📖 ZKIZ Archives


結盟日商 抵制三星 科技三龍頭打韓戰

2011-1-13  TNM




月前,歐盟以違反反托拉斯法重罰台灣面板廠,引起鴻海董事長郭台銘震怒,痛批韓商三星電子「抓耙子」,沒商道。不只郭台銘,台灣從DRAM、面板與零組件到3C品牌大廠,不是吃過三星悶虧,就是被欺負,新仇舊恨數不完。

本刊調查,從郭台銘登高喊「抗韓」後,鴻海先起義,與日商日立合作外,近期又頻頻赴日,接觸日商夏普,準備痛打三星,奪下中小尺寸面板全球第一大;此外, 智慧手機一哥宏達電及筆電一哥宏碁,近期不約而同「愛用國貨」,降低對三星採購,扶植台廠。這場抗韓大作戰,方興未艾。

韓國三星與台商競爭日趨激烈,當抓耙子、無商道的作風,引發台灣科技大廠不滿,鴻海郭台銘、宏達電王雪紅與宏碁王振堂近期全力反制三星。

去年底,廣州亞運跆拳道好手楊淑君的黑襪事件,激發台灣人反韓情緒;緊接著,歐盟執委會以違反反托拉斯法,重罰包括友達、奇美電等四家台灣面板廠,罰金一百七十五億元,更觸動台灣科技大廠對韓商的痛恨,尤其是遭重罰一百二十億元的奇美電大股東、鴻海董事長郭台銘。

郭董氣炸 攏日商

消息一傳來,郭台銘忍無可忍地高分貝痛罵:「向歐盟自首的韓國三星電子,不但是抓耙子,更是操縱價格的元凶,三星累犯自首無罪,合理嗎?他們(指韓國廠商)用各種方法要打死我們。」「希望政府當企業的靠山,硬起來一起抵制韓國。」

郭台銘去年十二月十日砲轟三星,不到月底,鴻海就付諸行動,宣布與日商日立合作,而這只是聯合日商抗韓的開始。

本刊調查,近期郭台銘還頻頻赴日,多次與夏普接觸,除了爭取夏普液晶電視訂單外,如與夏普合作順利定案,今年上半年將可搶奪中小尺寸面板龍頭地位,擊敗三星。

三星是蘋果與新力的面板供應商,而這二家公司也是鴻海的二大客戶,在鴻海併了面板廠奇美電後,三星也成為奇美電的最大競爭敵手。

尤其蘋果3i(iPhone、iPad、iPod)全球熱銷,銷量持續攀升,對中小尺寸面板需求越來越大,鴻海雖緊握蘋果iPad、iPhone組裝代工 訂單,但受限於技術、專利不足,空有龐大面板產能的奇美電始終未能成為iPad、iPhone的面板供應主力,這塊高毛利肥肉,仍讓三星獨享,看在郭台銘 眼裡,很不是滋味。

奇美奮起 搶3i

「吃下奇美電後,郭董最在意的就是中小尺寸面板,還多次親赴奇美電與該部門的人員開會打氣,不相信鴻海沒機會贏過韓廠。」奇美電主管透露。更慘的是,奇美電還被三星陷害,遭歐盟以「操縱面板價格」重罰,吃了大虧。

哪裡跌倒、哪裡爬起。郭台銘全力鎖定中小尺寸面板戰場,反攻三星。市調公司Display Search資料指出,二○一○年全球中小尺寸面板市占率,三星一四?九%,奇美八?二%,今年奇美合併統寶後,加上日立,市占率加總達一五?七%,將可 超越三星,成為全球第一大。

「如果奇美電再與夏普談成合作,老郭就可拉開與三星的距離,增加爭取蘋果面板訂單的本錢。」分析師觀察。

日商面板廠願意一塊抗韓,同樣是吃了三星不少苦。「面對三星的價格競爭,日本面板廠苦思對策突圍,郭董讓日商感受誠意,雙方是合作,而非競爭或買賣關係。日立就是一例。」鴻海主管說。日商養面板廠成本高,而郭台銘擅長降低成本,二者合作,各取所需。

