📖 ZKIZ Archives

智傲又爆？ 易明的生活點滴

來源: http://eming620.mysinablog.com/index.php?op=ViewArticle&articleId=14800929

　　果真是每天一爆，昨天有樂亞國際（８１９５，臨時買賣編號８３８６）一天之內暴挫九成多，今天又見智傲控股（８２８２）暴挫近七成。

　　智傲控股今天一開市已經較昨天收市價的４．４８元低開了１５．２％而報３．８元，約於十一點半已經跌至２．５元左右，當時的買賣盤居然拉闊至０．５元，而居然仍然有人跳價沽貨，雖然數量只是四千股、四千股的，看似沒有什麼啟示，卻已經出現了即將急跌的徵兆，結果上午曾經低見１．７１元，之後有人跳價於２．１４元買了四千股，並以此價收市，跌了５２．２％，而成交量只有３８．８萬股，沽壓表面上看似乎不大，可是我已經有預感其股價今天的跌幅可能擴大至約七成，結果又猜中了。

　　午飯之時我盡量尋找其大跌的原因，才發現是其於今年一月十三日以１．２５元上市，下周二半年的禁售期即將屆滿，明白了，似乎這就是急挫的原因，有人偷步先行沽貨之故。

　　我預是告訴朋友們，午後此股不但有跌至１元的可能，而成交量亦可能會暴增，結果猜對了一半，暫時股價最低只見１．３５元，可是成交量卻暴增至１２３３萬股，如此看，日內隨時真的低見１元，所以我一再告誡大家不宜撈底。

　　「此股以１．２５元上市，上市之後曾經高見８．４８元升幅５．７８倍，其後於４－６元之間橫行了近四個月，今早一開市就跌破了４元關口，顯然是已經完成了派發，別以為為從８．４８元跌下來已經跌了７４．７％，可是幕後人經過這大半年的派發，手上的貨成本可能已經是零，縱使把股價拋售至１元或以下仍然是『啖啖肉』哩！所以只宜看戲，不宜貪便宜撈底。」這就是我的見解。

　　事實上此股自三月中開始一直只能沿著１０天平均價走，無法擺脫其羈絆，已是有點不妙，直至上周一開始跌破５０天平均價更是已經敗象畢呈，有貨者早就已經要考慮止賺／蝕了，及至今早一裂口低開跌破４元關口更加可以確認已是「玩完」，一不狠下決心作出決定可能從此泥足深陷，無法脫身矣！

　　這就是依照圖表趨吉避兇的技巧了！

　　

斯諾登又爆猛料 美曾批準網絡攻擊4國政黨

據俄羅斯“衛星”新聞網7月26日報道，美國中情局前雇員愛德華·斯諾登在自己的推特上表示，美國政府曾批準對國外政黨實施網絡攻擊。

為證實自己的話，斯諾登附上了一份日期為2010年7月16日的文件。文件標註了“絕密”字樣，並具體列出了涉及的國家、國際組織、國外政治機構。其中，國外政黨包括巴基斯坦人民黨、黎巴嫩阿邁勒運動、印度人民黨和羅馬尼亞救國陣線。

