📖 ZKIZ Archives


李克強:今年赤字率會有“比較大幅度的提高”

來源: http://www.yicai.com/news/2016/03/4757699.html

李克強:今年赤字率會有“比較大幅度的提高”

新華網 2016-03-04 23:42:00

總理說,今年赤字率會有“比較大幅度的提高”。新增赤字將主要用來為企業減稅,同時部分用來保障民生。積極的財政政策會更加有力,穩健的貨幣政策要松緊適度。

新華網北京3月4日電 李克強3月4日看望出席全國政協十二屆四次會議的經濟、農業界委員並參加討論。

李克強:今年赤字率會有“比較大幅度的提高”

總理說,今年赤字率會有“比較大幅度的提高”。新增赤字將主要用來為企業減稅,同時部分用來保障民生。積極的財政政策會更加有力,穩健的貨幣政策要松緊適度。

李克強:盤活政府資產還有不小余地

“我們中央政府的負債率只有17%,地方政府的債務雖然相對高一些,但多數還是帶有資產、運營性的項目。”李克強總理3月4日參加全國政協十二屆四次會議經濟、農業界委員聯組會時說,“我們盤活政府資產還有不小的余地,這也為我們調整完善財政政策提供了空間。”

李克強:要激發農業中的“新經濟”

李克強4日參加全國政協十二屆四次會議經濟、農業界委員聯組會時表示,發展現代農業決不能“掠奪”農民,而要真正促進農民增加收入。根據中國國情,推動多種形式的適度規模經營,提高生產效率,加快發展現代農業。這實際上也是激發農業中的“新經濟”。(據新華社“新華視點”微博)

編輯:李燕華

更多精彩內容
請關註第一財經網、第一財經日報微信號

PermaLink: https://articles.zkiz.com/?id=188010

思考的碎片--20160312圍棋的獎金大概率會減少 Nainital的碎片哥

來源: http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_6a54e96a0102wb6a.html

阿法狗和李世石的對局,阿法狗大概率獲勝。
作為投資者最關註的不應該是結果而應該是這個結果帶來的影響,畢竟投資者是無法決定誰獲勝類似投資者無法決定任何政策任何趨勢,投資者就是解釋這個趨勢這個結果這個政策帶來的影響 而且是量化的解釋 用鈔票解釋。

我預測阿法狗如果獲勝圍棋的獎金會下降。
邏輯很簡單,以後任何比賽都要屏蔽電子設備,升段比賽也需要,因為電腦是作弊的。
這樣一定影響媒體關註度,沒有了關註度,自然獎金會減少

我特意找了下 國際象棋的獎金歷史。從這里大概可以看到 扣除通脹因素。1990-2000年之間是國際象棋獎金歷史高峰。現在是下降趨勢很明顯。對比歷史 1996年是Deep blue和卡斯帕羅夫的比賽嘿嘿。貌似國際象棋的歷史支持我的觀點。

1886, Steinitz-Zukertort: £800


The prize fund was split evenly. Steinitz won the match +10 -5 =5.

1891, Steinitz-Gunsberg: $3,000


Steinitz won the match +6 -4 =9 and took home a $2,000 winner’s share.

1921, Capablanca-Lasker: $25,000


 

Capablanca won the match +4 -0 =10, but only received $12,000 in prize money. Lasker got the other $13,000.

1927, Alekhine-Capablanca: $10,00


Alekhine won the match +6 -3 =25, but Capablanca received a $2,000 appearance fee.

1935, Euwe-Alekhine: $10,000


Euwe won the match +9 -8 =13 and the $10,000 stake.

1966, Petrosian-Spassky: $2,000


 

In this era of Soviet dominance, the world chess championship was an internal affair. Petrosian received just a $2,000 bonus for winning the match. 

1972, Fischer-Spassky: $250,000

Bobby Fischer brought unprecedented interest and money to the world chess championship. In addition to the gigantic purse, Fischer demanded — and received — 30 percent of the match’s television rights and gate.


Fischer, of course, won the match +7 -3 =11 and the winner's share of $156,250.

1978, Karpov-Korchnoi: $560,000


 

Karpov took home $350,000 for winning the match +6 -5 =21.

1990, Kasparov-Karpov: $3 million


 

Kasparov won the monster $1.875 million winner’s share by going +4 -3 =17 in the match. 

1995, Kasparov-Anand: $1.5 million


 

Kasparov took home a cool million for beating Anand +4 -1 =13 at the top of the world. 

2000, Kasparov-Kramnik: $2 million


 

Kramnik shocked Kasparov and the world and won $1.33 million for his +2 -0 =13 performance.

2006, Kramnik-Topalov: $1 million


 

The prize fund was arranged to be split evenly at $500,000 each regardless of result, and appropriately enough, Kramnik won the match on tiebreaks. 

2008, Anand-Kramnik: €1.5 million ($1.9 million)


Anand claimed the title by going +3 -1 =7, but each player took home the same $950,000 share

2010, Anand-Topalov: €2 million ($2.8 million)

 


 


Anand defended his title, going +3 -2 =7, and won the $1.68 million champion’s share.

2012, Anand-Gelfand: $2.55 million


Anand won the match on tiebreaks, receiving $1.53 million. He also was granted a $400,000 bonus from the Indian government.

2013, Carlsen-Anand: $2.5 million

 


 

Carlsen won the title and $1.5 million by going +3 -0 =7.

2014, Carlsen-Anand: €1 million ($1.25 million)

 


 

The winner of the match will receive $750,000, and the loser will take home $500,000.


 


PermaLink: https://articles.zkiz.com/?id=191894

Next Page

ZKIZ Archives @ 2019