接單未成 愛生恨

其實,郭台銘接觸的日商,不只家電廠、面板廠。併購普立爾後,郭台銘就曾與日本醫療器材廠商接觸,另為了提升鴻海無人工廠規模與效率,鴻海也與日本機器人、自動化設備廠商接洽,希望透過併購來壯大對抗韓商的本錢。

其實,三星不只是鴻海的敵人,還是鴻海的大客戶。而這位大客戶與郭台銘的恩怨情仇,早在二○○四年就開始。

當年,三星、LG手機全球市占率持續攀升,很可能擠下摩托羅拉、索尼愛立信,郭台銘為了搶攻三星、LG可能釋出的代工訂單,決定讓鴻海旗下的富士康(FIH)北上,前往山東煙台、廊坊設立生產線,就近服務這二大韓商。

結果沒想到,三星、LG雖宣稱會釋出代工訂單,卻是釋給韓國本土廠商,跟FIH預期相差甚大,這也是FIH近年業績不如預期的原因之一。「設了工廠準備接單,卻一直空在那,讓郭董很不爽,大罵韓國人沒誠信。」鴻海主管私下透露。

經驗到手 即翻臉

郭台銘不僅一次對內說:「(三星)是可怕的對手。」「三星產品線幾乎囊括所有電子產品,從手機、家電,到DRAM、面板等零組件,幾乎什麼都做,還可以經營品牌。」

被郭台銘視為可怕對手的三星,是富可敵國的韓國第一大企業,在韓國政府支持下,到全球市場攻城掠地,去年營收一千三百六十六億美元(折合新台幣四兆元),不但超越美國第一大電腦廠惠普,成為全球營收最高的科技廠,台灣前五大科技廠營收加起來,也比不上。

三星是台灣代工與零件廠的大客戶,也是台灣品牌大廠的敵手。對三星時常違反商道、壯大自己的方式,業者又愛又恨。「他們會找台商代工或生產零組件,一方面 把台商養大,同時向台商學技術,快速培養自己的代工、零組件團隊,最後自給自足,不但取代台商,還跑來跟台商搶客戶。」業者忿忿不平說:「三星擅長吸收別 人的經驗,像在液晶電視就效法新力、手機就模仿蘋果,零組件的生產就學台商,只要一學會,他們就會想盡辦法超越對手。」

雪紅反擊 暗轉單

除了郭台銘受害,去年威風八面的智慧型手機品牌大廠宏達電(HTC),也多次吃過三星的悶虧。像二年前,三星推動高解析度的OLED(有機發光二極體)面 板,大力推銷給宏達電,結果宏達電採用,推出高階機種Legend(傳奇機)大賣,三星看到OLED市場接受度高後,翻臉不認人,將貨源轉給自家品牌手機 Galaxy使用,硬是不出貨給宏達電,讓執行長周永明氣得大罵:「被韓國人騙了。」

不單採購零件被惡搞,三星更集結手機研發大軍,快速超越宏達電在智慧型手機的地位,去年第三季宏達電的全球排名硬是被三星擠下。另外,宏達電原先替 Google代工生產的品牌手機Nexus One,沒想到三星半途殺出搶單,讓Google決定把新手機Nexus S轉單給三星。「Peter(周永明)還因此去光華商場買了三星的手機回來研究,到底他們是怎麼做到的。」知情人士說。

有了這幾次教訓後,宏達電去年第四季開始大幅調整對韓商的採購策略。「只要台灣能夠設計、生產的,HTC都要向台廠採購。」周永明更對零組件廠商說:「不要把奶水餵給三星。」

