Webb狠批特速 「厚待」大股東
1 :
GS(14)@2012-10-10 22:50:25http://webb-site.com/articles/xpress.asp
15-year total
Under HK Listing Rules, directors pay has been disclosed in annual reports on
a named basis since 2005. In the 8 years to 31-Mar-2012, Mr & Mrs Chan were paid
a total of $268.2m (of which Mr Chan was paid $216.7m), while the total profit
attributable to shareholders over that period was just $60.4m.
Going back further, in the 7 years to 31-Mar-2004, the Executive Directors
were paid $206.0m, while the net loss attributable to shareholders was $307.9m.
The only EDs during that period were Mr & Mrs Chan and their children, but it is
clear from the pay bands that the vast majority went to Mr & Mrs Chan, with one
child earning between $1.0m and $1.5m in 4 of those years and otherwise below
$1m each.
Taking the 15 years together, the Chan family has taken pay of $492.8m, and
the total profit attributable to shareholders was...well, there wasn't any. It
was a total loss of $247.5m. And let's be clear, none of this pay was a breach of
the Listing Rules - because the Listing Rules contain no constraints on such
atrocious behaviour. During the same 15-year period, the
Webb-site Total
Return on the shares was -69.15%.
© Webb-site.com, 2012
....
本報昨日曾致電聯絡特速,暫未獲回覆。
倡修例 薪酬須小股東通過
...
浸會大學會計及法律系副教授陳少陽認同建議,並舉例指英國已要求執董的薪酬須得股東大會通過,但他亦解釋,當地上市公司股權分散,因此未有特別區分大股東及小股東。他認為,理論上監管方或同意Webb的建議可加強企業管治,但實際行動上有相當難度,「(大股東會指)要我人工由散戶批,當然不肯。」
上市公司商會:已有獨董審批
上市公司商會總幹事黃偉明認為,現時上市公司董事的薪酬須由獨立非執董組成的薪酬委員會審批,過程已非由公司管理層或大股東控制,「要對INED(獨立非執董)有信心」。
...
黃偉明則表明反對建議,認為要求管理層薪酬與業績掛鈎,或會令管理層追逐短期盈利,漠視長遠發展,不一定是好事。
2 :
reference(1610)@2012-10-11 10:59:08"要對INED(獨立非執董)有信心"....frankly I don't have any after attending various board meeting on my pre-IPO / post-IPO projects
3 :
GS(14)@2012-10-11 21:36:462樓提及
"要對INED(獨立非執董)有信心"....frankly I don't have any after attending various board meeting on my pre-IPO / post-IPO projects
可以講一些沒這麼敏感給大家學學野?
厚待青少年軍 劉江華死撐跟程序議員斥上樑不正下樑歪
1 :
GS(14)@2016-11-25 07:21:26【本報訊】民政事務局局長劉江華被揭在香港青少年軍申請捐款及空置校舍事件中,可能涉及利益衝突及特事特辦,劉昨首次現身解釋並否認所有指控,直言一切按程序辦事,但有立法會議員借動議辯論狠批劉「上樑不正下樑歪」,更損害公務員公信力。記者:陳雪玲 潘柏林早前有傳媒揭發去年才成立的香港青少年軍總會,在民政事務局力撐下擊敗其他老牌制服團體,不單奪得空置校舍作訓練用途,更獲華人永遠墳場管理委員會極速批出3,000萬元翻新校舍,而劉江華分別是青少年軍總會的榮譽顧問及華永會主席,被質疑有角色衝突。立法會昨討論區議會職能,劉作為主責官員須與會,席間民主黨立法會議員林卓廷發言時借機欲追究劉「光速」向青少年軍總會撥款3,000萬一事。林批評他用千幾萬公帑支持該機構,做法是「上樑不正下樑歪」,將來民政專員都「抬唔起頭做人」。不過林遭立法會主席梁君彥指他離題,禁止他再發言批劉。劉會後被大批記者追訪,他一再重申不論是華永會批出捐款以及青少年軍申請撥款都根據程序,「我嘅角色基本上沒有所謂利益衝突,當時批款係經過委員審批,大家同意呢項撥款」。
落選團體促交代準則
至於批款快與慢問題,他指重點是提交申請時是否經過既定程序審核,又稱自己雖是任青少年軍的榮譽顧問,但完全沒有參與其運作,「我作為民政事務局局長,係兼任差唔多幾十個會嘅榮譽職務……我唔覺得有任何利益衝突」。當被追問青少年軍與其他申請團體相比有何優勝地方,劉未正面回應,只稱該組織比其他兩個申請者優勝,但未有交代有何優勝之處。申請落選的香港基督少年軍總幹事吳淑玲指,在6月30日收到局方回覆申請失敗,當時並無解釋原因,兩次追問下才稱財務安排不及另一團隊(青少年軍)切實可行,但青少年軍是獲批地後,才獲捐款,希望局方可清楚交代審批準則。另一落選的香港少年領袖團總參事姜柏松慨嘆,沒有資源追究,認為局方審批空置校舍予香港青少年軍總會極具「效率」,「期望將來任何機構攞錢攞地,同樣有效率就好」。
來源:
http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/news/art/20161125/19844930