斯諾登披露的多份文件都曾引起國際社會的高度關註。據悉，巴基斯坦人民黨曾於2014年公開對美國國家安全局的竊聽行為表示強烈譴責，印度也向美國政府高層表示過抗議。

斯諾登推特控訴美政府

（綜合自環球網）

垃圾蟲上庭遲到又爆粗 一個煙頭官非停不了

1 : GS(14)@2010-10-13 22:26:55

http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/te ... 104&art_id=14547681
在法庭上爆粗男子勞汝明（ 55歲），事後仍然勞氣，堅持自己準時到法庭，絕非故意遲到，故被法官指摘感到不滿衝口而出說粗話。他更稱被法官罰款 500元。
司法機構回應指，主審法官已將事件轉交警方跟進，不宜評論。警方發言人稱，昨下午 1時 32分接獲沙田裁判法院轉介，指一名 55歲姓勞男子涉嫌違反《裁判官條例》，將跟進調查，暫列求警協助事件，無人被捕。
案情顯示，今年二月一日，被告在深水埗北河街街頭，遭食環署人員指控亂丟煙蒂票控亂拋垃圾罪。上月底，被告涉及的亂拋垃圾控罪於九龍城裁判法院首次聆訊，他否認控罪，案件延至昨早 9時半，在沙田裁判法院第 4庭再訊。
藐視法庭最高囚六個月被告自稱昨晨 9時已到沙田裁判法院，以為未輪到自己，故無進入法庭。至 11時，因聽到法庭職員呼喚名字跟隨進入法庭，結果主審案件的暫委特委裁判官覃有方指摘遲到。被告稱當時氣忿，自己喃喃自語「谷×氣」，裁判官覃有方指他涉嫌藐視法庭召庭警還柙，交第一庭裁判官重新排期審理，並轉介警方處理。
第一庭裁判官李唯治曾告訴被告「有冇講粗口呢啲嘢，唔需要拗，到時會審理」。「當時裁判官已經叫你道歉，你又唔肯」。此時身在犯人欄的被告自言自語「我又唔係同佢講，我自己谷氣講之嘛，無惡意 o架！」其間被告又說：「好人好姐就值得我尊重，老×套嗰啲我就唔驚嘅。」至下午 4時許，被告離開法院，其亂拋煙蒂案延至 12月中再審。
執業大律師陸偉雄稱，藐視法庭屬普通法罪行，無特別定義，泛指在法庭上說粗話，叫囂，或做出任何干預法庭審訊或不尊重法庭程序行為。根據《裁判官條例》第 99條，任何人在裁判官席前作侮辱性行為，或說侮辱性說話都已犯法，最高可罰款一萬元及入獄 6個月。他續稱，昨日原本審理案件的暫委特委裁判官只能裁處較輕微罪行，不能判處入獄，罰款亦不可逾 5萬元。

---

Webb 哥又爆大鑊

1 : GS(14)@2012-03-07 23:06:22

http://webb-site.com/articles/muck2012p4.asp

今次講下8202 的爛刁

Inno-Tech and United Premier Medical Group

Great China Media wasn't the first time that YY Wong, Chairman and co-founder of Inno-Tech, had sold a business to Inno-Tech. On 5-Mar-2007, Inno-Tech agreed to buy 56% of Autoscale Resources Ltd (Autoscale) from YY Wong and Robert Wong Yao Wing, then Deputy Chairman of Inno-Tech, for HK$58.97m, satisfied with 351m shares (39.84%) of Inno-Tech @$0.168. They sold 28% of Autoscale each.

Autoscale owned 37.71% of the ordinary shares of United Premier Medical Group Ltd (UPMG), established in 2002 and operating in mainland China and Macau, which had a net loss of $29.5m in the year to 30-Sep-2006 and lost HK$31.4m in the prior year (under HK accounting standards). It had contracts to fit out and manage various "VIP Centres" providing maternity-related services (obstetrics, gynaecology and paediatrics) in hospitals in mainland China and Macau. It also had 4,565 convertible preference shares outstanding, redeemable on 26-Jul-2008 at US$2,500 each plus 2% premium and 8% p.a. fixed dividend.

UPMG had a net asset value of HK$42.20m at 30-Sep-2006, but keep in mind that this would include the preference shares, with par value of US$11.4m (HK$89.0m), so ordinary shareholders' funds were negative. Autoscale had net liabilities of $0.159m. The circular dated 26-Mar-2007 contained a fairness opinion from Veda Capital (there they are again) and the deal completed on 19-Apr-2007. Inno-Tech booked HK$60.64m of goodwill on the acquisition of Autoscale.

On 21-Jan-2008, Autoscale (along with the other shareholders of UPMG) agreed to exchange its by-then 28.13% stake in UPMG (after conversion of preference shares) for 12m shares (23.93%) of a US shell called The Cavalier Group, incorporated in Wyoming and quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board, which had no prior business. A circular was dated 15-Feb-2008. On 13-May-2008, the shell was renamed China Health Care Corporation (CHCC), and the deal completed in Jul-2008. HK regulators do not require the filing of such agreements, but the US SEC does, so with that transparency, you can read the agreement here, including the list of 118 registered shareholders of UPMG.