例如宏達電的合作夥伴、手機晶片大廠美商高通,過去在三星下單代工基頻(Baseband)晶片,去年底在宏達電董座,同時也是高通股東之一的王雪紅暗示下,悄悄地把訂單轉給了台積電。「雖然二家公司都不承認,但台積電確實因高通的轉單而受惠。」知情人士說。

供貨搞鬼 傷雙A

原本向三星採購面板的台灣NB雙A品牌—宏碁(acer)與華碩(ASUS),不愉快的遭遇,也和宏達電如出一轍。

台灣筆電一哥宏碁去年在小筆電市場上,損失了不少市占,尤其在宏碁大本營歐洲,擅長經營電信商的三星,靠著一款高階小筆電,把宏碁打得潰不成軍,硬生生把宏碁歐洲小筆電銷售第一的排名搶走。

蘋果iPad去年吹起平板電腦旋風,重傷全球筆電大廠,宏碁與華碩因而轉戰平板電腦,但一起步就踢到三星大鐵板。三星先供貨給自家品牌,使得雙A推出新商品動作,比別人慢一大步。

「三星的七吋平板電腦Galaxy tab,去年九月上市,三個月就賣了一千萬台,銷售幾乎與iPad並駕齊驅,雙A到今年才推出產品,市場先機已被三星搶走,也難怪宏碁執行長蘭奇在紐約記者會上,都直言要減少對三星的採購。」外資分析師說。

為此,蘭奇在內部會議挑明:「現在宏碁最大敵人是惠普,三星是下一個敵人。」

本刊調查,宏碁過去有三到四成的面板向三星採購,第四季確實把一成左右的面板訂單轉給友達與奇美電,來制衡三星。「以前面板與DRAM缺貨時,JT(王振堂)還要親自飛首爾盯貨,現在因小筆電與平板電腦,雙方已從合作變為競爭。」宏碁人說。

華碩董事長施崇棠更是早就把三星當作敵人。華碩去年初與和碩分家後,施崇棠為了強化工業設計部門的能力,多次出國拜訪國際一流設計師,卻發現這些設計師早被三星重金禮聘。

「只要排名全球前一百大的設計師,三星就會派人接觸,砸大錢買設計,這種魄力台灣廠商望塵莫及。」施崇棠對主管說。

抗鴻陣線 扯後腿

雖然台廠串連開戰,但三星也不是省油的燈。就在郭台銘月前發飆的隔週,韓國首富、三星集團董座李建熙的獨子—新任總裁李在鎔,就帶著幾位高階主管搭專機來台,低調拜會緯創等代工廠固樁。

「李在鎔身為接班人,身段卻超柔軟,直說原料供應絕對沒問題,價格好談,真的很會做生意。」業者透露。

一位NB廠的主管更不諱言:「鴻海說要抗韓,人家三星也會利用台廠間抗鴻的力量反制老郭。」

像是長期與韓國競爭的友達董事長李焜耀,上週六出席集團植樹活動時,被問及抗韓一事,就避談:「今天不談這個。」據了解,三星除了自己生產面板外,也因為 自有品牌電視的關係,向友達採購大尺寸面板。「儘管三星出賣同業,友達也遭殃,但友達還要跟三星做生意,當然不可能像郭董一樣,明著嗆聲。」知情人士說。

對科技業抗韓熱潮,宏碁集團創辦人施振榮跳出來相挺,他直言:「韓國是所有人的敵人,台灣則要當所有人的朋友。」「『聯日抗韓』是上上策。無論面板業或DRAM業都如此,台灣不需要一味地跟韓國學(擴大規模),應以創新取勝。」

他也指出,韓國企業是「一間公司倒閉、國家就完蛋了」;台灣卻是有很多中小企業在支撐,市場雖小,但若是每天花一點點資源,就算是百分之一,放在長期的人才與設備投資上,放眼華人市場,仍將是贏家。

