📖 ZKIZ Archives

A Glossary of Phonology

A Glossary of Phonology

http://viid.me/qmhASZ

This is a share of link search from google.

Rules of the internet

https://archive.org/stream/RulesOfTheInternet/RulesOfTheInternet..txt

覆讀者留言：由 HSEA/HSEB 的回收風險至離題萬丈 cost of fund

話說早前有讀者留言問魔術師：

Thank you for your sharing. I would also like to buy HSEB recently, but it is 26.75 now, is the risk of HSBC calling this stock within 1 year high?

其實，只要查找一下，便知道大貓已提早公佈 HSBC HOLDINGS PLC. 8.125% Perpetual Subordinated Capital Securities (HSEA.NYSE) 與及 HSBC HOLDINGS PLC. 8.00% Series 2 Perpetual Subordinated Capital Securities (HSEB.NYSE) 的派息時間表，其中 HSEA 起碼派到２０１８年１月，而 HSEB 則起碼派到２０１７年１２月，亦即係話呢對孖寶「起碼」可以存活至２０１８年，往後派息就再等大貓公佈：

（圖片來源：Dividend.com > HSEA, retrieved on 4 Jul 2017)

（圖片來源：Dividend.com > HSEB, retrieved on 4 Jul 2017)

閱讀更多 »

覆讀者留言：由 HSEA/HSEB 的回收風險至離題萬丈 cost of fund（2nd edition）

話說早前有讀者留言問魔術師：

Thank you for your sharing. I would also like to buy HSEB recently, but it is 26.75 now, is the risk of HSBC calling this stock within 1 year high?

其實，只要查找一下，便知道大貓已提早公佈 HSBC HOLDINGS PLC. 8.125% Perpetual Subordinated Capital Securities (HSEA.NYSE) 與及 HSBC HOLDINGS PLC. 8.00% Series 2 Perpetual Subordinated Capital Securities (HSEB.NYSE) 的派息時間表，其中 HSEA 起碼派到２０１８年１月，而 HSEB 則起碼派到２０１７年１２月，亦即係話呢對孖寶「起碼」可以存活至２０１８年，往後派息就再等大貓公佈：

（圖片來源：Dividend.com > HSEA, retrieved on 4 Jul 2017)

（圖片來源：Dividend.com > HSEB, retrieved on 4 Jul 2017)

閱讀更多 »

取消國美(493)的一般授權(Take the GM out of GOME)

1 : GS(14)@2010-09-07 22:43:36

http://webb-site.com/articles/gomemandate.asp

---

Law Society of HK v David Chan Wah Tsang

1 : GS(14)@2010-11-26 16:33:38

http://legalref.judiciary.gov.hk ... IS=73940&currpage=T

---

2 : GS(14)@2010-11-26 16:33:58

http://orientaldaily.on.cc/cnt/finance/20101118/00202_044.html

獨資經營陳華增律師行（David W.T. Chan & Co）的律師陳華增，今年九月遭香港律師會入稟呈請破產，律師會早前並通過決議介入該律師行。

但是，陳華增數日前去信高等法院，表示醫生證明他精神上不適宜處理業務，批了90日病假給他，他以此要求押後處理律師會的介入申請，法官昨押後至十二月一日再處理。

至於律師會呈請陳華增破產的案件，則押後至十一月廿四日，與旺角長沙街漢普頓酒店物業買家彩星投資呈請陳華增破產的案件一併處理。

律師會昨指出，陳華增早前既能代表客戶入稟興訟，現質疑陳華增精神有問題的說法不可信。不過，法官昨認為基於公平，應給予陳抗辯機會，但要求陳屆時須親自出庭。

案件編號﹕HCMP1993/2010；HCB6512/2010

---

inconvenience to search for the information of each stock in the database.

1 : GS(14)@2011-01-17 22:46:09

1. Please do not keep changing the graphic user interface frequently. It will take some time for us to familiar it again for each update.

2. It is inconvenience to search for the information of each stock in the database. I cannot just input the number of the stock on the box provided on the real forum but I need to go back to realblog instead.