Finally, on 16-Feb-2009, Inno-Tech agreed to sell its 56% stake in Autoscale to Certain Success Holdings Ltd (BVI), the owner of which was not disclosed, for just HK$3.145m in cash, with an expected loss on the disposal of about $57.2m.

This part of the story isn't quite over though: on 15-May-2009, there was a ruling in the HK Court of First Instance between China Medical Ltd as plaintiff (we don't know its owner or place of domicile) and Autoscale as defendant. A judgment in default of defence had been entered on 20-Mar-2009, ordering Autoscale to honour a guarantee of an alleged liability of UPMG (or its BVI subsidiary) under a subscription agreement dated 1-Aug-2005. Autoscale wanted the judgment set aside. UPMG had allegedly failed to redeem the plaintiff's convertible preference shares or pay dividends, or use its best efforts to procure an IPO. The defence claimed that the reverse takeover by CHCC counted as an IPO. The judge disagreed, saying that the defendant had not made an arguable defence. The judgment refers to 914 preference shares - that would be US$2.285m (HK$17.82m) of par value. We can't find "China Medical Ltd" or the corresponding 914 ordinary shares (after conversion) in the exchange agreement with CHCC.

Interestingly, this contingent liability of Autoscale in the form of the guarantee was not disclosed in Inno-Tech's accounts at 30-Jun-2008, when Autoscale was still a subsidiary. Why not?
Kaiping Hotel deals

One of the UPMG shareholders listed in the agreement with CHCC was Smart Boom Investment Ltd (Smart Boom, BVI), which would receive 794,000 shares (about 1.6%) of CHCC for 397 shares of UPMG. We don't know how owns it, but on 4-Feb-2008, two weeks after the agreement to roll UPMG into CHCC, Inno-Tech agreed to buy Homesmart Properties Ltd (Homesmart) which ultimately owned a hotel in Kaiping City, Guangdong, for RMB20m (then HK$20.86m) from, you guessed it, Smart Boom, declared to be an independent third party. The price was based on an independent valuation of the property at 29-Jan-2008 of RMB20m by an unnamed valuer. The property was said to be "in good condition".

This deal followed an earlier pair of hotel acquisitions on 5-Nov-2007 from the same beneficial owner as Smart Boom's, again unnamed. One of those deals was to buy Sunny Team Corp Ltd (Sunny Team) for RMB13.5m (then HK$14.07m). The vendor had contracted for Sunny Team to acquire a hotel at 106, Guangming Road, Kaiping, Guangdong Province. That would be the Xingdu Hotel. Inno-Tech said the hotel was in "good condition" and it "did not intend to make further capital investment" on the property. The other was China Earn Ltd (China Earn), for RMB14m. The vendor had contracted for China Earn to acquire a hotel at 216 Tianjin Street, Jilin City. That would be the Jinjiang Inn Jilin Train Station Branch.

Strangely, the annual report of Inno-Tech at 30-Jun-2008 records Homesmart and Sunny Team as subsidiaries, but note 38, on the acquisition of subsidiaries, only includes one acquired subsidiary, Autoscale. So how were Homesmart and Sunny Team acquired? Meanwhile, China Earn is nowhere to be seen in these accounts. It was dissolved by deregistration on 18-Feb-2011. Inno-Tech has never explained what happened. A circular dated 11-Sep-2009 on another transaction, mentions the deal at the bottom of page 262 (IX-8) of the PDF, stating that the company acquired China Earn for RMB14m.

On 26-Jun-2009, seventeen months after buying Homesmart, Inno-Tech sold it for just RMB2m, 90% less than it paid, to Main Move Ltd (Main Move, BVI), said to be an independent third party. The owner of that was not disclosed. Even at this low price, 95% of it was deferred as a promissory note, so only RMB100,000 was payable on signing. The hotel was now said by BMI Appraisals Ltd (BMI Appraisals) to be worth RMB13m, but on 31-Jul-2008, Homesmart had borrowed RMB11m against it. What Homesmart had done with this money we do not know. Inno-Tech said it would book a loss of HK$20.41m on the sale. Homesmart had losses of only $800k from incorporation to 31-Mar-2009.