郭台銘 小檔案

現職 鴻海集團董事長 出生 1950年

家庭 與亡妻林淑如育有1子1女;與現任妻子曾馨瑩育有1女1子

學歷 中國海專

事業 1974年創鴻海;2001年鴻海成為台灣第一大製造業;2004年起成全球3C代工龍頭;2005年成為全球手機代工龍頭;2006年成全球數位相機代工龍頭。2010年鴻海合併營收2.3兆元

王振堂小檔案

現職 宏碁董事長 出生 1954年

家庭 妻子張美暖、育有2女

學歷 台大電機系畢、政大企家班第9期

事業 1981進入宏碁集團下的宏碁科技,1998年出任宏碁科技集團董事長;2001年宏碁集團分家,接下宏碁總經理;2005年起任宏碁董事長。2010年宏碁營收5,220億元

王雪紅小檔案

現職 宏達電、威盛董事長 出生 1958年

家庭 父為台塑創辦人王永慶,與前夫育有2子,現任夫婿為威盛總經理陳文琦

學歷 美國加州大學柏克萊分校經濟學碩士

事業 1987年創立威盛;1997年創立宏達電HTC。2010年HTC為全球第5大、美國第3大智慧型手機品牌,合併營收2,787億元

5大電子龍頭 都當三星是勁敵

◎宏達電(智慧型手機廠)

2010年第3季三星智慧型手機銷售720萬支,首次擊敗宏達電,躍升為全球第4大智慧型手機廠。宏達電為Google自有品牌智慧型手機Nexus S代工業務,也被三星搶單成功。

◎奇美電(iPhone、iPad面板供應商)

三星為iPad、iPhone的主要面板供應商,鴻海旗下的奇美電受限於先天技術、專利等,無法拿到iPad、iPhone面板供應大單,郭台銘擬聯合日廠與三星抗衡。

◎友達(面板製造廠)

友達申請赴中國設7.5代廠,經過9個月等待,政府終於在去年放行,但中國僅剩的2張面板執照,其中一張已發給三星,友達須藉入主昆山龍飛光電,取得執照。

◎台積電(晶圓代工廠)

三星視晶圓代工為未來核心事業,去年12月日本東芝40奈米製程以下晶片擴大委外,三星為主要代工廠,台積電為次要代工廠,顯示三星搶占市場有成,恐威脅台積電。

◎宏碁(筆電品牌)

宏碁小筆電在歐洲被三星的高階小筆電擊潰。宏碁已將部分面板訂單轉給友達與奇美電,以制衡三星。

台韓 高科技產業競爭史

◎DRAM

鑑於韓廠因政府扶植而成為全球龍頭,2000年前後,台灣將DRAM畫入2兆雙星重點扶植產業,期超越南韓。但韓廠有技術、成本優勢,又因韓圜貶值而可殺價競爭,不但地位難撼動,更屢次重創台廠。

◎面版

2000年起台、日、韓三強鼎立,台灣大尺寸面板市占率原本領先南韓,居全球之冠;2008年第3季三星、LG轉買自家面板,韓廠市占率進而超越台廠,近2年雙方積極卡位中國市場,競爭很激烈。

◎手機

2003年後台、韓已居全球前二大手機產國,韓國自有品牌出貨量遠高於台灣,台灣代工出貨量則較南韓高多出6成;台廠原在智慧型手機占優勢,但去年三星智慧型手機市占率已超越宏達電。

回應 鴻海:不評論

對於郭董近期赴日本與夏普洽談中小面板合作一事,鴻海發言人丁祈安表示,對於相關合作案,鴻海沒有任何評論。


PermaLink: https://articles.zkiz.com/?id=21380

合一投資(0913)發行新股給三龍集團(0329)執董歐陽啟初

1 : GS(14)@2011-04-02 14:58:16

http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... TN20110330122_C.pdf
2 : GS(14)@2011-04-02 15:00:08

