Revenue for the year was $350m, so it trades at 33x sales.

Despite this ridiculous valuation, or perhaps because of it, CEEI bought 69.384m L&A shares (1.73%) in the market from 17-Apr-2015 to 12-May-2015, spending a total of HK$112.7m or an average of $1.62 per share. This was announced on 12-May-2015. Of course, we don't know who the sellers were. Lucky them.

On 24-Jun-2015, the SFC issued a concentration warning, noting that 19 shareholders held 23.18% out of the 25% float.
Roundup

What you have seen here is a repeated pattern of abuse. The key steps in several transactions are:

Position votes in friendly hands which are not visibly connected to controlling shareholders or executive directors, by issuance of new shares or transfer of existing shares.
Arrange loan financing for any existing controller to take up entitlements, or even sell shares in the market with enough time gap to deter allegations of insider dealing.
Announce either (i) a large, deep-discount open offer without excess applications; or (ii) a "special mandate" placing, which in the first case will need "independent" shareholders' approval and in the latter, just shareholders' approval.
Use friendly votes to approve the proposal which damages the financial interests of anyone who cannot or does not put up cash (in the case of a placing, this isn't even an option).
Complete the fund-raising and receive deeply discounted shares as the underwriter, sub-underwriter or placee of the shares.

Hong Kong deserves better if it wishes to make a claim to be a world-class financial centre.

© Webb-site.com, 2015

---

163 : GS(14)@2015-10-16 00:59:23

不知所云

---

164 : greatsoup38(830)@2015-11-10 01:31:20

1 for 1 bonus shares

---

165 : greatsoup38(830)@2015-12-17 01:48:45

盈利增2.6倍，至2.5億，11.2億可變現資產

---

166 : GS(14)@2016-04-16 00:20:06

盈警

---

167 : greatsoup38(830)@2016-05-11 02:45:00

轉虧1.8億，現金1.8億

---

168 : greatsoup38(830)@2016-07-03 15:08:55

虧損降45%，至3,800萬，986持有745、802、1027、1063、1225、2324、8021、8193、8195

---

169 : GS(14)@2016-10-15 04:01:23

盈警

---

170 : GS(14)@2016-10-29 13:50:28

8100 買 8086、8018、1019、6161、6836、8081、2324、

---

171 : greatsoup38(830)@2016-11-12 14:10:22

5合1，又1供3@20仙

---

172 : GS(14)@2017-01-01 16:58:14

轉虧2.1億元，輕債

---

173 : GS(14)@2017-03-20 02:02:03

無人供

---

174 : greatsoup38(830)@2017-05-25 07:52:58

虧損增75%，至2,100萬，輕債

---

175 : greatsoup38(830)@2017-05-25 07:53:35

持有8021、1389、8193、802、8226、275

---

176 : greatsoup38(830)@2017-07-21 04:38:18

8100持2324

---

177 : GS(14)@2017-10-10 17:40:19

本公司董事會（「董事會」）謹此通知本公司股東（「股東」）及有意投資者，根據本
集團截至二零一七年九月三十日止年度（「本年度」）之未經審核管理賬目及董事
會目前可獲得的資料而作出的初步評估，比對本公司二零一五年╱一六年年報所
載截至二零一六年九月三十日止年度錄得的經審核淨虧損，預期本集團於本年度
將錄得淨虧損的明顯增加。本年度本集團業績之預期變動主要由於本集團上市投
資於本年度的淨虧損較之截至二零一六年九月三十日止年度者增加。

---

178 : GS(14)@2018-01-01 21:15:41

轉虧4,000萬，8億可變現資產

---

179 : GS(14)@2018-02-04 14:34:31

根據一般授權配售新股份
於二零一八年二月二日（交易時段後），本公司與配售代理訂立配售協議，據此，
配售代理已同意按盡力基準，向不少於六名獨立承配人配售最多550,000,000股
新股份，每股配售股份價格為0.050港元。

---

180 : GS(14)@2018-02-05 04:07:19

Webb曰:
The Enigma Network investment company is blowing the general mandate, issuing 19.96% new shares at $0.05, not mentioning the 84.9% discount to Net Asset Value of $0.3308 at 31-Dec-2017. The board claims the issue is in the interests of the Company and the Shareholders as a whole. The placing agent, Infast Brokerage, is 95% owned by GCPS (8193), another Enigma member. 3 minutes eariler, Capital VC announced a grant of 275m options at $0.058 to unnamed persons. Thats another potential 10% enlargement of the share base at an 82.5% discount to NAV. We call on the SFC to direct the Stock Exchange to reject the listing application for all the new shares.

「謎之網絡」投資公司正在衝破一般授權限制，以5仙發行19.96%股權，並無提及發行價較在2017年12月31日淨值33.08仙折讓84.9%。董事局指出發行「對公司及股東有利」。配售代理進匯證券是由另一間「謎之網絡」成員漢華專業服務(8193)持有95%。3分鐘前，首都創投授出2.75億購股權，行使價5.8仙予一些未披露名稱人士。這是另一個折讓82.5%發行10%潛在擴大股本的可能性。我們已經通知證監會和聯交所聯絡，以否決發行新股的申請。

---

181 : GS(14)@2018-03-21 18:15:57

首都創投有限公司（「本公司」）董事會（「董事會」）察覺本公司股份之價格最近有
所上升。董事會謹此宣佈本公司正協商簽訂有關投資於區塊鏈行業公司（「該投資」）
之意向書（「意向書」）。倘本公司簽訂意向書及╱或具約束力之協議，本公司將於
適當時候根據上市規則之所有適用規定作出進一步公告。

---

182 : GS(14)@2018-04-13 07:33:29

盈警

---

183 : greatsoup38(830)@2018-06-01 18:42:31

虧，5.4億可變現資產

---

184 : GS(14)@2018-10-14 12:43:28

董事會謹此通知股東及潛在投資者，根據本集團截至二零一八年九月三十日止
年度之未經審核管理賬目及董事會目前可獲得的資料而作出的初步評估，比對
截至二零一七年九月三十日止年度所錄得者，預期本集團於截至二零一八年九
月三十日止年度的未經審核綜合淨虧損將大幅減少。

---

185 : GS(14)@2019-05-24 08:39:05

無野好講

---