On the same day, Inno-Tech sold Sunny Team to Timewon Ltd (Timewon, BVI), the owner of which was not disclosed, for the same price as Homesmart, RMB2m, with 95% deferred as a promissory note. BMI Appraisals, which has featured many times on Webb-site, valued the Xingdu Hotel, Kaiping at RMB10.5m, and Sunny Team had a bank loan of RMB8.5m. Sunny Team had losses of only HK$993k from incorporation to 31-Mar-2009. Inno-Tech said it would book a loss of HK$0.52m on the sale.

Both these agreements came just 4 days (and 2 working days) before the year-end of Inno-Tech, and completion took place by on the year-end of 30-Jun-2009. Were they in a hurry? We call on the SFC to investigate the following issues:

  Was China Earn ever purchased, as the circular claimed? If not, why didn't Inno-Tech announce that the deal had failed?
  Who was the person that sold the 3 (or 2) companies to Inno-Tech?
  Why wasn't the acquisition of Sunny Team and Homesmart shown in the note on acquisition of subsidiaries in the 15 months to 30-Jun-2008? Did Inno-Tech jump the gun and acquire the HK shells before they had completed the hotel purchases?
  What were the due dates of the promissory notes on the sales?
  Who owned Main Move and Timewon, the buyers of Homesmart and Sunny Team, respectively?
  In both sales, the net asset values of the companies, Homesmart and Sunny Team, was not disclosed. What were they?
  What had Homesmart and Sunny Team done with the money from the bank loans? It's possible that they sunk it into renovating the buildings, but that seems like a lot to spend, given that both hotels were said to be in "good condition" when acquired, and in the case of Sunny Team, no capital investment in the property was needed.
  So if not in fixed assets, then where did the cash go? The original acquisition prices of Sunny Team and Homesmart were priced based on assets without borrowings. So the net assets, even after hotel devaluation, should have been about RMB13m and RMB10.5m respectively, less their modest operating losses since incorporation.

Note 39 of the Inno-Tech accounts for the year ended 30-Jun-2009 shows the combined disposals of 3 subsidiaries: Autoscale, Homesmart and Sunny Team. Look at the "satisfied by" part of the table:

We know that Autoscale was sold for HK$3.145m, so that is the cash line. So the table shows that even the RMB200k (HK$225k) of cash which was payable on 26-Jun-2009 had not been paid, and the promissory notes were the other RMB3.900m (HK$4.256m).
Trade debtors

The accounts for the year to 30-Jun-2009 were spectacular and remarkable for their lack of explanation of the following items, which we call on the SFC to investigate:

  Inno-Tech had trade debtors of $65.4m at the previous year-end, but managed to book an impairment loss of $122.2m against trade debtors, so at least $56.8m of that had been racked up in the year, on turnover of $78.1m. Of this turnover, $74.4m was from its original business of "design of residential intranet, provision of home-automation services and trading of related products", or what it calls the "intelligent system" segment. The segment booked a loss of $179.17m, compared with $0.29m a year earlier. There was no explanation for the impairment in the "management discussion and analysis" section.
  Meanwhile, the "hotel management" segment booked a loss of $113.3m on turnover of just $3.7m, compared with a loss of $67.5m on turnover of $1.3m a year earlier, the first year of the segment. So that's a total segment loss of $180.8m on turnover of $5.0m in 2 years. The mind boggles (and it must, because there was no explanation) on how they spent so much money for so little revenue, and that is before the losses on the sales of Homesmart and Sunny Team. Where did all the money go?
  The loss on disposal of subsidiaries in 2009, which also included the loss on the sale of Autoscale, amounted to $84.4m, which is significantly higher than the aggregate $78.13m Inno-Tech had estimated at the times of the sales. Overall, Inno-Tech booked a loss of $391m for the year.