合一及三龍均是我們所稱的「中南網絡」的成員(亦即本壇稱的「華匯系」)。這些股的發行價較每股淨值96仙,有68.8%的折讓。

Unity and Dragonite are both members of what we call the "Chung Nam Network". The shares are issued at a 68.8% discount to the net asset value per share of $0.96 at 28-Feb-2011.
3 : 游浪潮(3792)@2012-02-07 20:18:58

可能係呢隻野太兇殘,其他師兄都唔睇…

小弟十分喜歡這間公司的名稱,合一投資,實至名歸﹗

2011/12  一供二,供股價10仙
2010/12  合併後一供八,供股價36仙
2010/12  二十合一
2010/12  一供二,供股價15仙
2009/12  十合一
2009/12  一供一
2008/12  五合一
2008/12  十合一
2008/12  合併後一供五,供股價12仙
2007/12  一供十,供股價10仙
2007/12  十合一
2005/12  合併後一供十,供股價10仙
2005/12  十合一
2004/12  三供一,供股價14仙

最新動向

http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... TN20120207095_C.pdf

按合資格股東於記錄日期每持有一股股份可獲發兩股供股股份之基準進行供股,以每股供股股份港幣0.10元之價格配發862,378,676股供股股份
PermaLink: https://articles.zkiz.com/?id=273730

三龍國際(0329)發行新股予萊福資本(0901)執董蔡家楠小姐

1 : GS(14)@2011-04-02 15:02:10

http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/listconews/sehk/20110330/LTN201103301144_C.pdf
2 : GS(14)@2011-04-02 15:04:05

三龍及萊福均是我們所講的「中南網絡」(本壇稱「華匯系」),發行價對股價的折讓為12.1%,發行股數較今日的成交4,480萬股少約一半
(2011年3月30日)。

Dragonite and Radford are both members of what we call the "Chung Nam Network". The issue price is a 12.1% discount to today's close, for an issue size which is less than half the 44.8m shares traded today (30-Mar-2011).
3 : GS(14)@2011-04-02 15:56:09

3樓提及
樓主,中南網絡是什麼來的


即是華匯系...
http://realblog.zkiz.com/greatsoup/22385
4 : GS(14)@2011-04-02 15:56:53

http://realblog.zkiz.com/greatsoup/22385
We have no information on Daisy Wong Fung Kwan, Viola Mak Siu Hang, Bryant Zhang Yu Tao, Hui Yick Fu or Yan Chi Ping. If you know who any of them is, or have more information on any of the other subscribers, please tell us.

A bit of trivia: Mr Lam married Betty Chong Yuet Wah, a cousin and sister-in-law of Li Ka Shing. She is the daughter of Mr Chong Ching Um, the founder in 1935 of Chung Nam Watch Co Ltd. He was the father of the late Amy Chong Yuet Ming and uncle of Li Ka Shing, who married cousin Amy. In 1989, Mr Lam and his wife founded Qualipak Manufacturing Ltd, which made packaging boxes for watches. In 1994, they sold it to Unisouth Holdings Ltd (now Willie International Holdings Ltd, Willie, 0273) for HK$136m in cash. Mr Lam was MD of Willie from 19-Jul-95 to 20-Jan-99, when he stepped down to chair Qualipak International Holdings Ltd which was spun off and listed on 30-Apr-99. After asset injections and a change of control, this became C C Land.

The Chung Nam network
In 1995 Willie acquired stock and futures brokerages which it renamed Chung Nam Securities Ltd (Chung Nam Securities) and Chung Nam Commodities Ltd (Chung Nam Commodities) respectively, and a shell company which had already agreed to buy a seat on the stock exchange and is now a brokerage called Radland International Ltd (Radland). On 6-May-97 Willie sold 60% of Chung Nam Commodities to CU Investment (Holdings) Ltd (CUIH). They hadn't sold it for long. On 26-Nov-97 Willie agreed to buy Hennabun Capital Group Ltd (BVI, Hennabun), which owned CUIH, from a company which was 52.73% owned by Joan Huang Min Chuan, the mother of Henry Chuang Yue Heng (Henry Chuang), who was already a director of Radland. Henry Chuang became ED of Willie on 1-Apr-98 and Chairman on 25-Oct-99, where he remains. His brother, Eugene Chuang Yue Chien, has never been on any HK-listed boards.