---

2 : abbychau(1)@2011-01-18 17:11:39

1. 閱
2. 要選第四個

---

The three wise monkeys of HK boards

1 : GS(14)@2011-02-16 07:49:36

http://webb-site.com/articles/3wisemonkeys.asp

---

2 : GS(14)@2011-02-19 18:41:04

股壇長毛炮轟　獨董身兼多職
港交所上樑不正
2011年02月16日

為咗加強企業管治，港交所（ 388）最近建議上市公司董事會當中，要有三分一獨立非執行董事。網上股評人 David Webb唔止一次批評本港上市公司嘅獨董，大部份係由大股東選出嚟，唔夠獨立。噚日佢再撰文，用 3隻分別視而不見、聽而不聞同有嘢唔講嘅馬騮，嚟形容唔夠獨立嘅獨董，非常抵死。
講得興起， Webb燒埋港交所 3位董事嗰叠。雖然佢曾經話過，立法會議員石禮謙身兼 16間上市公司董事，質疑佢有無足夠時間應付，之但係， Webb唔認為港交所要限制每個人可以擔任幾多間上市公司董事，因為呢樣嘢完全在於董事本身有幾多職務在身。
佢舉例，一個全職行政總裁或立法會議員或行政會議成員，未必有好多空閒時間可以好好應付一、兩個獨董嘅職務。相反，一個無其他職務嘅退休律師或會計師，就可以應付 5個以上嘅獨董職務。
Webb 咪就係想話，港交所獨立非執行主席夏佳理，仲有獨董鄭慕智同許照中三個，做緊壞榜樣！喺港交所年報睇到，本身係律師行合夥人同行會成員嘅夏佳理，係另外 8間上市公司嘅非執董，仲要係 4個政府委員會嘅成員。鄭慕智係律師行高級合夥人，總共坐住 11間上市公司嘅董事會。正職係證券行董事總經理嘅許照中，亦係 6間上市公司董事。講到咁白， Webb想講咩，大家心照啦！
羅嘉瑞：點搵咁多獨董

香港上市公司商會主席羅嘉瑞噚晚喺春茗酒會就呻，家陣要搵有能力又有經驗嘅獨董已經好難，好多人係畀面先至做，如果仲話要有三分一屬於獨董，去邊度搵咁多供應？
至於限制每人可以做幾多間上市公司嘅獨董？使唔使設限？羅嘉瑞就話要因人而異，好似退咗休嘅，就會有多啲時間 handle多啲嘢，最好由公司自己衡量，最緊要嗰位獨董有能力、時間同有心幫忙。

李華華
[email protected]

---

Poll graft hearing told of chants

1 : GS(14)@2011-02-20 12:07:36

http://www.thestandard.com.hk/ne ... d=108198&con_type=1

---

Judge finds evidence of Citic fraud

1 : GS(14)@2011-03-19 13:48:15

http://www.rthk.org.hk/rthk/news/englishnews/20110318/news_20110318_56_741956.htm

Judge finds evidence of Citic fraud  
18-03-2011

     Simon Lee reports

Citic Pacific loses court bid. File photo.
A High Court judge has found there's evidence that Citic Pacific could have been involved in a conspiracy to defraud. Mr Justice Alan Wright rejected a bid by the company to prevent documents seized during a fraud investigation from being used against it in future court proceedings.
The judge said in his ruling that there was an apparent case of conspiracy to defraud. He said that Citic had given up its right to claim professional privilege when it surrendered the documents to the Securities and Futures Commission. The judge ordered the documents to be sealed for two weeks to give the company time to consider an appeal against his decision.

The Department of Justice alleged during an earlier hearing that Citic directors asked for loans from banks without disclosing that the company had made huge losses in currency deriviative trading in 2008. The court heard there was 'clear evidence' of fraud.

Police seized the documents during a raid on the head office of the steelmaker and property developer in 2009. They were investigating whether Citic had made false statements or conspired to defraud in relation to unauthorized bets on the Australian dollar.

---