Inno-Tech's auditor from 2005 to 2009 was PCP CPA Ltd (PCP), the incorporated version of Paul Chan & Partners. It gave a "true and fair" opinion on the 2009 accounts. In 2009, the firm merged with CCIF CPA Ltd to form Crowe Horwath (HK) CPA Ltd (CHCPA), so Inno-Tech changed auditor to the new firm at an SGM on 14-Jul-2010. Incidentally, the Managing Director of PCP CPA Ltd and a director of CHCPA is accounting legislator Paul Chan Mo Po.

---

2 : GS(14)@2012-03-07 23:15:19

交易1
http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... LN20081212027_C.pdf
http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... LN20090122023_C.pdf


交易2
http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... LN20070307004_C.pdf
http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... LN20070326056_C.pdf
http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... LN20080125043_C.pdf
http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... LN20090216044_C.pdf

酒店
http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... LN20070911027_C.pdf
http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... LN20071011036_C.pdf
http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... LN20071029129_C.pdf
http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... LN20071030045_C.pdf
http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... LN20071106052_C.pdf
http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... LN20071127037_C.pdf
http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... LN20080205062_C.pdf
http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... LN20090626059_C.pdf
http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... LN20080214038_C.pdf
http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... LN20070504022_C.pdf

---

3 : GS(14)@2012-03-07 23:18:35

http://www.redgatemedia.com/index.php?body=home&lang=sc
On 8-Jul-2011, Inno-Tech conditionally agreed to buy Redgate Ventures Ltd (Redgate Ventures) for about HK$1,941m, of which $290m would be in cash, $160m in 0% promissory notes and $1,491m in 3-year 0% notes convertible into up to 5,404m shares (98.27%) of Inno-Tech @$0.38. Cash would be raised by placing $200m of 2-year 0% convertible bonds, conditional on the acquisition. A refundable deposit of HK$80m has already been paid. The agreement was amended on 30-Dec-2011 and amended again on 21-Feb-2012 to knock $190m off the purchase price. The deal is still in progress and the circular has yet to see the light of day.

Redgate Ventures is "a diversified media company in China primarily providing advertising and advertising agency services through an integrated cross-media platform". The group "commenced operations in 2003". It appears that Redgate Ventures is a reworked version of Redgate Media Group, a loss-making Cayman company which aborted its US IPO in Apr-2010. You can read the latest version of their F-1 filing here. The group structures are somewhat different, but several of the mainland subsidiaries are the same. Redgate Ventures had net assets at 31-Dec-2010 of HK$16.5m. It claims to have swung from a $34.2m loss in 2009 to an unaudited $61.1m net profit in 2010 on turnover of $247.6m. The accountant's report in the circular should eventually reveal how they achieved this.

同全城熱戀相似的東東

---

4 : GS(14)@2012-03-07 23:19:49

http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/ ... LN20110722002_C.pdf
新爛deal

---

金盾停牌半年 福建民企又爆煲

1 : GS(14)@2014-10-08 10:56:57

http://www.mpfinance.com/htm/finance/20141008/news/ec_eca1.htm



【明報專訊】停牌超過半年的福建紡織民企金盾控股(2123)，原來已悄悄在內地捲入多起錢債官司，遭多名債主包括東亞銀行(0023)相繼展開追討，其中部分追討個案更早於金盾上市前已經發生，惟招股文件中卻未見清楚交代，令人擔心該股或有機會成為諾奇(1353)之後，另一「爆煲」福建民企。


金盾在今年4月宣布停牌，當時公司解釋為核數師需更多時間審核2013年度業績，並在4月底進一步披露旗下金盾紡織(涇陽)(下稱涇陽公司)捲入多宗錢債官司。不過，據本報翻查內地法院判決資料，發現涇陽公司早於去年，已就2010年7月向內地商人黃世集借2000萬元逾期未還一案，被福建泉州中級人民法院判敗訴，須判還本息、律師代理費及案件受理費，惟對照金盾在2011年上市時的招股文件，以及在2013年的同期公告披露後，卻未見明顯篇幅交代涉及有關借貸及判決資料。金盾上市的保驚薦人為國泰君安。