We pause to note that in the PCCW vote-rigging case, the judge held that 132 persons in whose names single board lots were acquired through Chung Nam Securities, and 18 persons in whose names single board lots were acquired through Radland, did so as a result of a plan devised by a Eugene Chuang. The judge also held that a plan had been devised by Pollyanna Chu Li Yuet Wah to induce employees of Kingston Securities and Golden Resorts Group Ltd, their friends and relatives, and clients of Kingston to purchase one to three board lots of shares (a total of 175 shareholders) and to sign proxy forms in favour of the Scheme of Arrangement to privatise PCCW.

In 1998, Willie reorganised Hennabun, which became the holding company of Chung Nam Securities, Chung Nam Commodities and Radland. The reason we are telling you this is that Hennabun subsequently became a financial lavatory down which other listed companies flushed their capital by investing in its shares or convertible notes, and some of those listed companies are or were run by people named in the list above.

On 15-Dec-03, Sinolink (controlled by Mr Ou Yaping) subscribed HK$75m for 50m shares (then 17.23%) in Hennabun (disclosed in a Willie circular of 24-Dec-03). $25m of this was impaired in in 2004, and the remaining $50m in 2005. Sinolink never named the investment.
On 3-Mar-04, Yugang (controlled by Mr Cheung Chung Kiu) subscribed HK$100m for 80m shares (then 20.56%) in Hennabun, disclosed in note 38(ii) of its annual report (thank heavens for post balance sheet events, which auditors insist on disclosing). In 2004 Yugang took a $30m impairment loss, and a further $50m in the half-year to 30-Jun-05. After the 2005 year-end, the investment was disposed of to an unknown buyer.
We consider Sinolink and Yugang to be on the periphery of this network, rather than in the core. Other peripheral companies which invested in shares or convertible notes of Hennabun included China Sci-Tech Holdings Ltd (0985), Beauforte Investors Corp Ltd (0021), Golden Resources Development International Ltd (0677), China WindPower Group Ltd (0182, then N P H International Holdings Ltd), China Investment Fund Co Ltd (0612) and Hanny Holdings Ltd (0275).

We're going to make this really simple for you. What we call the Chung Nam network currently includes Willie, Heritage, Forefront, two other companies we have not yet mentioned, Mascotte Holdings Ltd (Mascotte, 0136) and Freeman Corp Ltd (Freeman, 0279), and two Chapter 21 investment companies, Radford Capital Investment Ltd (Radford, 0901), and Unity Investment Holdings Ltd (Unity, 0913) which are both managed by CU Investment Management Ltd. Radford and Unity do very little but invest in other companies in the network, and there is a history of inter-dealing between these companies, even though at the times of most such transactions, they have not been "connected" within the meaning of the Listing Rules.

Freeman recently reacquired a controlling stake in Hennabun from Eugene Chuang in a deal which completed on 30-Sep-09. The circular dated 30-Jan-09 contains an accountants report (p157 of PDF) shows that Hennabun lost HK$516.1m in the 3 years and 9 months to 30-Sep-08. Note that we say "reacquired": Freeman first acquired control of Hennabun from Willie back in 2006 (before selling it to Eugene Chuang on 29-Jun-07), so there is another accountants' report in the acquisition circular dated 24-May-06 (p46 of PDF) which shows that in the 2 years ended 31-Dec-04, it lost HK$562.6m. So that means that in the 5 years and 9 months to 30-Sep-08, it lost a total of HK$1,079m. We don't know what they made or lost in the year which passed before completion of the acquisition.

The bulk of this track record was net bad loan provisions of $637.9m. It also made a loss of $195.5m in 2005 on disposal of subsidiaries which owned more loans. At least some of those loans were made to companies in which Willie said, in note 43(b) of its 2003 annual report, "a brother of a director" is also a director and/or substantial shareholder. Perhaps they were referring to Eugene Chuang, brother of Henry Chuang. At the end of 2004, two subsidiaries of Hennabun held loans in the amount of $291.62m, of which $200m had been guaranteed by "a director of Hennabun". During 2005, these and possibly other subsidiaries were disposed of at a loss of $195.5m.

The table below shows that the combined net loss of these companies in their latest financial year (Dec-08 or Mar-09) was HK$3,127m. Over the last 5 years, they have lost HK$6,201m (US$795m). We exclude Mascotte and Forefront before 2007 when they entered the network.



At any given time, large chunks of the stock in these companies (over 30% in most cases) is in the custody of Chung Nam Securities. The Webb-site CCASS Analysis system shows you the current holdings of Chung Nam Securities, including many of the other listed companies mentioned above. The losses are financed by repeated placings of shares and convertible notes (often with each other), and rights issues. The resulting dilution necessitates repeated consolidation (reverse split) of the shares. For example, Freeman has consolidated by 500,000 to 1 since 1998, and Heritage has consolidated by 1,000,000 to 1 since 18-Sep-01. It is difficult to conceive an easier way to lose your money than investing in the Chung Nam network.
5 : SYSTEM(-101)@2011-04-02 17:32:09

Guest(zid:733)所發的貼子已被greatsoup(管理組:8) 刪除了。(原因:repeated)
6 : GS(14)@2011-04-02 17:39:23

7樓提及
他們持有甘多蝕錢又冇人買既股票其實對他們有什麼益處呢?
又炒高派貨?


人地唔駛炒高的,咪一路派下去,幾錢真是唔緊要,集資的錢又可拿出拿入的,實際上基本上是無印。

手法主要是一堆公司選一間或幾間借錢給他們,然後認購番股票,這樣他們根本不用出錢,多了就給回公司囉
7 : fineram(806)@2011-04-02 22:33:28

9樓提及
明白了
但還有兩件事唔明
一是為何還有投資者買這公司的股票呢?
二是為何在這次配股和售股權之前會有大手成交呢?
感謝樓主你的講解^ ^


你這頭像我想起一個c-hing.

一是為何還有投資者買這公司的股票? 橋唔怕舊, 最緊要受. 每年都唔少新人入股海... 加上報紙又煲下, 實會有人買的.
8 : GS(14)@2011-04-03 14:35:53

9樓提及
明白了
但還有兩件事唔明
一是為何還有投資者買這公司的股票呢?
二是為何在這次配股和售股權之前會有大手成交呢?
感謝樓主你的講解^ ^


1. 因為以為有錢賺,同埋d人唔知
2. 大手成交有幾難做,你自己一買一賣都得的,他們有配套的
9 : GS(14)@2011-04-03 14:36:02

10樓提及
9樓提及
明白了
但還有兩件事唔明
一是為何還有投資者買這公司的股票呢?
二是為何在這次配股和售股權之前會有大手成交呢?
感謝樓主你的講解^ ^


你這頭像我想起一個c-hing.

一是為何還有投資者買這公司的股票? 橋唔怕舊, 最緊要受. 每年都唔少新人入股海... 加上報紙又煲下, 實會有人買的.


有同感
10 : GS(14)@2011-06-27 21:52:29

14樓提及
901的供股決議案有風險


搞唔掂啦
11 : GS(14)@2011-07-07 21:25:49

16樓提及
聽聞公司已發出法律文件,查驗股東身份...

估計是老猫燒鬚,被人暗中吃下了控制權.


是901,不是329,我早已談了,請參看這兒,謝謝
http://realforum.zkiz.com/thread.php?page=16&tid=5786
PermaLink: https://articles.zkiz.com/?id=273731

Next Page

ZKIZ Archives @ 2019