遭東亞扣押逾234萬元存款

資料進一步顯示，金盾自停牌以來一直官非不斷。當中涉及與另一內地商人黃慶祥之間的民間借貸，須移交蒲田中院處理。同時爆出該公司在2013年1月間接在陜西同興紡織公司股權承讓交易，承擔法律責任(見表)。有關交易，亦未見金盾的官方文件作出顯著披露。

至於東亞旗下東亞銀行(中國)西安分行，更因為涇陽公司未有還款，而一度被東亞方面扣押了超過233.5萬元存款，並輪候查封，惟其後發現原來公司另有更多「債主」而終結執行查封，待具備執行條件時，先交給興業銀行處理。

根據金盾的公開資料顯示，官司纏身的涇陽公司，為該集團內最主要的附屬營運公司，註冊資本多達2101.2萬美元，主要負責生產及銷售棉紗和坯布，以及買賣紡織產品原材料。以金盾在2013年6月底手頭現金達3.38億元，再加上今年初配股集資5500萬港元，表面上該集團現金充足，但是經過一段時間後，難言其財政狀有否意外的變化，加上接連出現多宗追討欠債官司，難免令投資市場擔心金盾會成為之前主席突然失縱的諾奇「翻版」。

明報記者 陳偉燊

---

2 : GS(14)@2014-10-08 10:58:10

http://www.mpfinance.com/htm/finance/20141008/news/ec_eca2.htm
福建民企財政互保 易火燒連環船


2014年10月8日

【明報專訊】繼福建諾奇(1353)「爆煲」之後，另一福建民企金盾控股(2123)亦官司纏身，並且捲入多宗民間借貸。業界相信，這或與新晉的福建民企家過份進取，甚至在鄉里之間講究團結互保，一旦經濟逆轉致企業出事，很多時致火燒連環船，難以自拔。


當地人作風進取 投資槓桿大

信永中和管理合伙人盧華基稱，福建民企看似較易出事，與其文化背景有關，因此在處理福建民企上市，最重要還是在董事會內，加入有能力的專業人士及增加獨立非執行董事的比例，藉此加強內部監控，進行重重審批。

以紡織、服裝業聞名的福建省，造就了不少知名的民營企業，但是一些新晉的民企家，表現過份進取。在下單時更有案例只給予承判生產商低至10%訂金，有別於落訂金30%的慣例，盡用槓桿爭取回報。

同時，福建省民企之間，更加講究鄉里之間的團結性及互保，以致很多時出現財政問題時，也不容易被發現，到出事時往往更難打救。

盧華基相信，隨監管機構提高警覺性，自諾奇後的福建民企爆煲個案，有望得到改善，並且會越來越傾向讓當地具實力的公司上市，改善福建上市民企予外間的印象。

---

又爆粗　拍司徒夾帶喪叫「呆X咗」馮盈盈死撐聲畫趣味

1 : GS(14)@2016-09-17 16:15:47

■騷波罅的馮盈盈和司徒夾帶大講有味笑話，表現豪放。互聯網圖片



出爐港姐冠軍馮盈盈繼被揭曾於社交網上，用流暢粗口文字鬧特首梁振英和不公義事件後，昨日被揭疑又爆粗，今次更加是有聲有畫面，網上瘋傳馮盈盈跟Youtuber司徒夾帶到石澳玩滑翔傘的短片，扮假教練的她騷波罅和長腿，在半空中驚到喪叫，忽然爆句：「呆X咗！」



■馮盈盈玩滑翔傘驚到不停喪叫，還疑爆粗：「呆X咗！」互聯網圖片

■馮盈盈疑爆粗後對鏡頭說：「嘟咗佢！嘟咗佢！」互聯網圖片

■馮盈盈玩完後說好high，被司徒夾帶取笑：「所以你要講粗口㖭！」互聯網圖片

大講有味笑話

短片於今年2月上載YouTube，馮盈盈坐在真教練前面，她在降落時似古代情色片主角上身，喪叫：「三次啦，唔再要啦官人！」接着更high到疑似爆粗：「下面啲人望住我哋呆X咗！」知衰多口的她對鏡頭說：「嘟咗佢！」馮盈盈更在短片中表現豪放，被問到是否好多年輕人搵她玩滑翔傘？她大講有味笑話：「冇錯，我幫過好多年輕人起機！」昨日司徒夾帶接受電話訪問，他說：「我唔覺得佢講嗰句說話，係叫爆粗。現實中，亦冇聽過佢講過粗口，啲人話佢facebook講粗口，我覺得遇到不平事，覺得不忿，上網發洩吓冇乜問題。」




來源: http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/entertainment/art/20160915/19770807

---

自覺語氣過火得罪人？江美儀又爆大家姐上身教做戲

1 : GS(14)@2017-08-06 18:41:21

亞視出身嘅江美儀，喺13年憑《衝上雲霄II》拎咗「最佳女配角」獎項之後，從此就是非連環爆，幾乎係有佢演出嘅電視劇、綜藝節目，甚至舞台劇，是非總係同佢連成一線。捱咗16年嘅江美儀終於有機會喺新劇《親親我好媽》擔正做女一，點知有傳佢對劇本諸多要求，趁曾勵珍放大假嗰陣，越級向杜之克投訴，結果搞到要停廠四日大執劇本，監製關永忠搞埋啲套劇嘅後期執包袱走人。江美儀雖然一口話冇件咁嘅事，又話珍姐叫佢唔好為呢啲無中生有嘅事唔開心。不過咁啱得咁橋，佢喺拍劇方面又靜咗一排。是非仲漫延去舞台劇《嬉春酒店》，有傳女主角之一嘅江美儀，有一日等齊全體演員到齊排戲嗰陣，就當住所有人面前質問監製，話「條數唔係咁計，咁你交代清楚！」再有指佢拖欠中介嘅介紹費，到再次公演嗰陣，美儀不見了。事後佢話可能係說話冇尾音，事件只係誤會。冇得拍劇咪改投余詠珊做綜藝，江美儀同麥包麥長青、滕麗名同顧紀筠個囝囝陳浚霆拍綜藝節目《街市遊樂團》，江美儀喺節目狂鬧做下把位嘅陳浚霆，跟住又話魚檔劏魚每日賺得嗰260蚊，又話剝蝦曬蝦乾係自甘墮落，結果江美儀俾網民狂插刻薄兼睇低人。江美儀事後接受周刊訪問，話反省到自己有錯嘅地方，語氣或態度過咗火得罪人，於是佢向大家衷心致歉。而近日就有傳江美儀拍《誇世代》，大家姐上身教後輩拍戲。




來源: http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/entertainment/art/20170806/20112985

---

馬雲又爆金句：月掙一二十個億很難受

1 : GS(14)@2017-12-03 18:14:40

【明報專訊】經常都語出驚人的阿里巴巴創辦人馬雲，噚日出席論壇時又爆金句：「一個月掙一兩百萬讓人很高興，但一個月掙一二十個億很難受。這個錢已經不是你的了，你沒法花了，你拿回來之後又得去做事情。」

查實今次都唔係馬師傅第一次呻有錢過頭，話說2014年阿里巴巴上市後無耐，佢接受傳媒訪問時就已經話自己「非常痛苦」：「（做中國首富）這是很痛苦的，因為當你是世界最有錢的人，身邊所有人都是因為錢而接近你。」

小琴唔係唔同意馬師傅嘅說話，嚴格嚟講係我都驗證唔到，不過對於喺低端人口連居住地方都無嘅中國嚟講，呢句說話難免令人覺得有啲刺耳。話又說回來，又話「錢不是我」、「別人因為錢接近我」，馬雲早排拍《攻守道》唔知又點睇？李連杰、甄子丹係咪都係因為錢接近佢呢？

email: [email protected]

[小琴密語]


來源: http://www.mpfinance.com/fin/dai ... 1296&issue=20171201

---